Come Anticipate "Brokeback Mountain" With Me

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (509 of them)
It's pretty funny.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 16 February 2006 03:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Whoops, well blame the search function! I did a message search for "Ned Sublette" and it came up wiff nuffink.

Melinda Mess-injure, Thursday, 16 February 2006 05:42 (eighteen years ago) link

embarrassingly I don't quite understand the final line. I swear what? It could mean a lot of things. If that's the point then I guess I do understand it. But I thought maybe I missed something it was referring to, specifically.

i didn't take it to mean anything, or rather, it's a thought that isn't completed aloud (maybe not even internally) and that the audience isn't privy to. HOWEVER, the way he says it has a rueful quality which testifies to his continuing to think of jack. i dunno, have you ever spoken aloud to a loved one who's died? me, i tend to sort of choke on desperation and futility before i finish a sentence. which when portrayed on screen is some kind of moving.

as for the visual quality of that last shot, i don't really know how to explain its effect but i think the oblique framing was an interesting choice. somehow seemed less maudlin than if the postcard were frame center. also evoked a certain naivete which comes across in amateur photographs which i feel is powerful (à la found magazine). but i think i'd need to spend more time than i have right now to articulate that well.

i think this movie had a fair number of problems but did a lot of things very well.

anyone who holds its popularity or critical success against it is being silly. and david ehrenstein is ridiculous.... he seems to be always applying some stonewall-era notion of "gay consciousness" to the contemporary scene. he's always trying to impishly "out" people or castigate them for naivete in denying that certain attributes *are* "gay" (as though anything could be unproblematically "gay"). actually it's the impishness that bothers me most. it's as though he's continually trying to shock people into a realization they'd made a few decades back. (he writes to an educated/liberal audience as though they're jack twist's dad. i always end up feeling patronized.)

amateurist0, Thursday, 16 February 2006 07:16 (eighteen years ago) link

i keep coming back to this movie, now seen it three times. i know how flawed it is, but it worked like an axe to the heart, i cant criticise it (because the issues of this film are too intertwined with the issues in my life.)

that said, remember that the whole film is framed obliquey, and the last shot is an acknowledgement, and i keep thinking that the man-on-man fucking is a mcguffin, to the films larger themes (ie the decimation that unexpected desire can cause, ideas of masculinty and honour, concepts of duty, and what the implications of derlicting that duty is, and larger, more formal working thru of isolation, landscape and comfort, and i think that it is one of 6 of 7 movies that talk about the current crisis of male heterosexuality)

anthony easton (anthony), Thursday, 16 February 2006 08:00 (eighteen years ago) link

know how flawed it is, but it worked like an axe to the heart

I agree; it's partly why I keep reviving the thread. It depends on to what extent one accepts the film's rather bleak vision.


he writes to an educated/liberal audience as though they're jack twist's dad

wow. OTM.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 16 February 2006 12:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Will fit grandly into the Best Picture trad of Out of Africa, The English Patient and other shiny, plodding tragic romances. Only this one is Culturally Significant.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 February 2006 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link

but Crash is more Culturally Significant! Everyone comes out of the theater exhilirated to learn that We're All Racists Inside!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 16 February 2006 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link

i know how flawed it is, but it worked like an axe to the heart

yeah, what anthony said, basically.

reading the entirety of this mammoth thread, it was surprising to see that a lot of the lines or scenes most heavily criticised were taken verbatim from the book (which i read about a year ago) - "jack nasty", "i swear", even lureen's 'robotic' phone scene. the film is incredibly faithful to the source material. (apart, possibly, from making jack and ennis so hott, but i ain't complaining about that, in fact i have a full-on j gyllenhaal crush now. despite the bad tache!)

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 February 2006 17:47 (eighteen years ago) link

There's a lot of alternative-universe fiction floating around on cyberspace in which the writers imagine Ennis and Jack's sex lives on and post-Brokeback. My biggest complaint remains Lee's (and McMurtry-Ossama's) reluctance to include any sex between the pair as they age – something that Proulx didn't elide (in the short story they fuck on the evening before their final argument in front of the fire).

The film's emphasis on what Morbius called the dull domestic melodrama comes scarily close to fetishizing the repression; I said "scarily close," but in my opinion it never falls over the cliff, in large part thanks to the exemplary casting (I've always thought Heath and Gyllie seemed more game than the script and Ang Lee permitted) and the material's natural terseness.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 16 February 2006 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

links?

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I read most of the chapters yesterday evening. Within its limitations it's fairly well-done; the writer's done a good job of approximating how Ennis and Jack would talk to each other.

http://community.livejournal.com/wranglers/631500.html

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Now we know it's a phenomenon:

ihttp://destinationdaniel.smugmug.com/gallery/1213678/1/56764738

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 16:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I wonder which Fassbinder film would adapt most easily to Legos ... In a Year of 13 Moons?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Jonathan Rosenbaum (in his review of a Naruse film):


Some lives are full of misery, but this doesn't mean movies that reflect them are automatically more truthful. If the shepherds played by Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal had sustained a happy, loving relationship over several decades in spite of everything, Brokeback Mountain might have been truly daring -- and it wouldn't have been less believable. The impulse to privilege the dark is hardly new; in prerevolutionary Russian cinema, tragic plots ending in suicide were so common and popular that some Hollywood imports with happier endings were revised to make them more "commercial." I would argue that a certain complacency surrounds some of these doom-ridden scenarios, especially ones that suggest social change is impossible -- a vested interest in the status quo, even conservatism, seems to lurk behind the apparent apoliticism.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, yes, he's got a point. Despair is often the hallowed ground tread upon by adolescents; it's why I have little patience for Joy Division these days and prefer New Order. To make serenity (especially earned serenity) compelling is the last hurdle an artist faces.

But Rosenbaum's ire is misplaced. While I'll agree that showing Ennis and Jack having middleaged sex or living in Frisco would have been more revolutionary, it would've been a different movie altogether, and not Annie Proulx's short story.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:26 (eighteen years ago) link

it would also have been a really uneventful and boring movie

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link

"daring" shouldn't neccessarily take precedence over making a movie, you know, a good movie

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

But the challenge of making it an effective, "happy" drama of love would've been greater.

The tragic appeal is clearly what made it "makeable" enough to be the multiplex landmark; Twist's doom IS the political message.

If I'd read the Proulx story at the time it was published in the New Yorker, I think I'd have forgotten it in a month.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:35 (eighteen years ago) link

can you think of a happy het love movie you might compare the alternate brokeback to?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Paul Cox's Innocence? (Transgressive b/c it's about OLD PEOPLE)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:42 (eighteen years ago) link

(Actually, I don't know. I never even saw that movie.)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:44 (eighteen years ago) link

The Big Sleep?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:44 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm trying to think of ANY movie about a couple living together happily and uneventfully... even in romcoms they have trouble hooking up for 99% of the movie!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Let's say I agree with Morbius but he's criticizing the wrong movie. It's unfair to criticize a work for art for what it doesn't do; you can only criticize the results. I mean, The Great Gatsby would have been a more devastating critique of American shallowness had Jay Gatsby survived and married fellow airhead Daisy Buchanan, but, sheesh, the existing denouement is chilling and rather beautifully done.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, Sydney Pollack made the point about movie romances working only when the couple doesn't get together. (Which is my criticism of BBM: it's The Way We Were with a climactic murder, and Jake doesn't have as many big scenes as Streisand.)

Of course, the parting doesn't always have to be fatal, eg Casablanca. Jack could've gone to law school, then to work for Lambda.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 March 2006 19:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Miami's premier gay bar is called Twist...

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Michael Bronski in the Boston Phoenix:

"Except for their long-running argument about getting their own ranch, we have almost no sense of what brings them together and sustains them as a loving couple. [The movie's] valorization of gay love is predicated on making that love socially and physically invisible.

"...The men are beautiful, the passions run high, the sex isn’t obvious, and no one is happy in the end. It’s the perfect unhappy Hollywood homosexual fantasy for people who’ve been disillusioned by the traditional happy Hollywood heterosexual fantasy."

http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid5416.aspx

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 March 2006 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link

people seem to be forgetting that there's a long line of unhappy h'wood het fantasies... perhaps not as common these days, tho

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 3 March 2006 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

But that's what Morbius' linked article argues: that Brokeback is another in a long line of "perfect unhappy Hollywood homosexual" fantasies.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 3 March 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

I just saw it on Sunday, and it totally killed me, I laughed, I cried, h8ers h8, etc. The hurt that their secrecy caused really wrecked me.

RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Gore Vidal, on Brokeback:

The interview's most shocking admission? He's an Academy member. He also really dug Capote:

I liked it, I’m a great fan of Ang Lee. He did the best Civil War movie ever made, called “Ride With The Devil.” And it was really, really good. Lee had an extraordinary feeling, for somebody from Taiwan, for the American Civil War. It was just fascinating. So I was eager to see the movie about the two sheepherders, actually is what they are, they’re not cowboys. You can see there’s not a cow in the movie, just a lot of sheep. You can see how the two sheepherders might get tired of the sheep and begin to look to each other, as a kind of variation on a theme. I liked it, I thought it was quite moving, obviously thematically it’s important to do a picture like that about two ordinary men, seized at a time in which all this is forbidden and so on.

It would have been nice, at the same time, if…it would have been better had they started with Kinsey, which was practically erased by the Academy, to which, alas, I belong. I thought that was a terrible error, because it was the best movie of last year, and informative and instructive: You learned a lot about the nature of human sexuality, that there isn’t just one good team and one bad team and one healthy team and one sick team. It’s not that at all.

Sex is a continuum. You go through different phases along life’s way … and if you don’t, you’ve been sort of cheated.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 9 March 2006 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link

They weren't kidding. Here's the full-page ad going into tomorrow's Variety:

http://davecullen.com/brokebackmountain/img/ad-final.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 9 March 2006 20:01 (eighteen years ago) link

OK I've gotta be honest. That really, really, really offends me. Do you know how much it costs to run a full color full page print ad in a major magazine? A not insignificant amount. Would it really have been unfeasible to have sent the $10k these people raised in honor of BBM to, I dunno, a GLB organization? Like, support reality? Yeah, yeah I know, people can donate money to more than one place but do you really think they are?

End of annoyance.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 9 March 2006 20:23 (eighteen years ago) link

But who's to say these guys aren't also donating to a GLB organization?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 9 March 2006 22:03 (eighteen years ago) link

No one is to say that, my point is that I think it's pretty sad to not have donated THIS money to one (either "as well" or "instead")

It's just really really pathetic, though at least they aren't calling out any of the other movies in their ad so they're being class about it.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 9 March 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Of the millions of gay men and women in the United States, you'd think that at least one would be a graphic designer.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 9 March 2006 23:04 (eighteen years ago) link

the impt thing vidal said there, is that the sex is a continum--i keep coming back to two scenes in the movie--the back seat of the car with anne hathaway and the ass fucking with michelle williams...and both of those have a sort of awkard, misdirected fumbling...

i keep thinking that jack and ennis have no idea how to deal with sex, that they let everything fall apart because they have no idea how to channel/funnel the long, slow, eating away that desire can do to a person (both each other, and their wives, and for ennis the girl in the bar)

life in the middle of the fly over is lonely, my father and his father didnt talk about anything, and that code of masculine silence, and the belief that duty to the land/work goes above all else is central to the film (which is why randy qauids charchter is pissed--nto because they are fags, but b/c they are fucking one one is supposed to be tending the sheep.)

there is no denial to pointing out that this movie is not about gay people, because sexual identity didnt have any cohesion in the west at all until lets say the early 70s, and violations of gender were alot more dangerous because they meant work didnt get done...

the gay cowboy thing is a mcguffin. this film may be a radical film not for the sodomy, but because its the first film in recent memory that hollywood understood what the fuck it meant to be RURAL, YOU KNOW LIKE NOT FROM NEW YORK OR LA, and currently not part of la or new york, remember, it ended almost in 1990, its current in destablizing the red state/blue state shit that we have to constantly go thru (its also why prolux is so impt, and canadian writers like valgardsen and
sinclair ross were too)

(patricia nell warren, whos amazing book the front runner, will be finally made because this thing made bank, makes similar points in her recently published essays.

is this opinon so out there, so strange, that it doesnt make sense, am i seeing a different movie?

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 10 March 2006 11:23 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.outsports.com/history/gaycowboys.htm
heres warrens essay

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 10 March 2006 11:25 (eighteen years ago) link

The Front Runner is soggy wish-fullfillment, though. No way is it comparable to the BBM short story.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 March 2006 13:40 (eighteen years ago) link

though at least they aren't calling out any of the other movies in their ad

Everyone KNOWS which one they're silently calling out.

Today's big NY Times movie ad features big smiling Jake & Heath pics. "It's the FEELGOOD Doomed Fags Tragedy of the Year!"

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 March 2006 14:14 (eighteen years ago) link

Jim Emerson posted the ad story in his blog:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=SCANNERS

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 March 2006 14:23 (eighteen years ago) link

Annie Proulx published this rant in The Guardian. Although she's right to skewer the air of self-congratulation it seems sour and misbegotten, especially the unnecessary jab at Three 6 Mafia:

Annie Proulx on how her Brokeback Oscar hopes were dashed by Crash

On the sidewalk stood hordes of the righteous, some leaning forward like wind-bent grasses, the better to deliver their imprecations against gays and fags to the open windows of the limos - the windows open by order of the security people - creeping toward the Kodak Theater for the 78th Academy Awards. Others held up sturdy, professionally crafted signs expressing the same hatred.
The red carpet in front of the theatre was larger than the Red Sea. Inside, we climbed grand staircases designed for showing off dresses. The circular levels filled with men in black, the women mostly in pale, frothy gowns. Sequins, diamonds, glass beads, trade beads sparkled like the interior of a salt mine. More exquisite dresses appeared every moment, some made from six yards of taffeta, and many with sweeping trains that demanded vigilance from strolling attendees lest they step on a mermaid's tail. There was one man in a kilt - there is always one at award ceremonies - perhaps a professional roving Scot hired to give colour to the otherwise monotone showing of clustered males. Larry McMurtry defied the dress code by wearing his usual jeans and cowboy boots.

The people connected with Brokeback Mountain, including me, hoped that, having been nominated for eight Academy awards, it would get Best Picture as it had at the funny, lively Independent Spirit awards the day before. (If you are looking for smart judging based on merit, skip the Academy Awards next year and pay attention to the Independent Spirit choices.) We should have known conservative heffalump academy voters would have rather different ideas of what was stirring contemporary culture. Roughly 6,000 film industry voters, most in the Los Angeles area, many living cloistered lives behind wrought-iron gates or in deluxe rest-homes, out of touch not only with the shifting larger culture and the yeasty ferment that is America these days, but also out of touch with their own segregated city, decide which films are good. And rumour has it that Lions Gate inundated the academy voters with DVD copies of Trash - excuse me - Crash a few weeks before the ballot deadline. Next year we can look to the awards for controversial themes on the punishment of adulterers with a branding iron in the shape of the letter A, runaway slaves, and the debate over free silver.

After a good deal of standing around admiring dresses and sucking up champagne, people obeyed the stentorian countdown commands to get in their seats as "the show" was about to begin. There were orders to clap and the audience obediently clapped. From the first there was an atmosphere of insufferable self-importance emanating from "the show" which, as the audience was reminded several times, was televised and being watched by billions of people all over the world. Those lucky watchers could get up any time they wished and do something worthwhile, like go to the bathroom. As in everything related to public extravaganzas, a certain soda pop figured prominently. There were montages, artfully meshed clips of films of yesteryear, live acts by Famous Talent, smart-ass jokes by Jon Stewart who was witty and quick, too witty, too quick, too eastern perhaps for the somewhat dim LA crowd. Both beautiful and household-name movie stars announced various prizes. None of the acting awards came Brokeback's way, you betcha. The prize, as expected, went to Philip Seymour Hoff-man for his brilliant portrayal of Capote, but in the months preceding the awards thing, there has been little discussion of acting styles and various approaches to character development by this year's nominees. Hollywood loves mimicry, the conversion of a film actor into the spittin' image of a once-living celeb. But which takes more skill, acting a person who strolled the boulevard a few decades ago and who left behind tapes, film, photographs, voice recordings and friends with strong memories, or the construction of characters from imagination and a few cold words on the page? I don't know. The subject never comes up. Cheers to David Strathairn, Joaquin Phoenix and Hoffman, but what about actors who start in the dark?

Everyone thanked their dear old mums, scout troop leaders, kids and consorts. More commercials, more quick wit, more clapping, beads of sweat, Stewart maybe wondering what evil star had lighted his way to this labour. Despite the technical expertise and flawlessly sleek set evocative of 1930s musicals, despite Dolly Parton whooping it up and Itzhak Perlman blending all the theme music into a single performance (he represented "culchah"), there was a kind of provincial flavour to the proceedings reminiscent of a small-town talent-show night. Clapping wildly for bad stuff enhances this. There came an atrocious act from Hustle and Flow, Three 6 Mafia's violent rendition of "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp", a favourite with the audience who knew what it knew and liked. This was a big winner, a bushel of the magic gold-coated gelded godlings going to the rap group.

The hours sped by on wings of boiler plate. Brokeback's first award was to Argentinean Gustavo Santaolalla for the film's plangent and evocative score. Later came the expected award for screenplay adaptation to Diana Ossana and Larry McMurtry, and only a short time later the director's award to Ang Lee. And that was it, three awards, putting it on equal footing with King Kong. When Jack Nicholson said best picture went to Crash, there was a gasp of shock, and then applause from many - the choice was a hit with the home team since the film is set in Los Angeles. It was a safe pick of "controversial film" for the heffalumps.

After three-and-a-half hours of butt-numbing sitting we stumbled away, down the magnificent staircases, and across the red carpet. In the distance men were shouting out limousine numbers, "406 . . . 27 . . . 921 . . . 62" and it seemed someone should yell "Bingo!" It was now dark, or as dark as it gets in the City of Angels. As we waited for our number to be called we could see the enormous lighted marquee across the street announcing that the "2006 Academy Award for Best Picture had gone to Crash". The red carpet now had taken on a different hue, a purple tinge.

The source of the colour was not far away. Down the street, spreading its baleful light everywhere, hung a gigantic, vertical, electric-blue neon sign spelling out S C I E N T O L O G Y.

"Seven oh six," bawled the limo announcer's voice. Bingo.

For those who call this little piece a Sour Grapes Rant, play it as it lays.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Fuck her.

Dan (Seriously) Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 11 March 2006 18:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Is she saying that the Best Picture Award was stolen by SCIENTOLOGISTS?

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 11 March 2006 19:47 (eighteen years ago) link

its a really quite decent peice of sour grape writing, like the oscar essay in esquire from about 1990

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 12 March 2006 00:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Her contention that Hoffman's turn is easier than Ledger's really bothers me, though. Only someone who knows shit about how acting works would claim that "mimicry" is less than "invention." As if there was a difference.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 12 March 2006 01:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Agreed. And Capote is a better film than Brokeback Mountain all around really, though I do like both (and Crash too, for that matter!).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 12 March 2006 04:09 (eighteen years ago) link

finney, i dont think as an englishmen, you are allowed to have an opinon on three of the most american movies of all time

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 12 March 2006 04:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think finney is an englishman

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 12 March 2006 04:33 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.