New Yorker magazine alert thread

nyer is kinda just one big explainer column

Agree. Food issue was terrible.

Kid Rock profile overrated in this thread. :)

all the time now when im reading stuff like the underground resto piece i think of your (or maxs?) description of the new yorker as something you read to have things to talk about to other people at dinner parties which is sort of an unwieldy description but exactly how a lot of pieces come off like 'oh, well the other day i was reading...' but that really isnt that bad because i mean you have to talk about something to yr friends coworker sitting beside you other than the weather and whats the most efficient biking route to get there xp

ya the kid rock was not that great, hes not v interesting, also lol at the generous attempts to position the rubin produced album as tasteful and timeless, when i finally checked out the songs i had a v of course experience

ya that was me xp B-)

and of course i am like the #1 offender as far as this behavior goes

i suffered the shock of recognition when you described it yes very much so

anyway i totally disagree with s1ocki about the london restaurateur piece i really love those low-key pieces about successful members of the professional class - other recent hilite was the long piece about the engineer that had worked in silicon valley - makes the world seem less relentlessly horrible to me all these reasonable people living their lives doing kinda cool stuff, making chicken for dinner

ha, otm

i just started listening to the radio station here & it is a kinda npr/radio 4 analogue that ranges from softly spoken news to interesting documentaries with a boring guy talking about climate change & then panel shows in which people put on improv voices & make "jokes" to clipped studio laughter & it strikes me as a neat & exact litmus test of how much you are part of the demographic you are part of - like most people have a turn-off point where they think that the documentaries are too boring or the commentators are too something or the panel shows are just insufferable bullshit, even if it's material for which they're primed (like that guy bill maher, right, like you agree with him or whatever but he is just the living worst & makes you hate people you should have a sense of attunement w/). & i totally have the stomach for like a gentle & nice new yorker profile about a bourgeois guy & his food-shopping routine & the interactions he has at the market, & i am sufficiently distant from ever going to an underground restaurant that i can appreciate the vicarious thrill of just knowing that there are such things and being momentarily involved in that & its personal undercurrent of social deprivation & that's fine. but then i can't read shouts & murmurs even if it's woody allen writing it, or i get bored in book reviews sometimes. s1ocki is a food person, maybe all of this is too close to the bone, maybe it is like when you read a positive newspaper review of a group you dislike & then are curious whether all of the newspaper's contents is equally error-strewn & off & you just aren't informed enough to know it.

seems like there's a trend for these profile pieces on 80s/90s celebs--

(Kid Rock/Trent Reznor/Ben Stiller) got famous doing a somewhat disreputable thing (rapping/industrial/meta-comedy) and yet their careers have persevered and they've gained new respectability by doing new things(Romney themes/movie scores/uh, directing)

(alyssa milano) got famous for doing a somewhat disreputable thing (dating baseball players/soft pr0n/acting w tony danza) and yet her career has persevered and she's gained new respectability by doing new things (listening to stereolab/yo la tengo)

loll

Kid Rock profile may not be anywhere near A+, but it's >>>>>>>>Reznor (he uses computers to make music!) and Stiller (he's a perfectionist when it comes to making shitty movies, especially his no-one-cares remake of "Walter Mitty!").

the Stiller piece was wonderful! full of a really ambivalent and ambiguous pathos, i thought.

I thought it took too seriously a subject not really worth taking that seriously, five or so years after a piece like this should have run.

Like, look the dude's track record, which has been this unbalanced pattern of "four for them, one for me." So many flops and shitty boilerplate sequels.

ya the author's fascination in the reznor piece with the idea of using computers to make music was pretty bad, like, if you still haven't gotten over that, maybe you shouldn't be the person or the publication to be covering trent reznor

a friend of mine had the cassette of pretty hate machine melted into her dashboard by the sun

see that would be a good talk of the town

s1ocki is a food person

it's 'bon vivant'

With computers, Reznor can make any sounds he wants, even sounds that don't exist!

he took a cello and a piano and put them together at the same time iirc

other recent hilite was the long piece about the engineer that had worked in silicon valley

Libertarian venture capital guy, or have I really fallen ?

... behind?

William Trevor story in the latest. Anyone read it?

Patricia Marx on personal outsourcing actually made me lol in a gentle and predictable way

Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief is out (or nearly out, in my time zone).

wait how is this book not from the same project as Paul Haggis' article discussed upthread, how did I get so confused, that's not relevant to this thread at all now

>:(

oh lol I'm all confused. Yes, this book is the book by the writer who wrote that article. Hooray!

i don't really want to be mean, but roz chast *sux*

why won't maira kalman grace us with her works more regularly

sex offender piece was wrenching, almost vertiginous to me.

St. Francis piece is gold. It's gonna get my highest accolade (tearing it out to save in my files).

yeah i'm looking forward to reading both of those this weekend

Gods! Last three issues all seemed to arrive within the last 1.5 weeks, plus my bedside pile has officially become "unstable."

Unless said pile involves issues dated 2010, I don't want to hear about it.

Only goes back to 2011. ._.

Thankfully the Jan 21 issue (obomber hearding cats on the cover) was unusually uninteresting (to me).

Much catching up to do, which can be accomplished in a couple of weeks thanks to lolunemployment.

Nussbaum only mentions six other shows in her Justified piece. Progress!

i don't really want to be mean, but roz chast *sux*

I've been saying this for years.

love the mongolian dinosaur article

Procedure required that an arrest warrant be issued against the dinosaur itself, so the action became known as United States of America v One Tyranosaurus Bataar Skeleton.

xp Actually, I kind of chuckled at this one from a few months ago:

http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/65/6527/OJ84100Z/posters/roz-chast-a-woman-stands-in-front-of-a-bookshelf-of-memoirs-in-a-bookstore-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg

But 99% of her stuff is lame.

i like roz chast

The Remnick story on the far right in Israel was a good terse account.

roz chast = too many words

early roz chast is fine, she's just been doing the same thing for like thirty years and it's exhausted

Haha:

too many words

― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:47 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Roz Chast: C/D

i was otm

JessiRoz Chastain

I finally got around to that Elizabeth Kolbert piece on the Dutch wilderness preserve. Like a lot of New Yorker articles, it seemed to take something that was interesting, but probably not worth more than a page or two, and stretch it severely. I think I also just don't usually love her pieces that much.

I thought the Kolbert was interesting for being part of the zeitgeist in conservation that sez maybe preserving native species shouldn't be the end all be all.

three fb friends posted borowitz report abt republicans demanding Obama resign over beyonce lip synching thinking it was real like they've gone too far this time, oof