sometime i read christgau and am amazed...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (841 of them)
haha well that even I can do

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:43 (twenty years ago) link

I've got your back if you do, man

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:43 (twenty years ago) link

See, I didn't know that Rabin was from South Africa! So now I've learned something else. I thought that the apartheid thing was a reference to "Owner of a Lonely Heart"'s unlikely cross-over to the R&B charts at the time. I like reading it that way. It makes me laugh.

Broheems (diamond), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:44 (twenty years ago) link

or let's put it this way: you don't have to know a fucking thing about Yes or its history or anything else to enjoy Dave's Yes article as anything other than a piece of writing. I know this because while editing the thing I had to look up about half of the references; I also know this because I have gotten lotsa feedback from people about that piece--in person and via email--that I know don't know or care about Yes at all. they just liked it as a piece of writing. you don't have to feel the same way, obviously, but presenting it in the pedantic terms you do doesn't make your case look very good.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:45 (twenty years ago) link

i didn't get half of the references (it took me twenty minutes to even remember who the outfield were), and i thought it was hilarious. i sent it to my prog loving best friend and he thought it was hilarious. tomorrow i'll take it into work and see what the indie kids think.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:47 (twenty years ago) link

what the fuck Matos - this article makes sense to you because *you* knew that Horn's from South Africa, that Jon Andersen really was a milkman - and then CALLING ME STUPID because I did not know those things beforehand. You're holding the fact that you understand the obscure context of his references over my head as evidence that I need to be spoonfed. In conclusion: fuck you.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 20:48 (twenty years ago) link

so wait, you transpose trevor rabin with trevor horn who produced "owner of a lonely heart" and has yet to be mentioned in this conversation and you expect us to believe that this is all so obscure?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:50 (twenty years ago) link

this article makes sense to you because *you* knew that Horn's from South Africa, that Jon Andersen really was a milkman

I didn't know these things when I read it, and it made sense to me. I don't think knowing anything about prog or Yes was necessary to understanding the article.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:50 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't call you stupid, and if I had it certainly wouldn't be because you didn't get some references, which I also--let me repeat--did not call you stupid about. I'm calling the fact that you prissily demand that everything be explained in black & white terms evidence of a need for spoonfeeding. I mean, if you want to talk about hyperbolic leaps, there you go.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:51 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't know these things when I read it, and it made sense to me. I don't think knowing anything about prog or Yes was necessary to understanding the article.

I don't think understanding this article is necessary to understanding this article!

Man that was wild, funny yes bit....awesome.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:54 (twenty years ago) link

yes horn = rabin obvy

(x-post)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 20:55 (twenty years ago) link

for the record, i liked the Dave Q piece.

BanjoMania (Brilhante), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:56 (twenty years ago) link

glad someone did!

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:57 (twenty years ago) link

Geez. The Yes preview is perfectly fine. Funny, even. I understood it from the start, even though I know nothing about Yes other 90125 -- aha! That was probably the fifth purchase that I couldn't remember. Regardless, I totally saw what he was doing, especially becaue he realized he needed to put the aforementioned parantheticals ["(KEY CHANGE)", etc.] That's funny. But to bring it back to the start of the thread, this Blondie review provided no context for me to figure out what the fuck he was saying. And all this math talk from Chuck Eddy is a red herring. The pattern of the HMs here are "here's a witty one liner about the BAND, ALBUM or MUSIC CONTAINED THEREIN" (eg. "The Kate Bush of PJ Harvey" and "Latin Playboys as conceived by an Anglo—too artistic, genuinely literary, lyrical enough to haunt you some").

I have no idea when the problem became, "rock critics are showing off" vs. "readers are morons", but that was the original intention here.

frankE (frankE), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:58 (twenty years ago) link

everyone liked it except me apparently!

Shakey Mo in minority of one shockah

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 20:59 (twenty years ago) link

er, that should read "wasn't the original intention"

frankE (frankE), Friday, 23 April 2004 20:59 (twenty years ago) link

the problem always becomes that because there are a lot of people on here w/axes to grind against xgau, and just as many people who like his stuff a lot and defend it. see also: "rockism," Avril during 2002, lots of other ILx flashpoints

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:00 (twenty years ago) link

Shakey, that's exactly what I'm talking about. IT WAS A JOKE. YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO SEEMS TO NOT LIKE THE DAVE Q PIECE. THAT'S WHY MY ONE-LINER WAS (NOMINALLY) FUNNY, OR AT LEAST INTENDED TO BE! what part of that do you NOT understand?

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

god, I'm starting to miss Alex in Mainhatten, for christ's sake!

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:02 (twenty years ago) link

at this point I have no idea what one-liner you're talking about, this thread is so convoluted...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:03 (twenty years ago) link

this is turning into full metal jacket

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:04 (twenty years ago) link

I should also finish this thought:

The pattern of the HMs here are "here's a witty one liner about the BAND, ALBUM or MUSIC CONTAINED THEREIN" not "here's a comment about one song I like, here's another comment about another song I like."

frankE (frankE), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:05 (twenty years ago) link

i'm already in a world of shit ...

BanjoMania (Brilhante), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:06 (twenty years ago) link

Slayer kinda suck.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:06 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't know they stacked shit this high...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:07 (twenty years ago) link

strongo is right, and I am retiring. 'night, all.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:07 (twenty years ago) link

can i have your job?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:11 (twenty years ago) link

"all this math talk from Chuck Eddy is a red herring"

Hey, I only mentioned math in one post, which nobody even answered!! I guess Metal Mike's accounting career is old news or something...

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:14 (twenty years ago) link

>The pattern of the HMs here are "here's a witty one liner about the BAND, ALBUM or MUSIC CONTAINED THEREIN" not "here's a comment about one song I like, here's another comment about another song I like."<

But choice A above does not necessarily NEGATE choice B. The Blondie review was meant to be both, obviously -- a witty one-liner consisting of comments about two different songs. Sort of.

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:17 (twenty years ago) link

For the record, I didn't like Dave Q's Yes piece either (at least the part I read--I doubt that I finished it). But then the only reason I read it was that praise for it from Ned and others made me curious about it (and I probably was bored at work).

*

I think it's pretty funny how not being terribly interested in writing with "personality" and not looking to writing primarily for its entertainment value is getting labelled "dumbing down" on this thread. I would have thought turning every discipline into a personality cult would be one example of "dumbing down."

*

I honestly don't know why I am continuing to post to this thread. Apparently, I enjoy this sort of thing. I wish I didn't.

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:22 (twenty years ago) link

Chuck, have you ever considered the field of law?

frankE (frankE), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:22 (twenty years ago) link

No, but I fought it once. And it won.

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

I'm assuming the "true summers" stuff is a reference to the chorus of Yes' hit "Roundabout": "Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too/Twenty-four before my love and I'll be there with you".

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:42 (twenty years ago) link

Also, the line about the Relayer cover will become funny if you quickly look up the cover.

(To be honest, I didn't really like the piece - though I love dave q and Yes - on first skimming but without even rereading this thread is making me appreciate it more.)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:44 (twenty years ago) link

thanks Sundar. I didn't think equating a phrase in common parlance like "many moons" with something random like "true summers" was quite fair meself...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

For whatever it's worth, the guy who designs music (and sundry other) section pages here at the Voice -- a graphics guy in his late 40s, not a writer, but also a really big Yes fan (he's going to see them live in April) thought the piece was hilarious.

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

I can't believe this is still going on ...


I loved the Yes piece, personally.

"I'm assuming the "true summers" stuff is a reference to the chorus of Yes' hit "Roundabout": "Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too/Twenty-four before my love and I'll be there with you"."

I hadn't caught that at first. But that was OK. The piece works even if you don't catch it. (I just figured it was an attempt to sound all fancy and literary - just like Yes.) And I think that's the key to making references, lyrical or otherwise.

I didn't know John Anderson was a milkman. If I were someday to find out he weren't, then I'd retroactively like the piece a lot less, because then it would read like pure fiction. But this mixture of fact and fancy is dead-on, particularly given its subject. And it solves the problem of "what the hell is there left to say about Yes?"

Just like Christgau pretty well solved the problem of what to say about the Blondie record, which, according to other reviews I've read in the past day and a half, sounds pretty Blondie-esque.


Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:04 (twenty years ago) link

I thought a lot of the jokes were funny and that it was clever writing. I just didn't really get what he was saying about Yes. It's entirely possible that I'm missing stuff as I didn't really read in depth. Was it just supposed to be an overview of their career as a build-up to the concert? If so, and it was written for a reader who doesn't know the band and get all the lyric and album cover references, I don't know what it would communicate to them. If it's written for someone who already knows a bit about the band, what is it telling them? Obviously most people here love the piece so they're getting something out of it anyway but that was how it struck me. (Unless the point is that Yes are clever and technically adept but don't really say very much. But I doubt that.)

I also didn't think it was obvious that Christgau was talking about song lyrics. (I too assume "believes in reincarnation" was a reference to it being a comeback album.) And I also don't really get, even after having it explained, what the value of that blurb would be for someone reading it.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:06 (twenty years ago) link

(That was a x-post)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:07 (twenty years ago) link

this is turning into full metal jacket

No Exit seems more appropriate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:15 (twenty years ago) link

"I'm not trapped in here with you. You're all trapped in here with ME."

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 April 2004 22:17 (twenty years ago) link

I also didn't think it was obvious that Christgau was talking about song lyrics. (I too assume "believes in reincarnation" was a reference to it being a comeback album.) And I also don't really get, even after having it explained, what the value of that blurb would be for someone reading it.

-- sundar subramanian (sundar_subramanian200...), April 23rd, 2004.

It's in the Honorable Mentions, so he thinks it's pretty good, but not great. Picking a couple of lyric references = "otherwise, it's pretty much what you'd expect from a Blondie album."

Granted, I needed to have a little of that explained to me - the "reincarnation" bit does sound like a metaphor, which leads one to believe that "wishes the pope had a bigger dick" is also a metaphor. But apparently others got it, so what the heck.

Attaching this much importance, positive or negative, to one of many 10-word end-of-the-column reviews: C or D?

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:24 (twenty years ago) link

while we're at it, why is anyone who writes about music of a non-classica/jazz variety termed a "rock" critic? i am not a rock critic. i almost universally dislike rock music of all strains and varieties, have absolutely no interest in it and never write about it. is jamaican dancehall rock?

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:32 (twenty years ago) link

ps i loved dave q's yes piece, even bearing my rockophobia in mind

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:32 (twenty years ago) link

>is jamaican dancehall rock?<

yes. especially when it rocks.

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 22:41 (twenty years ago) link

it was a rhetorical question because, really, in all honesty it's not.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:43 (twenty years ago) link

but this belongs on another thread

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:49 (twenty years ago) link

We're far apart but our hearts are holding hands
It's lonely just to sit here by myself each night
Not knowing when I'll ever get to hold you tight
Oh yes I have temptations and sometimes it's pretty rough
But temptation's never strong as our sweet love
Cause our hearts are holding hands across the miles
Even though we're lonely we can smile
Cause I know you're my woman
And I know you're my man
We're far apart but our hearts are holding hands
Today a stranger looked my way and flashed his gold
And said he'd buy me all the treasures I could hold
But I took out your last letter that said you love me so
And there I found the strenght to tell him no
Cause our hearts are holding hands...
And come what may our hearts are holding hands

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 April 2004 22:54 (twenty years ago) link

Too late, Dave. Robert Christgau in 1978 (in his best Pazz and Jop essay ever, by the way, and one of the best pieces he's ever written, and the piece that sort of inspired me to become an, um, rock critic):

"Whatever other genre distinctions you want to make (and they're always fuzzy), it's a weird switch to act as if black music (whatever exactly that means) is not rock and roll. If Motown was rock and roll, then so are the O'Jays and Donna Summer; if Linda Ronstadt and Randy Newman are part of the tradition, then so are Natalie Cole and Gil Scott-Heron. Rock and roll is a direct descendant of rhythm and blues, and so are soul, funk, middle-class black pop from Linda Hopkins to Ashford & Simpson, Philly-derived disco, reggae (less categorically), and jazz fusion and Eurodisco (less categorically still, since both are genuinely interracial styles with disparate forebears). All these genres share formal and cultural presuppositions with white rock."

But yeah, sure, it's a matter of opinion, just like all genre classifications. But I'd say a lot of techno and country and teenpop (and maybe all hip-hop) are rock, too. Just like James Brown and the Platters and the Shangri-Las and the Coasters and Desmond Dekker.

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 22:56 (twenty years ago) link

And besides, Elephant Man rocks HARDER than Creed, right?

chuck, Friday, 23 April 2004 22:58 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.