Sitcom Hell

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (151 of them)
Horsham, is that, Richard?

EDC is, I think, meant to be more neurotic than laugh-out-loud funny. I still love it, though. Any chance of going into more detail, Mike?

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Close, but no cigar. It was just down the road in Billingshurst.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Ah, whatever. I'm sure I remember reading that EDC was set in Horsham, but maybe I was misinformed.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

one year passes...
I can't recall the town in which EDC is set ever being mentioned. It was obviously Surrey though, as the company Martin (Richard Briers's character) worked for was Mole Valley Valves.

Tom's vision of hell theory rings true for EDC. In fact, it is a particularly complex example of this. The situation is hellish for Martin because of his perfect neighbour Paul (Peter Egan). Martin takes it to extremes ("Why do the moles make molehills my lawn and not Paul's?" he asks in frustration at the beginning of one episode). But also, it is hellish for both Paul and Martin's wife (Helen I think, played by Penelope Wilton) *because* of Martin's obsessive behaviour and tedious conversation. Martin gets on very well with the dull, far-too-couply Howard and Hilda, to Paul and Helen's chagrin.

Was EDC funny? Yes, but in a subtle way. It could almost be the origin of the term "gentle comedy", which would bring comments of "so gentle it's not funny" from lovers of more brash, in yer face material. My parents *loved* this show and I'm sure it is because they knew ppl who were just like the characters.

MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 13:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Reading through this again, I am struck that David R said that Malcolm in Malcolm In The Middle is surrounded by dumbos.... b-but Malcolm's mother is at least as intelligent as Malcolm, surely?

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 13:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
While describing Father Ted to o.nate, I did remember an old theory of mine that a defining characteristic of sitcoms is that the lead character is always on the make, that their upward mobility grating against the world provides the engine for the show, makes things happen where otherwise nothing would.

Good example: Father Ted obv., Only Fools & Horses obvx2, Steptoe & Hancock (which may in fairness have provided the kernel of the idea, now that I reread the thread above). US sitcoms are again a bad match.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 06:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Having spent most of yesterday in front of the telly, I can confirm that abc1 is the new sitcom hell.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 08:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Andrew, Bilko is surely one of the great examples of what you describe, and of course very American.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 09:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Ross from Friends seems to be a prime example

lukey (Lukey G), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 09:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Friends was one of, if not _the_, counter example I had in mind. Things happen to them, they don't go in search of things.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 10:16 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...
They are repeating Ever Decreasing Circles on UKTV Drama at the moment. It is great, but far from being gentle comedy, I find it almost as uncomfortable to watch as Fawlty Towers. Martin is mad, obsessive, unpleasant, small-minded but ultimately sympathetic because he's not wrong about Paul. Paul is deliberately trying to needle and upset him. Some of it might be for Martin's own good, but some of it is definitely because he fancies Martin's wife.

Mind you, you can understand Paul's bemusement. How does someone as intelligent, witty and all round great as Penelope Wilton's character end up married to someone like this?

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 11:29 (seventeen years ago) link

American comedy is usually about upper-middle class urbanites whereas British comedy is about the down-at-heel and underprivileged. Is this because the British, unlike the Americans, hate their rich. Imagine if a British equivalent of, say, the OC or Desperate Housewives came out - it wouldn't work. Of course these aren't strictly comedies but I wanted to use a different example from say Friends which they have tried (and failed) to recreate in a British setting.
My Family is a very strange one because it actually manages to bust every British comedy remit.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:00 (seventeen years ago) link

"a British equivalent of, say, the OC" - Hollyoaks!

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:05 (seventeen years ago) link

American comedy is usually about upper-middle class urbanites whereas British comedy is about the down-at-heel and underprivileged.

Roseanne v The Good Life v My Name is Earl v Coupling.

The OC and Desperate Housewives wouldn't work here because British culture doesn't work like that. Also, as you pointed out, they aren't comedies. Though Hollyoaks comes close to the OC, I guess (xpost)

My Family is pretty much the archetypal British sitcom, isn't it?

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Despite having been created by an American sitcom producer, it certainly is. But it is rubbish.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:22 (seventeen years ago) link

It's no 2.4 Children.

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Which in itself is no Love Thy Neighbour.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:35 (seventeen years ago) link

American comedy is usually about upper-middle class urbanites

Er...I'm sure we could find as many (or more) examples that aren't. Aside from the two Ailsa mentioned, Everybody Loves Raymond (they're not poor but...), Rhoda, Archie Bunker's Place/All In The Family, Sanford and Son (OK, last two = US equivalents of UK sitcoms), Chico and the Man, Cheers, Taxi, King of the Hill...

There's also a few amount of mileage to be had in US sitcoms of class-straddling culture-clash (Fresh Prince of Bel Air, er...Diff'rent Strokes at a push...)

It's not all Niles and Frasier sipping lattes (though that has its own class tension in Crane senior).


Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:47 (seventeen years ago) link

wasn't 2.4 children pretty openly fashioned after Roaseanna?

Cheers had a pretty broad social spectrum; laffs were both at the expense, and benefit, of the toffs (frasier, dianne) and the proles (the rest of them), at different times. episodes like the 'snark hunt', or when woody got involved in politics, or where frasier wanted to read them dickens but ended up twisting it into a tale of serial killers and mutant ninja turtles to keep the bar interested, were excellent at this.

i am not a nugget (stevie), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link

ok, what i said 9 posts earlier was a generalisation, mostly referring to post-mid 90s comedy more than anything else.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't see how Seinfeld fits -- it's more about Jerry & co. making other people's lives hell, I think.

Yeah, I think the only way "Seinfeld" fits here is through the George character. Which means that "Curb Your Enthusiasm" fits better, as larry=george.

Ste (Fuzzy), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:15 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't see how Seinfeld fits -- it's more about Jerry & co. making other people's lives hell, I think.

Yeah, I think the only way "Seinfeld" fits here is through the George character. "Curb Your Enthusiasm" fits almost perfectly here though.

Ste (Fuzzy), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah nice work ilx

Ste (Fuzzy), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Other British sitcoms not conforming to "British comedy is about the down-at-heel and underprivileged" : AbFab, My Hero, The Thick of It, Spaced. Still within your timeframe of mid-to-late 90s, mostly.

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I was actually thinking about this thread yesterday, as I finally watched the Speed 3 episode of Father Ted.

I have missed the boat as regards beating up the "upper-middle-class" line, but any generalisation about American Comedy that misses the Simpsons needs rewriting.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:06 (seventeen years ago) link

i wrote a massive incredible missive to justify what i said upthread and then got poxy fuled.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Was it along the lines of "I'm generalising to suit my own argument here"? :-)

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:20 (seventeen years ago) link

dog latin do you have a whole team of people helping you not get comedy??

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:21 (seventeen years ago) link

not really ailsa, but people are using one-off examples like My Hero (which is shit and doesn't work) and the Simpsons (which is a cartoon, not strictly a sitcom). As opposed to the huge glut of American soaps and comedies (Ellen, SATC, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Friends, Spin City, Frasier and loads of others) about socially mobile urbanites overcoming minor social faux-pas and relational situations rather than the average Britcom featuring a downtrodden protagonist/antagonist (Del Boy, Alan Partridge, David Brent, Basil Fawlty, Steptoe and Son, Men Behaving Badly), who while isn't some cloth-capped Yorkshire coalminer still resides in a less-than-ideal environment.
Interesting points of note, when we flip these around and look at rich British characters like Tim-Nice-But-Dim, Patsy & Eddie etc, they are more a focus of ridicule than a protagonist one sympathises with. The same goes for the Simpsons in which Homer is often seen as a lovable dunce.
You could say that US comedy is about people making a pigs ear of a good situation while Brticom is about people trying earnestly to make the best out of a bad one.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

people trying earnestly to make the best out of a bad one.

- peep show
- the office
- black books
- spaced
- fucking my family

do not conform to this.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Dog Latin, in that situation I find that if I click Back, my message is still in the box and I can stick it on the clipboard for pasteage as soon as ILX comes back to life.

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

You could, if you were given to generalisation.

Counter examples can be found just as easily as your examples. David Brent, Alan Patridge, as I see it, are classic examples of people making a pigs ear of a good situation - they are in good honest middle management/public eye positions are and shite at it, which is not in the same mould as a Steptoe/Norman Stanley Fletcher at all.

Similarly, Earl Hickey, Roseanne & Dan Conner (pre lottery-winning shark jump), are good honest decent hard-working folks who are making the best of a bad situation.

(xpost)

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Except Earl isn't decent or hard-working, he's a petty criminal, but, hey, he's just trying to be a better person! It says so in the opening credits!!

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:44 (seventeen years ago) link

people trying earnestly to make the best out of a bad one.

- peep show
- the office
- black books
- spaced
- fucking my family

do not conform to this.

actually i think Black Books and Spaced kind of do.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link

yes, they make a point in Spaced and Black Books to say they don't have any money. The Peep Show boys aren't exactly wealthy, chisel jawed machos. The Office is as mundane a situation as you can get. Which leaves My Family, which is actually an American sitcom that happens to feature British actors living in England and is arguably crap*.

*I quite like it, but then I don't "get" comedy.


xxxpost
didn't mean to diss cloth-capped Yorkshire coalminers, just trying to down-play the "class" card since characters in Men Behaving Badly aren't exactly lower-class, but they still represent a kind of grottiness which you just don't get on US TV. Similarly, shite like Hollyoaks just goes to show what happens if you try and sheen-up British TV in the same way American TV does - we just can't do it.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Madchen, yeh I do that but somehow it didn't work for some reason this time.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

of course there are exceptions to the rule, like roseanne for example, but they don't outweigh the general trends here. The last ten years have turned comedic TV actors like Kelsey Grammar, Jennifer Aniston and Ricky Gervais into megastars, and this means the networks are getting very savvy about what works and doesn't work. This is why recently we've been getting more and more US sitcoms (many of them absolutely generic crap that gets shown on Paramount at 1:30am) that fit the Friends/Spin City model, and why British shows follow in the mundanity of the Royle Family, the Office, Peep Show, etc..

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:03 (seventeen years ago) link

One other example I can think of is Nathan Barley, where Nathan is shown up as an over-payed clown who does actually make a pigs ear of a good situation yes. But did the Friends kids ever get pointed and laughed at because they were all lawyers and actors and lived in big apartments?

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:07 (seventeen years ago) link

plz tell me theres really a britcom called 'fucking my family'

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:08 (seventeen years ago) link

it's more commonly known as Eastenders

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:09 (seventeen years ago) link

xxpost

same as Brent and Partridge - how the British love to see the mighty fall, whereas someone like the good Dr Crane or Larry David is lauded and admired. Either that or they get put into embarassing situations which spiral out of control, in which case we are expected to sympathise.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

"whereas someone like the good Dr Crane or Larry David is lauded and admired"

^^ dude youre embarrassing yourself with the not-getting-it here

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, if you pick the examples you are using. Explain me Nighty Night, Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps, The Green Green Grass etc. You can fit anything into any example of a trend if you are selective about what you use...

(xpost, Friends, Rachel was a waitress, Joey a *failed* actor, Phoebe a coffee-shop singer/masseuse. Hardly the high-fliers, eh?)

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link

the only person we're meant to identify with on frasier is the working class ex-cop dad!!

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link

i sympathise with Dr Crane and Larry David in CYE probably even more than i'm supposed to.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:14 (seventeen years ago) link

see british humo(u)r takes down people like brent & patridge, whereas in america everyone is too busy admiring c. montgomery burns & the epa guy from ghostbusters

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that most American sitcoms don't depict wealthy/upper middle-class people per se as much as they depict "normal" people living wildly beyond what their means realistically should be? A waitress, cook, and coffee bar singer would NEVER be able to afford the spacious, decorated NYC apartment the girls on Friends had. At the same time, Friends is about the only show I can really think of where this occurs.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Nighty Night - haven't seen, sorry

Green Wing - haven't really seen properly but it's really a sketch show and was set in a hospital in which case it's out of this domain. That said, compare it to something like Scrubs.

Two Pints Of Lager - barely classifies as a comedy, but this bunch of chavs aren't particularly aspirational are they?

Green Green Grass - what is this? Is it good?

(and wrt Friends, they must have been pretty well-paid waitresses to keep them in ornate wooden dogs, comfy chairs and hair straighteners, non? the concept of money is so swept under the rug in this show, you'd think they all lived in some kind of Marxist paradise).

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

and what's post may have been made to counter my argument, but he's got a good point. the simpsons gets away with an awful lot for an american show, probably because it is a cartoon and so can convey alternative messages in this way.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:20 (seventeen years ago) link

"whereas someone like the good Dr Crane or Larry David is lauded and admired"
^^ dude youre embarrassing yourself with the not-getting-it here

-- and what (an...), May 30th, 2006 5:11 PM. (ooo)

The viewer is supposed to, at the end of the day, on the protagonist's side, no matter what kind of an arsehole he is being that day. You're not supposed to be so forgiving with characters like Brent or Partridge.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

btw, I was wrong about Earl using his lottery money, he's trying to right his wrong karma so that his money may come to him like it would have done had he not been such a bastard in his past. He's very much the lovable loser making the best of a bad situation.

Answer, btw, to "where does...fit into this?" is "it doesn't". Doglatin is pretty much talking pish from a fairly uninformed standpoint.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 06:23 (seventeen years ago) link

no, no, i'm pretty certain you can find a hell for certain seasons of Night Court

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 06:29 (seventeen years ago) link

btw, I was wrong about Earl using his lottery money, he's trying to right his wrong karma so that his money may come to him like it would have done had he not been such a bastard in his past. He's very much the lovable loser making the best of a bad situation.

No, he does have the money. What happened was, he got the winning ticket, then he got hit by the car and lost the ticket. Then, while he was in hospital, he saw Carson Daly on the telly talking about karma, so he made his list, and when he fixed the very first thing on his list (I forget what it was), he found the ticket and collected the money. And now he's using the money to fix all the bad things he did because if he doesn't, karma will take the money away from him again.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 07:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, I was right the first time. Yay me (I wasn't really paying attention in the first episode). I sort of assumed he had the money and that's how him and Randy could afford to go and do all the other stuff from there on in, but it's not really been mentioned again that I've noticed.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 07:59 (seventeen years ago) link

It was mentioned a fair bit in the first few episodes, mainly because Joy (who is my favourite character in it) kept trying to figure out ways to get the money off him. But now even she's in on the karma thing.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 08:01 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't remember a lot of rich people on Night Court either.

also Cheers.

Q('.'Q) (eman), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 11:20 (seventeen years ago) link

what about nigel colcord and all rebecca's other failed romances with yuppies; frasier & lilith; woody's girlfriend; diane and her family?

i am not a nugget (stevie), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 11:49 (seventeen years ago) link

i meant robin colcord of course

i am not a nugget (stevie), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 11:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Night Court were upper-middle class, weren't they? At least the two main lawyers (I think my first sexual feelings might have been Marky/ie/whatever Post-directed) and the judge had to be reasonably well-off.

milo z (mlp), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Lawyers working in the district attorney's office and public defenders actually don't make a lot of money at all.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Also: Bull, Marsha Warfield's character and the other female bailiffs, Art the janitor(bruno kirby), John Astin as the judge's slighty cracked father

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I know PDs and low-level DAs aren't raking it in, but I'm just thinking relative to Roseanne or Mama's Family or Good Times, the three big characters in Night Court were relatively high up the socioeconomic chain.

milo z (mlp), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:46 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.