http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2012/10/indiana-jones-the-complete-adventures.html
If there is a better piece of writing on these films, I haven't read it.
― this is the dream of avril and chad (jer.fairall), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 03:38 (eleven years ago) link
Didn't know until yesterday that Temple of Doom was a prequel.
The part of my personality that's still eleven years old thinks that's big news and wants to talk to people about this.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:42 (eleven years ago) link
also the part of me that thinks the coolest part about Blade Runner is the "is he an android?" discussion and the part of me that desperately wants to know if Bond is one man or five different guys who go by the same code name James Bond.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:43 (eleven years ago) link
Dun dah dun dun
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:44 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah wow that last article is intense. I never realized what a horrible person Indiana Jones is.
Of course, he's a cartoon though!
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 10 January 2013 04:17 (eleven years ago) link
Does anyone else feel any poignancy in the Belloq/Marion relationship, culminating in his upset at her being tossed into the snake pit with Indy, or have I just watched Raiders so many times at this point that now I'm only looking for new things?
― The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Saturday, 3 August 2013 18:13 (ten years ago) link
saw Temple Of Doom around midnight on an *actual cinema* at a festival last week at very loud volume with a whooping, cheering crowd. it's scarier than i recall! the bit where they force him to drink from a skull in the Temple and all that stuff.. real intense. i'm surprised there wasn't much more of a fuss made back in the day about the horror aspect of a kids film, being as it was a PG over here. maybe there was a fuss made and i forget?
― piscesx, Saturday, 3 August 2013 19:57 (ten years ago) link
Well, it (and Gremlins) started the PG-13 rating.
― The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:18 (ten years ago) link
Yeah, there was total fuss.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:44 (ten years ago) link
Welp.
http://variety.com/2013/film/news/disney-acquires-indiana-jones-rights-from-paramount-1200927216/
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 December 2013 23:34 (ten years ago) link
How long til this gets handed over to J.J. Abrams?
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:15 (ten years ago) link
This is much worst news than Star Wars IMO.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:24 (ten years ago) link
agreed, either they keep making them w/ harrison ford which plz no or they start making them w/o harrison ford which god fucking no.
― balls, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:24 (ten years ago) link
Oh, come on, isn't the answer obvious? http://img2-2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/080521/shia_l.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:34 (ten years ago) link
― balls, Saturday, December 7, 2013 2:24 AM (1 hour ago)
Well if they were to come up with a really really good screenplay for one more film then obviously I wouldn't be complaining, but how likely is that to happen. Indiana Jones without Ford and Spielberg would not be Indiana Jones.
If they do spin-off films with his kid that wouldn't really bother me.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 03:45 (ten years ago) link
Me neither, cause then I'd have absolutely zero reason to see them.
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 04:18 (ten years ago) link
christ this reminds me i saw Temple.. at a festival in summer with a VERY loud sound system and fuck me some bits of it are as good as terrifying.
― piscesx, Saturday, 7 December 2013 05:36 (ten years ago) link