New Burial album. More info?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (643 of them)

"'Raver' in my head on loop today. Reminds me of Luomo and Akufen stuff more than anything else.

-- blueski"

sounds to me almost like pepe braddock's "burning" done in a "cheval" stylee. very pepe.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 13:33 (sixteen years ago) link

"no way, don't you remember the sudden influx of 4 on the floor housey type garage in 01? EZ's record, Tuff Jam's stuff from that time, Qualifide, etc etc. by the end of that year i was buying almost as much 4 on the floor stuff as jams with the 2-steppy beat no matter which end of the split it was on. a bunch of the deejays (iirc it was dream team and some other cats) decided to start playing more soulful, it didnt catch the media hype perhaps but it was a definite part of the movement that led to the path to funky house being an urban UK thing."

This movement was pretty small in 2001 though, and didn't really heat up until 2-step started transforming into grime over the course of 2002 (with "Pulse X" etc.). I was trying to obliquely reference it with my mention of Mike Dunn. Even The Dreem Teem were somewhat half-hearted about it, it seemed a bigger deal than it was because of the controversy over So Solid Crew and generational change.

In fact, 4X4 garage wasn't suddenly revived in 2001, this was happening in 2000 as well - remember tunes like Zack Toms' "Bring Me Down", Wideboys' "Westside" and "Stand & Deliver", Dominic B's "Going Round"... As for Tuff Jam, did they ever really change their sound from speed garage in the first place? Matt Lamont didn't even really start making 2-step beats until 2001! And his best 4X4 stuff from 2001/2002 was with El-B!

Not to mention the fact that the 4X4 was revived in the hard 'n' dark end of the scene as well - DJ Narrows for example, and let's not forget Blazing Squad's first hit before they became a boy band (esp. great with Elephant Man on the vocals).

So yeah there was a rise in 4/4 stuff around this time, but I think this development was more about a general nostalgia for speed garage (in both its soulful and ruff forms) than a desire to gentrify 2-step.

Tim F, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 13:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I reckon the Cyrus album is better than Untrue. There. Do I win £5?

Martian Economics, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

even when he's arguing w/ 'pipecock' i'd rather read Tim's writing than 90% of ilx

deej, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

You got that right.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

i caught most of this thread after the fireworks, but here are some thoughts.

if burial made a hardcore record, would that turn the continuum into a loop? it reminds me of MT's comment that nothing ever really changes.

what do people think of the skull disco comp?

breaks-based music exhausted itself for me awhile back, but i love the way it sounds in cassy's panorama bar mix i.e., it creates such a nice tension and hypes up the mix without sounding forced.

i don't buy the genius theory because it's too close to fundamentalism and art is way more dirty than that.

tricky, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

"what do people think of the skull disco comp?"

bores me to tears.

"breaks-based music exhausted itself for me awhile back, but i love the way it sounds in cassy's panorama bar mix i.e., it creates such a nice tension and hypes up the mix without sounding forced."

i like music with sampled drums in general, but in terms of a "break" sounding sampled drum beat, im really feeling carl craig's remix of tony allen.

"i don't buy the genius theory because it's too close to fundamentalism and art is way more dirty than that.

-- tricky"

how exactly is it close to fundamentalism? how is music something other than an artist expressing himself?

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

"how exactly is it close to fundamentalism? how is music something other than an artist expressing himself?"

Haha howzabout a million ways.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost, well, that's exactly it. i mean, what else is there to say if all you say is "how is music something other than an artist expressing himself?". i am very sympathetic to that view, but for me it is a jumping off point. it's like conflating effects with causes because at the end music is a very personal experience that everyone experiences a little bit differently. that's one of the reasons why we are here on this board i'd imagine.

i love CC's "straight mix" of tony allen. the subtle changes and brokenness in the breaks from bar to bar is so elegant!

tricky, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing i don't get about pipecock is its not just that he's saying "the best way to understand art is as an expression of an artist" but that "the ONLY way to understand art is as an expression of the artist," like he seems totally unaware that there is an art to reception

deej, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"This movement was pretty small in 2001 though, and didn't really heat up until 2-step started transforming into grime over the course of 2002 (with "Pulse X" etc.). I was trying to obliquely reference it with my mention of Mike Dunn. Even The Dreem Teem were somewhat half-hearted about it, it seemed a bigger deal than it was because of the controversy over So Solid Crew and generational change."

i mean, the seeds of grime were already heavily present in 01, as were the seeds of dubstep and the 4 on the floor revolution. "battle of the mc's", "envy", etc were all sort of the almost hiphop tracks over a tough garage beat.

"In fact, 4X4 garage wasn't suddenly revived in 2001, this was happening in 2000 as well - remember tunes like Zack Toms' "Bring Me Down", Wideboys' "Westside" and "Stand & Deliver", Dominic B's "Going Round"... As for Tuff Jam, did they ever really change their sound from speed garage in the first place? Matt Lamont didn't even really start making 2-step beats until 2001! And his best 4X4 stuff from 2001/2002 was with El-B!"

yeah, the El-Tuff stuff (which was what i meant when i said "tuff jam", crack rules) was super ill, but it was definitely part of a larger movement towards that sound. i guess none of these subgenres was really established in 01, but that was when the initial tensions that led to their separation really began.

"Not to mention the fact that the 4X4 was revived in the hard 'n' dark end of the scene as well - DJ Narrows for example, and let's not forget Blazing Squad's first hit before they became a boy band (esp. great with Elephant Man on the vocals)."

sure, narrows and stuff like some of the 4 on the floor harry lime stuff was on the darkside, but i think they were kind of on the very fringes of what would be the usual "2-step scene" in general, even though some of the tunes crossed over ("grouch", "saved soul", etc) into the more mainstream 2-step world.

"So yeah there was a rise in 4/4 stuff around this time, but I think this development was more about a general nostalgia for speed garage (in both its soulful and ruff forms) than a desire to gentrify 2-step.

-- Tim F"

the thing that i think differentiates the 4 on the floor stuff from speed garage is the basslines, the 01 era stuff didnt have the dread bass lines almost at all, it was much more bouncy and house oriented. i dont think it was an effort to "gentrify" 2-step, on the contrary it was more like a "going back to our roots to rediscover our identity" movement.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"the thing i don't get about pipecock is its not just that he's saying "the best way to understand art is as an expression of an artist" but that "the ONLY way to understand art is as an expression of the artist," like he seems totally unaware that there is an art to reception

-- deej"

but the reception is where all the flaws in the communication come in. if you enjoy trying to converse with someone in a foreign language without understanding what theyre saying just because it sounds nice to your ears, i guess that works for you. i prefer to understand the language.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

that only works if you conceive of music as a method of communication

max, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

or as a language w/ a relatively fixed syntax and semantics and etc etc etc

or that you can't understand english and yet have no clue what someone is saying (cf pipecock)

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, can undersand english

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha yeah srsly pipecock you are about the last person in the world who should be lecturing anyone on "communication"

max, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

"that only works if you conceive of music as a method of communication

-- max"

hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

"or as a language w/ a relatively fixed syntax and semantics and etc etc etc

or that you can't understand english and yet have no clue what someone is saying (cf pipecock)

-- moonship journey to baja"

it is not fixed in any way, thats why it is not easy!

you guys would be funny if you weren't so stupid.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, pretending you're smart/condescending doesnt make it so

deej, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"sorry, pretending you're smart/condescending doesnt make it so

-- deej"

maybe i can pretend to be a cool ilxor type who doesnt know shit, then everyone would like me? hahahahahahaha. really, i cant believe some of the things that people say. music is not a form of communication? come on, that is literally the most retarded thing ive ever heard anyone say on any music forum ever, and that is saying a lot. how can you possibly be that retarded? how?

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

sigh.

max, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

"sigh.

-- max"

is trying to use your brain making you tired? you might wanna go ahead and give up, i dont think it will do any good.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

"flaws in the reception"

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

""flaws in the reception"

-- moonship journey to baja"

there are some serious flaws in your reception of basically everything from what i can tell, i guess it shouldnt be surprising that it would extend to music.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

You are a bot, right?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

"You are a bot, right?

-- Ned Raggett"

yeah a "you guys are fucking stupid" bot.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

im trying to stay on your level so you can actually understand the pictures i post!

http://www.sakebomb.com/news/images/jeffandshit.jpg

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Or you can't actually think of anything more sophisticated than balls and shit because you're a backward farmhand?

jim, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm pretty sure deej is talking about me

;_:

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm pretty sure deej is talking about me ilx

deej, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

We are all ilx.

http://www.allhatnocattle.net/Hands%20Joining%20the%20World1.jpg

jim, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

* Go to Google Images
* type in : burial untrue review
without quotes
* look at first pic

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The source of that pic is far more serious and completely out of context (just based on the pic name), despite it being used by a blogger to just go "pitchfork be dry lol"

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

ilm was always going to implode like this

whatever, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

"Or you can't actually think of anything more sophisticated than balls and shit because you're a backward farmhand?

-- jim"

yeah, thats probably it. i need to get out to milking your mom, now.

pipecock, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www2.b3ta.com/images/tailpipe.jpg

John Justen, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

goddamn it. i swear i only think "tailpipe.jpg? wtf is that" when i'm at work

deej, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

dude has a look on his face. neither satisfied nor unsatisfied.

whatever, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

xD

W4LTER, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

"The sound that I’m focused on is more, you know, when you come out of a club and there’s that echo in your head of the music you just heard…I love that music, but I can’t make that club sort of stuff…but I can try and make the afterglow of that music."]

so i put this on again today in honor of the thread and seriously it just sounds like vintage 2step w/ an extra layer of distortion and crackle. and some woodblocks, whoo. i can't believe we had this enormous meltdown over such an ordinary album (pretty, even very pretty, but very pretty is par for the course for most 00-01 2step).

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

but on second look tis a fake exhaust pipe.

whatever, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I reckon the Cyrus album is better than Untrue.

yeah i'm feeling it eh, but only in a mashup style with some other shit over the top otherwise it just sounds underdone, like wheres the rest of it ???

it sounds very now, in relation to the "scene" whereas burial is either on some future shit or past shit...

...like if burial had of come out about 2001 it would have been massive if only to counter the light fluffiness of 2 step back then and maybe got a bit more mileage out of the genre

actually nah, on second thought, theres not much future in burials music which is also why no one really want to go down that particular cul de sac...

...if anything he's limited himself to his trademark sound so you pretty much know what to expect in the future from him

of course if he came out and went mainstream it would give him more scope but if i were him i'd just create another entity for anything too radically different and keep burial underground ...

what do people think of the skull disco comp?

...not enuff cowbell !!!

pollywog, Thursday, 22 November 2007 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I just heard a couple burial tracks for the first time and I'm really surprised at how much people are going ape for this. It sounds straight outta 1998, when trip hop, drum n bass, and goddamn illbient were all swirling around in the air. I'm not sure why, ten years later, it's suddenly interesting.

pgwp, Thursday, 22 November 2007 01:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not sure why, ten years later, it's suddenly interesting.

...because he's anonymous and kode9 is pushing it

pollywog, Thursday, 22 November 2007 01:24 (sixteen years ago) link

this would actually go really great with some illbient

mh, Thursday, 22 November 2007 01:29 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.