the most important election of your lifetime: 2012 american general election thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5607 of them)

Have there been any past instances of an entire political party just deciding to shamelessly shill for a private corporation? Maybe they should declare FedEx Appreciation Day and every right winger will have to spend $20 to send their mail.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 3 August 2012 14:15 (eleven years ago) link

Of course politicians are bought and paid for by private corporations all the time. I mean for consumer-level products, the "Here's a picture of me buying this product and loving it! If you are a real American you will do the same!"

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 3 August 2012 14:17 (eleven years ago) link

if people had to spend $20 to send mail the USPS wouldn't be in such bad shape

k3vin k., Friday, 3 August 2012 14:18 (eleven years ago) link

Does FedEx deliver gay packages?

Moodles, Friday, 3 August 2012 14:18 (eleven years ago) link

everytime I see his name, I pray he's gone back to his important work on baseball.

Why, what's he done wrong?

Your sweet bippy is going to hell (WmC), Friday, 3 August 2012 14:18 (eleven years ago) link

Incurred the wrath of morbz, to begin with

sive gallus et mulier (Michael White), Friday, 3 August 2012 14:46 (eleven years ago) link

The jobs report is about what was forecasted yesterday--and, as iatee pointed out, the unemployment rate edged up because more people re-entered the labour force.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/03/in-july-jobs-report-something-for-everyone/

Last time, the Republicans seized on the fact that whatever the unemployment rate was, it was actually much worse because of all the people who'd given up looking for a job and weren't counted. I'm guessing they will not point out this time that the increase is deceptive because people have resumed looking. It goes on.

clemenza, Friday, 3 August 2012 14:54 (eleven years ago) link

Adult film star Jenna Jameson. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)
Filed Under

Entertainment, News, Politics, Syndicated Local
Related Tags

Barack Obama, Election, Government, Jenna Jameson, Mitt Romeny, politics, Porn Star, San Francisco
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) – Porn star Jenna Jameson chose a familiar stage to make her endorsement for the 2012 presidential election Thursday night. At a San Francisco strip club, the former adult actress and stage performer said she was ready for a Romney presidency.

“I’m very looking forward to a Republican being back in office,” Jameson said while sipping champagne in a VIP room at Gold Club in the city’s South of Market neighborhood. “When you’re rich, you want a Republican in office.”

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 August 2012 17:35 (eleven years ago) link

Ron Jeremy endorsed Barack tho

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 3 August 2012 17:37 (eleven years ago) link

man I miss those old Gold Club billboards

giallo pudding pops (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 August 2012 17:37 (eleven years ago) link

all this sound n fury re job reports and gdp reports and other reports is a bit misplaced imho, while how people feel abt jobs the economy and other things is super important to the election i really dont think these reports are the same thing as how people feel, especially since there are a million different ones all the time

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

what matters is how Victor Davis Hanson feels.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 18:29 (eleven years ago) link

will only officially be a huge deal if the number is negative. people are too stupid to parse all these numbers. especially since the real unemployment/underemployment/u6 number is always ignored anyway.

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 3 August 2012 18:29 (eleven years ago) link

no individual number is important, trends are tho

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 18:30 (eleven years ago) link

and fwiw i dont really think having little interest in parsing each unemployment number is really a stupid approach

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 18:31 (eleven years ago) link

It's not that people are too stupid – it's who cares? What matters is whether I or someone I know is unemployed.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 18:31 (eleven years ago) link

if its someone who i hate thats unemployed then for sure the president is getting my vote

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link

will only officially be a huge deal if the number is negative

Agree. If the array of monthly numbers lurches along as is, Romney's ineptitude and taxes and all the rest will remain front and center.

clemenza, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:00 (eleven years ago) link

the numbers have been basically treading water forever which is fine for obama, tho not actually fine irl

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

re washingtons indifference to mass unemployment http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/08/why-washington-accepts-mass-unemployment.html

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:03 (eleven years ago) link

God, I would let Joe Biden eat my non-essential organs if it meant that 2% of the defense budget would be transferred to building fast trains and fast internet infrastructure for the next decade.

"Pffft" --buddha (silby), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:05 (eleven years ago) link

is that a thing Joe Biden does?

keeping things contextual (DJP), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:06 (eleven years ago) link

well you never know until you ask

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:07 (eleven years ago) link

idk I'm just saying, I don't really have a lot else to offer, my money and my vote wouldn't mean much in the scheme of things, but if Joe Biden hungers for human kidneys I have an extra one xpx

"Pffft" --buddha (silby), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:08 (eleven years ago) link

appendix too, u dont need that right

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:08 (eleven years ago) link

basically treading water forever

Take a look at Gallup's approval rating starting in about December 2009--except for one noticably bad patch a year ago, it's practically a flat line.

clemenza, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:08 (eleven years ago) link

ya its all sort of odd

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:10 (eleven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/XhShZ.png

its funny how romney had to come out and say this, what a world

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:13 (eleven years ago) link

It's interesting looking at the approval ratings for all the post-war presidents:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx

The most volatile seem to be Bush I and Carter. Reagan's is quite steady through two full terms. Nixon's steady, then, surprise, falls off a cliff. LBJ is one long decline. With Obama, it's like the people who talked themselves into giving him a chance bailed after a year, and hardly anyone's changed his mind since.

clemenza, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:18 (eleven years ago) link

its funny how romney had to come out and say this, what a world

Romney takin the bait there

his incompetence as a candidate is kind of breathtaking

giallo pudding pops (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:38 (eleven years ago) link

he's pretty firmly on the Dukakis/Kerry end of the scale

giallo pudding pops (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:39 (eleven years ago) link

MA hasn't been able to generate a good Presidential politician since the Kennedy assassinations

keeping things contextual (DJP), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:40 (eleven years ago) link

more http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/08/job_growth_s_been_stalled_for_18_months_and_nobody_s_doing_anything_about_it_.html

― lag∞n, Friday, August 3, 2012 2:07 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i only skimmed this quickly, but it seems like in asking the question Yg isn't willing to 'go there' and say why.

frankly i think the investor/owner/banker class (and the fed governors whose mental world almost entirely overlaps with them) have political motivations. there is mountains of sidelined cash and no meaningful capital investment. the fed has a bunch of tricks that remain unpulled, even as it makes a mockery of half of its dual mandate. why? the answer sort of comes out as "idk, the time just isn't right." what's, uh, unique about this particular time?

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:42 (eleven years ago) link

we've got a world historical drought going, harvests in the fall are going to be dire and food prices are going to go haywire. the last rounds of QE had the effect of increasing commodity prices (for reasons i don't quite get tbh) so it's another good excuse to do nothing.

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:45 (eleven years ago) link

no doubt that sounds conspiratorial but jesus you have outright lunatics being taken seriously as interpreters of our political economy. that guy getting jonah goldberg's email might be flipping through resumes next, feel me?

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:46 (eleven years ago) link

I don't know if it has to be a conscious-level conspiracy but I think the fed is prob a little too isolated from the suffering of long-term unemployed ppl. the interest groups who have the most to gain are pretty far from political sphere. its as true in health care as monetary policy.

iatee, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:48 (eleven years ago) link

from the political sphere

iatee, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:49 (eleven years ago) link

ie old people and rich people both hate inflation and think our health care system is great

iatee, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:50 (eleven years ago) link

or Romney can listen to Mark Steyn:

Re: Put Up or Shut Up

By Mark Steyn

Sorry, Katrina, that Romney response seems weak tea to me. For a start, what’s with all the “Harry this” and “Harry that” stuff? Why maintain a pretense of cozy clubbability when some slug’s defaming you? He should call him “Reid”, and with a curled lip. Mitt is Mister Cautious, and I can understand that to a degree when you’re dealing with Obama and everything you say risks shrieks of “Racist!”, but if you can’t be rude about a seedy, unloved, timeserving hack like Reid, who can you be rude about?

can't wait for Romney's curled lip to scare Dems into voting for him.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:50 (eleven years ago) link

It's interesting looking at the approval ratings for all the post-war presidents

dang folks really did Like Ike

it's smdh time in America (will), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:51 (eleven years ago) link

have you guys read any good journalism in recent years on the Fed?

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:53 (eleven years ago) link

"seedy, unloved, timeserving hack" true enough but he came through your shitstorm with a smile didn't he

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:53 (eleven years ago) link

political reporters for obvious reasons shroud it in mystery.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:53 (eleven years ago) link

have you guys read any good journalism in recent years on the Fed?

― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, August 3, 2012 3:53 PM (8 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well there was this one macro i saw on facebook

lag∞n, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:54 (eleven years ago) link

alfred you could try to follow some of the dissident finance blogs but it's hard going and i never know who is batshit, frankly.

yves smith, but she's kind of more-greenwald-than-greenwald as a writer

zerohedge is a little too ron pauly but i think hoos reps for them?

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:55 (eleven years ago) link

treading water

All the invest bankers and traders at my work, regardless of party affiliation, feel like nothing major's going to happen until after the election; the rich and the corps w/stagnant capital aren't going to undo their purse strings until they know what's what.

sive gallus et mulier (Michael White), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:55 (eleven years ago) link

alfred you could try to follow some of the dissident finance blogs but it's hard going and i never know who is batshit, frankly

this is the problem

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 August 2012 19:56 (eleven years ago) link

i read ritholtz but i follow so little of it i don't know why i bother.

it's like, finance shit i don't get, left-field analysis i don't get, old meme, dadrock, car porn, finance shit i don't get, bizarre political analysis, etc.

goole, Friday, 3 August 2012 19:58 (eleven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.