The American Smiths

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (183 of them)
chuck klosterman makes a morrissey-axl comparison in Fargo Rock City too, but his take on it is that axl spoke for smalltown american kids as morrissey spoke for closeted gay kids - that they each brought a certian sensibility into engagement with the broader culture and captured the imagination of people beyond hayseeds and fags respectively. I think the mo=gay icon equation is a bit reductive, but I do think there is something to the idea of both of them as caricatures of identifiable types who were successful because they were too complex and singular as individuals to really fit those caricatures.

Fritz, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Eminem is the American Smiths.

anonymous in case you laugh at her, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Both certainly get notice for their hairstyles.

I have to possibly revamp my Weezer judgment a bit if only because I just saw a brilliant e-mail handle: "Motley84 = Weezer02"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

No way can you say Guns n Roses in the same line as The Smiths. Guns n Roses were a band that weren't interested in the fans or the songs - just in getting their dicks sucked and making lots of $$$$ from awful radio friendly rock songs. That why they've been largely forgotten, no one really rates them as a band. Their albums are never mentioned when 'great albums of all time' come up. They are seen as a flash in the pan that some 11 year olds liked until they discovered something better in the early 90s (Nirvana).

Guns n Roses have nothing in common with The Smiths. Morrissey and co. were the finest band that ever existed and their fan base is dedicated beyond comparison and the influence of The Smiths is huge. Plus, and most importantly, what was being said and the way it was being said was new, unique and utterly brilliant.

I don't think REM come close to The Smiths either. I don't think there can be an American Smiths or a British Smiths.

I guess The Strokes are sorta like Menswear or Elastica. Spotty posh kids with some a few corking tunes, but God knows how long they'll last. I think they'll be around for a while due to their richass parents though.

Calum Robert, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

http://www.dragondata.com/~mich/yabb/YaBBImages/s14shakehead.gif

Melissa W, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(at Calum)

Melissa W, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Calum what exactly is with your weird and usually quite unrealistic caricatures of any rock band ever to chart in the US? The first paragraph of your post consists mostly of statements that are actually provably untrue, especially as it goes on. The Nirvana thing is particularly egregious, insofar as in retrospect, the historical function of G'n'R appears to be as a bridge between hair-metal and grunge: it's incredibly striking all these years on what a fulcrum they were in that regard.

If we're talking place-in-culture I think the mostly-awful Klosterman book nevertheless pegs something: G'n'R and the Smiths both related to their audiences in a particular and similar sort of way, but what they were relating and to whom were, at the time, almost diametrically opposed.

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't think REM come close to The Smiths either.
Well, in a way they *do* have two things in common. 1) They were the mainstream entry-point for their countries alt.pop and 2) They showed that not everyone from "'round those parts" could be classy and smart. The Smiths proved that post-punk wasn't just angry skinheads yelling "Oi Oi Oi!" and REM showed that not all musicians from down south were beer-swilling redneck Allman Bros-wannabes. And they were sensitive while they did it. The more I think about it, Stipe fills the same niche as Morrissey: Anguished sadsack artist from a small town. A male version of Harriet Wheeler.

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(And since middle-school-me pledged absolute loyalty to the Smiths camp in that opposition, deciding whether or not to call G'n'R "the American Smiths" means deciding whether or not I want to conclude that the UK = good and the US = bad: adolescent musical-identity absolutism is kicking into gear, quite appropriately as adolescent musical-identity absolutism is precisely what makes comparisons between the bands viable.)

(How would we separate the outsiderism of both Axl and Moz? Axl's was the outsiderism of being inside, of being typical and thus anonymous, and it was the outsiderism of entry, of proving worth and breaking from anonymity by "taking over." Moz's outsiderism was the outsiderism of difference, an outsiderism that theoretically linked all the different into a viable and separate community.)

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

And yeah, I'm still with Custos on the REM. This was precisely what I was saying in the REM vs. Smiths thread, that they were essentially the same band except REM had very American (and rural) qualities as opposed to the very British (and very cosmopolitan) Smiths. Open- ended versus rigorously stagey, goof humor versus mordant humor, "friendly" versus "clever" ... it goes on and on.

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Look, I'm not even entering into this. I was on another music forum a while ago and someone mentioned Guns n Roses. They got the attack they deserved from a bunch of Stone Roses and Smiths fans.

The difference is enormous and the two have nothing in common. Guns n Roses = bad stadium band, largely seen as a joke.

The Smiths = most important British band of the past 20 years.

Maybe you need to be American to see something in common, but as a British (Scottish) person at the time of the early 90s I can ASSURE you the kids who liked Guns n Roses were denying all knowledge of having any such CD in their collection as they hit puberty and, yes, discovered Nirvana.

Calum Robert, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Whatever. G&R rock.

Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually Calum maybe you need to know anything at all about Guns'n'Roses to debate the connections: anyhow in a thread questioning who might be "the American Smiths" the opinions of Scottish pre-teens aren't particularly relevant. And I'm not arguing that Nirvana and grunge in general didn't pull off most of G'n'R's audience in their moment of weakness -- only that in retrospect it's blindingly clear how much smaller the difference between the two was than it seemed at the time. Also once again Calum your arguments would be more compelling if they were (a) actually arguments and (b) showed any evidence of having read whatever posts you're arguing against (or anyway think you're arguing against, seeing as you rarely appear to have read them well enough to know yourself).

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(NB by "Scottish pre-teens" I mean not you but whatever cultural disowning of G'n'R you posit happening around you -- not that plenty of the same thing didn't happen here in the US.) (I assume you personally are at least 13, although I wouldn't be incredibly shocked if I were wrong.)

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

...I can ASSURE you the kids who liked Guns n Roses were denying all knowledge of having any such CD in their collection as they hit puberty and, yes, discovered Nirvana.
Not true. Theres not shame in owning Appetite for Destruction, but its considered to be horribly gauche to own any of their other albums.
Even my most Indiekid intensive friends feel no shame about the first GnR record. "It fits nicely between Jon Spencer Blues Explosion and Redd Kross" they'd day without a trace of irony.
Sure, G'n'R were a stadium rock metal band, but they were a VERY GOOD stadium rock metal band. In the 80s only Metallica (and possibly Megadeth, Anthrax or Slayer) could be considered to be their artistic equals in the genre, with all other stadium metal bands a distant distant 3rd place.
After hearing a bunch of Bon Jovi crud for 5 years, Appetite for Destruction was a breath of fresh ait. Trust me, Calum, that record is much better than you remember.

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Granted, owning a Y&T record was considered to be in horribly bad taste and owning a Poison or Motley Crue record is still considered a hanging crime.

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh and speaking of the Klosterman book his example-person for Smiths fans as gay -- a friend of his whose opinions on the matter of briefly paraphrased -- is also Indian, which I think Klosterman desperately misses the importance of: the Smiths' draw among American suburban Indians, east-Asians, and immigrants of really all sorts (including me) was incredible. (I'm not certain whether Moz's popularity among Latinos functions in the same way but it seems likely enough.) See above post w/r/t the "outsiderness" of being "inside" versus "outside" -- I assume the connection everyone's trying to draw is Axl as the straight-white-boy Moz.

nabisco%%, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

nirvana were the scottish REM

mark s, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

ha ha ha ha ha

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Uh...waitasec...then whose the Scottish Nirvana?

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

stone temple pilots

mark s, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh. where i said earlier: "and 2) They showed that not everyone from "'round those parts" could be classy and smart." I mean't to a say and 2) They showed that some folks from 'round those parts could be classy and smart."

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

...the Smiths' draw among American suburban Indians..."
That was until Moz wrote a mean-spirited song called "Redskins in Platforms."

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Begone foul Italics

Lord Custos III, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Another datapoint: I am an American, suburban Indian who'd never heard of the Smiths until well after buying Appetite for Destruction. I will admit though, that I listened to metal and rap partly to rebel against the suburban asians' typical taste for fey modern rock. I hated these people and I hated their music (my elementary school was mostly hispanic and most of the kids there assumed I was too; I didn't meet any of these asians until middle school and never understood them even though their fathers were all engineers like mine and they all lived near me). Nirvana and Sonic Youth changed my life and I got rid of Appetite for Destruction, only to download it many, many years later. I have since formatted my hard drive. Ladies and gentlemen, I am a Husker Du album.

Kris, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes, but which album?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've only heard Metal Circus, and that's not it, so one of the other ones.

Kris, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Stadium rock really isn't my thing at all - especialy when it is accompanied by bad hair and truly awful songs. Can't say I ever liked Guns n Roses - especally that awful one that had the video in the church and a big long pompous guitar solo. 'November Rain' - that's it. Oh the (unwelcome) memories come flooding back.

Maybe they were welcome in the American music climate at the time, but we had The Stone Roses, Morrissey and The Happy Mondays to brigthen up the charts back then.

I will say this as well - The Manics are not best suited to be compared to Guns n Roses either. A far better band that changed lives and kicked ass on stage. When they were good at least, but that's another thread surely!?!?

Calum Robert, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

you don't think Gun 'n Roses changed any lives?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

They had as much impact on America as (I assume) the Manics had on the UK.

Lord Custos IV (, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think, perhaps, that Pavement, while they were rolling artistically from 92 to 95 were the closest thing the US has had to The Smiths. Well, other than R.E.M. from 83 to 88. Malkmus as a West Coast Morrissey/Marr hybrid... that's a funny thought.

Tim DiGravina, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Good God, most of the Indians - and nearly all the ones who were proud of being so - at my high school were into hip-hop ("nice hip- hop not rap" one explained to me once), bhangra, and R & B.

sundar subramanian, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, I think it's sort of a cross between what Kris and Sundar said - it seemed to me that some were into mainstream 'modern rock' mainly, the rest into hiphop and bhangra. My little brother (who is 20 and is president of his university's south asian students assoc., haha) is a good example of this. I tried to turn him onto other music once - it didn't work so hot - "Ew, that's weird, I don't want to be weird!" he said! We bond over a lot of hiphop, tho, so it's all good.

geeta, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Ew, that's weird, I don't want to be weird!"

Your brother scares me.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

he scares me too!!! (do you SEE??!)

geeta, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Replacements were a bit Smiths-ish, don't you think? Not as much as REM, though.

Arthur, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

the smithereens

Senor Pulpo, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

the ramones
the melvins
the simpsons

mark s, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

the simpsons

We have a winner!

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sure, G'n'R were a stadium rock metal band, but they were a VERY GOOD stadium rock metal band.

Definitely. In the same league as Def Leppard, Van Halen, Bon Jovi, AC/DC and Queen. Stadium rock/hardrock.

In the 80s only Metallica (and possibly Megadeth, Anthrax or Slayer) could be considered to be their artistic equals in the genre, with all other stadium metal bands a distant distant 3rd place.

That's a whole different genre (Speed/Thrash) altogether, both in terms of music (use of classical melodies and percussive riffing versus pentatonic blues-based 70's rock 'n roll) and audience. The only overlap in audience came in 1990 when Metallica released their rock album. And where does this leave the German triumvirate Sodom/Kreator/Destruction, or Testament, who were equally popular/influential in that '82-'89 period?

Putting G'n R in the same genre as Metallica is a bit like comparing Sade with John Coltrane.

Siegbran Hetteson, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Definitely. In the same league as Def Leppard, Van Halen, Bon Jovi, AC/DC and Queen. Stadium rock/hardrock."

Sorry but this is the funniest thing I've ever read. Are you American by any chance?

Calum Robert, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

actual funniest thing ever heard

axl rose, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

No offense to any of the Brit contingent of ILM - but calum you're behaving like a cartoon stereotype of a smug superior snobby englishman. what do you do, walk around with a union jack tea cozy on your head? really, why do you bother to make comments about music you know nothing about & that you consider beneath your contempt? you add nothing to the discussion but tired cliches.

fritz, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes of course I do. Only, erm, I'm Scottish actually. Now who's not reading threads properly?

Nor am I actually slagging of yanks, although I did have the experience of living with three culturally/ socially inept ones (2 from Texas) a short while ago. That was in England, actually, and they were seen as twats. Although that isn't neccessarily cos they are American.

Point is - Americans do tend to like really crap stadium rock. Some Brits lap it up as well. Just America seems more guity.

That other thread is indeed really funny - I imagine the chap who wrote that is a handsome, sexy and highly intelligent individual.

Calum Robert, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

oasis = crap stadium rock

fritz, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

but that's neither here nor there, point is - you speak in cliches and received wisdom: EVERYBODY KNOWS the Smiths are great, brilliant, life-changing; EVERYBODY KNOWS that Guns and Roses are tacky American trash. NOBODY mentions Guns N Roses in greatest albums of all time lists! (which is both inaccurate and irrelevent, by the way. they do, but who cares.) You don't even bother explaining why you feel the way you do or whether you really feel anything at all. You're entitled to your opinion, it just doesn't seem as if you have one of your own.

fritz, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

GnR as the american Smiths, gimme a break. They sound nothing alike, completely different audiences, different levels of mass success, etc. Maybe you can make a slight comparison between more esoteric aspects like fan devotion, outsider appeal, etc. But I could never think of GnR as the american smiths. GnR might have been the American Oasis. There really isn't any american Smiths, either now or during the Smiths era, maybe Magnetic Fields is the closest thing. The problem with the REM comparison is I don't stipe made anywhere near the emotional connection with his listeners as Morrissey did, lyrically speaking.

g, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

anyway...

i still haven't had chance to read that piece upthread, i'm going to print it off and read it on the tube on the way home. but i have a feeling there is something about new york dolls, and both bands seeming connection to glam and punk, that only partially comes out in their music, but is certainly more than hinted at. i definitely think there is something to this, and i'd like to try and work it out a bit more - ok, off to read the piece now!

gareth, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"guns and roses are the american smiths" is too simplistic, but there are a number of interesting parallels esp. mo n' axl: they both drew on the jagger/richards dynamic of fey, vaguely androgynous lead singer + doped up guitar god; both informed by their own interpretations of NY Dolls-inspired campiness; both had public moments of weird ambivalence about immigration (gnr: One In a Million/mo: National Front Disco etc.); this & the fact that they both draped themselves in flags - maybe evidence of some deeply conservative impulse; both gave good liberal-baiting interviews; both aging away in LA, sitting on finished records we may never hear.

fritz, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

My little brother (who is 20 and is president of his university's south asian students assoc., haha) is a good example of this. I tried to turn him onto other music once - it didn't work so hot - "Ew, that's weird, I don't want to be weird!" he said! We bond over a lot of hiphop, tho, so it's all good.

Ha ha apparently we share a brother (mine was the treasurer, and he embezzeled a bunch of money to pay for private parties and satellite pirating equipment), though I'd never think of trying to turn him onto anything "weird" except drugs. I took him to this britpop club once and he was baffled by the fact that the girl he was hitting on the whole time turned out to be a lesbian. I think if I were a few years younger, I might have been into the bhangra/hip hop scene too, but I think I just preceded it.

Kris, Thursday, 27 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Blue Oyster Cult.

in a better world, perhaps

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago) link

there was the whole "wrapping himself in a Union Jack in front of a large crowd of skinheads" incident to add to Moz's record too.

good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:28 (twelve years ago) link

'Skinheads' or Morrissey fans?

Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago) link

it was a Madness concert in the early 90s, in Finsbury Park. The way the NME painted it, there were a lot of NF types there.

good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago) link

Right. Far be it for me to defend Morrissey (there's a first time for everything) but it's hardly his fault if some other band's fans contain a few fascists.

Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link

Suggs from Madness was like best friends with the dude from Skrewdriver right? I thought Madness had a lot of ties to WP skinhead stuff under the surface

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago) link

xp But to then wrap oneself in the flag, in the full knowledge of the type of audience you're in front of, seems ill-advised at best, and extremely dodgy at worst.

good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago) link

Suggs from Madness was like best friends with the dude from Skrewdriver right? I thought Madness had a lot of ties to WP skinhead stuff under the surface

Well, there was a rumour that he'd been friends with a guy from Skrewdriver, not the main guy, but who knows? And a lot of Madness' early fans were skinheads so, given that scene at the time, it's likely there were a few wrong 'uns among them.

Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago) link

i'm not gonna post stuff from skrewdriver bio sites, but anyway i found a bunch of wiki stuff that said suggs worked as a roadie for skrewdriver and when suggs moved out to his own house the ian main dude took his old room and lived with sugg's mom in her house for a while

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago) link

(i guess that was "stuff" i meant links)

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago) link

Wow.

"Sorry to bother you, Mrs McPherson, but do you think could you turn down that recording of Hitler's address to the Reichstag please? I can't hear what Shaw Taylor's saying on Police 5."

"Oh sorry love, that's the lodger, what's he like? He does love 'is Adolf, bless 'im!"

Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago) link

By the way, from Shaw Taylor's wiki page:

Taylor was a boyhood friend of the writer Anthony Burgess, who published his novella A Clockwork Orange in 1962, the same year Police 5 was first broadcast. The novella's central character - Alexander the Large - was said to be loosely based on Taylor, who was interested in violent crime from a very early age and also had a rare gift for the English language, as demonstrated by his "Keep 'em peeled" catchphrase.

... this is surely bollocks? Taylor is from Hackney and Burgess was a Manc for starters.

Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 17:08 (twelve years ago) link

eight years pass...

If it hadn't already been done to death, I'd have launched a Smiths website. But too many already. So I decided instead to launch a website around the music of two other great songwriters - Cathal Coughlan and Sean O'Hagan. On https://coughlanohagan.com/, I think I'm building up something worthwhile. Hope you enjoy it.

weirwrite, Saturday, 23 May 2020 06:52 (three years ago) link

I'd think American Music Club might fit the bill. Arch self deprecating lyricist over classic melodic rock though there's a lot more country in it alongside Nick Drake and stuff.
Singer even came out of the closet later but is thankfully not a rabid patriot or xenophobe.

Stevolende, Saturday, 23 May 2020 07:01 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.