People who insist that they hate the Beatles - C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (193 of them)
what about well-known yet underground musicians who claim in interviews that their favourite band is the beatles but then change and say, 'no, i meant led zep' ,in the same interview - c/d?

Clare (not entirely unhappy), Thursday, 2 October 2003 11:57 (twenty years ago) link

Isn't hating a band because of their popularity and not their music the epitome of rockism?

NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 2 October 2003 11:58 (twenty years ago) link

I think that if your tastes in music include tuneful pop songs then you will probably like at least something the Beatles did. But there are lots of bands I can say that about. I don't think for instance that if I was to suggest that everyone who hates ABBA is a poser there would be much general agreement: there isn't the kind of 'b-b-b-but you can't hate them' reaction that there is with the Beatles.

PF I think you've misread me. I was saying that people who like everything the Beatles did are mentalists, not that you had to like everything they did to like them. I like them and I think they made some quite bad records.

The mythology/context thing cuts both ways. Some people hate the Beatles because of what they have come to stand for critically, yes - these people can't listen to the records 'objectively' but who can or would want to listen to any records 'objectively'. But lots of people who love the Beatles love them because of the idea of what they achieved and what they were first to do - surely as valid/invalid a reason as hating them because of context.

If the Beatles' records have a certain 'Beatlish' quality (I'm not sure they do, I don't know all of them) which makes people like them then surely other people might dislike that quality too.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:00 (twenty years ago) link

Didn't Carla Bley say that the beatles was her fave group after she collaborated with Brotzmann? That would be quite funny to hear.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:03 (twenty years ago) link

I can't wait for Dave Stelfox to post on this thread...

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

You're right Tom, personally though I think I could probably enjoy Beatles records, I think I could enjoy lots of records if I tried hard enough, I just really don't want to and don't feel it would be right. So hating a band on a point of principle, yeah sort of silly. But defending a band on the basis of their achievements and their being the first etc etc is far more the stuff of cliche.

People who dislike the mythology of the Beatles could well be Beatles fans, I think I'd be wary of anyone who bought into it really.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

Only listening to things "objectively" is a dud though, isn't it? the mythology is what makes it fun...

Contra-dick-shun time:

I have like 10 Beatles albums but never listen to any, however. There's too much baggage there for me to even casually enjoy them without feeling the iceberg of their history-legacy breathing down on my neck, making me pressured to feel as if I should pay more attention to the lyrics/music/whatever, since its so "important." Listening to the Beatles is a ponderous task these days - shame on the mythologers!!

Vic (Vic), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

Free-thinking folks not constrained by the tastes of society or ignorant losers with no sense of history and a need to show how "unique" they are?


Also this is kind of off, the Beatles are not the tastes of society anymore. They are a historical event recorded in a specific way, over and over again.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:16 (twenty years ago) link

The cult surrounding the Beatles annoys me considerably less than it did at the height of Oasis and Britpop and all then, when you couldn't walk down the street without the Beatles being thrust in your face. But I always liked a lot of the music (not the granny-friendly McCartney stuff though really).

Nowadays, though, you hardly ever hear about them, even in the music press its all Ramones and Velvet Underground and Television and so forth, which I suppose reflects the guitar music of its day just as the Beatles did in 1995-96. But does anyone out there (except possibly the Pinefox) really think they were the best band in the world ever? When was the last time any of you put their records on? Do the people out there really put Beatles records on as much as we are led to think they do?

I don't own any Beatles records... it feels like walking into a record shop and buying Revolver would be like admitting defeat, like admitting there's NOTHING else I want to buy in the entire shop. And it's a completely irrational feeling (like buying girl's drinks in the pub, heh heh).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:17 (twenty years ago) link

actually, i'm comfortable with people liking or disliking the beatles for whatever reason - because of their Importance, because they were the first blah blah - i'm just uncomfortable when people tell me there is something wrong or inadequate about me not listening to them that much - or making judgemnts about how much of a "music fan" i am if i don't listen to them that much.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:21 (twenty years ago) link

Define "society" Ronan... I mean, if you asked UK society as a whole I reckon there's a fair chance that the Beatles WOULD end up being the favourite band. But then UK society is comprised far more of yer Daily Mail readers than it is people who are into dancehall or house or The Strokes or whoever.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:22 (twenty years ago) link

the title of this thread sums up the attitude i dislike : it's "People who INSIST that they hate the Beatles - C or D?" not "People who hate the beatles..." It's as if any beatles hate must be a pose, and that we shouldn't take someone's word for it that they just don't like 'em that much (i actually implied the same thing with my first post)

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:32 (twenty years ago) link

As esoj pointed out in his very first post, the title of this thread and the question asked are both intentionally loaded, I didn't really think people would take this thread this seriously. If I had known this would be a "serious" thread, I would have tried to ask the question in a more even manner.

But part of the reason why I asked it that way is that when I've run into people that say they hate the Beatles, they say it in an insistent way, like they're trying to lure someone into an argument. It didn't even really come up in conversation, they just kind of said it.

NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 2 October 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't like the Beatles for years, then I saw Yellow Submarine. I didn't care for the movie but the songs were good or at elast different then their early crap.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 2 October 2003 13:51 (twenty years ago) link

i find a lot of Beatles lyrics too trite and off-putting as a result. on the other hand, i thought 'Free As A Bird' was alright, hahaha

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 2 October 2003 13:55 (twenty years ago) link

I think it's a good thread NA.

Matt I last put a Beatles record on on Wednesday. It was Abbey Road: I didn't enjoy it much.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:06 (twenty years ago) link

The PF is probably right, I think I did hate the Beatles once. I don't anymore, I'm more or less indifferent to them now.

A few years ago, as others have noted above, they seemed inescapable and the heavy rotation of their classics drove me crazy. I now find the Beatles thoroughly escapable and I have grown much more interested in actual 60s melodic pop (as opposed to 60s inflected melodic pop).

I quite like some of Revolver.

As PF says, maybe I'll work up a little hate in the future. It seems a bit pointless now.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:08 (twenty years ago) link

**But does anyone out there (except possibly the Pinefox) really think they were the best band in the world ever?**

I think one of the best 15 bands maybe. But I think most of the general public think that they're the best band ever.

**When was the last time any of you put their records on?**

Sunday - Anthology III to hear 'Come And Get It'. I ended up playing the whole of both CDs

**Do the people out there really put Beatles records on as much as we are led to think they do?**

Yes.

I don't think there's anything wrong with being suspicious of them because of the whole mythology, or anything wrong with trying them and not liking them. But I am quite staggered that so many folks here have such a *thing* about not even trying them out. Especially people with an ear for pop. I just don't understand it. Just grab a copy of Abbey Road/Revolver/Help/White Album - no-one will laugh at you, and it's not compulsory to buy the anthologies on DVD as well - just treat them like any other artist. For me,I admit I love them the mythology is optional; there are times when I've immersed myself in it, but mostly they're just *there* along with Abba, King Tubby, Chic, Joy Division, The Supremes..... all fucking great.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

But does anyone out there (except possibly the Pinefox) really think they were the best band in the world ever? When was the last time any of you put their records on? Do the people out there really put Beatles records on as much as we are led to think they do?

1. I do
2. Most weeks, I'm afraid
3. Why not?

freedom dupont, Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:18 (twenty years ago) link

I sold back all my Beatles CDs some time back when I realized I really never needed to hear them again, and hadn't actually listened to them in years upon years. In the late eighties the CD versions came out around the same time I got my first CD player, and I ended up with a slew of them and pretty well played them to death (alongside, IIRC, the Pet Shop Boys and Pink Floyd). I mp3d the discs before I sold them to be on the safe side, but I haven't felt the need to listen to them. They were there and the impact was had and I can't bring myself to hate but I can't feel much passion for 'em.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:20 (twenty years ago) link

Tom E, you originally said: "You should only start liking the Beatles after you've made sure you like the things that Beatles-lovers stereotypically hate."

This is different from what you then said, which was, um: "I was saying that people who like everything the Beatles did are mentalists, not that you had to like everything they did to like them."

I expect you can see the difference. But OK, it is not worth either of our precious times to bother about this point anymore. We both like the Beatles, anyway. Hooray.

I like the Doc's post too. And Tim H's, though he is saying something different.

the pinefox, Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:37 (twenty years ago) link

Ah, sorry, PF, I thought you were talking about something else I said.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:04 (twenty years ago) link

The myth overshadows the music *as much as you let it*. So don't let it. I mean you lot wouldn't NOT buy the new Basement Jaxx just because everyone's pissing their pants about it, would you?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

I probably would.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:15 (twenty years ago) link

(I'd probably not buy it, I mean. If everyone else seemed to be running off and buying it I'd be fairly sure I'd hear the thing anyway and would spend my money on something else.)

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:16 (twenty years ago) link

Matt, by society I meant THE CHARTS, is that wrong?

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:18 (twenty years ago) link

But lots of people who love the Beatles love them because of the idea of what they achieved and what they were first to do - surely as valid/invalid a reason as hating them because of context.

Let's take sides: is that a valid or an invalid opinion? It seems bogus to me, more or less because, listening to the Beatles while reading the I-Mac book a few years ago this was really how I heard them.
But the effects of the book wore off, and there was no emotional connexion with these songs left over. So: claiming to hate them is a bit much, but certainly not dud.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

I wouldn't buy it either way, doc.

the pinefox, Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

The Beatles were okay, I don't have any of their albums.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:40 (twenty years ago) link

They don't suck, exactly.
But they are very, very, very overrated.

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:41 (twenty years ago) link

Well, Ronan, "1" was the biggest selling album of the year it was released (2000 or 2001?).

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:49 (twenty years ago) link

The only Beatles CD I owned was the BBC sessions - all their early r'n'r covers and stuff. I listened to it non-stop playing Donkey Kong Country.

I still don't like much that they did, but the only Beatle I actively dislike (musically) is McCartney.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 2 October 2003 15:50 (twenty years ago) link

i used to think i'd never be able to listen to the beatles again: the two-year period where i listened to them pretty much all the time (approximately ages 14-15, the average age of most beatles fans these days i expect) pretty much ruined them for me for a few years. it was actually rereading "revolution in the head" (i was halfway through it when i heard about ian macdonald: this made reading the grim conclusion of the book a very eerie experience) that made me appreciate them again.

one reason i don't feel bad about being an unabashed beatles lover anymore is that people who say they hate the beatles tend to big up the stones. recently i realized that no matter how many stones songs i say i like (and i do like a lot) i could never LOVE them, for so many reasons (mainly that i find their myth/reputation far more irritating than the beatles' ever was), and i do love the beatles. i could sell all my beatles albums tomorrow and use the money to buy every stones record i don't have and this would be no less true.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 2 October 2003 16:05 (twenty years ago) link

Doc the difference is that the new Basement Jaxx hasn't been getting praised and mentions in primetime news periodically since I was born.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 2 October 2003 16:37 (twenty years ago) link

and that's a disgrace, it's so great!

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 2 October 2003 16:38 (twenty years ago) link

Is it okay if I just hate Paul McCartney?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 2 October 2003 16:49 (twenty years ago) link

Can I help you hate?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 October 2003 16:50 (twenty years ago) link

No way, man. "Silly Love Songs" rules.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 October 2003 17:54 (twenty years ago) link

people who say they hate the beatles tend to big up the stones

I don't hate the Beatles, but for me, it's the Beach Boys and the Kinks who I praise a lot more.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 October 2003 17:57 (twenty years ago) link

Justyn i love yooooooo....

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 2 October 2003 17:59 (twenty years ago) link

Were there any pop fans who hated the Beatles during the sixties?


Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 2 October 2003 20:08 (twenty years ago) link

Yuck, that was horribly put - I mean, did any pop fans or bands in the 1960s admit to hating the Beatles?

Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 2 October 2003 20:10 (twenty years ago) link

I'm quite convinced that The Beatles could be the best band ever; however, they are not my favourite band ever. We are sporadic in making this distinction.

I often find the Kinks to be wildly overrated. Although I like them, I think.

Ally C (Ally C), Thursday, 2 October 2003 20:43 (twenty years ago) link

best beatles album/the only beatles tape (or any format) i've ever owned:

anthology 2 (tape 2)

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

i'm sure some beatles fans would consider that a blasphemy equal to hate.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

Yuck, that was horribly put - I mean, did any pop fans or bands in the 1960s admit to hating the Beatles?

Who would dare, and risk getting trampled by hordes of indignant girls?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

No, Anthology 2 is pretty good. But did it have "And Your Bird Can Sing" on it, the one where they're all high and giggling?

Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:29 (twenty years ago) link

Cookie is right, at least sporadically.

the pinefox, Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:41 (twenty years ago) link

I should say that they were, once, my favourite band. However from about the age of 12 onwards it was a wholly unfair contest.

Ally C (Ally C), Thursday, 2 October 2003 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

I dislike the Beatles. I used to actively hate them. I think they're boring, but unlike anonymous shit, like elevator music, they also irritate me. They're the biggest cliche of bands that people have a passion for, and expect me to as well, and force me to hear it and hear them talk about it, but I don't want to. Well thats how I felt while first developing a taste for music I do like, anyways. Later on, I got into lots of bands that the Beatles meant something to, so I decided I had to go listen to more of their stuff. I did and I found some positive qualities- not all their stuff is as overplayed and irritating and cliched as the worst of it- they had songwriting talent- but there were lots more reasons to dislike them, like their personalities, politics and pretensions. So generally I still dislike them. They do have a few tunes I actually like, but I don't care enough to ever get anything by them.

sucka (sucka), Thursday, 2 October 2003 22:46 (twenty years ago) link

being familiar with www.ilxor.com means you know where all the Beatles haters are.

will, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

even so, I can go years and not hear a Beatles song and not feel incomplete or anything. Or I could, if such a thing were possible.

will, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

that's true...than I hear an obscurity like "All I Wanna Do" or "And Your Bird Can Sing" and remember.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Lennon apparently grew to hate hearing Beatles songs as they had bad associations for him (though he was proud of them).

I like the story of a flunky being despatched to find out who it was repeatedly playing Beatles records in the Dakota appartment block that was driving him mad.

Bob Six, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't like "Stairway," but it ain't no thang, y'know

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

But, really, the question comes down to: if you're a professional music critic how much older favorites do you have to time to hear? I'm always hearing laments on how that Sharrock, Miles, Aretha, or Eno album never gets the attention it deserves because there's simply too much new shit to assess. I've heard enough Beatles in my lifetime to never hear another note, yet will sing or marvel anew when a song plays on a jukebox or friend's car.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, there again: love me some Led Zep, can't stand "Stairway". Blame classic rock radio. And the 15-year-olds.

Deric W. Haircare, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred OTM for like 10 posts in a row.

Bob Standard, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

ten years pass...

Anthony Burgess, in an essay on Marshall McLuhan:

"His adoration of the Beatles (always, to me, an index of intellectual unsoundness) is based presumably on their having become priests of electronics."

Ward Fowler, Thursday, 16 August 2018 13:01 (five years ago) link

Typical jealous Manc.

Scottish Country Twerking (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 August 2018 13:31 (five years ago) link

let us all stand in awe of the intellectual giant who wrote the screenplay for jesus of nazareth

liberally social (darraghmac), Thursday, 16 August 2018 15:03 (five years ago) link

I like his work but yeah he does have the classic autodidact attitude problem. Looking forward to reading the Roger Lewis bio.

Blecch, where is thy Zing? (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 16 August 2018 15:20 (five years ago) link

Brb petitioning to change my job title to Priest of Electronics

faculty w1fe (silby), Thursday, 16 August 2018 15:40 (five years ago) link

Burgess was a devotee of symphonic and chamber music and he wrote many pieces which were never popular, even among classical musicians and audiences, but thank god at least they were intellectually sound. This was one of his more twatish pronouncements and being a twat was one of Burgess's great talents.

A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 16 August 2018 20:55 (five years ago) link

Technically correct: the best kind of correct.

faculty w1fe (silby), Thursday, 16 August 2018 20:57 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.