No.2 is still in the oven but we're certain that will be it for us. I don't have the urge to have a large family and nor do we have the space or money.
<Generalisation alert>In my experience, these days having large families seems to be the preserve of the very wealthy or the very poor.
― Meg (Meg Busset), Sunday, 18 January 2009 13:17 (fifteen years ago) link
We decided on two cause we don't want to be outnumbered. But honestly, if I had been ten years younger, we would have probably gone for three. Who knows? But I think two is great. No way two can gang up on the other. hah.
In regard to space: do you guys put your kids in one bedroom? We decided no, two seperate. Why? Elisabeth still wakes up in the middle of the night. This is one of the reasons I BF for such a long time (way past 12 months). I don't think I could put her (O) through it. Elisabeth still wakes up every single frigging night. *sigh* I really long for uninterrupted sleep.
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 18 January 2009 21:32 (fifteen years ago) link
We were thinking one or two, and ended up with twins...
― schwantz, Monday, 19 January 2009 04:46 (fifteen years ago) link