'John Carter,' aka the Edgar Rice Burroughs 'A Princess of Mars' adaptation

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (553 of them)

I disagree about the quality of the film, but also I think that by the only yardstick that marketing cares about - will people go see it - it was a great film, the word of mouth despite the shitty campaign is what pulled it back into profit (not that any hollywood film is ever in profit etc etc)

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 May 2012 23:07 (eleven years ago) link

wait what

Fas Ro Duh (Gukbe), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:21 (eleven years ago) link

what a terrible 'movie'

lag∞n, Saturday, 26 May 2012 04:49 (eleven years ago) link

two years pass...

this was fucking shit

local eire man (darraghmac), Friday, 12 December 2014 22:56 (nine years ago) link

VG will have your scalp or something.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 12 December 2014 23:09 (nine years ago) link

killfile

difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 13 December 2014 00:16 (nine years ago) link

why is this still on my bookmarks??

Frobisher, Saturday, 13 December 2014 00:26 (nine years ago) link

four years pass...

It's from the books I suppose but the ending of this is pretty good, plot-wise.

In the DVD commentary they talk about it becoming a thing on the level of Superman or Bond. The pathos, I almost feel bad for the probably really quite rich people who were indulged in this folly.

*there's (Noel Emits), Wednesday, 13 February 2019 11:24 (five years ago) link

three years pass...

Memmmmmories etc

https://www.thewrap.com/john-carter-movie-history-why-it-failed/

Ten years, crazy. Still half convinced that this not being a success is why Disney bought Lucasfilm later that year.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 March 2022 00:20 (two years ago) link

That's quite an in-depth article for... this movie. I think Collins not being sure which version of the princess to play is indicative of the major problem I found with the movie: characters were not well-defined at all

Vinnie, Thursday, 10 March 2022 01:30 (two years ago) link

this movie killed the FNL dude's career, didn't it?

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2022 01:40 (two years ago) link

this movie killed the FNL dude's career, didn't it?

A combination of this and True Detective season 2. Both of which are better than people say.

but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 10 March 2022 02:17 (two years ago) link

It was based on a beloved and highly influential property

lol....beloved and influential to who exactly?

call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 March 2022 02:40 (two years ago) link

people who read & enjoyed it?

terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 10 March 2022 02:44 (two years ago) link

i'm questioning the characterization of the property as some kind of sure thing to bank a movie on. i had literally never heard of it until this came out despite existing in plenty of circles where sci-fi and fantasy fiction were regularly discussed for all of my teens and 20s.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 March 2022 02:48 (two years ago) link

i don't know how wide an audience they have in 2022 but burroughs's mars books are some of the most influential in SF, even if the influence tended to trickle down through other stuff -- bradbury, heinlein, flash gordon, star wars.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2022 03:18 (two years ago) link

Cameron cited it as an inspiration for Avatar, and I don't doubt it inspired others. But yeah, it was certainly no bankable property ten years ago or now - too old, largely forgotten

Vinnie, Thursday, 10 March 2022 03:23 (two years ago) link

yeah "this thing inspired this other thing that you like" is not really how IP attracts audiences

call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 March 2022 03:27 (two years ago) link

The Del Rey paperbacks were how I first heard about them, and they came out...late 70s I think?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 March 2022 04:44 (two years ago) link

i feel like princess of mars is sort of out of fashion, partially because Edgar Rice Burroughs is also out of fashion right now (lotta racist shit in the original Tarzan), but both properties were hugely popular in their time. I remember being kinda surprised when the movie came out, though, even having been aware of the books and having read a couple a long time ago. they were in print for a long time. probably still are.

ian, Thursday, 10 March 2022 04:46 (two years ago) link

in terms of influence... they are not the very first examples of what is now called "portal fantasy", but they are early, predating the chronicles of Narnia by decades. there's definitely plenty of writing in this genre, and the idea has been used over and over again from alice in wonderland (pre-princess of mars) to stargate: atlantis to whatever.

ian, Thursday, 10 March 2022 05:04 (two years ago) link

my reaction to this coming out was kind of like... this is a movie for old men who listen to old time radio dramas and collect Amazing Stories and Weird Tales from before the 2nd world war.

still never seen it.

ian, Thursday, 10 March 2022 05:06 (two years ago) link

i still think it was a much better movie than conventional wisdom acts like it was

terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 10 March 2022 05:20 (two years ago) link

I'd agree, pretty much stand by everything upthread. It ain't perfect but it's often really entertaining.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 March 2022 05:22 (two years ago) link

Reread the first three Mars books after seeing the movie (great in IMAX), and thought the movie did a great job of capturing the spirit while tightening the plot. Besides the Star Wars prequels, was the first movie I've seen people actively dogpile on to hate, without having seen it. At least, it was the first movie I was invested in seeing, so disheartening watching it shredded. Would have appreciated a second movie.

As a kid, also loved the Green Star books by Lin Carter, which is a straight rip of the concept.

the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Thursday, 10 March 2022 14:09 (two years ago) link

(lotta racist shit in the original Tarzan),

― ian, Thursday, March 10, 2022 4:46 AM (ten hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

Surely the whole concept of the white aristocratic lord of the jungle is inherently racist from the get-go.
Quite apart from the depiction of the natives outside of that.

Stevolende, Thursday, 10 March 2022 14:53 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.