― dave q, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link
― dave q, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:44 (twenty years ago) link
― dave q, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:48 (twenty years ago) link
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:31 (twenty years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:17 (twenty years ago) link
I dunno, maybe he's sort of like a nestling that has fallen out of the nest,a nd is hopping around pathetically, filling my eyes with.. uhh.. whisky (phew, for a sec I almost lost my totally masculine badass image!)
But the world is a much cooler place now than it would've been without Michael Jackson about.
― Øystein Holm-Olsen (Øystein H-O), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:24 (twenty years ago) link
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:30 (twenty years ago) link
― Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link
Michael Jackson, on the other hand, just induces painful head shaking and a sort of morbid curiosity/disgust. And to equate him with Prince is just shameful, I think - MJ can't write or play jack fucking shit. He's only written, what, 4 or 5 great songs in his ENTIRE CAREER?!? I mean, who cares about this loser? His personal artistic output is pathetic - we're talking maybe three or four album's worth of good material TOPS, and on more than half of it all he did was sing/squeal.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 23:07 (twenty years ago) link
― Emma, Monday, 9 June 2003 11:41 (twenty years ago) link