This is the thread in which we anticipate "Capote"

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (234 of them)

View Previous Page...

pwnage :-)

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Can I too be the friend of your film critic friend? May we have tea together?

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Did you find the quote where I said I'm not really even that close to him?

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:40 (eighteen years ago) link

No! Scandal!

But he actually posted to that one thread!

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:41 (eighteen years ago) link

film critics are the most pompous boring twats ever!

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:41 (eighteen years ago) link

(xp) Yes, I had e-mailed him about it!

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:42 (eighteen years ago) link

I also like it because the phrase "my film-critic friend" could totally have come straight out of your high school journal blog thing!

Anyway, Capote...

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha... Adam is ILX's reigning concurator.

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 04:35 (eighteen years ago) link

i was sort of hoping your film critic friend would be revealed to be none other than "the surprisingly shy, humble, ever-smiling Armond White!"

― gear (gear), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:00 (eighteen years ago) link

MY film-critic friend (who i haven't talked to in a while) IS friends with armond white!

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:04 (eighteen years ago) link

is he an asshole in real life too??

― gear (gear), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:04 (eighteen years ago) link

i'll give you three guesses

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Who are you referring to? Jºhn D3m3try?

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:09 (eighteen years ago) link

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:11 (eighteen years ago) link

n4t3 p4tr1n?

― j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I love this game! This thread needs to be retitled the "guess who my film-critic friend is" thread!

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:23 (eighteen years ago) link

'oberman!

― gear (gear), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:37 (eighteen years ago) link

Wait, but is this the same film critic that JBR said the description of my friend reminded her of? So is this person in Chicago? And writes for a website?

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Nathan R@bin?

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:45 (eighteen years ago) link

nah, new york, and he writes for print publications too... your description just made me roffle because it was so like the dude i know. (xpost)

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:48 (eighteen years ago) link

now i'm not saying.

― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:48 (eighteen years ago) link

Mike D'Angel0?

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 05:55 (eighteen years ago) link

I'll admit I can't get my head around any film critics being friends with Armond.

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 06:28 (eighteen years ago) link

jaymc, which of your friends am I, when you are talking to other people? Am I your bon vivant friend? Your healthcare nonprofit administrative assistant friend? Your poor internet humor friend?

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 13:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I refer to jaymc as "my citical theorist/musician friend who views individual sexuality as essentially fluid and non-specific".

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Seriously, like, search the archives!

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:31 (eighteen years ago) link

::sigh::

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Okay, I'll stop.

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

It's cool. :)

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:37 (eighteen years ago) link

I refer to jaymc as "The Sigh-monizer." Or I will.

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Or maybe "Sigh-man Says."

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Most of my beleaguerment is for dramatic effect.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I refer to him as "Miss Sigh-gone".

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyway, I think I borrowed the sigh-bracketed-by-double-colons from Alex in NYC!

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:47 (eighteen years ago) link

We're totally ruining this thread, guys.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:47 (eighteen years ago) link

It's only the internet!

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link

http://communitylink.gopbi.com/groups/755/FSLO-1042165543-983755.jpg

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:50 (eighteen years ago) link

I am really not anticipating "Capote" very much. Biopics are the pits.

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:52 (eighteen years ago) link

That is generally true.

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link

I think I like movies to either be completely real or completely made up, make up your mind.

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 16:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I sort of agree that biopics are usually not great. I just checked my top 50 of 2000-04, and the only biopic I listed was American Splendor, and even that is arguable as to whether it's actually a biopic.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 16:03 (eighteen years ago) link

The best things about American Splendor are not the biopic things. Also biopics are more tolerable if they're about people who aren't really famous.

― n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 7 October 2005 16:05 (eighteen years ago) link

We're totally ruining this thread, guys.

Considering I would've never clicked on this thread twice if it weren't for the tangent, my guess is we're validating this thread.

I just checked my top 50 of 2000-04

Pleast post this.

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:21 (eighteen years ago) link

You'll make fun of me.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:24 (eighteen years ago) link

And yet:

1. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Gondry, 2004)
2. All the Real Girls (Green, 2003)
3. You Can Count on Me (Lonergan, 2000)
4. 25th Hour (Lee, 2002)
5. Mulholland Dr. (Lynch, 2001)
6. Talk to Her (Almodovar, 2002)
7. Together (Moodysson, 2001)
8. Spirited Away (Miyazaki, 2002)
9. Lost in Translation (Coppola, 2003)
10. A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (Spielberg, 2001)

11. Collateral (Mann, 2004)
12. Before Sunset (Linklater, 2004)
13. Far From Heaven (Haynes, 2002)
14. Y Tu Mama Tambien (Cuaron, 2002)
15. Spellbound (Blitz, 2003)
16. Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon (Lee, 2000)
17. Lilya 4-Ever (Moodysson, 2003)
18. Wet Hot American Summer (Wain, 2001)
19. The Man Who Wasn't There (Coen, 2001)
20. Sideways (Payne, 2004)

21. Amores Perros (Gonzalez Inarritu, 2000)
22. Amelie (Jeunet, 2001)
23. In the Bedroom (Field, 2001)
24. Million Dollar Baby (Eastwood, 2004)
25. Minority Report (Spielberg, 2002)
26. High Fidelity (Frears, 2000)
27. Chuck and Buck (Arteta, 2000)
28. The Company (Altman, 2003)
29. Bully (Clark, 2001)
30. Jesus' Son (MacLean, 2000)

31. Kill Bill Vol. One (Tarantino, 2003)
32. American Splendor (Berman and Pulcini, 2003)
33. Undertow (Green, 2004)
34. Capturing the Friedmans (Jarecki, 2003)
35. Best in Show (Guest, 2000)
36. Adaptation (Jonze, 2002)
37. We Don't Live Here Anymore (Curran, 2004)
38. The Manchurian Candidate (Demme, 2004)
39. Morvern Callar (Ramsay, 2002)
40. 28 Days Later (Boyle, 2003)

41. Punch-Drunk Love (Anderson, 2002)
42. Almost Famous (Crowe, 2000)
43. Shaun of the Dead (Wright, 2004)
44. The Dreamers (Bertolucci, 2004)
45. Memento (Nolan, 2001)
46. Kill Bill Vol Two (Tarantino, 2004)
47. Requiem for a Dream (Aronofsky, 2000)
48. Ghost World (Zwigoff, 2001)
49. Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (McKay, 2004)
50. Hedwig and the Angry Inch (Mitchell, 2001)

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:25 (eighteen years ago) link

Make fun of you? What's become of my ILX persona? Oh, right... those film poll threads.

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I only stand by that as a list I made a couple weeks ago. Always changing, etc.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I was kidding, Eric. ;-)

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

It's a decent list.

I didn't like Talk To Her, though.

― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't understand you. But you loved Bad Education, which didn't impress me much.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Skipping 134 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

you have a blog again? i keep track. link?

― jed_ (jed), Monday, 4 September 2006 23:18 (seventeen years ago) link

same link as before

― PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Monday, 4 September 2006 23:28 (seventeen years ago) link

and slocki your wish is my command

http://fineturkishtobacco.blogspot.com/

― PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Monday, 4 September 2006 23:32 (seventeen years ago) link

maura: oh have you seen 'minor accomplisments' yet
maura: balaban is an exec rpoducer
strongo: oh yeah? then where's my mom's alimony

― PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Monday, 4 September 2006 23:39 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...

So I saw the trailer for Infamous last night before Science of Sleep and my friends and I were all looking at each other going "WTF." The thread revival of a month ago clears up some mysteries, but still.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:46 (seventeen years ago) link

'infamous' might be better than 'capote', which actually isn't high praise

― gear (gear), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

We need you to post your thoughts re Science on that thread, Ned!

― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I did already!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 5 October 2006 20:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Ok, this new Capote was the voice of Dobby the house elf in Harry Potter 2.

This bears repeating!

― Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:14 (seventeen years ago) link

five months pass...

So, did anyone here other than me see Infamous? I thought it was quite terrific. Much better than Capote, which left me rather cold. It's a cruel twist of fate that Toby Jones should turn in a performance like that and have it all but ignored because someone else got there first.

The relationship between Capote and Perry Smith made more sense to me in Infamous, as did Smith generally, in fact.

― Alba, Monday, 19 March 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Infamous was more entertaining/involving than Capote. Less self-importantly dour, and yeah, the doomed romance angle worked better. Still a pretty cruddy movie, though. Not a total snooze, but not much more than that.

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 19 March 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

just saw capote two nights ago. i really liked a lot of it. chris cooper makes me happy in anything, to be honest. i loved the colours, the farms, the scenes at chris cooper's house, all of the harper lee scenes.

what really frustrated me was the end. i spent the last 40 minutes or so thinking "this will be great if they don't show the execution." the west wing, of all things, is really great at never ever showing 'important' moments. i.e. the state of the union address is never shown - we see the preparation and the fallout, and while we may see clips of the speech we never actually see the unmediated scene, because what the president says is irrelevant - it's the stuff around it, how we react to it, that we care about. the execution is irrelevant - it is the lead-up and fallout that matter. we know at a point that it is going to happen, and showing it is besides the point. that they felt the need to need to show the execution suggested that it was somehow important, and it really wasn't - the film is not about the killers or the crime or the system. it's about the book and the author, to which the knowledge of the execution matters, not the event.

i was really into the levels of fictionalisation, too - this is a fictionalisation about the process of fictionalisation, with the added fun of having been adapted from a book about the writing of a book!

― derrrick, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 09:14 (seventeen years ago) link

four years pass...

http://nymag.com/guides/fallpreview/2011/movies/moneyball/index2.html

kinda curious for the guy's new one, w/hoffman, pitt & jonah hill. this piece is sorta interesting, you get to hear pitt talking about movies (i always wonder how much + how huge actors watch films)

― sexual union prayerbook slam (schlump), Monday, 22 August 2011 08:41 (twelve years ago) link

this jonah hill pic is too much

http://images.nymag.com/guides/fallpreview/2011/movies/movies110829_jonah_560.jpg

― johnny crunch, Monday, 22 August 2011 14:08 (twelve years ago) link

six years pass...

I've seen this five or six times now--approaching comfort-film status (odd designation, I know). Love the music, Cooper and Keener and Balaban (even though, from what I've read about him, that's not William Shawn), PSH of course.

― clemenza, Saturday, 30 June 2018 15:57 (five years ago) link

two years pass...

Came to post pretty much exactly the same post I put here two years ago. I'm watching Shirley (still not finished), and in the middle of that thought this might be a good point of comparison, so I watched this again. I really love the contrast between the Kansas scenes and Capote holding court back in New York--one of the main things the film's about, really.

― clemenza, Monday, 22 February 2021 20:06 (three years ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.