Loveless Remaster Actually Sound Better?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (338 of them)

No bass at all?!? Like... no bass part whatsoever or just no bottom end?

btw didn't i braek ur heart (NickB), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:18 (eleven years ago) link

Alas poor Martin Kemp (was it remastered by Gary?)

btw didn't i braek ur heart (NickB), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:23 (eleven years ago) link

haha.
no.
seem to have read somewhere tis same bloke who messed up the recent duran remasters, but i can't be 100% certain.

mark e, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:38 (eleven years ago) link

the worst remastering/ mastering job i can think of is the Blur StarShaped DVD which is *legendarily* screwed beyond words. it's the only genuinely unlistenable DVD or CD
i've ever owned.

piscesx, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:40 (eleven years ago) link

I believe that was mastered from a VHS copy.

Anyways, I played CD1, it has the 'full fade' on Soon, which makes it a mislabel.

Mind you, the "CD1" and 2 markings are tiny so hey.

Mark G, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:11 (eleven years ago) link

four months pass...

Hey what's this? Got a good beat to it.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 22 September 2012 17:26 (eleven years ago) link

So, I gave them a listen and I don't think they really fixed the problems with Loveless and Isn't anything. I had heard people say before that Loveless on vinyl sounded amazing and the CD sounded like crap. I have always thought the recording was too tinny and not wide/full enough.

I thought the same thing about Jesus and Mary Chain's Psychocandy, but I think the remaster fixed this album and now it sounds great. I thought Sterelolab's Peng! remaster fixed that album up as much as possible, but the Loveless remaster doesn't do the trick -- in fact, it kind of goes in the other direction. Now, a lot of the vocals sound so separated from the noisy drone that it looses the effect of being behind a wall of sound.

3×5, Sunday, 23 September 2012 17:06 (eleven years ago) link

Yo, what Peng! remaster???

gwenguthrie gwen ross (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 23 September 2012 20:44 (eleven years ago) link

ha i just checked the mbv forum for the first time in a lil while: the thing that makes me laugh is how GREEDY everyone is. like there is the perpetual state of still-flickering optimism riding on whispers or occasional kevin shields interviews, but on top of that people are all trying to put DATES on it. like possibly November??. i guess if it really is almost finished then WE COULD HAVE IT LIKE STRAIGHT AWAY? also atm there is a post in which people are enthused by rumours about, 1., deadlines, i guess forgetting the grey sunlightened pencil deadline of 1994 on the wall of a now demolished studio, &, 2., that after recording is finished there would only, "only", ~only~, only be mixing to do. i mean it could be out in october if he just has to scribble mix my new album off his checklist. i am really not different from these people but the similarities between mbv fans & doomsday cults are so marginal.

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Sunday, 23 September 2012 21:00 (eleven years ago) link

Peng remaster?

svend, Monday, 24 September 2012 20:50 (eleven years ago) link

Discogs says reissue is 2008, but I can't see any mention of a remaster.

Chewshabadoo, Monday, 24 September 2012 21:38 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.