Mitt Romney Running Mate Speculation Thread

I like the two gay staffers behind HRC already wondering which hotel room they're going back to

what is HRC holding?

She's gonna flick a bottle cap at somebody.

a popper

missing a comma

what, is HRC holding?

The SOS doesn't have all the nuclear codes, right? These photos are starting to make me nervous.

After a few drinks Clinton is known to chuck D batteries at staffers. [citation needed]

lol, these photos are making me wish I'd gone to college with HR because she'd fit right into my peer group

After a few drinks Clinton is known to chuck D batteries at staffers. [citation needed]

don't believe the hype

how low can she go?!

CNN just went through this--all the usual names plus, because Romney's supposedly losing women so badly, Condoleezza Rice. Meanwhile, Ralph Reed, who's been creeping me out for two decades, says that Romney needs more unscripted moments, so people get to know him better. Hasn't every one of Romney's self-inflicted wounds the past few months been an unscripted moment?

hush, let Ralph have his illusions

I'm gonna go with Christine O'Donnell.

For a split second I thought she was aiming for a dartboard across a crowded bar.

I'm gonna go with Christine O'Donnell.

Lord Jesus, I know You are disappointed in me and that my prayers do not ascend to Your great throne. But hear, O Lord, the words of your servant, Deric W. Haircare. He is a good man, and his idea has much lol to recommend it. Christine O'Donnell, Lord. ttyl w/b

rubio's incredibly lukewarm (=overtly unimpressed) endorsements of romney probably mean he's out, no?

mitt's not afraid of the witch

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/13/odonnell-and-romney.html

"i mean, i wish it had been somebody else -- but anybody on the republican ticket will be better than obama" is what he said on the TV IIRC.

rubio's incredibly lukewarm (=overtly unimpressed) endorsements of romney probably mean he's out, no?

Rubio, a protege of Jeb Bush's, surely can read the tea leaves as assiduously as Madison did Gibbon: both look towards 2016.

nah 2012 is actually prob a more winnable election than 2016

The candidate with no incumbent will be less for grabs than the one with an incumbent?

Sean Hannity agrees.

xpost

the gop will still be in basically the same shape it is today, prob worse + the economy will be better + lotsa strong dem candidates

haha how are we defining "strong"? I see a landscape in which "centrism" will triumph over honesty about economics.

It was ever thus -- I just don't know what there is to look forward to in 2016 besides better Nicki Minaj records.

"strong" = "capable of winning a national election"

imo fuck centrism, just look like you make sense and hope that the tea party/weirdo social conservatives/regional wackos continue to keep looking extra crazy and push your platform

what's the platform?

Dems have tread water for years. Tea Party crazies make it easier for Dems to score Halperin-esque "tactical" victories.

well I never said "a solidly left-wing politician is going to win the presidency" but the 2008 and 2012 gop primaries were not aberrations, they're the new norm.

guys

Mitt Romney running mate speculation thread

not "revisit overarching theories of how the political process works" thread

sincerely, Thread Cop

in conclusion rubio would take that vp spot in a second

christie and romney would make such a delightful pairing, i pray for this

I know Christie's belligerent, and a bully, and a loudmouth, but I think the main thing is that he gives the appearance of being jolly. And Mitt + jolly is a winning combination.

he gives the appearance of being jolly when you see him in a picture maybe, because jolly is just another word for fat, but when you see him actually open his mouth he just comes off like your asshole boss

That jolly appearance would last about a week. He'd flip out pretty quickly on somebody who asked a question he didn't like. xp

yeah christie is a non starter, itd be awesome tho, he is so huge and belligerent, amazing contrast w/the mittster

I know Christie's belligerent, and a bully, and a loudmouth, but I think the main thing is that he gives the appearance of being jolly. And Mitt + jolly is a winning combination.

because he's fat...?

veep choices are often asked to be the more strident and attacking half of the ticket, so christie's being naturally belligerent may not disqualify him. if I were willard, I would hope to have a veep who would choose his fights strategically, rather than just going at folks like a guard dog hurling himself against a chain link fence.

if romney needs to repair his relationship with evangelicals, christie is NOT the way to go.

I would think Christie would be a bridge too far for Mitt - it's true, your running mate gets to be the guy who gives the appearance of "shooting from the hip" or whatever but Christie's just tone-deaf. It's easy to imagine his gaffes becoming the day's main story again and again, and to imagine him wanting to double down on whatever the gaffes were. Altho post-Palin that may well be the strategy, some "I stand by everything I'll ever say" dude, but I think team Obama would completely tee off on somebody like Christie

like didn't he tell somebody in a college crowd to suck his dick recently? in which case I join lag∞n in praying for Christie to join the Romney ticket

I was kidding around with the jolly stuff...I'm mostly basing my Christie prediction on how much time the two of them were spending together for a while there, and the (probably mistaken) belief that Romney will want to pick someone who's not as bland as he is. And, as Aimless points out, he might, with some discipline, be a good attack guy. But then I can quickly think of other reasons why he'd be a poor choice. The one thing I don't think anyone's mentioned is that the best pick today (politically) might not be the best pick in August--it'll depend where the race stands then.

Right you are. Mitt and his team will look at a lot of polling and focus group info before they make their choice, and they won't drop a clue until the convention, other than to float the names of people they think might help them for having been mentioned on the short list (without attribution, natch).

pretty sure nominating a Muslim to a judge position disqualifies Christie from national republican political nomination in 2012, no?

One of the CNN people--Crowley, I think--said that with so much media overkill today, "surprise" is at a premium, and that all the people who are at the top of the list right now may have been talked-out by August. As always, I sat in my chair and thought, "Hmmmmn, sounds reasonable."

xp
not when the incumbent's middle name is hussein.

that's sooooo 2008!

even if mitt goes for a surprise & game changing vp pick which he v well feel is necessary come convention time you can bet it will be v well researched and prudent

yeah like I said upthread thematically I think mitt's 'game change' temptation would be a non-politician