ATTN: Copyeditors and Grammar Fiends

maybe it's like the opposite of a betty

― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:39 (34 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah, kinda. do bettys get capped?

I wouldn't capitalise herbert, but that's probably my employer's aversion to capitalisation talking (we don't capitalise yorkshire pudding either)

The word herbert is often preceded by "spotty"

http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/37663/what-is-the-meaning-of-the-term-herbert-in-british-slang

(scroll down to the slang dictionary definitions)

mm, i wouldnt either myself but it looks unprofessional uncapped and too stiff capped so idk

sadly i suppose no publication would accept the rightful spelling of 'erbert

Eh. Herbert is a slang term in this case, with the proper name serving as a generic indicator of type?

Then do not capitalize. But also realize that slang is only appropriate for an audience that will instantly recognize it as slang. iow, non-Brits will be head scratching. At least, by lowercasing it, you will be giving them a vital clue about useage.

yeah, it looks weird capped. John, as in someone who frequents a prostitute, would not be capped, right? idk if herbert has penetrated British slang to that extent though. I do know my mom says this all the time.

Oxford dictionary site has it lower case:

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/herbert?q=herbert

sorry to mislead aimless, i'd just read that quote and was wondering aloud rather than me being in the process of writing something

and yeah, john is another example

btw americans, did you not see this illuminating usage example on alba's link?

T. Barling: A dozen baby-brained herberts looking to face me off just to say they squared up to Kosher Kramer before the cobbles came up a bit smartish. (1986)

If it's slang, then it can be lowercase. (john, betty, sheila)

But if it's named after a proper individual (I've got the Benjamins), then capitalize it.

yeah - "a right bunch of herberts".

can anyone translate that xpost

face me off and squared up to = challenge to a fight
Kosher Kramer = presumably the narrator
before the cobbles came up a bit smartish = before they hit the ground

(smartish = quickly)

restaurant i'm starting at tomorrow just revealed new signage advertising a "prefix special"

*slaps forehead*

Maybe customers that have the same telephone prefix as the restaurant get a discount.

anyone with an O' or De or Mc or La or even de la in their surname gets a discount?

discounted prices on anti-pasta

surname or first name, let's be generous

And you're starting there tomorrow...this is a huge dilemma! Will you be the new-guy know-it-all who just needs to be hammered down to the same height like all the other nails, or say nothing and be vaguely embarrassed by your employer every time you see the sign?

xp Double discount for LaShonda O'Malley.

eh, i'll just cringe a little. i'll live.

"Hi! Mega-welcome to <REDACTED>! Can I take your overcoat? It will just be a 5 minute mini-wait for your table."

I don't understand. What are they trying to say a prefix special is?

'prix fixe'

oh duh.

I thought of them serving the customer food before it's been fixed and then went, "wait a minute. I don't even think Yankees 'fix' food anyway."

hungover brain blank. which is correct, "hit-or-miss" or "hit-and-miss"? the former, right?

I've always said hit-and-miss. It's not about saying something's a one-time hit or miss, but that it's patchy, no?

oh whoops i put it through as the former. oh well!

I've always said "hit-or-miss" -- to my mind that conveys "sometimes hits, sometimes misses" better than "hit-and-miss," which sounds vaguely paradoxical even though I know what it's trying to convey.

i'd use 'hit or miss' as a predictor of a one-off event, and 'hit and miss' to review a body/collection/whatever, kinda slightly different things?

the former

AND

In a situation where there is but one opportunity to hit, then hit-or-miss would appear to be most appropriate. Where there are many opportunities, but no certainty about any single result, then hit-and-miss would seem more applicable.

I always thought it was hit-or-miss. Altman was very hit-or-miss in the '70s; some great films, some wild misfires. If it were a perfectly alternating pattern--great one always followed by a misfire--I guess hit-and-miss would work.

Collins gives both:

http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/hit-and-miss

My old NYT boss on the death (and/or dearth) of copy editing: http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/01/opinion/perlman-romney-needs-editor/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/120601011023-perlman-cnn-horizontal-gallery.jpg

this is the greatest

In part, it is her expression.

also BREAKIN NEWS

Am I Reaganing, or am I reaganing?

As this neologism is entirely of your own devising, I believe you need only consult your own notion of its ideal platonic form to know the answer to this question.

So why is "fun" a word that doesn't follow standard English suffixes for the comparative & superlative? How can you tell when you say "more ____" v "____-er"?

I am totally messed up forever on "funner" because some friends of mine wrote a great and catchy song with the chorus of
I'm not a runner
Jumping is funner
I just jump
I said it in front of my student teaching supervisor once, "funner," and of course she corrected me. People fucking hate being corrected, don't they. I do. Today my students told me their teacher would yell at them if they used the word "weirder," they tried to tell me it wasn't a word, afict it totally is.

my oed says weirder is a word

yeah it totally is!
I know the teacher they're talking about, she likes to yell and humiliate people.
Right after they told me I couldn't say "weirder" because she said it wasn't a word, I opened the door, and she was outside walking by. She's haunting my language usage!

You should have corrected her in front of the children.

So why is "fun" a word that doesn't follow standard English suffixes for the comparative & superlative? How can you tell when you say "more ____" v "____-er"?

― Word of Wisdom Robots (Abbbottt), Tuesday, June 12, 2012 1:31 AM (22 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"fun" isn't an adjective, it's an abstract noun, so there is no comparative or superlative. you're describing quantities of an abstraction, like you could have "more love" but something can't be "love-er" in that sense. though "fun" is a word in transition, i think, because people see the noun adjunct construction so often - e.g. "a fun thing" - that they want to treat it as a real adjective: i'm pretty sure i've seen some published examples of "fun" as adjective in US english recently, which was what made me check why they were so jarring.

Ok, confusing, maybe it's a young ppl thing but I feel like fun is used as an adj all the time

hang on, this is more controversial than i thought! just trying to work out why "words are fun" would be OK in my theory, because it obviously sounds fine. OED has it as noun and archaic verb only.