Just when you thought it was safe - OK CUPID PART 3: The Return of the WOO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11167 of them)

what effect will the answer have on your lifestyle during these weeks

post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago) link

depending on the status i will either
1) make out with other people, or
2) not make out with other people.

bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago) link

this seems to confirm it is at an early stage, where answers are not yet necessary and questions are too soon

why is the being away for 3 weeks relevant? would the possible answers to the question be the same even if they were not away for 3 weeks?

post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 21:03 (twelve years ago) link

or rather...

what effect will the answer have on your lifestyle before and after those weeks

post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago) link

post you make it sound like all new relationships reach an "obvious" point where without anyone stating it explicitly you know its exclusive.

I've had more than one experience with assuming that to be the case and it turning out not to be, so it doesnt work that way.

Medical Dance Crab With Lesson (Trayce), Thursday, 15 March 2012 01:55 (twelve years ago) link

As in I mean Ive been with someone i saw almost daily, for months, then after many months got a very suprised "oh this isnt an actual RELATIONSHIP, wtf!?"

Medical Dance Crab With Lesson (Trayce), Thursday, 15 March 2012 01:56 (twelve years ago) link

I never ask these kinds of questions, prefer not to worry about this kind of thing too much. If it 'feels' exlcusive then I guess it feels right for me to be exclusive, if it turns out not to be doesn't really matter because I was doing what feels right

post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 06:52 (twelve years ago) link

I don't really like labeling things tho or thinking about definitions too much though

post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 06:53 (twelve years ago) link

I mean I know I'm sorta writing a bit like a robot on this thread but in actual life I prefer just to go on instinct - horses for courses - but it seems to work out best that way if i trust them, for me at least

post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 07:00 (twelve years ago) link

In my experience, "I prefer just to go on instinct" is guy speak for "I have appalling communications skills, I expect my partner to know my needs by ESP, and I will just assume that I know my partner's needs by similar methods, and project if necessary."

It also tends to have a side order of "My needs always have primacy (and even thinking that my partner might have needs of their own makes me uncomfortable.)"

I would feel uncomfortable being in an exclusive relationship, with someone whose communication skills are so poor that they cannot even have a conversation about whether a relationship is exclusive or not. Because poor communications impact other places outside the bedroom. Assuming that one knows what one's partner wants, without discussing it with them, is just a real red flag for me.

I'd say, BG, don't bring up the question unless you are absolutely certain that *you* want an exclusive relationship. Because there's no way to un-have the conversation. If you are still experiencing the desire to make out with other people, are you so certain you want to exclusify the relationship? Or are you worried your partner will get hurt if they find out that you made out with others while they were away? (Or just worried that they may be doing the same thing?) These are legitimate worries, but one needs to work out what the worry is, before asking a question to assuage it.

...I KERNOW BECAUSE YOU DO (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Thursday, 15 March 2012 08:33 (twelve years ago) link

WCC brings up good counterpoints, I definitely think its about finding out what is right for you and what approach is right for you, as there is no objective correct approach

I think I mostly have good communication skills, and have no problem in discussing a situation, relationship or thing at all. I have no problem in discussing the other person's needs or questions, and if the other person wants to discuss if something is exclusive or not, I'm totally happy to have that discussion. But I don't require that validation for myself, ie I don't PERSONALLY need to ask that question or have the question answered. The trusting in instinct refers to my own feelings about a particular situation (and in this particular scenario BG is asking the question for their own needs, not the other persons needs - if this was a question about BG's other persons needs then I would have answered this question differently)

post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 09:45 (twelve years ago) link

I'd say, BG, don't bring up the question unless you are absolutely certain that *you* want an exclusive relationship. Because there's no way to un-have the conversation

ie I'm pretty much agreeing with WCC here because this is actually about BG and not the other person, and asking this question is kind of putting the other person on the spot, when you yourself don't actually know the answer to the question, or what answer you want. This is why I don't like this question, and this is why I think the question is too early, and putting pressure on the other person

post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 09:48 (twelve years ago) link

I never ask about exclusiveness, or for that matter, even explicitly demand it from my partner.

everything else is secondary (Lee626), Thursday, 15 March 2012 11:31 (twelve years ago) link

well, i'm just thinking of the possible outcomes of just making assumptions. there is a 50% chance that we would both make the same assumption, and that would be fine. but the 50% chance that we don't make the same assumption is where there is potential for getting hurt. i am fine with this being exclusive (i don't feel like i really need to be with anyone else right now) but if they want to not be exclusive then i'll go out with other people. if i'm cloistering myself and find out he is sleeping around, i'd be pissed, but if i'm sleeping around too, i'd be less pissed. and vice versa i'm sure. but i don't want to take not having the conversation yet as a mandate to go make out with other peeople.

of course i chickened out last night and didn't bring it up, though.

bene_gesserit, Thursday, 15 March 2012 14:44 (twelve years ago) link

I told a friend of my frustration over writing a dating profile and she told me that Livingsocial recently ran a special on profile ghostwriters and she's encouraging me to use one.

It seems like a good idea but also weird and not genuine. But more like a solution to an overwhelming task.

Depending on price, I'm pretty sure I'm gonna hire a ghostwriter!

free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Thursday, 15 March 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago) link

Ghostwriter!

1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago) link

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wASiu_X4a5A/Tu7fL2o5UOI/AAAAAAAAAMI/wSwsO9xjxE0/s1600/ghost+writer+tv+show.jpg

iirc, one of these teens will write the profile for you

1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago) link

can't decide if getting a ghostwriter for your dating profile wd be the better synopsis for a romantic comedy or a horror movie

Kony Montana: "Say hello to my invisible friend" (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago) link

This just brought back the weirdest memory!

I had to ghostwrite someone's dating profile once! He had hired me to help him with his pronunciation, and I would meet him at work and we would basically just talk for an hour. I tried to give him some assignments, but he kept not doing them and changing the subject when I tried to talk about the book I asked him to read.

Then he showed me his dating profile and asked me to "give him advice" about it, and I did. Why not, he needed some help. Then things got a little weird when he took me to the car dealership on their free car wash day and asked me to just sit in the waiting room with him, so people could see that he was with a woman. Our professional relationship ended shortly after that.

Laura Lucy Lynn (La Lechera), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago) link

tbf, if I was trying to do the bait-and-switch to make other ladies feel like they should compete to have me, you would definitely make the list

mh, Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago) link

"You're going to have to work extra hard, ladies. I'm dating at this level."

mh, Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago) link

ha, i do make a good emergency wedding date even though no one has ever taken me up on this offer.

Laura Lucy Lynn (La Lechera), Thursday, 15 March 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago) link

bene_, in your shoes I would probably seize a comfortable moment to say something like "hey, while you're gone, I'm gonna, like ... not make out with other people, you know?" and see if his eyes look like the eyes of someone who is being suddenly imposed upon.

mick signals, Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago) link

"You're going to have to work extra hard, ladies. I'm dating at this level."

<3 <3

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:16 (twelve years ago) link

xpost
yeah, I was going to say something similar earlier. Or you could casually mention that you were going to disable your okc profile tonight, or something like that.

1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago) link

Jackie: So, Steven, when I go to Marquette with Donna this weekend, there'll be lots of cute boys around.
Hyde: Lucky you.
Jackie: Well, unlucky them, because I won't let them kiss me. Yeah, that's my promise to you. (Hyde gives her a blank stare.) Now, I'm not saying you have to promise me anything, but if you want to, now would be a good time. (Hyde continues his blank stare.) Okay, well just know…that I won't be kissing anyone.
Hyde: Good to know.
Jackie: Good to know? Well, that's it?
Hyde: Did I stutter?

mookieproof, Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago) link

Who's the lucky fellah, bg?

In Gilmore Girls, Lane tries to teach Rory how to have "the talk":

"We've been dating a few weeks no. Where do we stand? What are we to each other? If another girl asks you out do you feel free to go?"

Of course Dean was so infatuated with Rory that the talk wasn't necessary.

Virginia Plain, Friday, 16 March 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago) link

it's the person i metioned awhile back, who i had exchanged 50 okc messages with before our first date thing. i'm feeling less and less inclined to initiate this conversation but i feel like it would be wrong to do something without saying something!

bene_gesserit, Friday, 16 March 2012 17:44 (twelve years ago) link

I haz a date on Sunday. Third time some kind of charm? God I hope so.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Friday, 16 March 2012 17:44 (twelve years ago) link

Just for some kind of sparks, excitement, mashing, anything the slightest bit exciting.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Friday, 16 March 2012 17:47 (twelve years ago) link

hey bg, i don't think you should feel like you have any obligation to not do anything, if nothing's been explicitly stated on either end.

laurel, 3rd okc date or third date w/same person?

rayuela, Friday, 16 March 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago) link

3rd person! I know it's not much considering how many dates you have to go on to meet an interesting and compatible stranger, but they're just happening so slooooowly....

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Friday, 16 March 2012 17:52 (twelve years ago) link

Bg, do you have a definite prospect? He seems to like electronic communication...maybe you could initiate the convo by text.

Good luck Sunday, laurel.

Virginia Plain, Saturday, 17 March 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago) link

Nerves!

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Sunday, 18 March 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago) link

did the gang go away, at least?

mookieproof, Sunday, 18 March 2012 21:17 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah. Am beginning to reconsider the wisdom of hanging out with them 3 nights in a row, though.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Sunday, 18 March 2012 22:08 (twelve years ago) link

have realized i should probably deactivate this while unemployed as i can't really afford to be dating atm

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 18 March 2012 22:31 (twelve years ago) link

though that didn't stop me from going out with this one p badass girl friday night who, i suspect, might be a good new friend. also nice student who i've been activisty with for the last 6 months is now single and seems interested in spending some non-activisty time with me, so there's that.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 18 March 2012 22:32 (twelve years ago) link

Well, so, that happened.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Monday, 19 March 2012 04:53 (twelve years ago) link

uh oh?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 19 March 2012 05:11 (twelve years ago) link

No! Actually I think it was shockingly normal for a date! I'm a little surprised by "normal" at this point, maybe? He is v v pretty btw.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Monday, 19 March 2012 08:42 (twelve years ago) link

btw guys i had a breakthrough tonight, i realized i am only attracted to lesbians, it all makes sense

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 19 March 2012 08:44 (twelve years ago) link

lol when I see "that happened" I jump to assuming that it's an admission that more happened than was expected

mh, Monday, 19 March 2012 13:19 (twelve years ago) link

There might have been some unrepentant smooching in full view of a bar half-full of people. Which actually IS more than I expected.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Monday, 19 March 2012 13:29 (twelve years ago) link

whee!

rayuela, Monday, 19 March 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago) link

Excellent, I thought my nuance detector was not working this fine Monday morning but I see it is calibrated after all

mh, Monday, 19 March 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago) link

Oh you.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Monday, 19 March 2012 13:49 (twelve years ago) link

btw guys i had a breakthrough tonight, i realized i am only attracted to lesbians, it all makes sense
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, March 19, 2012 8:44 AM (5 hours ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGMr6kCWau4

Wesley Crusher: Teenage F#ck Machine (forksclovetofu), Monday, 19 March 2012 14:25 (twelve years ago) link

Just messaged me to inform me I am radiant despite "tipping towards 50"

>:[

zooey bechamel (Trayce), Thursday, 22 March 2012 03:46 (twelve years ago) link

GUY just messaged me that should say.

zooey bechamel (Trayce), Thursday, 22 March 2012 03:46 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.