http://www.flickr.com/photos/hjm_s/
Fuji XPro-1 + the Fuji negative film simulation - I think the look might be right up a few ILPers alleys.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 8 March 2012 20:21 (twelve years ago) link
looks like the 5D3 is only half a stop better than 5D2 in low-light, and most of the image improvements came in video. disappointing! otoh if I ever felt the need to jump into digital full-frame, 5D2s will be cheaper and just as good
― dayo, Friday, 20 April 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link
As someone who still rocks the 5D-I... I want this
― Grimy Little Pimp (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 20 April 2012 17:48 (twelve years ago) link
I want a D800 w/ the new 28/1.8 that Nikon is releasing
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 20 April 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago) link
but not really. so big, so heavy, so little desire to carry one around
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 20 April 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago) link
http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/m_monochrom/
depending on what the files look like... might sell everything I have + my kidney and get this
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 11:23 (eleven years ago) link
I haven't kept up with the 'state' of digital photography so I dunno what current top gear setups are capable of but the detail in some of these shots is pretty staggering
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1950531/l1000272-dng?inalbum=leica-m-monochrom-preview-samples
#11 - level of detail in the corners is pretty out of this world
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:20 (eleven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/hy22n.jpg
make sure to enlarge!
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:23 (eleven years ago) link
oh wow
http://i.imgur.com/Yh59Q.jpg
the cars in the bottom right corner - that's what I would expect from a medium format camera. wow
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:25 (eleven years ago) link
just had a look at some of the samples from the d800 over at dpreview and to my eyes the monochrom shots blow the d800 out of the water w/r/t detail and resolution
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:29 (eleven years ago) link
I guess they should, seeing as every pixel in the M-Monochrom is a luminance-capturing element whereas colour sensors are split up into Bayer RGB mosaics. I've gone from thinking this was a daft idea to...er, yeah, wanting one.
― Michael Jones, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:43 (eleven years ago) link
by the way it looks like imgur adds compression to the photos - the original ones downloaded from dpreview gallery are much cleaner (and bigger - the one with the cars weighs in at 8.8 megs.)
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 12:51 (eleven years ago) link
at one eighth the price I would be interested, but still couldn't afford one.
― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 11 May 2012 13:29 (eleven years ago) link
The M9M is kind of interesting, but some of the examples I saw (girl holding a Nikon) had some bad highlight blowouts, no better than your average 35mm DSLR - I'm less interested in a mono camera for resolution than for dynamic range that comes closer to Tri-X/HP5.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 May 2012 14:53 (eleven years ago) link
yeah I've heard the sensor being used is not current-gen tech. otoh it seems even canon can't really squeeze any more DR out of sensors - the new 5D Mk III, for example, doesn't really seem to have improved DR. or maybe you need some kind of fuji EXR tech.
looking at the shot of the girl with the nikon from dpreview, I don't mind the blown sky that much. the resolution w/ which you can see the strands of hair, and the lint on the jeans, is pretty spectacular, imo.
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 15:03 (eleven years ago) link
I mean, the shot of the space needle is so much better than this MF scan using very good equipment! http://www.dantestella.com/technical/gsw690iii-res.html
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 15:05 (eleven years ago) link
The girl with the Nikon bothers me more on her hands and jacket - blown skies are part of the game, but losing skin and clothing detail is pretty frustrating. Just read the photographer comment that he blew the exposures the first day, because he was relying on the rear LCD too much to judge exposure. So that one probably isn't the camera's fault anyway.
Apparently I'm getting a OM-D E-M5 for work (documenting construction projects) whenever the kit comes in to my local store.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 May 2012 15:26 (eleven years ago) link
blown away that Leica has had these in the hands of a number of photographers already without any legit information leaking or anyone being spotted
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 May 2012 15:27 (eleven years ago) link
haha because its waterproof?
― dayo, Friday, 11 May 2012 15:42 (eleven years ago) link
Partially. I wasn't keen on carrying my XPro-1 in my truck all the time and needed something that could make nice 12x18 prints. If the E-M5 gets jacked, I'm not out any money, at least.I picked it because I want to try the Olympus 12 and Panasonic 25 for myself.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 May 2012 19:29 (eleven years ago) link
was there an ILP thread in which we argued basic digital versus film stuff? i don't have the vocabulary but still feel there are real broad differences in how each handles light (that feels like the biggest?), renders depth, &c.
the detail thing here is really interesting. sort of in the spectrum of those google videos in which you can infinitely zoom into any angle of a museum panorama.
― blossom smulch (schlump), Saturday, 12 May 2012 10:29 (eleven years ago) link
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um1FjRFzJWQ
― dylannn, Sunday, 13 May 2012 06:39 (eleven years ago) link
X100: y/n?
― ༼◍ྀ ౪ ◍ི ༽ (cozen), Monday, 14 May 2012 22:41 (eleven years ago) link
The X100 is fantastic. The XPro-1 makes some improvements (sensor, quick menu, etc.), but the X100 is just the right size for what it is and the image quality is A+ since the whole camera is built around the lens's interaction with the sensor.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 04:24 (eleven years ago) link
I downloaded one of the M Monochrom JPGs from Steve Huff's site and made some adjustments in LR4. Even the JPG is very malleable without losing detail, I imagine RAW is A+.Would definitely sell everything to get one if they were 1/3 the price.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 04:26 (eleven years ago) link
so uh... got any X100 pro tips? : )
― ༼◍ྀ ౪ ◍ི ༽ (cozen), Friday, 18 May 2012 19:15 (eleven years ago) link
:D
― stet, Friday, 18 May 2012 20:20 (eleven years ago) link
never having owned a DSLR idg the AF complaints; camera is snappy as all hell and super silent. MF + AFL is god mode. OVF is def going to be a learning curve; EVF is better than that on the wife's pana G3
need to learn how to lightroom now
― ༼◍ྀ ౪ ◍ི ༽ (cozen), Friday, 18 May 2012 21:12 (eleven years ago) link
turn on the corrected AF frame, turn off any power saves and turn on quick-start mode. Invest in a 95mb/s UHS-1 card, invaluable to the camera's responsiveness.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 20 May 2012 18:42 (eleven years ago) link
Gorgeous first few images on Flickr with the X100, Cozen.
― Michael Jones, Monday, 21 May 2012 08:41 (eleven years ago) link
thanks!
milo: done, done, and done. superfast SD card is on next month's shopping list
― ༼◍ྀ ౪ ◍ི ༽ (cozen), Monday, 21 May 2012 11:54 (eleven years ago) link
do you shoot RAW or jpg, milo? read the jpgs are stellar from the X100 so tempted to ditch RAW
(would that increase speed/write-time?)
― ༼◍ྀ ౪ ◍ི ༽ (cozen), Monday, 21 May 2012 12:04 (eleven years ago) link
I always shoot RAW, I want the full set of data for playing with in LR/PS - and as a personal thing, JPGs don't feel finished. Shooting JPGs will make write-times much faster, the files are ~1/4 the size.
JPGs from the mirrorless cameras (Fuji, micro-4/3, etc.) usually seem better than DSLR JPGs, I guess the assumption is that more people will be shooting them so they put more effort in.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 May 2012 19:35 (eleven years ago) link
Meant to say the JPGs are very nice even though I stick to RAW. If you want to shoot B&W JPGs, monkey with the settings - everything at standard makes for very flat files with almost no whites or blacks.
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canon-eos-m/
― dayo, Monday, 23 July 2012 20:56 (eleven years ago) link
can't believe the uk price. $799 = £560 including vat, not £750.
― stet, Monday, 23 July 2012 21:14 (eleven years ago) link
Pretty outrageous pricing. Panasonic Lumix GF-3 + 20/1.7 still some kind of high-water mark for this sort of camera system, I think, based on price.
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 08:50 (eleven years ago) link
Amazon US has been running some crazy Panasonic deals - basically, buy the 20 or 14 and get a free GF3 body. Must be clearing out inventory in advance of the GF5.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 24 July 2012 18:06 (eleven years ago) link
I don't want it, but the Sony full-frame compact w/ fixed 35/2 lens is a bold move. I'm shocked they didn't figure out how to include an EVF or OVF to really fuck up Leica's world, tho.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 13 September 2012 13:57 (eleven years ago) link
yes. and ovf and evf will be available at launch for an extra $450/600.
but... three grand to start? three thousand dollars? what's up with that?
― dylannn, Friday, 14 September 2012 01:15 (eleven years ago) link
FF SLRs start at $2200, this includes a top-shelf lens, etc., I guess
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 14 September 2012 03:29 (eleven years ago) link
and its small
― dayo, Friday, 14 September 2012 03:30 (eleven years ago) link
*everybody throws their leica x1 into the trashcan*
is it missing the point to bring up in this conversation all of the cool fixed focal length p&s cameras already out there that aren't digital?
― dylannn, Friday, 14 September 2012 03:58 (eleven years ago) link
http://japancamerahunter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/0011534-811x1024.jpg
Not missing the point at all, IMO - enthusiasts have been pining for a true digital Contax/Canonet/Hexar AF since the first DSLRs. Micro-4/3 got closer, the X100 got closer still, there have been awesome small-sensor compacts, but this is the closest anyone's gotten to the fanboy's wet dream of a 36x24 sensor in a T2 package.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 14 September 2012 06:23 (eleven years ago) link
it's gorgeous, too. this is fixed lens though, right? boo.
― stet, Friday, 14 September 2012 07:39 (eleven years ago) link
The RX1's 35mm lens offers two control rings. The aperture ring offers click stops, but given the lack of an 'neutral' position on the ring we assume there is no mechanical connection to the aperture blades. Nevertheless the dial's operation feels very nice, with very well defined clicks, pretty much the same as on a mechanical lens.The second ring lets you adjust the minimum focus distance, which basically makes it a macro-mode switch. The third ring, the furthest form the lens mount, is the focus ring. It's nicely dampened and moves very smoothly, but has no mechanical connection to the focus elements of the lens as the RX1 uses a focus-by-wire system.
The second ring lets you adjust the minimum focus distance, which basically makes it a macro-mode switch. The third ring, the furthest form the lens mount, is the focus ring. It's nicely dampened and moves very smoothly, but has no mechanical connection to the focus elements of the lens as the RX1 uses a focus-by-wire system.
=(
― dayo, Friday, 14 September 2012 11:56 (eleven years ago) link
Leica M (M10), 24mp yada yada yada price of a good used Corolla etc.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 17 September 2012 19:47 (eleven years ago) link
suddenly so many cameras around that I want. The d600 and 6d both look pretty nice, too.
― stet, Monday, 17 September 2012 19:52 (eleven years ago) link