TS: Aphex Twin: Selected ambient works 85-92 VS SAW Volume 2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (173 of them)
I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results?

Ian Johnson, Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry...

1. I Care Because You Do
2. Come to Daddy
3. Surfing on Sine Waves
4. SAW2
5. SAW1
6. Caustic Window Comp
7. Classics
8. Windowlicker

Eh. 'Classics' no great shakes for me, probably why I forgot it.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Disagree as vociferously as I can muster, Richard D James is a fantastic record, especially when listened to in conjunction with the "Girl/Boy EP" ("Boy/Girl"? I forget).

Seconded re: Expert Knob Twiddlers as well, esp for the fab Francois Hardy sample.

Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

five months pass...
Vol. 2 affects me like no other record I've ever heard. Each track is its own distinct sound universe, not so much composed as seemingly unearthed or discovered. The album is basically egoless, by which I mean you are never aware of the presence of the composer. The beauty of the tracks is not so much in the underlying musical ideas (in a "wow, how did he ever think to do that!" way) as in their sheer near-physical presence. They give the uncanny and very disturbing impression that they are emanating from within your own mind. I realize that my description makes it sound not so different from other zone-out drone type stuff, but SAWII lacks that sensed underlying intention of being created in order to lull you to sleep or trance you out. The melodies are actually quite beguiling; they rarely if ever tense up and resolve, which gives the impression that they could go on forever -- and further reinforces the sense the listener gets of having uncovered them, of aurally witnessing some natural phenomena rather than being subjected to the ego-driven expression of a fellow human. More later; I could talk for hours about this record.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results?

I've tried it before but the results are debatable. It appears to sync up for the first 10 mins and then not really. Worth a try though if you're bored.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

"I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results? "

i remember doing this a while ago,it was a bit of a laugh but i can't remember whether it was actually better or just a novelty
the reason i did it was because i read that it was designed to work well like that
haha crosspost

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:25 (twenty years ago) link

I can't actually believe that some people thought this was a joke or a novelty when it came out? What was the thinking behind that conclusion?

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:41 (twenty years ago) link

who thought it was a novelty?

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:49 (twenty years ago) link

I was under the impression that some thought this was a middle-finger-up album in the same vein (albeit much more subdued) as Metal Machine Music. As in, "No beats, what's gotten INto this guy?!"

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:56 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, that's correct. it was expected that he would just go on in the beat-type template but he turned around and gave warp a dbl CD rec of ambient music. wonder what they thought...but of course, unlike MMM, it was no contract breaker or anything.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:05 (twenty years ago) link

The first album he put out was ambient. No shocker that the second one was too, as I recall.

Such controversy as there was revolved around the lack of titles and the symbols/images he used to identify each track instead.

My basic theory with Aphex Twin is that everything without beats rules, and everything with beats sucks.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:30 (twenty years ago) link

well i can imagine some spa putting on sawII and dismissing it instantly,but i have always thought it was one of his more well regarded albums

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:34 (twenty years ago) link

but wasn't some of his early stuff (singles) beats oriented. some was ambient but at that point he was being talked abt etc and he was a new-ish signing to the warp label (as i recall, SAW II was his first big release on there).

I don't think everything that has beats sucks at all but he has never managed to make an out and out grebt record by using beats.

SAWII is the best thing i've heard from him.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:37 (twenty years ago) link

i just sold vol ii because as much as i respect it i never, ever listen to it.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:37 (twenty years ago) link

My basic theory with Aphex Twin is that everything without beats rules, and everything with beats sucks.

While I think this is balderdash, I do hold the "piano" pieces on Druqks in very high regard, despite the general spottiness of that album. If I had a CD burner, I'd make myself a special EP of just those tracks. The very last track, in particular, is so beautiful it hurts.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:38 (twenty years ago) link

No dude, SAW I was his first big release on Warp! I comes before II, you see...

The first track he was known for was Didgeridoo, which was pretty pounding. But the next was Analogue Bubblebath, which was classically fluffy.

His beats are crap! They really are.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:40 (twenty years ago) link

(Did anyone hear the with-added-beats version of one of the SAW II tracks on that "Remixes for Cash" thing? I thought the track was... way diminished in that form. I read a review somewhere speculating that all the SAW II tracks may have originally had beats that were then removed, but I don't know where they got that from.)

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:42 (twenty years ago) link

are you saying he gets ''beats'' out of a piano? (haven't heard druqks yet).

''No dude, SAW I was his first big release on Warp! I comes before II, you see...''

ok thought it was on that label from belgium, my memory fails me again at this late hour.


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:44 (twenty years ago) link

The first 12 inches were on R&S, but not the album.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:45 (twenty years ago) link

I read a review somewhere speculating that all the SAW II tracks may have originally had beats that were then removed, but I don't know where they got that from.

Possibly because the track is called the "Original Mix"?

SAW 85-92 and SAWII are both gorgeous and brilliant. I couldn't possibly choose.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 21:21 (twenty years ago) link

Possibly because the track is called the "Original Mix"?

Oh, okay, whoops.

It would be quite something if all the tracks on that album really had started out like that, and then had the beats removed on a whim.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 21:32 (twenty years ago) link

Vol. 2 affects me like no other record I've ever heard. Each track is its own distinct sound universe, not so much composed as seemingly unearthed or discovered. The album is basically egoless, by which I mean you are never aware of the presence of the composer. The beauty of the tracks is not so much in the underlying musical ideas (in a "wow, how did he ever think to do that!" way) as in their sheer near-physical presence. They give the uncanny and very disturbing impression that they are emanating from within your own mind. I realize that my description makes it sound not so different from other zone-out drone type stuff, but SAWII lacks that sensed underlying intention of being created in order to lull you to sleep or trance you out. The melodies are actually quite beguiling; they rarely if ever tense up and resolve, which gives the impression that they could go on forever -- and further reinforces the sense the listener gets of having uncovered them, of aurally witnessing some natural phenomena rather than being subjected to the ego-driven expression of a fellow human. More later; I could talk for hours about this record.

Just read this and I agree with everything Clarke B said. I like the long silences in the middle - they get very interesting in the wee hours, especially if you're half awake because it's the silences that make you wake up!

Um, Ben Williams is very VERY wrong btw. SAW1 was on R&S, not Warp. Polygon Window was RDJ's first album on Warp. And the Twin's beats rule. Obviously people are forgetting "I Care Because You Do", probably the most consistent (and best) beat-driven Aphex album. The RDJ Album and Come To Daddy are great as well.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:19 (twenty years ago) link

Ageispolis and Heliosphan are both tons better than Xtal.

...and Green Calx is better than all three of them.

I don't have SAWII, so I'm going to hold off on rating it until I get a copy.

Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:37 (twenty years ago) link

I like the long silences in the middle - they get very interesting in the wee hours, especially if you're half awake because it's the silences that make you wake up!

don't you just hate posting something you already said months ago on the same thread?

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:45 (twenty years ago) link

i read this as Aphex vs StockAitkinWaterman and was delighted by Marcello's championing of the trios second greatest hits comp.
-- gaz (gary.lo...), January 21st, 2003.

Me too Gaz. What a disappointment.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 17 July 2003 00:14 (twenty years ago) link

bull vs. shit.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 17 July 2003 00:47 (twenty years ago) link

One of the coolest moments I've experienced while listening to this album is having my dad come in my room to say good-night right at the beginning of disc 1 track 3 and asking "what is *this*?" He proceeded to lay on my floor and listen to the entire track, and at the end summed up the emotional tone of the piece perfectly: "That's one of the loneliest things I've ever heard."

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 02:54 (twenty years ago) link

are you saying he gets ''beats'' out of a piano?

er, piano is a percussion instrument?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:12 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, it is. You strike it. Actually, all sound is percussive. Also, all tones have beats. Plus, I'm a wanker.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:20 (twenty years ago) link

but we love you anyway

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:22 (twenty years ago) link

"you should read the customer reviews on amazon
1/3 of them never really got into it
1/3 of them find it the most peaceful,relaxing music ever
1/3 of them find that it terrifies them to the very core of their being"

Okay, does anyone here actually find nothing at all remotely disturbing about these tracks? Yes the record is in some sense quite beautiful, but god how some of those sound worlds get under my skin! Maybe it's good I've never done acid...

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:32 (twenty years ago) link

Okay, does anyone here actually find nothing at all remotely disturbing about these tracks?

Yes. I listened to SAWII while shrooming one time. Everyone went to some godawful bar to celebrate someone's birthday so I was all alone. I eventually had to turn it off because it was 'giving me bad vibes, maaan.'
I do wish there were more hauntingly beautiful tracks on there, such as the one Clarke just mentioned (Disc 1, Track 3--which to me isn't lonesome, but instead evokes the feeling of lying in bed in the arms of a lover)(but it does have that 'all is right w/the world, too bad I'll eventually die' mood too)

oops (Oops), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:46 (twenty years ago) link

sigh... I feel like I'm missing something, but I've given SAWII a chance, and RDJ's ambient stuff does absolutely nothing for me. All of those two discs sound like individual parts of Brian Eno or Robert Rich outtakes. (Basically, I'm feel the opposite of Ben)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:22 (twenty years ago) link

Donut Bitch has ears of cloth and hates music. Oh wait.

Clarke B's story about his dad and Disc 1, Track 3, aka One Of the Most Beautiful Songs Ever = genius.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:41 (twenty years ago) link

from discogs.com:

"Selected Ambient Works 85-92, 2x12" (R&S)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Distance)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)"

i dont remember it ever being on warp either.
the warp site shows the 'on' ep to be the first aphex record out on warp, 15.11.93

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 17 July 2003 09:46 (twenty years ago) link

haha was that fucking thing on warp or not (yes i don't remmeber being on warp either).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:20 (twenty years ago) link

Since the copy I have seems to be R&S, I guess I lose the SAW I trainspotting battle.

Call me old-fashioned, but I like my beats to have at least a minimal sense of rhythm.

Ben Williams, Thursday, 17 July 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

But pretty much all the tracks on SAW II are repeated sequencer riffs, just without old-school Warp beats thundering over top of them.

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 16:35 (twenty years ago) link

But 85-92 is all about the heavenly analog love-fests, whilst SAWII is all about digital dragons being abducted by UFOs (case in point: disc 2 track 4)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

i've to-ed and fro-ed over which one i prefer, but i'm definitely on SAW2 at the moment. it's the first two tracks on Disc 2 that really do it for me right now - scarcely moving, gorgeous music.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 17 July 2003 22:13 (twenty years ago) link

eight months pass...
SAW I
Surfing On Sine Wines
Analogue Bubblebath Vol. 3
On EP
SAW II
Windowlicker
Hangable Auto Bulb
Classics
I Care Because You Do
Come to Daddy /Flim
RDJ Album
Expert Knob Twiddlers
Analogue Bubblebath Vol. 4

SAW1 makes me immensely happy and brings make too many good memories of being in London and my conversion from serious student to clubber; SAW2 is rewarding, but not immediate in the same way as SAW1.

I listened to both this week, and SAW1 wins.

Nik (Nik), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:29 (twenty years ago) link

yes yes yes! SAW2 is clever whereas SAW1 is just fucking wonderful.

don, Friday, 9 April 2004 21:30 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, SAW 1 succeeds without really trying. SAW II suceeds, but is really trying.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 9 April 2004 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

They're BOTH pretty.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:08 (twenty years ago) link

music mole OTM.

Strangely that sentiment also neatly describes how I feel about Nirvana's Nevermind and In Utero.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 10 April 2004 02:51 (twenty years ago) link

But anyway, I love both of them, though SAW 85-92 has a slight edge for me.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 10 April 2004 02:52 (twenty years ago) link

two years pass...
I'm listening to SAW 85-92 for the first time in a very long time, and loving it more then I ever did. Both Xtal and Tha are phenomenal, an almost unbeatable way to open an album.
I did some searching on a few AFX fansites and was unable to figure out which of these songs was recorded in 1985. Can anyone enlighten me?

Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Xtal kills me, always will do. No one has ever done anything like that ever.

I never found out when the songs were recorded but Xtal gives the impression of being quite old, doesn't it?

I'm going to play this now.

A Rush of Cold Blood To The Head (Bimble...), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Also I used to play Xtal when I DJ'd and people would always ask me what it was.

A Rush of Cold Blood To The Head (Bimble...), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm still listening...after it's done, I'm going to try to predict which one is from 1985.

I know, I know ILM. Hold your breath.

Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:32 (seventeen years ago) link

saw II sounds lush on my stereo setup, it's really enveloping.. like somebody stated upthread, it's as if it's emanating from something other than the stereo speakers. hard to compare it to 85-92, the music is markedly different - the terrain and spaced out qualities of it aren't really present on 85-92. Stone in Focus is timeless and beautiful. it does sort of evoke the feelings of late night/early morning acid comedown, like a warm cave/gentle brain balm. Love Tha, too

Syro is spotty, for sure. Papat4 (Pineal Mix) + S950tx16wasr10 (Earth Portal Mix) are both fantastic, along with the front end of the album (Minipops + XMASEVET10). 4 Bit 9d Api+e+6 is another banger, even my mom dug it. the Circlont tracks are chunky-sounding, they don't have that effortless feel/flow that characterizes some of the "drill" tracks on Drukqs.

Fredugolon 6 (on Rushup Edge) is another underrated track.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 1 April 2017 19:49 (seven years ago) link

my mistake, Fredugolon 6 is on the Confederation Trough ep. The CD version has this little gem: https://youtu.be/_wTl-wYL0-k

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 1 April 2017 21:36 (seven years ago) link

^ This guy gets it!

The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Saturday, 1 April 2017 23:10 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YMO1DZJMc

There's nothing as refined or fleshed out as this, on the RDJ album. 54 Cymru Beats is a modest example, check out Taking Control or Ziggomatic 17.. these tracks set a high-water mark that hasn't been touched since.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Sunday, 2 April 2017 01:23 (seven years ago) link

designer of saw II artwork/logo:

https://www.facebook.com/residentadvisor/videos/10154686276379480/

dollar general (am0n), Thursday, 6 April 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

that was nice

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 19:59 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDSFMxLQBsk

dollar general (am0n), Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:31 (seven years ago) link

https://www.instagram.com/p/BR594wqhkiL/

having the logo mutate over time to unrecognizability would have been brilliant

0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, 7 April 2017 05:13 (seven years ago) link

hold on though are frogs and dogs up there really acting like Windowlicker isn't a banger on a big system

― 0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, March 31, 2017 5:23 PM (one week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I really really like Windowlicker FWIW. It's clever in more ways than one.

but I do see what you're saying DL, there was definitely a sense of each track being its own thing back then. that whole stretch from ICBYD to Windowlicker rules because you don't know what you're going to hear, the way he mixes acoustic and real-world sounds with drill n' bass hell was always fascinating to me. it's hard to imagine him doing something like "Logon Rock Witch" or "4" anymore.

― frogbs, Friday, March 31, 2017 8:34 PM (one week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

And this is OTM

Lennon, Elvis, Hendrix etc (dog latin), Friday, 7 April 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

Yeah there was a Disco Nihilist post that I think about a lot, talking about how Aphex releases used to be like shocking brand-new worlds. Hard to imagine that happening again.

0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, 7 April 2017 18:48 (seven years ago) link

there have been many posts saying exactly that...

clouds, Friday, 7 April 2017 18:52 (seven years ago) link

At this point I find the most exciting thing Aphex Twin does is occasionally bring out tracks that include his signifiers, like on "Cheetah" there's a couple synth pads that sound like his classic ambient work.

Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Friday, 7 April 2017 18:57 (seven years ago) link

all his tracks have his signifiers though?

clouds, Friday, 7 April 2017 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I guess so..perhaps some just resonate with me more

Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Friday, 7 April 2017 19:19 (seven years ago) link

he comes up with some gnarly bass lines, like those in 4 bit, papat4, and Xmas_Evet10 on Syro. hell, even the circlont14 (Shrymoming mix) 20-step bass breakdown is good for a calboti (an internal chuckle). the textures are surely popping, or maybe they're just remarkable. papat4 is elating, the bass is burgeoning.. but it's short-lived. oh, Aphex *sigh*

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 8 April 2017 13:56 (seven years ago) link

https://youtu.be/_1Pk2bKF3xs

this Aleksi Perälä character uses tonalities (Colundi Sequences?) that vaguely recall saw II.. giant catalog of his stuff on Bandcamp

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 8 April 2017 14:08 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB_ClJ9nikY

dollar general (am0n), Monday, 10 April 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Thanks for sharing that am0n. Getting serious tingles.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 05:28 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.