Turner fuels Friends reunion talk

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (36 of them)
I guess you're right. Just about all of the humor involving the men, though, is centered around them doing or saying something lame or stupid. If that's true to the same extent for the female characters (I'm not sure that it is), then they at least come off as less sort of pathetic in these instances.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

A website made up the scoop that NBC was preparing a series of four hour-longs. It's since been disproven. You may have read an article that was based on that erroneous information.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Sunday, 29 January 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think that Monica is supposed to read as unintelligent. Crazy, controlling and nightmarish, but not unintelligent. Rachel isn't a rocket scientist but she's not supposed to be stupid, either. You could make a very strong argument that even though Ross and Chandler have all of the signposts/accolades that people associate with intelligence, they aren't really any smarter than Monica and Rachel; in fact, Monica's career doesn't have the same type of academic path, so she can't really be compared on the same scale, and Rachel spent too much time self-absorbedly looking a husband to be a trophy wife towards to build up academic credentials.

Dan (Fair's Fair) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 29 January 2006 22:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Also I'm not sure why we're talking about academic achievement. When the writers sit down and say "Ross/Rachel/Monica does something dumb", they don't mean "fails to conjugate a latin verb".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 29 January 2006 22:11 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.