CHRIS BROWN

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nKa-dM7PvEo/SJoq0xXyCRI/AAAAAAAACB0/1GLKbKLfUbE/s400/jesus_horse_clouds_king.jpg

it's funny how i can be as juvenile and mean as i want and you still think i'm being "superior"

like, nothing about 'mizay-era minaj' is dumb! its just a description of a period of her career! and you decided to read into that that i was somehow the only person on earth who associated musical output with management

which 1st off is totally untrue -- lots of people do & i'm sure there are cases where management did have an effect, but

2nd, i never made any causation argument there anyway, just observed that this was when her music was best to me.

its like u just want to beat up on me out of boredom or something which, lol ilx, but im letting you know right here that its kind of annoying

you guys are still friends, though, right? deej-some dude fights make me anxious.

its like u just want to beat up on me out of boredom

uh, maybe this thread is not the place for this.

jho already made that joke

referring to it as the "mizay era" was kinda funny imo

(sorry poor taste) xp

thank you, j0rdan

i dont think that post of jordan's backs you up at all?

the first time deej casually said "Mizay" to me like i was supposed to understand exactly what that name means was right after he declared "there's no way a dude like Lil Durk has as many actual youtube views as Bo Deal" and i was like okay man i don't have the right tunnel vision for this conversation

i thought the phrase "mizay era" was funny, so does j0rdan

fwiw i'd try to take this offline & talk to him on IM but hes posted IMs publicly in the past so now i dont really feel comfortable doing that either

deejs world of lame insult dudes

i thought the phrase "mizay era" was funny, so does j0rdan

― DNRIYHM NATION 1814 (some dude), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:30 PM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah but how does that have anything to do w/ what you posted

joe's article on multiple regressions is good but it doesnt actually speak to the issue i was interested in here it just suggests that their attempts to apply statistical analysis could have other variables not taken into acct which i can totally understand, i.e. the diff between rural & city drinkers

but i had never really thought abt the deadly dangers of drunk walking & hit & runs are obv common in some areas based purely on the stats the present up front before even making their argument

― D-40, Friday, February 24, 2012 3:15 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

would this influence your decision making?

y'know deej there's an amazing strategy of conflict resolution you've never ever tried before called (italics coming) dropping it

djp djp djp djve, socjaljze

oh sorry you guys are shitstorming

I mean obviously not but you seem to understand why the freakonomics thing was stupid, what else do you want to know?

djdn't mean to jnterrupt

would this influence your decision making?

― ploppawheelie V (k3vin k.), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:31 PM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

no i just found it interesting

i mean, the fact is vehicles are more likely to kill other people anyway, but that wasn't the question it was about chris brown receiving divine comeuppance

i had an entire conversation with my housemate, ate crackers and went out to post some letters and this is still going on!

crackers be biters

you mjisspelled bjters

oh dammjt fucked up my own joek

oh dip

I mean obviously not but you seem to understand why the freakonomics thing was stupid, what else do you want to know?

― ploppawheelie V (k3vin k.), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:33 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i guess one thing that really interests me in life is how people have reasonable & unreasonable fears (well i guess no 'fear' is reasonable but let's say people will manage risks based on perceived risk w/out a real sense of perspective) so what i was wondering was whether or not ppl realize how 'dangerous' drunk walking could be or if freakonomics dudes were just blowing that up for the sake of a hook into a partic. chapter of the book. Like, perceived risks vs. actual risks is something i wonder about a lot (like irrational fear of flying when people are more likely to die in a traffic accident -- sometimes received wisdom is actually wrong! and you don't need flawed statistical analysis to prove it)

the first time deej casually said "Mizay" to me like i was supposed to understand exactly what that name means was right after he declared "there's no way a dude like Lil Durk has as many actual youtube views as Bo Deal" and i was like okay man i don't have the right tunnel vision for this conversation

― DNRIYHM NATION 1814 (some dude), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:29 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

some people watch SNL, some people listen to brick squad

i'm gonna call you mr. burn because there's no way i can come back from that slow-burning 15 minute zing

not everything is a zing.

maybe u should try 'dropping it' though

deej you should take out daniel kahneman's 'thinking, fast and slow' from the library

I mean obviously not but you seem to understand why the freakonomics thing was stupid, what else do you want to know?

― ploppawheelie V (k3vin k.), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:33 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i guess one thing that really interests me in life is how people have reasonable & unreasonable fears (well i guess no 'fear' is reasonable but let's say people will manage risks based on perceived risk w/out a real sense of perspective) so what i was wondering was whether or not ppl realize how 'dangerous' drunk walking could be or if freakonomics dudes were just blowing that up for the sake of a hook into a partic. chapter of the book. Like, perceived risks vs. actual risks is something i wonder about a lot (like irrational fear of flying when people are more likely to die in a traffic accident -- sometimes received wisdom is actually wrong! and you don't need flawed statistical analysis to prove it)

― D-40, Friday, February 24, 2012 3:45 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ha it's funny you brought this up cuz "you're more likely to die in a car crash than a plane crash" is biased in probably very similar ways that the drunk walking vs drunk driving was

you mjisspelled bjters

― robbery by sudden snatching (DJP), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:41 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh dammjt fucked up my own joek

― robbery by sudden snatching (DJP), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:41 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Thought I was on De Subjectivisten for a minute there.

that looks interesting, although part of the amazon write-up kind of made me think of the book on elbows

http://www.magicalwasteland.com/mw/2012/1/31/fake-non-fiction-best-sellers.html xxp

ha it's funny you brought this up cuz "you're more likely to die in a car crash than a plane crash" is biased in probably very similar ways that the drunk walking vs drunk driving was

― ploppawheelie V (k3vin k.), Friday, February 24, 2012 2:52 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well i think its definitively true though in a way their study doesn't seem to be

yeah, was gonna say. deaths per traveler, per trip and per mile traveled are all higher by car, iirc

well both planes and cars should banned obv

it's true, ornithopters all the way

I want to join this argument cause it involves math and cars but I am having trouble understanding what is going on

also I don't care about chris brown

(drunk walks away)

lamp is right tho everyone should read kahneman

im reading reviews now, partly b/c i was trying to figure out to what degree that was a lamp zing

it's prob a zing tbh but if all ilx zings were educational we would be much better off

yeah i mean hes not blowing my mind that 'mr smarm' wasn't a 'zing' that i used 'system 2' to come up w/ here that was kind of my point

but if he was just responding to the drunk driving v drunk walking thing then fair play

er, system 1. i have those numbers backwards

i wish i could be given the linda problem again w/out knowing the outcome