The Shining

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1303 of them)

yeah BL is almost a opaque as 2001 for me...been a long time since i've seen it tho!

ryan, Thursday, 8 January 2009 18:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Ah, OK, I see where you're coming from on BL. Makes sense!

^likes tilt-a-whirls (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link

four weeks pass...

Got the blu-ray of this today and am, frankly, amazed by the quality of the transfer and how it looks in HD. Watching Vivian Kubrick's making of documentary also opened my eyes about just how much was put into getting the look of it right; I knew that the interiors were all on set in Elstree, but it's so easy to forget that when watching the film and it looks utterly like a real hotel. I certainly hadn't realised that the colossal exterior of the Overlook used in the early outdoor scenes and during the snowbound climax was all a set as well.

There's a nice bit of interview too where Nicholson is talking about the actorly obsession with methods of different kinds and the quest for "realness" and when he discussed this with Kubrick his response was "real isn't necessarily very interesting".

Bill A, Thursday, 5 February 2009 22:12 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

http://www.jayweidner.com/ShiningSecrets.html

Here's an interesting article which proves that The Shining is actually a coded message from Kubrick, where he confesses he faked the Apollo moon landing.

Tuomas, Friday, 29 October 2010 16:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Must watch this movie today!

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 16:45 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0057.jpg
omg

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 16:52 (thirteen years ago) link

Seven Apollo missions went to the moon, but only six landed. Six crates of 7-up.

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 16:52 (thirteen years ago) link

Awesome.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 29 October 2010 16:54 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0053.jpg

Jack, his family, and the Overlook Hotel, are trapped in the Cold, just as America was trapped in the Cold War with Russia. The stuffed bears, seen through out the film, are the Soviet Empire's symbol.

Symbolically the Bears seen through the film are also the representation of the pressure that the Russians put on the USA to get to the Moon. They had to fake the moon landings and cover up the real truth behind the flying saucer craft and machinery that the US government actually has created and employed since World War Two.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:32 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0066.jpg
http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0069.jpg

Danny is literally carrying a symbolic Apollo 11, on his body, via the sweater, to the Moon as he walks over to room 237. Why do I think this?

Because the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 237,000 miles.

LOL

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:34 (thirteen years ago) link

i have never seen this movie, nor will i ever. im scared shitless by it.

Str8 Drapin It (chrisv2010), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:36 (thirteen years ago) link

overlook hallway carpeting is so badass

naked human hands and a foam rubber head (contenderizer), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:37 (thirteen years ago) link

The funniest thing is, I've read some "serious" analyses of The Shining that make equally broad conclusions based on minuscule details as the moon landing guy.

Tuomas, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:41 (thirteen years ago) link

In high school, I was once at the house of Tim Daly (of Wings fame; his son went to my school & we were in an a cappella group together). On a shelf, surrounded by dozens of other VHS cassettes, was a hand-labeled tape titled "THE SHINNING."

I always think of that when someone mentions this movie; I wonder what THE SHINNING, as a different movie, could be like, and whether it would star Tim Daly.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvkgKRMlp90

omar little, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:46 (thirteen years ago) link

Gonna use this opportunity to repost the Physical Cosmologies analysis, which is pretty convincing and a damn wonderful read!

http://www.mstrmnd.com/log/802

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:46 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGMoBo9f40I

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:47 (thirteen years ago) link

xp goddamit omar

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:47 (thirteen years ago) link

The funniest thing is, I've read some "serious" analyses of The Shining that make equally broad conclusions based on minuscule details as the moon landing guy.
yeah there's one (which i think was linked to on ILX somewhere) that was fairly convincing in some respects ... but totally batshit in others.

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:48 (thirteen years ago) link

oh xpost - that's the one i'm talking about, adam. kinda fascinating.

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:48 (thirteen years ago) link

The funny thing about that Tim Daly story is that his Wings co-star Steven Weber went on to star in the Stephen King-approved TV miniseries version of "The Shining."

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link

omg i never knew that -- that might explain what was on the tape, and why it was home-recorded! lol thx phil

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:56 (thirteen years ago) link

Eyes Wide Shut was released on July 16 th 1999.

Stanley Kubrick insisted in his contract that this be the date of the release.

July 16 th 1999 is exactly 30 years to the day that Apollo 11 was launched.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link

I present this tidbit of an interpretation to show not only that Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings but also to ask NASA to release all of Kubrick's Apollo moon landing footage in their original, glorious 70 mm film.

would he settle for a blu ray release

mr. mandelbrot flythrough vertigo, esq. (Edward III), Friday, 29 October 2010 18:09 (thirteen years ago) link

i have never seen this movie, nor will i ever. im scared shitless by it.

That fits, as it scares no one shitless while they are watching it.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 30 October 2010 02:27 (thirteen years ago) link

I have seen the shining scare plenty of ppl oh wait it's dr morbius

mr. mandelbrot flythrough vertigo, esq. (Edward III), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:02 (thirteen years ago) link

thank you for this link, tuomas!

the waning trend (latebloomer), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:07 (thirteen years ago) link

This explains why the previous "caretaker" was so pressured and stressed that he had to kill his TWIN daughters.

Why?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
Because the previous NASA missions before Apollo were named Gemini!

Hugo Stiglitz, a rich young man in search of romance & adventure (Pillbox), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:47 (thirteen years ago) link

Here's another site with an incredibly complex analysis based on tiny details in the movie. For example, according to the site a commentary on the genocide of Native Americans is hidden in the food cans you can see on the background in the storage room scenes.

I'm not saying these analyses are invalid, it's perfectly possible Kubrick meant to hide those messages in the movie. If that's true though, it begs the question: if you want to make a statement on American history, why the hell hide it in cryptic background items most viewers are not even gonna notice?

Tuomas, Monday, 1 November 2010 10:47 (thirteen years ago) link

Because Kubrick had OCD resulting in an extreme attention to detail in his movies?

Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Monday, 1 November 2010 10:51 (thirteen years ago) link

nine months pass...

Kubrick's daughter's documentary :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4745727919325920852

calstars, Friday, 12 August 2011 01:12 (twelve years ago) link

five months pass...

Here's another page with some more links to interpretation essays:

http://theshining.20m.com/

calstars, Sunday, 5 February 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago) link

My favorite detail is how the carpeting changes after the ball is rolled toward Danny while he plays with his toys down the hall from Room 237:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny1.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny2.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny3.jpg

calstars, Sunday, 5 February 2012 17:06 (twelve years ago) link

a MOMENTARY LOSS of MUSSSSSSSCULAR COORDINATION! a few extra foot-pounds of energy per second per SECOND!

the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 5 February 2012 19:02 (twelve years ago) link

Something must be in the air!

http://io9.com/5882985/watch-this-insane-breakdown-of-stanley-kubricks-hidden-narrative-in-the-shining

Using unpublished info from the Stanley Kubrick Archives as a key source, Kubrick's Gold Story is a film analysis that uncovers economic themes encoded in The Shining with regard to gold vs fiat monetary systems.

You got to ro-o-oll me and call me the tumblr whites (Phil D.), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Strange, I remember 1980 audience laughing at most of the stuff the guy is surprised about here.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/i-saw-the-last-showing-of-the-warner-bros-35mm-print-of-the-shining/

And though I've never come around to liking this film, it's a shame there are going to be even more "last 35mm screenings."

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 March 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago) link

guess many of the Shining lovers here have never seen it in 35mm

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 03:54 (twelve years ago) link

O HAI

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/4530/shinning.jpg

<3 this movie so much

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:23 (twelve years ago) link

Every time I see that screencap I mistake the guy on the right for George Bush Sr.

cashmere tears-soaker (Abbbottt), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:24 (twelve years ago) link

guess many of the Shining lovers here have never seen it in 35mm

35mm or no, I would love a chance just to see this on the big screen at all - same goes for pretty much all Kubrick, I suppose, but esp. this & 2001. The only one I was around to catch in its original theatrical run was Eyes Wide Shut (which I actually rather like, but still..)

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:27 (twelve years ago) link

Every time I see that screencap I mistake the guy on the right for George Bush Sr.

that would go a long ways in understanding why Dubya turned out the way he did ...

morbz will sneer but the only Kubrick i've seen on the big screen is barry lyndon (it was worth it of course).

kurwa mać (Polish for "long life") (Eisbaer), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:31 (twelve years ago) link

just remembered that I caught a screening of Dr. Strangelove back in lolcollege. My first time seeing it!

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:34 (twelve years ago) link

I saw it in 35mm but was 12 years old and don't really remember much about the screening itself due to having been terrified. Have seen it a dozen times on DVD and Blu-Ray since. I've seen 2001 in 70mm at the AFI, Lolita in 35mm at the Cleveland Cinematheque, and Eyes Wide Shut in its theatrical run.

Flagpost Sitta (Phil D.), Friday, 2 March 2012 11:22 (twelve years ago) link

The DVD/Blu-Ray of the shining still only contains the theatrical print, rather than the longer television version, which i don't think has ever been made available to purchase - just as the original, longer theatrical cut of 2001 remains MIA.

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 11:25 (twelve years ago) link

The DVD/Blu-Ray of the shining still only contains the theatrical print, rather than the longer television version

No, this "longer television version" was the original theatrical release! Save for the penultimate scene of Barry Nelson visiting Shelley Duvall in the hospital, which I saw on opening night but was cut by Kubrick after a few days and has never been seen again. THEN he further cut it AGAIN from 144 minutes to 113 after MONTHS. I saw this version once and it's total hash from my POV.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/alternateversions

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 12:30 (twelve years ago) link

OK, rereading Ward's post I don't know what the difference is, if any between "the longer television version" and "the original, longer theatrical cut" is. I don't think it was SK's practice to re-edit for TV (aside from the violence/nudity in The Shining for broadcast censorship).

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 12:37 (twelve years ago) link

ahh, looking at the IMDB entry, it seems that the "longer television version" i know (from watching it on britishes tv) is, in fact, the original long theatrical cut (minus that final scene.) i'm p sure, tho, that it's the shorter 'European version' that's on the DVD and Blu-Ray in the UK, thoguh again, it appears the american dvd/blu ray is the longer version.

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 12:48 (twelve years ago) link

so i guess i have to buy the region 1 dvd to get the longer cut

btw, did anything ever come of atom egoyan's plan to make an opera based on the film of the shining?

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 12:49 (twelve years ago) link

Strange, I remember 1980 audience laughing at most of the stuff the guy is surprised about here.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/i-saw-the-last-showing-of-the-warner-bros-35mm-print-of-the-shining/

And though I've never come around to liking this film, it's a shame there are going to be even more "last 35mm screenings."

― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, March 1, 2012 2:11 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

ah shit, i had no idea that was the last ever showing of the 35mm print. i was planning on going too!

RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Friday, 2 March 2012 14:00 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.