gender

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (459 of them)

but seriously, oh what a world it would be if we could all voice our opinions and then use rigorous scientific method-like analysis to call bullshit on the ones that don't serve the whole
xps
hm

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago) link

obv i'm not talking about quantitative science itself there BUT choosing to fund certain projects could be determined in such a way. i'm being a socialist now tho with this line.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:09 (twelve years ago) link

Science is the only known corrective for the limits of human cognition. No matter how discomforting the truth of what it reveals, we must abide by its findings until better findings come along.

Banaka™ (banaka), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:10 (twelve years ago) link

lol

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:12 (twelve years ago) link

Wait, so high-testosterone males are stable extraverts who engage in antisocial and risk-taking behavior?

― happiness is the new productivity (Hurting 2), Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:04 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

"stable" in that they're consistently extroverted, yeah

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:17 (twelve years ago) link

banaka otm, posthuman future now plz

high five delivery device (Abbbottt), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:25 (twelve years ago) link

I don't quite know how to posit this without sounding suuuper airheaded, but I'll try...

I know that menstrual synchrony is kinda dismissed as hogwash hearsay, but I've always wondered if hormonally certain groups/types of people (and types could even mean on a chemical level, I'm not sure)...if there's ever some kind of...'hivemind' way that gender can manifest. Whether it's in male violence for example.

And I'm not discounting behavioural choice here. I don't quite know what I'm suggesting. But I'm just wondering about all the ways that 'typically' male/female behaviour come out, and if we all have the same kind of stew, as gbx, described it, if there's ever circumstances where certain behaviours might seem to manifest innately?

I'm kind of lost in my own question now so I'll pull the chute and apologize in advance for being so hilariously nebulous

Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:29 (twelve years ago) link

i think it's been proven that humans are social creatures and that yes 'hivemind' exists to a certain extent! it's the only way to explain the popularity of reality tv anyway

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:32 (twelve years ago) link

and other things that groups of people like

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:33 (twelve years ago) link

^ science

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:33 (twelve years ago) link

science rules

Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link

it's like magic

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link

science, how does it work

Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

bunsen burners are involved iirc

max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:37 (twelve years ago) link

we're gonna need some of those big glass beakers. Where's Walter White when you need him.

Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:39 (twelve years ago) link

hey, things have chilled back down over here. nice. anyway, i dunno about the idea of gender groups becoming one. i do notice that if i'm watching sports with a bunch of guys who like sports, i find that i can easily sink in and enjoy the game. i get caught up in the action, work to figure out the details, even commit emotionally to my team. if i'm on my own, however, sports are the most boring shit in the universe. don't think i do this anywhere near as much with groups of girls.

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link

in other words, my self is socially dependent, is redefined constantly by my social environment. this extends to stuff like gender and even my body. who and what i am are not by any means constant.

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 February 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link

which i guess = VGrrl OTM

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 February 2012 01:16 (twelve years ago) link

Just FYI, I'm caught up with both the feminist and gender threads. I think I should win an award for that.

Jeff, Thursday, 16 February 2012 13:23 (twelve years ago) link

don't be so competitive, man

"renegade" gnome (remy bean), Thursday, 16 February 2012 14:03 (twelve years ago) link

don't think i do this anywhere near as much with groups of girls.

You don't know the same girls I do. I've watched the last two World Cups and the last two Euros w/a group of women

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago) link

i get caught up in the action, work to figure out the details, even commit emotionally to my team.

Why do you think I'm into soccer?

one little aioli (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:02 (twelve years ago) link

lol nearly xp w MW

one little aioli (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:03 (twelve years ago) link

girls.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago) link

Well, to be fair, it was in opposition to "guys".

getting good with gulags (beachville), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:35 (twelve years ago) link

Not saying it's not a blunder, but...

getting good with gulags (beachville), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago) link

Note how I both echoed contenderizer but shifted to ladies women.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago) link

Why do you think I'm into soccer?

b/c you're an Anglophile?

jaymc, Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago) link

You have to admit to the eye-candy aspect, Laurel

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago) link

The only eye candy aspect that interests me is cuet skinheads also watching the game tbh. The players? Tscheh.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago) link

Except for Agger obv.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago) link

LOL

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago) link

The only part of the last WC that my gf cared two cents about was the daily post in Jezebel of the best abs or thighs or something.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:24 (twelve years ago) link

That thing is so fuckin annoying.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago) link

This is undoubtedly sexist as hell of me but I also like watching w/my ladyfriends 'cause I get all the dirt on the WAGs.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago) link

I'm a little ashamed to say that her present fb crush is none other than the Special One. De gustibus, etc...

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago) link

No, I meant my experience is exactly like contend's: I like other people liking the game. I like the tacit permission to let go and feel something that other people are sharing. That's it. My complete intro to soccer as a thing was with a bunch of Americans who were absolute maniacs for it, no public scene was too large, crying after the game was de rigueur win or lose. I still feel this.

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:30 (twelve years ago) link

i do notice that if i'm watching sports with a bunch of guys who like sports, i find that i can easily sink in and enjoy the game. i get caught up in the action, work to figure out the details, even commit emotionally to my team. if i'm on my own, however, sports are the most boring shit in the universe.
...
in other words, my self is socially dependent, is redefined constantly by my social environment.

this is so alien to me. i think of my sense of self as way too hard-won to be so malleable. ha, the last conversation i had along these lines was with kelly clarkson (she agreed with me)

first period don't give a fuck, second period gon get cut (lex pretend), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago) link

i agree, laurel.

and lex, it's not malleable, exactly - there's no bending w/r/t perception or cognition, but rather a heightened empathy for Human Achievement or shared spectacle or common experience. kind of akin to good times at a bad movie, b/c the rest of the audience finds it equally hilares.

"renegade" gnome (remy bean), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago) link

No, I meant my experience is exactly like contend's: I like other people liking the game. I like the tacit permission to let go and feel something that other people are sharing. That's it. My complete intro to soccer as a thing was with a bunch of Americans who were absolute maniacs for it, no public scene was too large, crying after the game was de rigueur win or lose. I still feel this.

― drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:30 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This exactly why I like sports most specifically going to actual games. There's something so amazing and electrifying about sharing that buzz and excitement. It's amazing.

I even went to basketball game recently and had a blast specifically because of this. I mean, I know NOTHING about basketball but watching and feeling everyone get so into it made it awesome.

wolf kabob (ENBB), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link

I prefer but don't need society to get into soccer. I don't even need commentary though I like to hear the crowd.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago) link

I enjoy football (American) when I am watching it with friends who know more than me – that is most of my friends - and add the value of a soundtrack or emotional pulse and interactivity. fwiw, my mom and aunt are the football fans in my family - my dad could give a rat's ass for any game except competitive ice skating (?).

"renegade" gnome (remy bean), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago) link

You know what makes me really angry and could probably either fit somewhere in here or in the IA thread - fan gear made for women that is all pink and rhinestoned and ridiculous. I hate it to the point where if I see some girl/woman wearing that sort of thing I will automatically assume I'd hate her. I realize that isn't necessarily true but the mere existence of that stuff bothers the hell out of me let alone the people that actually by it.

wolf kabob (ENBB), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago) link

the Patriots / Susan G. Koman stuff is espesh egregious

"renegade" gnome (remy bean), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago) link

I am somewhat tired of ppl who say something about a pink shirt. A simple nice shirt/tie combo would be sufficient, if you have to say something, but 'brave', 'gay, wink, wink' and 'in touch w/my feminine side' are perfectly ludicrous.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago) link

communal experiences enhance stuff i already like but if it's something i don't enjoy on some level already, i'm either gonna be left cold or just be annoyed if i have to endure it with other people. football is a very good example of that

first period don't give a fuck, second period gon get cut (lex pretend), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago) link

It's so patronizing to 'feminize' sports gear as if a fan wouldn't wear the normal color scheme. Come to think of it, I know lots of normal American women who wear Am fb shirts on Sundays.

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago) link

It's incredibly patronizing. I work right by Fenway Park so see a lot of basball fans during the season and (I mean I guess this is why they make it) but lots of women love that stuff! It's amazing to me how much of it is sold/worn. I HATE IT. /rant

wolf kabob (ENBB), Thursday, 16 February 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago) link

If there's anything that cheapens, it's friggin rhinestones.

"I like shiny things!"

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 16 February 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago) link

somebody's not getting a vajazzler for x-mas

"renegade" gnome (remy bean), Thursday, 16 February 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.