Radiohead - In Rainbows

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1608 of them)

yeah i hear what you're talking about, my guess is it was an editing/mixing mistake but they left it in because they thought it sounded cool

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:18 (five years ago) Permalink

i wonder if maybe it was some kind of scratch cue during the recording process and they decided to leave it in. kind of a weird place for that though.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:18 (five years ago) Permalink

I keep missing it but I'm listening on a shitty boombox with no time display.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:21 (five years ago) Permalink

i think this is one of my favorite radiohead albums. maybe like #2 or #3.

― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:39 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's my number 1.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:22 (five years ago) Permalink

I listened to the drum stem (which I downloaded from iTunes, lol) and it does sound like a digital thing.

jaymc, Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:24 (five years ago) Permalink

the discbox packaging warped my LP's over time... total bummer.

BringTheAuBonPain, Thursday, 16 February 2012 01:26 (five years ago) Permalink

ten months pass...

Played this at our record club last night. By far my favourite thing they've done.

http://devonrecordclub.wordpress.com/2013/01/03/radiohead-in-rainbows-round-43-nicks-choice/

comedy is unnatural and abhorrent (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:43 (four years ago) Permalink

Interestingly Rob was talking about how he's barely listened to it, because of how awkward the discbox packaging is.

comedy is unnatural and abhorrent (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:44 (four years ago) Permalink

In terms of the actual music, I haven’t a clue what Thom Yorke is singing about here, and don’t really care – he uses his voice much more effectively and with greater understanding here than he has before, layering it beatifically on “Numb”, finding jitteringly compelling space on “15 Step”, edging towards sublimation on “Reckoner”.

Do you mean "Nude" here? Speaking of which, that's the one song on In Rainbows that I could without. For some reason when he hits that high, isolated falsetto note near the end it embarrasses me to listen to it in a way that doesn't occur in other Radiohead songs. Also, "Nude" is an old radiohead song (from 1996 or early 1997, i think?) that fans were clamoring to be released for years, and then when it finally came out on In Rainbows it was disappointing on a few levels because I'd already heard it so many times on bootlegs back on high school, and also it somehow sounded dulled down compared to the original!

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 3 January 2013 17:03 (four years ago) Permalink

Damnit, I do. Will correct.

comedy is unnatural and abhorrent (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 3 January 2013 17:07 (four years ago) Permalink

Have they got a song called Numb? I can't think of one but it's like the most Radiohead-y one-word songtitle ever.

comedy is unnatural and abhorrent (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 3 January 2013 17:09 (four years ago) Permalink

Don't know about Radiohead but Portishead have a song called "Numb" (the one with the duck noises in the beginning on "Dummy") and it fits also very well as one word song title of the band.

alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 3 January 2013 18:04 (four years ago) Permalink

Nude was my initial instant favourite on the album and I think the spacey arrangement is lovely - probably helps that I'm not a mega-obsessive fan and had no awareness of previous versions of the song. Reckoner and Weird Fishes have taken the lead in my affections in the years since IR was released.

I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Thursday, 3 January 2013 18:06 (four years ago) Permalink

The "Live From The Basement" versions are even better, adding a missing human element.

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 4 January 2013 00:30 (four years ago) Permalink

four years pass...

this video takes a lot of detours to make the simple point that the piano riff in Videotape is syncopated - fun nonetheless:

https://www.vox.com/videos/2017/8/4/16092184/videotape-radiohead-secret-rhythm-earworm

niels, Saturday, 5 August 2017 18:10 (two months ago) Permalink

That video is simultaneously interesting and, depending on your point of view, what was wrong with much of modern Radiohead/Yorke.

"Mmmm, I like this. It's complex and inert." :P

yesca, Sunday, 6 August 2017 16:22 (two months ago) Permalink

i just skimmed that video but listening to "videotape" again it seems like bullshit? i'm no musicologist but it feels like for the piano to be syncopated it has to be syncopated against something, but everything else in the song follows the same timing as the piano until the metronome/click thing that comes in at the end. so i'd say maybe the click sound is syncopated but not the piano.

na (NA), Monday, 7 August 2017 20:52 (two months ago) Permalink

I think they're right based on the live versions of the songs, especially that festival one. And the drumming (like on the Basement version, and even the studio one) makes a lot more sense this way. But yeah it seems like a silly and stubborn arrangement choice, it just makes it really hard to play, for no real payoff.

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 7 August 2017 20:56 (two months ago) Permalink

Also yes that video could have been 45 seconds long.

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 7 August 2017 20:57 (two months ago) Permalink

maybe the band is thinking of it as being syncopated as they play it but just listening to the album version it's hard to hear it that way

na (NA), Monday, 7 August 2017 21:03 (two months ago) Permalink

i just skimmed that video...
maybe the band is thinking of it as being syncopated as they play it but just listening to the album version it's hard to hear it that way

yeah, near the end of the video they finally make clear that they're talking about the syncopation in the live version in the song, and that the album version's lack of a backbeat takes away the syncopation, even though there are still traces of to be heard (like in the metronome you mentioned, and also just the phrasing of the vocals imo)

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 August 2017 21:20 (two months ago) Permalink

"In Rainbows Turns 10" cash-in headlines should be arriving in a few short weeks. Does life get any better?

billstevejim, Monday, 7 August 2017 21:25 (two months ago) Permalink

I'm listening to the "Live from the Basement" version on Youtube and the piano is establishing a straight beat along with the kick drum, with syncopated flourishes popping up here and there in the accompanying percussion.

this iphone speaks many languages (DJP), Monday, 7 August 2017 21:43 (two months ago) Permalink

maybe it's kind of like an easter egg, from a listening perspective I'm not sure what it adds

I'm surprised Thom rates it so highly, I'd take that and bodysnatchers off In Rainbows if I were sequencing it

niels, Monday, 7 August 2017 21:57 (two months ago) Permalink

I agree. But on this version, there's a pretty clear drum beat that puts the piano/vocals a 1/6th note ahead of each quarter note: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isETL6R7x2w

Maybe by the time of the Basement version they decided to stop being so hard on themselves and just play it the way everyone else hears it. Or maybe they didn't want to explain to Clive that "no, actually..."

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 7 August 2017 22:00 (two months ago) Permalink

xp

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 7 August 2017 22:00 (two months ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.