i hate that section. "irrelevant" chris fogle turns a page etc.
― zverotic discourse (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:34 (twelve years ago) link
it's extremely sentimental in this context.
also im not sure how interested i am in this book even ignoring the title, and i love dfw.
who is "d.t. max"
― the third kind of dubstep (Jordan), Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago) link
he wrote this article on DFW for the New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/03/09/090309fa_fact_max?printable=true
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 February 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago) link
also im not sure how interested i am in this book even ignoring the title
^^ agree
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 10 February 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago) link
oooooh
http://www.thepointmag.com/2012/essays/coming-to-terms
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago) link
Jerk friend thinks cool friend is jerk.
― getting good with gulags (beachville), Friday, 17 February 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago) link
frazen is just a dick
― dave coolier (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 17 February 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago) link
this is not a very well-written essay so far
"Wallace’s lifelong battle with depression, culminating in his grizzly suicide"
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Friday, 17 February 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago) link
yeah that was lol but i liked the second half of the essay for saying most of the things i'd said at it during the first half, including
What is the most real thing? This is the question that artists like Wallace want to use their fiction to investigate, and which the realist so often behaves as if he has already answered.
which is pretty key regarding a guy who thinks that the problem with america is ebooks
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Friday, 17 February 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago) link
that is a pretty long essay just to point out that franzen is dick
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Friday, 17 February 2012 17:04 (twelve years ago) link
thanks for that, que. just reading through, i'm remembering how much less offensive i seemed to find farther away than some people, here. & i think the story about signing a book with a drawing of his penis is being misconstrued as some sort of weird graffiti rather than self-deprecatingly juvenile taunt.
― john-claude van donne (schlump), Friday, 17 February 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago) link
suicide by bear
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 17:17 (twelve years ago) link
yeah i don't think the essay was well written but in parts it made some excellent points about what kind of writers those two are and the differences between them.
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago) link
I just started The Marriage Plot and there is a character in there who is interested in philosophy, wears a bandana and ponytail, and chews tobacco.
― jaymc, Friday, 17 February 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago) link
(Presumably this has been noticed by others.)
haha yeah, there's been a whole media clusterfuck about it, pretty entertaining stuff
― CANDY aka JUNK (some dude), Friday, 17 February 2012 17:22 (twelve years ago) link
jaymc, this is a really good piece on the topic: http://nymag.com/print/?/arts/books/features/jeffrey-eugenides-2011-10/
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Friday, 17 February 2012 17:22 (twelve years ago) link
man that is a horrible title
Should be noted that this title is 10X better than the title Max had originally attached to the book, which must've been murdered during the later editing rounds.
― Spertify (CompuPost), Friday, 17 February 2012 18:18 (twelve years ago) link
xp Cool, that looks good. I'll check it out when I'm done with the novel.
― jaymc, Friday, 17 February 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago) link
which was. . .
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago) link
don't leave us hanging
― CANDY aka JUNK (some dude), Friday, 17 February 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago) link
not really, but that would've been the worst possible title
excellent
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago) link
1nfinite F1re :/
(Googleproofed since I was sworn to keep this dumb, insignificant tidbit secret)
― Spertify (CompuPost), Friday, 17 February 2012 19:02 (twelve years ago) link
still laughing at don't leave us hanging
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Friday, 17 February 2012 19:02 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.google.com/imgres%3Fum%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial%26biw%3D1680%26bih%3D850%26tbm%3Disch%26tbnid%3DEFYXUAZGGkQaBM%3A%26imgrefurl%3Dhttp%3A//twitter.com/infinitefires%26docid%3DxsMUvaRAAop1tM%26imgurl%3Dhttp%3A//a0.twimg.com/profile_images/861973297/untitled.JPG%26w%3D500%26h%3D375%26ei%3DYqQ-T7e3A83TgQfKrLWxCA%26zoom%3D1
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Friday, 17 February 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago) link
good title for an action movie tho xp
― johnny crunch, Friday, 17 February 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago) link
sorry
http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/861973297/untitled.JPG
Infinite Fire is a better title
― Mr. Que, Friday, 17 February 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316182370/
― markers, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 01:39 (twelve years ago) link
^ !
― john. a resident of chicago., Tuesday, 21 February 2012 01:55 (twelve years ago) link
yeesh i've taken 4 months break from IJ and not sure i can get back into it
and i was like 400 pages in! there's no way i can just negate all that and start all over again this summer. entertaining but fucking brutal book.
― NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 02:48 (twelve years ago) link
it took me a year to get around to reading _the pale king_ but i'm doing it now and it makes me feel i was wasting time reading other novels.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 02:49 (twelve years ago) link
xp you can get back into it. I spent 11 months finishing it in spurts, my longest break may have approached that long. You're not going to build a totally coherent map of the plot on one readthrough and it's not even that important to enjoying the novel. It's super impressionistic, so just pick up where you were and remember that confusion is part of the intended effect.
― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:51 (twelve years ago) link
Yeah man just start over - that's what I did
― Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:38 (twelve years ago) link
This is kinda neat - a police sketch of Hal Incandenza based on the description of him from the book:
http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzq65kd7hB1r3ke0zo1_500.jpg
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:49 (twelve years ago) link
eyes not dead enough imo
― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:50 (twelve years ago) link
blame the software's "dead eyes" slider.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:51 (twelve years ago) link
maybe it's a sketch from prior to his video room anhedonia epiphany
― jesus christ (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 05:10 (twelve years ago) link
That book is so quietly sinister, nobody ever talks about that
― Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 05:13 (twelve years ago) link
re: uncollected journalism etc: most of those pieces seem to be up at the howling fantods under less portentious titles
http://www.thehowlingfantods.com/dfw/uncollected-dfw.html
their news page also mentions the paperback edition of the pale king will have four extra chapters, which led to my yelling 'oh come on fuck off' at the computer
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:11 (twelve years ago) link
also mentions the paperback edition of the pale king will have four extra chapters,
Ugh. Fuck Off.
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:21 (twelve years ago) link
i think there was some discussion elsewhere about how they were being billed as 'scenes' rather than chapters, maybe curtailing expectations of their length/importance, but yeah i mean i'd totally like to read them. i was trying to remember whether the most recent of the pieces that were extracted before its release in the nyer - about a kid-incarnation of one of the workers' toy truck - made it in, which i guess it did but i can't remember re-reading in there.
― john-claude van donne (schlump), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:27 (twelve years ago) link
i don't think it was.
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago) link
'scenes' just makes it even more annoyingly like a dvd release
are the constituent parts available in austin or does little, brown have them? how long are we looking at before someone can go in the archive and evaluate pietsch's choices?
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago) link
afaik the deal was always going to be that the materials would be available upon release of the book, but yeah i've never heard anything about them. after that terrific awl piece on his various self-help books, the estate removed the relevant texts from the collection, which i totally understand & think is not any kind of fascistic censorship or anything, but which is a weird thing about the archives in general.
i have v good memories of the pale king, anyway. i have not read infinite jest.
― john-claude van donne (schlump), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago) link
bio out 8/30 -- http://www.amazon.com/Every-Love-Story-Ghost-Wallace/dp/0670025925/
― markers, Tuesday, 6 March 2012 04:40 (twelve years ago) link
Just started Infinite Jest, but I'm having a little trouble with the stilted prose ... reminds me of one of those science fiction authors who write like crap but are famed to have interesting ideas. Is it worth slogging through to get to the fabled good stuff?
― Spectrum, Saturday, 19 May 2012 19:35 (eleven years ago) link
Only you can answer that question. Slog on until it hurts to slog any further. If this isn't your time to enjoy it, come back to it and try again later in life.
― Aimless, Saturday, 19 May 2012 19:38 (eleven years ago) link