Yes and 'How Do You Listen To Prog?'

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (165 of them)
This is a prog thread, the words 'pretentious' and 'wank' = strickly infra-dig!

dave q, Friday, 3 October 2003 09:28 (twenty years ago) link

Close To The Edge is (only)38 minutes long yet could have been twice as long and still fit on a single CD. But there are only 3 'songs'!!

I love Close To The Edge now. Siberian Thingy is ace, as is the first track. Not sure about And You And I.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:57 (twenty years ago) link

They often sound like The Beach Boys!

I still don't like Steve Howe much.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 3 October 2003 11:15 (twenty years ago) link

The words "pretentious" and "wank" give meaning when speaking of "art for art's sake". All kinds of lack of melody is "art for art's sake" and is always useless wank. :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 3 October 2003 11:16 (twenty years ago) link

Steve Howe's tone can get annoying, particularly on Relayer, but Chris Squire and Bill Bruford are kings among men, so to speak. Bill Bruford wrote the main riff in Siberian Khatru too, so he gets points for that!

Damian (Damian), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:15 (twenty years ago) link

Jon Anderson and Rick Wakeman remain the two main reasons why Yes are great anyway :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:18 (twenty years ago) link

Curiously, I bought "The Ultimate Yes" about a month ago and have taken my time getting into it. Disc one is mostly good stuff, but disc two goes a bit pear shaped when it gets to the 80s era with Trevor Horn and all that. But when it's good, it's good - I like the way the vocal harmonies are far richer than I expected. Yes, the lyrics are toss, and sometimes they go on a bit (I've still not managed to get through to the end of the track from "Topographical oceans" yet), but sometimes the melodies and the playing come together to make a really cool noise.

I've not really added anything to the debate, have I? Oh well... next time I see some of those Yes remastered CDs cheap I'll have to snap a few up, because I want more now.

Rob M (Rob M), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:21 (twenty years ago) link

Question: why are Mahavishnu Orchestra considered jazz fusion and not prog? Is it because there are no vocals? They sound very prog to my ear.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:02 (twenty years ago) link

A lot of prog fans certainly like them. I think it's just to do with the players, most coming from a jazz background. Though, Mahavishnu's rep is based on their Eastern rave-ups, and people hardly ever talk about the softer stuff (their ballads sound to me very much in a jazz mold). Also, "Miles Davis" off Birds of Fire sounds to me like John McGlaughlin's chop-shredding version of the Bitches Brew/Jack Johnson style of fusion.

dleone (dleone), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:29 (twenty years ago) link

Or I guess that's "Miles Beyond".

dleone (dleone), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:32 (twenty years ago) link

Probably just because they were coming from the position of jazz musicians and extending what they were doing with rock rhythms and sounds, as opposed to groups based in rock songwriting who started stretching out and adding jazz and classical ideas.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:36 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, as said it's definitely because MO had a very jazz-like approach to their playing and songwriting, but added a lot of rock elements into it; hence what fusion became.

Some prog bands did eventually go over into fusion, like Soft Machine for instance, who started out as psych, went prog-with-lots-of-jazziness and then fusion.
To me it has a bit to do with how the songwriting and playing is focused. If you've ever seen Mahsvishnu Orchestra sheet music, you'll see there's also a lot of parts left open for ad lib... To me there's a pretty strong link to the sorta complex lines of hardbop and bebop taken up to a rock'n'roll fury.

Obviously this is a discussion that's been going for years. hardcore jazzguys who hate fusion will yell about it having nothing to do with jazz. While most other people tend to go "mano, what be this jazz shits? Get yer cane, pops!"

Try going to groups.google.com and search for something like 'fusion prog', and I'm sure you'll find plenty of arguments pro and con.
I know there was a looong discussion on rec.music.progressive a year or so back called "Is fusion prog?"

Great, genre-discussions! I usually try to keep out, but I couldn't help myself!
Is polka pop?
Is progmetal prog?
Is smoothjazz jazz?
Is industrial electronic?
Is bluegrass c&w?

Thank god I'm going out for the weekend so I won't be dorking up this thread any more http://www.organissimo.org/forum/html/emoticons/whistling.gif

Øystein Holm-Olsen (Øystein H-O), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:26 (twenty years ago) link

this thread reminded me to get 'close to the edge' cassette 2nd hand that i saw a couple of weeks back but didn't get (bcz I already had enough bargains).

from one listen I agree with Sundar's assessment: nice hooks, melodies but words cannot do justice to how awful that organ part is (with the really weedy ambient shit straight after that). Yes had some great melodies and rhythms but some boring bits. its Its pretty good, but nowhere near as great as Crimson ('red' is the only other prog rec i had before today).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link

I listened to Relayer last night, and it's a weird one even by their standards. Noisy, peculiar-sounding 'themes', and some bits that are almost scary. Not a bit of it is catchy, and since they were actually a chart-topping album act at that point, a pretty gutsy release. My favorite Roger Dean cover, too.

Sean (Sean), Friday, 3 October 2003 19:27 (twenty years ago) link

"Relayer" suffers badly from the lack of Rick Wakeman

"Soon" is still incredibly beautiful though. And "To Be Over" is great too.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 3 October 2003 23:11 (twenty years ago) link

Question: why are Mahavishnu Orchestra considered jazz fusion and not prog? Is it because there are no vocals? They sound very prog to my ear.

Ditto Zappa. I bought "Inner Mounting Flame" a while back because I remember quite liking it but I found it to be irritating nonsense for the most part.

Dadaismus (Dada), Sunday, 5 October 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

Doc, I'm not too surprised that you're digging the Yes CD's since a lot of the ZTT stuff, especially Who's afraid of the Art of Noise, parts of a Secret wish and disc one of Welcome to the pleasuredome sound very proggy to mine ears. In fact I think Howe does some of the 'licks' on the title track on WTTPD.

I'd also recommend to cure your Howe aversion finding some stuff by his former band Bodast. More like late period Small Faces, taut wired, jukebox britsoul rather than the panoramic space symphonies he produced with Yes.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Sunday, 5 October 2003 18:05 (twenty years ago) link

Propaganda's "a secret wish" features both steve howe, and ian mosley (the drummer from marillion!!)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 5 October 2003 18:22 (twenty years ago) link

I was listening to Boards of Canada's Geogaddi the other day and for some reason, "The Beach at Redpoint" reminded me in a weird way of "The Fish" - the aquatic-type theme, the steady pulse with the constant addition of new layers that sort of swallow you in, the wavy feel, the way the rhythms are just sort of off each other.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 6 October 2003 00:14 (twenty years ago) link

I went through the stage of hearing 90125 before any other yes stuff like many people; followed up by the yes album, close, and fragile; and like everyone else decided that 90125 was dross for years, until about two months ago when I pulled it out again and realized what a great artrock album it really is. distinct from prog, it really leans on the big rock production, but it does some surprising things and has a lot of memorable hooks. It stands apart from the rest of the yes catalog but def. has its charms, mainly in the production.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 6 October 2003 05:27 (twenty years ago) link

Hands up who's got a copy of Tales From Topographic Oceans? What do you make of it? On first listen, disc one is great - SOME of the best stuff they ever did, but disc two is... hmmm, I can't think of any other double albums that differ so much from one disc to the next in terms of how good they are (I'm not saying it's crap, mind you).

Damian (Damian), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:33 (twenty years ago) link

I have Tales and find it to be rather tedious. Haven't played it much though, despite having owned it for a few years by now, so who know, maybe it'll grow on me..... uRF.

Øystein Holm-Olsen (Øystein H-O), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:45 (twenty years ago) link

Well, it's always nice to see a good thread about my favourite band... I've got every studio album they released (and am waiting for the Rhino remasters of Yessongs and Yesshows), almost all of them both in vinyl and CD, and even some in the new Rhino-remastered editions as well. All of it is very good: dynamic, contemplative, noisy, melodic, you name it.

Funny how the third phase (after a first "British blues" phase and the second, "classic" phase) of the band hasn't been referred yet. As Rick Wakeman's solo career declined, and Yes were craving for a new breath for their career, Wakeman got back to the fold and Yes penned two (in my opinion) great albums (Going for the One & Tormato), which mixed their standard complex arrangements with a straight-forward rock feeling.
Highlights from this phase: Awaken - Parallels - On the Silent Wings of Freedom - Future Times, etc.

Then, the band started breaking up: Anderson quit, and Wakeman followed. Instead of quitting, Squire, Howe and White brought the Buggles (Trevor Horn and Geoff Downes) into the band and created my favourite Yes album ever: DRAMA. Probably the heaviest of all Yes albums, it is chock full of great basslines and guitar riffs. Horn is similar in tone and pitch to Jon Anderson (though he has a Police-era-Sting type accent), while Downes keeps himself away from flashy solos, providing mainly some textures and backgrounds, and the occasional melodic line. Machine Messiah, Does It Really Happen? and Tempus Fugit are the highlights, but all tracks are great.

After this schizoid line-up, Yes broke up for a couple of years, just to be reborn as a art-pop number, leaded by South Africa's own guitar-wankery master Trevor Rabin (who tried to overshadow a returning Jon Anderson both on singing and songwriting fields), and produced by former Yes-man Horn, but that's another story...

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:06 (twenty years ago) link

Funny to see al this prog-listening going on. I've recently been annoying my more tasteful friends by playing Genesis constantly, and I'm loving it. I'm really getting into the quieter, folky songs on their first couple of albums -- god they sound really mysterious and dark, The Musical Box, Harlequin, Seven Stones all that jazz. In fact Nursery Cryme is a great album if you ignore "The Return of the Giant Hogweed" which is just shit. Okay I guess it's quite funny if you want to look at it like that.

But yeah what I'm really loving is the creaky, grainy darkness of the folky tracks. All those Mellotrons, I love Mellotrons. Did any more-folk-less-prog bands make much use of the Mellotron? I'd love to hear it.

As for In the Court of the Crimson King, the first two tracks are amazing, but as it goes on I like the rest of it less and less...

I want suggestions!

Steve.n. (sjkirk), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

Hey Dr. C! I recognise those punk-rock blinkers you've been wearing - I wandered 'round wearing a very similar pair for many, many years myself!

Fwiw I think you started with the right band (Yes) but I'm absolutely positive you'll like Caravan (they evolved from The Wylde Flowers who of course were part of the Canterbury Scene.... may I presume you're familiar with Soft Machine, Gong, Robert Wyatt and Kevin Ayers already?) and King Crimson.

After that I'd suggest you give Camel, Barclay James Harvest, Jethro Tull and Van Der Graaf Generator (Mr. Lydon was a fan of theirs you know!) a try too.

In all instances however I suggest you treat their "post-punk" output with extreme caution....

My personal theory (which naturally I am not prepared to elaborate on, discuss or justify in any way whatsoever) is that pretty much all of the Prog bands unconsciously did everything they could to pave the way and set the stage for the advent of Punk; laying themselves wide open to every bit of shit that was thrown at them in the process; by plunging head-first straight up their own self-indulgent arses at some time between '75 and '79.

Of course this is why fine, noble, intelligent, upstanding young gentlemen like yourself and myself believed all the Punk rhetoric and saw nothing of value in Prog - because by then it really was all a load of old bollocks!

The one exception to this wildly sweeping generalisation that is so hugely and monumentally, glaringly bloody obvious that I can't possibly even attempt to ignore it, is King Crimson ("like Remain in Light with more noodling and even more polyrhythms" isn't too bad description of 1981's "Discipline" and 1982's "Beat" btw, although of course they've gone on somewhere else again since then!)

Oh and there's absolutely nothing wrong with compilations when you're trying these bands out either; that sounds like just another pompous conceit to me (although that might just be a fragment of those old blinkers still stuck in the corner of my eye). In fact I'd specifically recommend:
"Where But For Caravan Would I...?"
"The Compact King Crimson" (or failing that "In The Court Of The Crimson King" AND "Discipline")
"Echoes" (Camel)
"The Collection" / "Mockingbird" (Barclay James Harvest)
"Original Masters" (Jethro Tull)
"First Generation" (Van Der Graaf)

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

Can we drop this ludicrous revisionism which states that Punk was formed as a direct result of or reaction to Prog? This is such a simplistic and simple-minded approach to what actually happened. In fact, the greatest objects of scorn for Punk Rock's pioneers (in Britain at least) were the rock aristocracy of Led Zep, The Who, The Stones, Floyd, McCartney etc, not to mention all that Californian soft-rock/ country rock crap that was clogging up the airwaves. Let's face it, come 1975-76, Prog Rock was pretty much dead in the water (as Stewart states above) - a fact acknowledged by (and actively welcomed by) some of its leading proponents: Fripp, Hammill, Gabriel. Why would Johnny Rotten have cared about frigging ELP or Yes in 1976?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:41 (twenty years ago) link

But yeah what I'm really loving is the creaky, grainy darkness of the folky tracks

No mellotrons, but if you want the darkest, dankest, proggy folk, you could do worse than investigate the first album by Comus
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~rneckmag/comus.html

NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:49 (twenty years ago) link

Dadaismus is pretty much OTM.

Fwiw (I did say I wasn't going to attempt to justify my comments precisely because I knew they'd inevitably lead to this sort of debate!) my belief is that the demise of Prog through auto-asphyxiation and the advent of Punk (in the UK at least) were both direct consequences of the huge bottleneck that seemed to exist at that time between the bands with the dry ice and the flying pigs and who could fill the stadia (the "rock aristocracy" that Dadaismus describes above) and the little guys slogging their way 'round the pub circuit.

The guys at the bottom thought they'd never be able to get to the top (hence the willingness of so many of them to leap aboard the first passing bandwagon that offered a chance for them to break the stalemate and get noticed) and the guys at the top who had no real competition and thought they could do what ever the fuck they liked.

Of those at the top, the Proggers simply happened to be those whose self-indulgence was most obvious and undeniable and this in turn made them the easiest targets!

Hence of course the reason why it was OK for Mr Lydon to wander 'round wearing a Pink Floyd T-shirt with "I hate" written across it whilst singing the praises of Can, Beefheart, "Bitches Brew" and Van Der Graaf Generator!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

... and of course a lot of punk musicians had actually been prog rock fans - which is not really surprising if you grew up in the late 60s/ early 70s but which the current batch of hipster prog fans seem to find of enormous significance, heaven knows why it's anymore significant than being a Slade fan or a Beatles fan.

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:21 (twenty years ago) link

[i]Hands up who's got a copy of Tales From Topographic Oceans? What do you make of it?[/i]

A flawed gem.

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 14:42 (twenty years ago) link

Re: Mahavishnu Orchestra:

Q: "Would the Mahavishnu Orchestra appeal to people who follow prog rock?"
A: "For many, yes."

Q: "Is the Mahavishnu Orchestra a 'prog rock' band or a 'fusion' band?"
A: "Who cares?"

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 14:50 (twenty years ago) link

Would it be rude of me to hijack this thread and ask the assembled Prog-nuts what Peter Hammill albums they'd recommend???

Not a hard-core Hammill nut, but have heard a few...

Definitely Recommended:
A Black Box

Good:
Silent Corner...
Nadir's Last Chance
Fireships
Loops & Reels

Eh:
Chameleon in the Shadow of Night (solidly in the minority here)
Out of Water

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 14:56 (twenty years ago) link

"Relayer" suffers badly from the lack of Rick Wakeman

I agree with you, if you replace the words "suffers badly from..." with "if so much fucking better it hurts because of..." :)

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 15:00 (twenty years ago) link

The tracks on the first two Mahavishnu albs - the only ones I have - are relatively short, and there no 'suites' or 'concepts' (other than the overall Eastern-Mysticism vibe, which to me feels more like post-Hendrix hardrock psych - also see McLaughlin's wonderful 'Devotion' alb, which Chuck inc. in 'Stairway to Hell')

I love 'Inner Mounting Flame', but I still have a bit of a prob. w/ the jazz-rock electric violin on it (at least there's no jazz-flute!)

Andrew L (Andrew L), Sunday, 12 October 2003 15:04 (twenty years ago) link

Gotta disagree with you on the Camel though, those early albums are pretty dang good, as long as you don't go pass Moon Madness

"Lunar Sea"...mmmm......

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

Or I guess that's "Miles Beyond".

Does that song seem to be riffing off of "Mademoiselle Mabry" (off of Miles' Filles de Kilimanjaro), or am I just imagining things?

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 October 2003 15:13 (twenty years ago) link

I love Tales From Topographic Oceans. If I had to rank the Yes albums I own, from favorite to least favorite, it would run:

Relayer
Tales From Topographic Oceans
Yessongs
Close To The Edge
Fragile

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Sunday, 12 October 2003 16:32 (twenty years ago) link

What?!? No "The Yes Album"? Go out and get it now! :)

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Sunday, 12 October 2003 18:00 (twenty years ago) link

Doesn't have Roger Dean cover art. Thus, I shall not purchase it. Seriously, though, as my ranking should indicate, I prefer their more abstract/extended/up-their-own-asses stuff to their still-trying-to-be-a-"normal"-rock-band stuff. So The Yes Album, being earlier than anything else I own, is unlikely to please me.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Sunday, 12 October 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

You might be surprised... It's much more abstract and extended than their two previous efforts (though they would get even more up to their asses with Fragile). Try "Yours is no Disgrace" and see for yourself...

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Sunday, 12 October 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link

I think Tales was the wrong album for Yes to do right after Bruford left. They should have eased into it, maybe done a Fragile knockoff, and then tried Tales.

dleone (dleone), Sunday, 12 October 2003 21:05 (twenty years ago) link

Oh yay, Joe is back! So I can talk about Tales... without feeling like I'm admitting to something really unseemly like having a drawer full of whips and chains. I'm starting to think the album is really, really great - they might have fallen on their arses with regard to whatever Jon Anderson was striving blindly towards, but it sounds great! I don't care for all of it, seeing as it has some of the most annoying Moog sounds in history, but sometimes I can be totally convinced that they're a pop band, certainly for a few minutes during Ritual when the song keeps doing those weird turns... that 'at all, at all' refrain is definitely one of THE best moments in Yes history.

Damian (Damian), Sunday, 12 October 2003 22:24 (twenty years ago) link

All Krautrock is prog, isn't it? So why are Yes viifies and...Neu aren't?

Vebga, Sunday, 12 October 2003 22:35 (twenty years ago) link

Neu! are probably the punkiest example of krautrock, mind you.

Damian (Damian), Sunday, 12 October 2003 22:46 (twenty years ago) link

Mmmm. But Prog is always projected as so Un-Peel, whereas Peel faves the Cocteau Twins are
Thee Proggest Group evah!!!1

Venga, Sunday, 12 October 2003 23:01 (twenty years ago) link

Hmm, good call! As a side note, what I find interesting is that some of the biggest Stereolab fans on ILM are some of the biggest Yes fans (I'm including myself and at least two other ILMers in that reckoning). It is tempting to imagine Yes at the height of their fame with bored French girl singers on vocals instead of Anderson, Squire and Howe - "chased amid fusions of wonder in moments hardly seen forgotten, tu ti tu ta tu ti tu ta".

Prog was un-Peel because the man himself felt that groups like Yes, ELP and Deep Purple didn't need what limited exposure the show could offer them (he was presenting Top Gear at the time, I think). The odd thing is, while he wouldn't play Deep Purple, he's perfectly content to play the Datsuns. But I don't want to concern myself with them here.

It's funny how Tales From Topographic Oceans makes Relayer seem as concise as an early Beatles album.

Damian (Damian), Sunday, 12 October 2003 23:39 (twenty years ago) link

I love Yes, but I confess I could never get into Tales From Topographic Oceans. Maybe I just haven't tried hard enough, I don't know. I should give it another spin. I love their long-form works like "Close to the Edge" and "Gates of Delerium", but Tales always bored the shit out of me.

The Yes Album is totally great, Phil - you should definitely pick it up. I can't imagine that you wouldn't like it. It's got Bruford, Squire and Howe, for crying out loud! It has to be good!! "Starship Trooper" and "Yours is No Disgrace" are as "prog" as anything on the follow-up Fragile.

Let's talk about Going For the One! I love that record. The title cut is one of the best songs they ever wrote, and "Wonderous Stories" is classic hippie Anderson.

Has anyone heard that alternate "Gates of Delerium" yet?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:18 (twenty years ago) link

christ, I misspelled "delirium" 20 times in that post.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

strangely enough i just got my copy of yessongs signed by roger dean a couple of weeks ago. i haven't listened to it for 27 years.

gaz (gaz), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:34 (twenty years ago) link

I have the alternate Gates Of Delirium - I'm not sure I really needed to hear a version with Jon Anderson working out the words... some of those studio run-through things added to the reissues as bonus tracks really show up the flaws in his singing. The alternate version of And You And I isn't too bad though, granted.

Damian (Damian), Monday, 13 October 2003 06:58 (twenty years ago) link

Re "Don't Stop Believin'" - I think the 'crescendo' effect comes from all the ingenious interlocking parts. The bass figure is originally played with the left hand on the piano intro, then the bass gtr plays it in the first bit of the song, while the guitar is playing the same chords as the piano intro the solo, and then the vocal chorus at the end restates the theme from the guitar solo while the gtr and bass are now doubling that original intro! It all comes together! And when Journey do it you don't even notice the command of 'classical' structure, compare it to a similar-contemporaneous distillation/compression move like Rush "New World Man" which sounds like enthusiastic amateurism in comparison!

Re "Escape" - only 'problem' I have is that the G/D/A part just utterly fuckin' destroys me. More air-drum seizures! Then that subsequent ONE LINE from Perry is just "this is the voice of God speaking", a magisterial "we have achieved orbital velocity now, goodbye Earth!", the rest of the song seems like an anticlimax to me. Still an incredible attempt. Sonic analog to the picture on the cover!

Re Triumph - dunno, never could get with the singing. Maybe if Rik Emmett was Steve Perry...but then nobody is, are they?

dave q, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:20 (twenty years ago) link

During a phoner, I once asked Jon Anderson what "Mountains Come Out of the Sky/And They Stand There" meant. At first he attempted to explain and then he hung up on me.

mopepope (musicmope), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:47 (twenty years ago) link

Good for Jon. I'd hang up on any hack who used "phoner" myself.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:51 (twenty years ago) link

dominique,

TERRIFIC video! Haven't yet seen any video of the Blasquiz-era (though have seen Bobino, which more than makes up for it).

Guy Clement = Tony Levin's French twin?

Joe (Joe), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 11:58 (twenty years ago) link

BTW, another entry in the "revolution will not be televised, but the apocalypse will be administered via Internet" series:

http://www.csi.edu/ip/ce/yesology/
http://www.billboard.com/bb/tangledweb/index.jsp

I always suspected the people of Southern Idaho are closet Shakira fans!! :)

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 9 November 2003 03:22 (twenty years ago) link

It's weird - I've been stumbling across articles in university publications, one of which is an analysis of The Revealing Science Of God by a lesbian Marxist feminist named Jennifer Rycenga, which praises Yes for their 'non-hetero-normative' lyrics. Then there are all those Bill Martin books... it seems like there are legitimate philosophical grounds on which listening to Yes can be defended now. :)

By the way, what's Fish Out Of Water like?

Damian (Damian), Sunday, 9 November 2003 09:09 (twenty years ago) link

its ok! its what yes should have been ie: bill bruford and patrick moraz.

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Sunday, 9 November 2003 09:19 (twenty years ago) link

Shit, they're both on it? Now I have to investigate.

Damian (Damian), Sunday, 9 November 2003 09:34 (twenty years ago) link

two weeks pass...
Simon Reynolds publishes the feedback of his progressive music taxonomy:

http://blissout.blogspot.com/
PROGMETHEUS UNBOUND: THE RETURN

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 24 November 2003 13:56 (twenty years ago) link

That's pretty cool that he did that, plus he listed Ground & Sky, GEPR and Gnosis!

dleone (dleone), Monday, 24 November 2003 14:11 (twenty years ago) link

three years pass...

So how do YOU listen to prog now?

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 May 2007 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

with glittery cape on
http://wgsu.geneseo.edu/blog/images/rickwakeman.jpg

gershy, Saturday, 19 May 2007 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

So, Dr.C never got around to hearing 'Relayer'. Pity.

Just got offed, Saturday, 19 May 2007 09:24 (sixteen years ago) link

four years pass...

I'm terrified of seventies Yes but I need to listen to it a bit for a research project. Where should I start? My best friend liked Yes so I heard it quite a bit. Not my steez back then. Such were the times...

Like Jethro Tull is cited as "progressive". I thought they were a "punk" band.

I'm scared of Yes. I'm afraid it might conjure memories of scarily free hippie people.

I'd rec either the Yes Album or Fragile. The Yes Album is probably the best for newcomers but Fragile has the full "classic" lineup and shows off pretty much everything great about 70's Yes. Nothing to be scared of - stay away from Tales, otherwise most of their peak period is chock full of great instrumental parts. Obviously they were a lot whiter than Parliament but they kind of have the same vibe - with a different singer and less time changes, you kind of feel like they'd be known more as a funk band.

frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Monday, 30 January 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago) link

I was going to say the same two albums. there isn't anything scary on those. stay away from tales of topographic oceans and relayer, they are full of scary (and boring) things.

akm, Monday, 30 January 2012 20:59 (twelve years ago) link

Man, Relayer is awesome. If you are scared of awesomeness, stay away from Relayer, otherwise enjoy.

Also, Close to the Edge rules too.

You're a notch, I'm a legend (Bill Magill), Monday, 30 January 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago) link

second The Yes Album as a good jumpoff

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 30 January 2012 21:10 (twelve years ago) link

yeah Relayer and CttE are great albums (CttE is slowly becoming one of my favorite prog albums ever) but you kind of have to be into the band in some respect first.

frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Monday, 30 January 2012 21:12 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.