Huh? IIrc, OC presided over the first of four Anglo-Dutch wars, the end result of which was the conquest of Dutch imperial posessions, the re-establishment of William of Orange as Stadtholder (in most provinces) in '72 and his ascension to the thrones of Britain after the Glorious Revolution as one of the heroes of European protestantism, something neither Charles II nor James II could claim and Britain went on under Anne to be fully involved in the War of the Spanish Succession to counter the Bourbon attempt to 'get rid of the Pyrenees' and establish a Catholic Franco-Spanish superpower. As the general who finally determined the legitimacy and dominance of a low church version of protestantism in England, he can hardly be said to have done as much as anybody to keep Britain out of late 17th century European conflicts.
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ich Ber Ein Binliner (Dada), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 13:32 (seventeen years ago) link
he broke absolute monarchy in the UK
I'd rather honor someone like Fairfax or Pym than a man who started fighting the unfettered power of the executive and finished by claiming it for himself. He was no Cincinnatus.
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:18 (seventeen years ago) link
I still think that is absolutism had been maintained, or at least parliamentary authority curtailed by a loss in the first or second civil wars England would have been much more deeply embroiled in European wars of the late 17th century.
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link
Yes, very great. If anything I'd say it might stand as the definitive take on the subject (in the English language) for this generation at least. The next will find its own.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link
I think the thread, short as it is on discussions of whether Abraham Lincoln is a complete cunt, offers a clear answer to the question :)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link
Will I be the first to point these out as Anglo-Irish?
"To hell or to Connacht" said Cromwell (allegedly, well it was certainly the policy) and drove people off their land by act of Parliament resuliting in the Cromwellian Plantation. My family name is a Norman one from the south-east and our family ended up in Mayo, thanks we're pretty sure to this bout of ethnic cleansing. I turned out alright though! In any case plenty of people were shoved on to poor land with farm sizes around 80 acres, causing poverty to be endemic for centuries to come (up until the Land Commision's efforts started to have an effect in the late C19th) Also see the Irish he shipped of to the west-indies where they worked in sugar plantations. And this is nothing but punishment for Irish Royalism (Imagine, Irish Royalism, they should have been thankful considering what came later) and hatred of Irish Catholics in general.
Was it Cromwell that crushed the Diggers and the Levellers movements?And he didn't refuse the Crown outright, he sat on his arse and thought for a full month if I remember correctly.
But blah blah blah, Abe's better, partly because he was played by Henry Honda and that's what's important!
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link
Royalism deserves to be punished
― Ich Ber Ein Binliner (Dada), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:01 (seventeen years ago) link
xpost
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:01 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.newgenevacenter.org/portrait/cromwell.jpg
http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sharemed/targets/images/pho/t029/T029278A.jsm
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― I Supersize Disaster (noodle vague), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ich Ber Ein Binliner (Dada), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link
C'mon, he allowed Catholic-sympathizing, Scottish-blooded monarchs the vote.
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― I Supersize Disaster (noodle vague), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link
Indulge a moment of grumpiness and let me point out that fanatically religious egalitarians like these do not deserve their iconic status. Can you imagine more dull company?
― M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ich Ber Ein Binliner (Dada), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:41 (seventeen years ago) link
i must take issue with the charge that abe was ugly. next to every other president - discounting the ones we only have paintings of - in history, he was a dreamboat. espec with the beard.
(aside from woodrow wilson and ronald reagan, have we ever had a conventionally good-looking commander in chief?)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:18 (seventeen years ago) link
(read: not so much with the conquering (French) land, more with the manipulating everybody to gang up on whoever looks preeminent at the moment.)
― literalisp (literalisp), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― literalisp (literalisp), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:41 (seventeen years ago) link
Give me the Sultan of Brunei and a fat pay check and I'll learnt to waltz for him.
Netherlands, Spain, Denmark, Sweden and Norway seem to get along fine.
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Thursday, 7 September 2006 00:41 (seventeen years ago) link
hey ... you makin' some kinda hereditary succession joke?
― literalisp (literalisp), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:21 (seventeen years ago) link
-- Major Alfonso (GOOGILFREEdelexica...), September 6th, 2006. (later)
Not without emasculating hereditary rulership.
-- Squirrel_Police (goblinatri...), February 26th, 2000.
Nice time warp we've stepped through.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:38 (seventeen years ago) link
No, that was completely unintentional! Have you not encountered any of SP's posts before?
― salexandra (salexander), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:44 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.trilogy3.com/images/bios/lloyd.jpg
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 7 September 2006 01:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― literalisp (literalisp), Thursday, 7 September 2006 02:28 (seventeen years ago) link
From what I remember, the Army - and particularly, General Monck - were more significant in forcing the Restoration; and immediately before, in the early months of 1660, many people expected Monck to seize government himself. This is based purely on hazy memories of the first few months of Pepys' Diary, though.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Thursday, 7 September 2006 06:41 (seventeen years ago) link
Or Vietnam furing Charlemagne's reign?
Or Thre mile island during the reign of Jimmy Carter the Peace Loving?
OR WHAT?
Fuck, I need to got pack some more.
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Thursday, 7 September 2006 09:18 (seventeen years ago) link
Discarding the examples of regicide from William Rufus to Edward II to Henry VI and Edward V as having been enginereed by relatives or powerful nobles, Richard II was essentially deposed due to deep unpopularity, but the agents of his loss of power were the nobility which rallied behind Bolingbroke. He was brought before Parliament, however, and made to renounce his throne.
Hereditary rulers are totally illegitimate
Unless they're popular. Given that many societies have organized their 'executive' as essentially a war leader and high judge, the question remains: how does one choose this dux bellorum? Cromwell, like so many dictators after him, was also in many was no different than many early European kings. He felt that the Lord Protector should choose his own successor, regardless of popular sentiment and unrestrained by popular mandate, and it just so happened that his choice was his son. Historically, amongst the germanic peoples that overran Europe at the twighlight of Roman hegemony, their king was chosen, often by the arguably 'democratic' acclamation of the freeborn men of the tribe and usually from a vigorous line who often claimed (yet another version of the 'mandate of heaven' or 'the dvine right of kings') descent from a popular deity. If you look at the pre-Christian claims of descent for most of the royal families of the heptarchy, for example, it would seem that Odin, especially, had spread his seed out widely. only a cynic like Voltaire would point out that "the first king was (merely) a lucky soldier."
Given that the process of finding a king to 'acclaim' from amongst the favored family (a process replayed in practically every Mafia movie of our time) often involved cunning uncles outmanoeuvering their green nephews despite the king having formally chosen them as a successor, the process of primogeniture became increasingly de rigueur as a means of making the succession surer and more straightforward, and the number of royal sons that were crowned during the reign of their fathers is a telling indication of the worry many kings felt about stability.
That stability should be available to a Castro, a Cromwell, a Hitler, a de Rosas should seem self-evident; instead of relying on the accident of biology, they could nominate their successor. However without the validation of tradition, especially in its more superstitious forms such as heridity and divine mandate, the lucky star such dictators tend to enjoy is not passed on and such institutions as they manage to create, are as Montesquieu noted in De l'esprit des lois governed by fear more than honor and tend to require a good bloodletting before everyone is sufficiently scared to submit to the new boss. The Roman Imperial legacy of acclamation of a military victor followed by heriditary succession and punctuated occasionally by coups is a sort of 'third way' between these two and it has existed amongst their successor as well, most notably in the deposition of the Merovingians and the establishment of the Carolingian line in France.
The Japanese were, up to yesterday, mulling over extending access to the Imperial throne to women, so questions of tradition in inheritance amongst different peoples evolve according to the circumstances that they face.
However we choose our highest executives, either by blood, or by submission to conquest by a 'genius', or by election, the long history of human blunders as much as the record of certain people presently in power might lead a reasonable person to conclude that the potential for major fuck-ups is always present.
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 7 September 2006 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link
Napoleon!
― Ich Ber Ein Binliner (Dada), Thursday, 7 September 2006 14:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 7 September 2006 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 7 September 2006 15:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 September 2006 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 7 September 2006 15:13 (seventeen years ago) link
?
― The Real DG (D to thee G), Thursday, 7 September 2006 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link
no shit
― The Real DG (D to thee G), Thursday, 7 September 2006 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 8 September 2006 01:47 (seventeen years ago) link
"There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so."
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 8 September 2006 20:32 (seventeen years ago) link
Still, the latter was cruel to the Irish, but everyone should remember that everyone hated the Irish as they were backwards primitives anyway. Even though he crushed the Scots, it is great to think of a time when they were actually a real military threat.
Cromwell sucks, but most people do. The end result of his actions was for the better. And yes, Tim Roth rocks.
― The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Friday, 8 September 2006 21:58 (seventeen years ago) link
I've noticed some revisionist Irish books recently which discuss Cromwell's campaign in Ireland in terms other than equating it with some Waffen SS sweep through Ukraine. I think they say that the storming of Drogheda (where the defending garrison was massacred) would not have been considered out of order by anyone at the time - the city's wall was breached, the garrison were offered a chance to surrender, they declined to take it. Storming cities in that setup typically saw attacking forces take enormous casualties (see Cromwell's later loss of around a thousand guys in an unsuccessful attempt to storm Clonmel); the accepted rule was that if defenders brought it to this by not surrendering after the walls were breached (if given the chance) then their lives were forfeit.
I don't know what the revisionists say about Wexford, where Cromwell's army massacred the entire population of the town.
One thing that should be said about Cromwell in Ireland is that he insisted that his blokes buy things off the locals rather than just taking them, and unlike the armies in Ireland of the Royalists, Covenanters, and Confederates, his guys did not go round raping and pillaging on a casual basis, so one must thank him for some things. However, there is still this real sense of him as a crazed nutter with a lust for blood... one of his letters back home after the siege of Drogheda recounts how the garrison fled into a church, which was then set alight by Cromwell's troops, "And from within they cried 'I burn, I burn'. Scary man.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Saturday, 9 September 2006 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― DV (dirtyvicar), Saturday, 9 September 2006 20:48 (seventeen years ago) link
Hi, Aleister Crowley.
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 00:09 (seventeen years ago) link
Or someone else...
― mikef (mfleming), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 05:57 (seventeen years ago) link
HONEST ABE, BITCHES
― EsteBAN LOUIS JAGGER (ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!!), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 06:35 (seventeen years ago) link
Not true
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 08:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 08:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 09:42 (seventeen years ago) link
to be honest, the way you learn about Cromwell in school in Ireland is so obviously demonising of him that I bet his army marched around Ireland handing out sweets to little children and playing with little bunny rabbits.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link
So the savagery of Cromwell's army in Ireland is deniable. I have read recent scholarship about how his army was less savage towards Irish people than the army of the Irish catholic Confederates (more inclined to buy things from locals, less inclined to rape and pillage).
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:50 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.lettersofnote.com/2010/12/all-ladies-like-whiskers.html
― dick roach (schlump), Sunday, 5 December 2010 12:18 (thirteen years ago) link
Reminder that the Los Angeles federal courthouse has a statue of Abraham Lincoln where he's a shirtless young stud suggestively tugging at his waistband like a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model: pic.twitter.com/32bjqEERYi— Zack Stentz (@MuseZack) February 20, 2019
― omar little, Thursday, 21 February 2019 05:42 (five years ago) link
Really nice rev by Keith Thomas on an odd book on Cromwell, which has many descriptions of the English land (and sky) scape.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/06/23/the-making-of-oliver-cromwell-hutton-thomas/
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 19 June 2022 17:05 (one year ago) link
Highly ironic to revive this on Juneteenth in order to give a shout out to Cromwell.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 19 June 2022 18:16 (one year ago) link