lamp: http://www.zuriick.com/
the sizing's kinda fucked. they don't have half sizes so i'm wearing them half a size too small :(. so many sick styles but only the laceup ones i could get over my foot.
― (jaxon) ( .) ( .) (jaxon), Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link
@ mj2b - the purple is a little more muted irl more gray than purple its "graphite" according to google. they also came with white laces which ruin the look imo
@ jaxon - do you have any common projects? thats what i thought those might have been. i kind of want the black hi-tops but i always get annoyed by them at the store and get something else
― Lamp, Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:19 (fifteen years ago) link
man that desert boot construction (silhouette? i dont know what to call it) is showing up everywhere
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:21 (fifteen years ago) link
common projects are so ridiculously overpriced though
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link
thats a big part of the reason that i havent bought them yet and, tbh, i like the look of the zuriick's that jaxon posted just as much as the cp achilles. also i dont want to like look those ultralame guyz in my hood in band of outsiders topsiders. fuck them.
these are the shoes i got the most complements on all year:
http://sneakersandshoes.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/cesario-lo_white-cement.jpg
― Lamp, Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:35 (fifteen years ago) link
http://images.nicekicks.com/images/nike-daybreak-vintage-1.jpg
― eman, Monday, 5 January 2009 00:10 (fifteen years ago) link
i've been looking for a nice dress shoe for almost 2 years now and kept flip flopping on the opening ceremony (the ones upthread i got) and the common projects. they both have that wooden sole and i wasn't sure they'd go w/suits, but they look great w/jeans and suits and i'm sure the more i wear them the darker the wood will get. wifee found the opening ceremonies online at some sweedish site for almost half what they were in the store and no shipping so i was super stoked
― (jaxon) ( .) ( .) (jaxon), Monday, 5 January 2009 00:52 (fifteen years ago) link
also really liked Fiorentini + Baker and Rachel Comeys
― (jaxon) ( .) ( .) (jaxon), Monday, 5 January 2009 00:59 (fifteen years ago) link
my dress shoes are alden plain toe bluchers ... would love to get a pair in cordovan someday
http://www.aldenshop.com/images/968.jpg
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 5 January 2009 02:23 (fifteen years ago) link
http://i39.tinypic.com/2rwwcq9.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/fu3xio.jpg
― sleep, Monday, 5 January 2009 07:56 (fifteen years ago) link
http://i39.tinypic.com/n3p7ac.jpg
― sleep, Monday, 5 January 2009 08:08 (fifteen years ago) link
man sb mids are pretty nice though
― sleep, Monday, 5 January 2009 08:14 (fifteen years ago) link
jaxon, i have a pair kind of like those from opening ceremony, grey suede oxfords, they are awesome. what is this swedish site? would buy more
got a pair of these in burgundy off ebayhttp://i404.photobucket.com/albums/pp127/deanofsomething/146638646_tp.jpgflipper!
― disco is the reason (daria-g), Monday, 5 January 2009 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link
sleep, those are the "matching pair" of vulcanized vans i mentioned upthread
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 5 January 2009 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link
oh nice, i missed that, same red stitching on the heel and everything
― sleep, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:41 (fifteen years ago) link
ilx is historically pretty bad at shoes
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:42 (fifteen years ago) link
some of these are aight tho; like sleep's last pair
like lamp's last pair too but they are a bit orthopedic
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:43 (fifteen years ago) link
oooh I like these jaxon : )
http://bigcartel.com/account/4977/746406/sky_0468.jpg
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:44 (fifteen years ago) link
my shoes are also a bit orthopedic wasn't a diss
http://www.herrenausstatter.de/pimages/30/30546_norm.jpg
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:48 (fifteen years ago) link
so are you historically bad at shoes too or is this a new thing for you
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:54 (fifteen years ago) link
cause those are butt-ass ugly, friend
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:55 (fifteen years ago) link
they are fine
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago) link
i'm sorry, that came out mean. i'd swap out the laces though.
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:57 (fifteen years ago) link
they came w/purple and grey but I don't mind the yellow
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link
daria http://www.tresbienshop.net/
― (jaxon) ( .) ( .) (jaxon), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago) link
lol didnt realize those prices were in kroner
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link
tres bien is so great but so spendy : //
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link
I think they look nice, cozwn! Then again, I'm probably historically bad at shoes.
― "80s Baby" (Z S), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:38 (fifteen years ago) link
we can be historically bad at shoes together : )
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:39 (fifteen years ago) link
n/h
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link
I bought these last week after a xmas eve villain stole my boots:
http://images.wolverineworldwide.com/is/image/bulk/cat1/2007/6/4/WBS-W5706-07.psd.fpx?wid=550&hei=550&align=0,0&qlt=80&op_usm=0.5,1&fmt=jpeg
― "80s Baby" (Z S), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:41 (fifteen years ago) link
Secretly, I just wanted to be able to tell myself that I am wearing Wolverine boots.
just got
http://www.globushop.fr/mix/120.jpg
― s1ocki, Monday, 5 January 2009 22:31 (fifteen years ago) link
fyi thats the kind of thing ur supposed to tweet about
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Monday, 5 January 2009 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link
here ill write u a sample:
just got a pair of these: http://www.globushop.fr/mix/120.jpg
if u want u can just copy/paste that
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Monday, 5 January 2009 22:36 (fifteen years ago) link
ok ill tweet it
― s1ocki, Monday, 5 January 2009 22:37 (fifteen years ago) link
cosign lamp's post about the creative recs -- i know ive said it before but i really like that design -- and they def get more thumbs up than any of my other shoes
― choom gangsta (deej), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 02:33 (fifteen years ago) link
i would like these -- not really in the cards at the moment thohttp://images.nicekicks.com/images/undr-crwn-adidas-gil-zero-ice-cold-2.jpg
― opinions4usic (deej), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 10:32 (fifteen years ago) link
waht do u folks think of these -- is the design too new balance-y?http://www.zappos.com/images/729/7292927/5007-690036-p.jpg
― opinions4usic (deej), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 10:33 (fifteen years ago) link
telling ya -- these are REALLY comfortable
http://s.onlineshoes.com/images/br095/124169_366_45.jpg
― m coleman, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 11:11 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.urbanboutique.co.uk/images/product/large/734.jpg
better shot
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link
my ll bean moccasins arrived in the mail yesterday
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link
uhhh nothing about that on twitter, what's up??
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link
sleep ftw imo
― 't (wanko ergo sum), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 17:29 (fifteen years ago) link
While basically idolizing ILX in every other respect, I have always been more or less aghast at its taste in shoes.
― 't (wanko ergo sum), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link
id say a decent % of the shoes in this thread look fine
― opinions4usic (deej), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 19:51 (fifteen years ago) link
thank you for standing up to wanko ergo sum
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:00 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah this is def the best shoe thread on ilx
but did I tell you ilx has been historically bad at shoes and it is a new thing for me
― cozwn, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:02 (fifteen years ago) link
― s1ocki, Tuesday, January 6, 2009 2:00 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
my latest 'thing' is to defend ilx from ppl using negative hyperbole about it -- see also 77 thread defending ilm as more than just tim finney and vahid
― opinions4usic (deej), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:06 (fifteen years ago) link