Great sweaters!
― Love stream of mic checking (Eazy), Sunday, 1 January 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago) link
Won't be shown in much of the Middle East.
― Love stream of mic checking (Eazy), Monday, 2 January 2012 05:25 (twelve years ago) link
i didn't know the story and i found bits of this kind of difficult to follow, or rushed or something. the bank epilogue in particular was incomprehensible. i watched the swedish version and found that much clearer. but i thought the fincher version was, as per, beautiful to look at. also the key soundtrack moment (no spoilers) was breathtaking.
― caek, Monday, 2 January 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago) link
thought this sucked tbh
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 2 January 2012 18:44 (twelve years ago) link
It's weird seeing a second movie adaptation esp. after reading a book (which I thought was pretty okay myself, although the second book hums along quite nicely IMO and the third is just a complete mess). On the whole I think this was maybe slightly stronger than the Swedish version with the caveat that it may be because I knew the novel that I didn't find it hard to follow.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 2 January 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago) link
the more i think about this the less i like it. the credit sequence had me roffling and i don't think it really had me at all after that.
i was expecting some hollywood dramaturgical changes, but some of them were really odd imo.
― goole, Monday, 2 January 2012 19:25 (twelve years ago) link
Really surprised at how crap the mystery was in this
― just sayin, Monday, 2 January 2012 19:29 (twelve years ago) link
After reading the hype about how the screenwriter didn't watch the Swedish version of the film, and how different it felt from the first version. From memory it seemed almost identical, just with a larger budget.
And saying the 'twist' was completely different, when it's a pretty non-core element of the story was very lame.
Not sure why my I wasn't more cynical about the marketing before watching the film to be honest.
Still, I quite enjoyed myself while watching the film.
― Chewshabadoo, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 15:11 (twelve years ago) link
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, January 2, 2012 1:44 PM (5 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 7 January 2012 05:14 (twelve years ago) link
You guys must be sweater-haters.
― Cheap desert locations (Eazy), Saturday, 7 January 2012 05:51 (twelve years ago) link
I was unimpressed by the book, so I felt no real need to see this movie. And the vogue article about Rooney Mara made it sound like Mara and Fincher have a perverted puppetmaster relationship that makes Hitchcock sound like a feminist by comparison. It was offputting.
― Nicole, Saturday, 7 January 2012 14:19 (twelve years ago) link
I didn't like this nearly as much as Zodiac or The Social Network, but they're two of my favourite films of the past few years, so that wasn't a surprise. I did like it more than I expected to. I came to it completely cold, not having read the book and not having seen the original. For some reason I had it in my mind that it'd be all whirlwind style, like what I always imagined Run, Lola, Run would be. (Terrible, I know--prejudging a film based on having prejudged another film I haven't seen.) But it moves along carefully, and I did get caught up in the story. The coda--everything after the main story is resolved--lost me a bit, but no matter. There are such pointed similarities to Zodiac and Seven in spots, I do get the feeling Fincher is consciously supplying material for all the PhD theses he hopes get written about him one day. The thing that will stay with me is Rooney Mara--her performance is very affecting. It only took me 90 minutes to figure out she was the ex-girlfriend in The Social Network.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 13 March 2012 04:12 (twelve years ago) link
This was super, super, super forgettable
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 13 March 2012 05:16 (twelve years ago) link
what a silly stupid movie
― max, Friday, 6 April 2012 23:34 (twelve years ago) link
that credit sequence!
"oh, hey, for once Stellan Skaarsgaard isn't going to turn out to. . . . Oh, nevermind."
― Frank Youngenstein (Phil D.), Friday, 6 April 2012 23:44 (twelve years ago) link
Well, the cinematography and set design was better than the other movie adaptation. That's all I've got.
Opening credits were such a non sequitur, and.. yeah
Starting to think all movies with strong female characters need a female director or at least someone female in a prominent behind-the-scenes role. Then again, I have met women who think Zack Snyder movies are ok, so results may vary.
― mh, Saturday, 7 April 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago) link
it was straight downhill after that credit sequence
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 7 April 2012 00:19 (twelve years ago) link
It's been years since I've started a movie three times and been unable to finish it.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 00:47 (twelve years ago) link
twice, for me!
― Number None, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link
lol why would you try that third time?
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 00:50 (twelve years ago) link
Third time's the... Give up point
― mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 03:59 (twelve years ago) link
Saw this film a second time and liked it more.
― stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 04:05 (twelve years ago) link
Saw this for the first time, went in cold (hadn't read the book or seen the other movies, didn't know the plot). Was pretty ridiculous. Deus ex hacker invoked numerous times. She's great, James Bond might as well be telling her story in flashback. Nazis, serial killers ... it even has a character basically ask another character "you know something is fishy, you suspect you are in danger ... so why did you stick around?" And never answers. Like, what is driving this dude to put his life at risk to solve this old mystery? "The Vanishing" it is not. It's assuredly made, but pretty silly.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 19:06 (ten years ago) link
been going back through the fincher filmography and this movie basically fucking sucks, way worse than benjamin button imo
you're better off rewatching the trailer 75 times
― the quar on drugs (Simon H.), Thursday, 6 August 2020 03:20 (three years ago) link
I wonder if fincher ever considered making this his first run at TV instead, because the structure and characterization as presented make absolutely no goddamn sense as a standalone movie
― the quar on drugs (Simon H.), Thursday, 6 August 2020 03:22 (three years ago) link
i'm sure he's run at a TV many times, but his friends usually stop him before disaster happens
― popeye's arse (Neanderthal), Thursday, 6 August 2020 05:02 (three years ago) link
lol
for real though the appeal of this story/series is totally mystifying to me, and would have been unthinkable even a few years later I think
― the quar on drugs (Simon H.), Thursday, 6 August 2020 14:58 (three years ago) link
whereas Gone Girl, also based on a massive book thought of as belonging to a particular cultural moment, if anything gets a little better to me every time I revisit
― the quar on drugs (Simon H.), Thursday, 6 August 2020 15:02 (three years ago) link