The Matrix Reloaded (full spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (408 of them)
Did anyone here not laugh when the Merovingian made that woman's vagina explode?

s1utsky (slutsky), Saturday, 31 May 2003 21:32 (twenty years ago) link

also, what the hell sort of name is the merovingian??

dave k, Saturday, 31 May 2003 23:03 (twenty years ago) link

see above corporate mofo link, though for all I know about european history, it could be total b.s.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 1 June 2003 02:37 (twenty years ago) link

the merovingians were a line of kings & also a grail-themed holy order of knights.

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 02:58 (twenty years ago) link

VAGINIMERON

Dan I., Sunday, 1 June 2003 07:27 (twenty years ago) link

NEDuchadnezzar

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 1 June 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link

BIIIIIIG dropoff in box office this weekend also

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I noticed. They're in what, fourth?

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

with any luck they'll just ditch the third one and we can be in this state of suspended speculation 4-eva

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:44 (twenty years ago) link

FOURTH!!! - behind Nemo (understandable) Bruce Almighty (slightly understandable) and the Italian Job (wha?!!!) - and the thing is, it ain't like the Italian Job had a big opening.

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:48 (twenty years ago) link

If Zion is not the real world, but instead is another level of simulation that Neo overcomes at the end of the film, could this explain the totally lame Zion scenes?

As well as Morpheus's speech (that Tracer mentions above), the rave sequence was totally rubb...unless...it is meant to represent a questionable 'alternative' lifestyle that is being manufactured for the few who 'live' in Zion (questionable is the key word here - this is why it is done so poorly). Continuing this line of thought, the sex scene was completely lame...unless...sexuality is being used as a passifier to placate the minds of the citizens of Zion and make them think that they are experiencing an authentic reality.

Trinity could also be a passifying program designed to keep Neo down - this would be a plot development for the next film. Alternatively, I could just be making excuses for the poor parts of Matrix Reloaded.

bert (bert), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

It's like when people tried to convince themselves that the last act of Minority Report was a brilliantly conceived dream sequence.

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:09 (twenty years ago) link

i dont think the rave and sex scene were lame as such, just curiously 'old-fashioned' and too rooted in old cliches you would expect this film/concept with the scope it has to avoid more e.g. Morpehus speech technically fine but just very dated and inevitably cheesy...the sex scene (more of a love scene lets face it) wasnt actually that bad, i got the impression it was all about 'man, imagine having sex with The One!' tho frankly i think i'd rather not

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:56 (twenty years ago) link

That rave bit had been going about seven seconds and I was thinking 'Fuck, this scene's going on far too long it's...wait, it's only a few seconds in, am I being silly....agh it's still going FUCK'.

'It occurs to me that this movie seems to be written for philosophical software engineers more than anyone else.'

As a first year philosophy student I lived with three software engineers whose unsubtle DVD pirating operation allowed me to see the Matrix for the first time.

The many-Smiths scene was kind of like them going 'This is ridiculous and overlong and OH JUST LOOK AT IT! Look at the effects! LOOK AT THEM! Hahaha!'. A bit like that TvGoHome show where a hand holds up a shiny coin for you to stare dumbly at (and that entire last Star Wars thing), but in a good way.

The anticlimactic dreadlock albino twins reminded me of Luke Haines.

The Matrix is supposed to like, send you spiralling into all these big-ass epistemological crises ennit, but I'm probably just gonna lose sleep over the above Morpheus = Evil theory.

Ferg (Ferg), Monday, 2 June 2003 00:25 (twenty years ago) link

I laughed and laughed and laughed until a couple of sci-fi nerds two rows in front of me threatened to set their phasers on "Dork" and take aim at me.
Laughed during the rave/sex scene
when the action was randomly and needlessly slo-moed and we had to wait like thirty seconds to see a bullet go exactly where it was obviously heading. I guess that's what passes for dramatic tension.
when the keymaker says "I'm here because my purpose is to be here." Meaning, "I'm a plot device that miraculously does little to advance the plot."

this was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded. For all the trouble they've gone to to create this credible Matrix-verse, they sure left a lot of loopholes.
Suddenly I'm looking forward to more shitty Star Wars movies.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:02 (twenty years ago) link

slo-mo not necessarily needless - the technique is deployed partly to show off but also to highlight the beauty of actions that often occur too fast for the human eye/mind to fully register and appreciate. the speed of bullets, the fleeting flash of fire that announces each shot fired, rather like the choreographed combat scenes the interplay of slow/fast action can be likened to ballet or other dance-based performance, if nothing else its a useful tool for reminding how epic the story's premise is and how important every action can be potentially i.e. firing shot at Trinity may hit and kill her which might have major consequences depending on Neo's reaction (as it turns out he disappointingly just shoves his healing hands in her and gives her a heart massage i think)

Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded

how exactly?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

another thought: the rave/love scene tie-in...take it out of its supposed cyber/futuristic context and you could have an exact replica of the scene in a film like Braveheart or similar ie medieval/period epic drama. i bet it wouldnt get laughed at half as much.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

(as it turns out he disappointingly just shoves
his healing hands in her and gives her a heart massage i think)

This reminded me of those psychic surgery scams that were popular in the Phillipines and ridiculed by Penn & Teller.

Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded

how exactly?

All of the ambience created by the element of the Unknown was lost. By trying to codify what had before simply been overwhelming and nebulous, they trivialized the entire Matrix concept.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:29 (twenty years ago) link

i don't think they did that, unless you accept that as a natural, nay, unavoidable, consequence of doing further installments (which is what it is rather than a sequel as such). and i think to call films like this or even Episode 1 & 2 the 'worst films ever' is more oTT than those who think Reloaded is better than the first Matrix film (which I initially did although admittedly now I hold them in equal esteem). why are things like dialogue and general acting regarded as more important than aesthetics and artistic and technical execution of the film irrespective of its cast? its comparable to the way a lot of music is derided for lame/hackneyed lyrics despite boasting excellent production. perhaps this film is the equivalent to that but then i think it does actually offer something more if not equal to that of a supposedly 'mindless/throwaway' pop song in terms of emotional resonance. the Matrix doesn't have to be construed as mere mindless yarn...nor is it high-art cinema. somewhere inbetween definitely, much like the predicament its leading characters are now in.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:58 (twenty years ago) link

I expected more/better.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

we could say the same of your criticisms Horace

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:11 (twenty years ago) link

but you'd be lying.
You don't expect much from me, admit it.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:17 (twenty years ago) link

don't pull that thang out unless you plan to bang

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:27 (twenty years ago) link

why are things like dialogue and general acting regarded as more important than aesthetics and artistic and technical execution of the film irrespective of its cast?

Stevem, I think most people's problem here (or at least mine) isn't neccessarily the quality of the dialogue (it was pretty bad in the first film too), but rather the overabundance of it--the too many long, long scenes of just talking heads, which never gave the movie the chance to build up any momentum. To me this is poor artistic execution.

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

agreed although i found this to be quite unexpected so the relative novelty of the philosphical monologues didnt really bother me tho i was thinking 'i can't believe they didnt edit this more' during the rave/love scene and Merothingamajig's rant. The Architect scene was fairly well timed and conceived.

i think i'll be sorely disappointed with Star Wars Episode III in perhaps the same way Horace has been with Reloaded - as he said he 'expected more' tho i'm not sure if that means he had ideas that failed to appear in the film or he expected more (and more convincing) character development and less cliched dialogue.

can some parallels not be drawn between Reloaded and X-Men 2 also? both seemed to drift somewhat aimlessly plotwise at times (tho this didnt make them actually boring as you were kept guessing as to how exactly things were going to pan out) partly because it became apparent that both films were trying to avoid certain courses of predictability at least at times and with both involving a wide range of characters, several of whom had very vague alleigances to good and evil (esp. as the nature of what is good and what is evil is challenged refreshingly in both films). tho neither could hardly escape relatively happy 'endings' that amount to 'love conquering all', both follow the model of the middle act leaving several things unresolved and setting things up for the next installement.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:14 (twenty years ago) link

Well, I thought both were let-downs--I think you're right with X2 in that the movie was stubbornly trying to chart a different course. While I respect that I think Singer forgot the important shit that needed to be in an X-Men movie, and settled for a pretty lousy, straight-to-video-quality finale.

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:36 (twenty years ago) link

OOOH. Thanks for reminding me that I can now go read the X-Men 2 threads.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:54 (twenty years ago) link

I think in X-Men, it's partly a matter of too many characters for anyone to do anything meaningful.
I only saw The Matrix once, so I'm no expert on it by any means, but one of my favourite parts was guessing at which myth/tradition/movie/book/religion they were plundering at any given moment. There was a similar appeal to the first Star Wars movie.
But Reloaded felt very unfocused to me, the hand-to-hand seemed awful wooden, and the relationships superficial and forced.
Agent Smith was the best part of it, and I guess that's what will take me to whatever the third one is called.
But the Keymaker was very portent for me, in that he admitted he was merely a plot device, something many of the other characters failed to achieve.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:54 (twenty years ago) link

i suspect a lot of these criticisms could also be applied to many high-end anime films, but i'm not enough of an expert on that genre to give good examples

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

I don't really like anime, so there you go. maybe my appreciation of reloaded is contingent on that.
whatever, I don't begrudge you for enjoying it though, just so you don't think that I think that because I don't like something it's worthless and anybody who likes it is an unsophisticated rube taken in by hot hot hot Monica Belucci.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 17:07 (twenty years ago) link

why do people keep saying they laughed at the movie. you laugh at funny things, not things you think you're clever enough to be unimpressed by. word.

as far as the sunglass example that opened this thread, it's badass to wear sunglasses when it's cloudy or indoors, but in bright light what's the point; you look like a tourist. I mean, someone could accuse you of wearing glasses to protect your eyes from glare, and without irony I state that that would be a terrible thing.

parts of this great movie were just awful, and not in a laughable way.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:34 (twenty years ago) link

The anime I like has totally great plot and character shit in addition to bad-ass action and animation.

Cowboy Bebob, episode five, hell yes.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:38 (twenty years ago) link

parts of this great movie were just awful

i love that remark...truly it was awfully great, and greatly awful

actually i am not that big on most anime but i use the strong anime influence evident in Matrix Reloaded to argue it case, bizarrely. live action versions of anime films have been pretty much dud all round haven't they (altho i think Crying Freeman had its moments at least)?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:47 (twenty years ago) link

City Hunter was SO BAD

Dan I., Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:54 (twenty years ago) link

My God. It was magnificent. Though I am a moron.

There is a preview at the end of the film? Noooooooooooooo! That'll teach me to want a ciggy badly.

I thought the trajectory was less mystical; Morpheus is the mystic boy, and he's revealed to be a patsy, played like a sucker by the Oracle.

Trinity was mighty fine. More than fine. I will fite the One and her husband in real life, because I luv her more than any man could.

Think that many have been hysterical with this; it's Episode I/II redux. Hysteric's reaction is 'This is not it'. Expectations were just too high, hence inevitable come-down. I'm so glad I waited and calmed the fuck down.

Overall - kung-futastic. Thumbs up from me.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 09:56 (twenty years ago) link

iron lion zion

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 00:32 (twenty years ago) link

stevem if you want to check out some decent live-action 'anime' style films I suggest the following

Attack The Gas Station

The Returner

Resurrection of the Little Match Girl

and of course I love Gunhed as well but they haven't made a DVD of it yet. Frankly I am waiting for the Criterion Collection to pick these up (HA HA).

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:55 (twenty years ago) link

I loved the Teahouse Fight. It looked less like a fight and more like a beautiful dance. Especially that topdown view of Neo & Seraph performing spinkicks. And did anyone else think Morpheus - especially in Zion - sounded & spoke like teal'c in Stargate SG-1?

http://www.frailart.net/members/kodanshi/Hammylet.jpg

N. Ron, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

I gotta say, as much as I loved this bitch of a movie half to death the first time I saw it, IT MAKES SO MUCH MORE SENSE THE SECOND TIME.

Mike Stuchbery, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:12 (twenty years ago) link

When Agent Smith multiplies he become The Smiths. Do you (Morri)see!

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:53 (twenty years ago) link

I thought it was more an Attack of the Clones -- (c) Peter Bradshaw (or whoever it was reviewed it for the Guardian)

Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:31 (twenty years ago) link

one possibility about Smith's multiplicity...every time he copies himself he loses some of his original strength. probably not the case but would explain how Neo seems to have no less a problem fighting ten Smiths then fighting 100

i went and saw it again and yes it did make more sense. and the teaser trailer at the end looks pretty good, but tho i may have missed them i saw no glimpse of the twins in the next film, bah

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:11 (twenty years ago) link

regarding the story James Blount linked to, it reminds me of how some fundamental Christians objected to Harry Potter for promoting 'dark arts'

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:16 (twenty years ago) link

When Agent Smith multiplies he become The Smiths. Do you (Morri)see!

That's not punny.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link

Wrong, Nicole, wrong! That made me laugh out loud for ages. It therefore (to use an Americanism) "carnstitoots" funny. Very funny.

N. Ron, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

I've seen it ten times now (literally--we're showing it at the theatre I project at--and I'll be seeing it 12 times a week through August) and I like it a lot more now than when I first saw it (though I am surely sick of it).

The talky bits wear really thin, especially the Councillor Haman and Merovingian scenes and the scene with Penelope in the bathroom is drawn out. However the shot where she turns and gestures toward the Keymaker's cell is like the hottest thing ever filmed. I have decided Neo is a program and something is fishy with the Council but I am perhaps Matrixed out.

ps the freeway scene is way too long.

And the credits are ELEVEN MINUTES LONG. ELEVEN. That's REALLY LONG.

adam (adam), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:59 (twenty years ago) link

You're a projectionist?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

I haven't seen this yet but me and trife will be first in line when it his the Athens dollar theater

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

I am an IMAX projectionist. Like a regular one except bigger.

adam (adam), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:30 (twenty years ago) link

i sat thru those 11 minutes of credits to catch the trailer for Revolutions...its just about worth it, even tho it means you have to listen to Rage and P.O.D. beforehand, muahaha

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.