Would Anyone Still Vote Labour?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (473 of them)

I'd vote for them again because I'm not convinced any other party would do a better job, hardly a ringing endorsement but probably a significant factor in a lot of people's voting tactics last time around.

JohnFoxxsJuno (JohnFoxxsJuno), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I might in local elections but I'll have to look at my (Labour) MP's record more closely before the next parliamentary election. (She's new, and has a majority over LD of about 500 iirc)

beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:47 (eighteen years ago) link

I have never actually voted Labour in my life - it's always been the Liberals/Alliance/Lib Dems, tactically in '83, '87, '92 and '97 because they were the main opposition to the Tories in my constituency at the time (Oxford West and Abingdon), and then for real in the last two elections. Unless the Lib Dems foolishly decide to steer rightwards next time, I don't see any reason to change my voting habit.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:53 (eighteen years ago) link

I voted Labour since the late 80s but voted Lib-Dem last time. I live in a safe tory seat (but hey it's The Gay Tory!) and so I could safely protest my opposition to Blair (in particular). However the thought of the tories gaining power again would make me vote Labour again in a trice (or whatever a very short time is) if I thought it would make a difference. Thatcher was a fcking disaster and all the things that people hate about Britain stem from those years. The trouble is that Blair has not had the guts to change that, scared crapless that he'll lose the mythical middle England vote, and thus lose the power which he loves so dearly.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:57 (eighteen years ago) link

Blair has not had the guts to change that, scared crapless that he'll lose the mythical middle England vote

Or maybe he's just a right wing cunt.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 16:58 (eighteen years ago) link

The Tories are going to win the next election anyway, so you may as well just vote for who you like

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:05 (eighteen years ago) link

lol

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:06 (eighteen years ago) link

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3710830.stm

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:10 (eighteen years ago) link

We're hardly in the same situtation now tho

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:12 (eighteen years ago) link

And we won't be in the same situation as we are now in two or three years time.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:14 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, by that time the Tories will be even more certain of winning the election

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:15 (eighteen years ago) link

yes, presumably in that time the Tories will have gathered a fair amount of increased support and momentum, enough to ensure the narrowest victory margin (for either them or Labour) in a very long time. (xpost)

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Why would a middle class Middle England voter NOT vote Tory in the next election?

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:17 (eighteen years ago) link

MIDDLE CLASS GUILTs

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:18 (eighteen years ago) link

New Tories too soft on gays?

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Why be guilty about voting for that nice Mr. Cameron?

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

After all he's more like Tony Blair than Tony Blair is these days

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Sod middle class guilt. ILX is slowly turning me Tory.

Hello Cthulhu (kate), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I must revive my joining labour plan, may once Blair has gone. I don't tend to vote labour as I live in a safe labour seat and feel I can do more good by voting for a minority party in the current system.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Three years time = no Blair. That's going to make a huge difference. The most the tories can hope for is for a re-run of '92 with Brown as Major. Brown turns out to be ineffectual AND unable to control the party and the Tories win the nxt election. It could happen but I doubt it.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Does nobody actually care about things like ID cards, 'glorification of terrorism' act etc., preferring to quibble about how 'left-wing' they actually are? Maybe this electorate deserves them.

Riot Clone, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Three years time = no Blair. That's going to make a huge difference.

Yes, it means that the Tories are more likely to win

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Well y'see, Mr Clone, nobody's very convinced that the alternative would offer some fabulous ID card-free, terrorist friendly utopia.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:22 (eighteen years ago) link

There's one surefire way for Labour to win the next election: get people who don't vote at all (poor people and young people) to vote for them. But, no chance of that happening.

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

'Yes, it means that the Tories are more likely to win'

Why?

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Why not?

What makes you think they'd be inclined to vote Labour if they were to vote Dada?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

Poor people do tend to vote Labour, when they vote at all

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

internet geeks should form its own party

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

'Yes, it means that the Tories are more likely to win'
Why?

Because the people who put New Labour in power are Tory voters at heart.

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Poor people do tend to vote Labour, when they vote at all

But when the Bee-Enned Peas are doing well it tends to be in poorer areas doesn't it? The poorer and younger you are the easier it is to nudge you rightwards (or rather reactionary behaviour, rather than conservatism itself), no?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:28 (eighteen years ago) link

New Labour have become a conservative right of centre party - with crap policies, what's even more laughable you now have the tories under Cameron morphing into New Labour Mark2 with a spin on social justice issues

Progressive politics: is what is needed

Bill of Rights
PR voting system
scrap ID cards [this is new labour's poll tax..that will ultimately lead to their downfall]
scrap tuition fees
introduce 50p top band of tax for over 100K income
Tax incentives for business that create jobs in Britain..and penalties for those that outsource British jobs outside of EU
get out of Iraq

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:29 (eighteen years ago) link

There's one surefire way for Labour to win the next election: get people who don't vote at all (poor people and young people) to vote for them. But, no chance of that happening.

If there's no chance of it happening then how is it any more of a surefire way of them winning than say, all Tories switching their votes to Labour?

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:30 (eighteen years ago) link

it's more that the BNP exploit areas where there are racial and social tensions, there aren't enough Pakistanis etc in nice leafy middle class areas to nudge nice leafy middle class people rightwards nor is there enough unemployment and bad housing etc etc

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:31 (eighteen years ago) link

(xpost) Like I said, Labour are going to lose the next election

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

Basically, people end up voting for whoever they think is going to win.

Then they can be all 'hray' when they do.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:33 (eighteen years ago) link

When my nice impeccably liberal/left boss says to me, "But this David Cameron, he doesn't seem like the old Tories, he seems pretty reasonable", then I know Labour are in trouble

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:34 (eighteen years ago) link

yes Dadaismus it's the wealthier regions that remain intrinsically conservative, nimby etc., but the disadvantaged areas are where extremism flourishes more (obv. examples being Tower Hamlets, parts of Bradford and Oldham), as you say.

Basically, people end up voting for whoever they think is going to win.

except the people who vote Lib Dem etc?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:35 (eighteen years ago) link

but the disadvantaged areas are where extremism flourishes

Flourishes is putting it a bit strongly

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:36 (eighteen years ago) link

"Basically, people end up voting for whoever they think is going to win.
Then they can be all 'hray' when they do"

is this at all true?

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:38 (eighteen years ago) link

no "impeccably liberal/left" person would even flirt with the notion of considering voting Tory.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:39 (eighteen years ago) link

She's American/Irish, she doesn't have a vote

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Fair enough. Ignorance is an excuse.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, Americans are ignorant?

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Ignorant of the history of the Tories, why not? I'm trying to find reasons for being taken in by laffing boy Cameron.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

There's a oft-observed halo effect, where the first few polls after an election show a higher number claiming to have voted for the winner than actually did.

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Basically, people end up voting for whoever they think is going to win.
except the people who vote Lib Dem etc?

you can still win the actual MP vote innit.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

unless you vote RESPECT and live in bethnal green

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

I voted Labour in 92,97 and 01 and come from a family that has always voted Labour, but I voted Lib Dem as a protest vote last time. If there was an election tomorrow I wouldn't vote Labour, but I don't know what I'll do by the time the next election comes round. I'm prepared to give Brown the benefit of the doubt for a while once he becomes leader. I still consider the Labour party 'my' party, just one that I don't vote for under its current leadership (in the same way that Manchester United is 'my' football team, but I refuse to return to Old Trafford under its current ownership). I think I would actually like some kind of Lib-Lab coalition to get in next time.

Tehrannosaurus HoBB (the pirate king), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Incidentally, I'm still going to vote Labour in local elections too, because in my unitary authority area the Tories and Lib Dems have a coalition pact, and don't put candidates up against each other.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 19:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Jeez - Charles Clarke is too much:

The home secretary told a Westminster lunch the fact Mr Dromey did not know about the loans meant "you have to wonder how well he was doing his work".

It's like that Mad magazine line where a pedestrian knocked 20 feet into the air by a police car 'was today charged with leaving the scene of an accident'.

Bob Six (bobbysix), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago) link

The other sensible labour counter seems to be that actually many of the protesters were arrested under the policing act of last year not the public order act & it’s like no shit you gallus pricks, we want that fascist law repealed too

michel goindry (wins), Tuesday, 9 May 2023 19:07 (eleven months ago) link

It was a whole thing!!

michel goindry (wins), Tuesday, 9 May 2023 19:08 (eleven months ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/11/female-labour-mp-accuses-shadow-minister-of-sexual-assault

She is reluctant to make a formal complaint through Labour’s own independent complaints system, although she was encouraged to, as she felt his popularity within the party would not help her case.

This does not sound good in any way.

the pinefox, Friday, 12 May 2023 10:51 (eleven months ago) link

so she's basically saying Labour's independent complaints system tends to ignore serious complaints made against MP's if they are high profile front benchers, colour me surprised.

calzino, Friday, 12 May 2023 11:03 (eleven months ago) link

For gods' sake please don't vote for this cunt

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/labour-real-conservatives-keir-starmer-protect-way-life-2337576

contrapuntal aversion (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 13 May 2023 05:57 (eleven months ago) link

I always thought the only reason he didn't join the Conservative Party was a sense of embarrassment about his stupid Labour history geek name. But at least now he explains why he didn't need to do it.

calzino, Saturday, 13 May 2023 06:26 (eleven months ago) link

>>> insisting his party’s transformation will be like “Clause IV on steroids” – a reference to Sir Tony’s decision to abandon the goal of common ownership of industry – with a focus on putting communities “in charge of their own destiny” and a reformed state.

Sir Keir will offer a personal view of his own patriotism, based on understanding the “true worth of service, respect and stability” and criticise those who harbour “patronising contempt for those who fly our flag”. <<<

the pinefox, Saturday, 13 May 2023 08:00 (eleven months ago) link

Would anyone actually say "I'm going to do [X] - on steroids!" ?

Only KS.

the pinefox, Saturday, 13 May 2023 08:01 (eleven months ago) link

"I'm going to do the Olympic 100 metres final on steroids."

Maggot Bairn (Tom D.), Saturday, 13 May 2023 08:18 (eleven months ago) link

:D

the pinefox, Saturday, 13 May 2023 08:32 (eleven months ago) link

"on steroids" in this case really means all the most negative and reactionary aspects of New Labour but this time not propping up poverty wages with tax credits and fully committed to the austerity consensus, so not dissimilar to the May govt. Which Tory govts of the last decade are the *real* conservatives is a more of a pertinent question for the DM and Con Home, it shouldn't be a pitch made a year before a GE by the leader of a supposed party of Labour. Grim times for democracy.

calzino, Saturday, 13 May 2023 08:48 (eleven months ago) link

He’s like Theresa May on Imodium

michel goindry (wins), Saturday, 13 May 2023 09:01 (eleven months ago) link

lol, Theresa May - without the charisma

calzino, Saturday, 13 May 2023 09:04 (eleven months ago) link

I saw a Kieth supporter responding to Tory twitter taunts about the sexual assault by one of the shadow cabinet and lack of action taken thereof, and they responded with "but what about the rapist in the Tory party, eh?"

calzino, Saturday, 13 May 2023 09:12 (eleven months ago) link

He's a cunt like (most of) the rest of his party

Toshirō Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Saturday, 13 May 2023 09:21 (eleven months ago) link

xp i saw that too calz. tell me you don't care about sexual violence without telling me etc

contrapuntal aversion (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 13 May 2023 09:59 (eleven months ago) link

lol, nice juxtaposition there

calzino, Friday, 26 May 2023 15:20 (eleven months ago) link

three months pass...

It was great to catch up with my friend @CondoleezzaRice to discuss China, Ukraine and the Global South at this moment of huge geopolitical change. pic.twitter.com/Nl5Qd4hhTP

— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) September 7, 2023

the pinefox, Friday, 8 September 2023 14:12 (seven months ago) link

it's a club and we're not in it

School of RAAC (Noodle Vague), Friday, 8 September 2023 14:13 (seven months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.