Pit Bulls: What's the appeal?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1263 of them)
I don't know about 'turning' - I haven't seen any of this in the literature.

Some dogs are dog-aggressive and some are people-aggressive. These traits are not limited to one breed by any means. The problem is that when a pit is people-aggressive, it can do a lot of damage, because it is so strong. The important thing is to spend time with the dog before adopting it, and to take obedience classes with it so that it can learn to socialize.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:43 (twenty years ago) link

i was attacked by one as a teenager. they are loaded guns with legs.
they + their owners should all be shot.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:47 (twenty years ago) link

Okay, I'll tell my sister that. I seriously will.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:48 (twenty years ago) link

please. also tell her "eat my assleavings" for me.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:52 (twenty years ago) link

Is that a death threat?

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:58 (twenty years ago) link

no, my assleaving are non-leathal.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 16:58 (twenty years ago) link

Look - bad owners need to be prosecuted. The pit bull people are all for this. They are also in favor of the euthanizing of bad dogs. But it is simply incorrect to blame the entire breed for what a few dogs have done. As I said, there was a similar hysteria about German Shepherds about 30 years ago, and in the eighties and early nineties, it was Rottweilers.

I myself had a chunk taken out of my leg by a Fox Terrier.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:01 (twenty years ago) link

wow. assleavings. Just wow.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

i apologies for my flippant remarks.
after i was attacked i let the owner off the hook (i do think the father of the family treated the thing poorly). less than a year later the dog took a run at some children in the park - they weren't hurt - only terrified. i felt terrible for not suing the owner + having that dog put down. had anything happened to the kids i don't think i could've handled the guilt. i don't understand why anyone (who's not a thug) would get a dog with such a poor reputation (i don't really care about your stupid facts). i'm sure they're loyal dogs and good to their families - they are v. protective and deadly if you're a stranger.
i was just some guy standing on a side walk at the wrong time.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:10 (twenty years ago) link

Good owners get the dogs because they're familiar with them and because they've checked the "stupid facts". You should have cracked down on the owner.

At one time, it was the most popular dog in the US. Petey from the Little Rascals was a pit. So was Nipper, the RCA dog. And Sergeant Stubby was a WWI hero. Also, pits worked at the World Trade Center site after 9/11. They're used as police and therapy dogs.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:14 (twenty years ago) link

I just don't understand what the attraction to this particular breed of dog is, especially given their violent track record.

Keep in mind their violent track record is akin to that rash in kidnappings last year that the media created. Any large working dog can be made dangerous by years of neglect and abuse.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:39 (twenty years ago) link

So, it's the media's fault, is it?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:42 (twenty years ago) link

Pardon my polite incredulity.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:43 (twenty years ago) link

Because the media overblowing a story is so hard to believe...? How about that string of shark attacks last year, what were there... like 2 or 3 of 'em?

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:46 (twenty years ago) link

come to think of it, alex - it was the media that attacked me + nearly crushed my hand.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 17:53 (twenty years ago) link

It's a good thing you've never been robbed by a black person, dyson, you might have to join the kkk.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

Dog owners who seem to me like inhuman assholes encourage the sort of behavior in their dogs that creates the reputation of pitbulls, which is augmented by the tendencies of the media. I'm just saying exactly what bnw said two posts ago. Oh well. (xp)

Dyson, I hope that eventually the owners were held accountable for their irresponsibility in owning such an aggressive dog. Those sort of dogs (of ANY breed) should be put down, and their owners deserve punishment.

(xp again)

JuliaA (j_bdules), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:02 (twenty years ago) link

there are local rescue centers for pit bulls between here & detroit. my friends got a coupla dogs from there and they're just as lovable as any other.

heh. this thread is, of course, "the anecdotal evidence thread."

Huggy Dork (Kingfish), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:05 (twenty years ago) link

actually, the owner of said dog was the biggest racist fuck i've ever met + used to (according to his sons) be in the clan.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:06 (twenty years ago) link

They're less susceptible to attacking people than other dogs, but because they're a walking muscle, when they do attack, it's usually pretty bad. But I've seen many pit bulls and I've never come across one that wasn't well-mannered.

PIT: Spot of tea, good chap?

GEAR: Thanks, Pitty.

PIT: Anytime.

See?

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:07 (twenty years ago) link

In that case, Dyson, it doesn't at all surprise me that he'd have a vicious dog.

Violent families = abuse of animals = bad dogs.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:09 (twenty years ago) link

agreed. there should be a screening process for people wanting dogs like these.
like i said they're like loaded guns + in the wrong hands they can be deadly.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:13 (twenty years ago) link

It's not the dogs, it's the assholes who mistreat them. I know someone who has a pug, Emma, whose first owner treated her horribly - abuse and neglect, etc - and that pug bites like a SOB. She's working with Emma so that hopefully she'll eventually be safe around unsuspecting people; til then Emma stays in house. ANY breed will be nasty if it's raised to be.

The pit bulls I've met at our local offleash park have all been very sweet, and have played nicely with my dog. I imagine dog-fighters and thugs who breed for aggression don't frequent the park very much.

I have been charged by a completely insane pitbull on a chain, in front of a club, held by a (white) THUG. I bet that dog could've bit me but GOOD.

Neither pro nor con, but Big Boi from Outkast breeds them... http://www.pitfallkennels.com/

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:17 (twenty years ago) link

I wonder what Andre breeds? aside from LOVE that is

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:22 (twenty years ago) link

My favorite "bulls" are French Bulldogs. Oh sweet lordie, I want a gaggle of them!

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:26 (twenty years ago) link

French Bulldogs ROCK. They look like darling little gargoyles. Calvin was playing with one last week, and it ran and with its standing-up ears it looked like a bunny.

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:34 (twenty years ago) link

Meanwhile: Toddler Mauled By Family Pit Bull, May Lose Eye

I have no idea why anyone would want one of these animals. I'm not sure if this is correct, but I think of pit butll owners the same way I think about Hummer drivers - sure you can but why? And is it responsible?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:47 (twenty years ago) link

In my sister's case, she worked with them for a long time before deciding to adopt one. People adopt them because they are familiar with the breed.

Also, keep in mind that many news reports of 'pit bull attacks' involve dogs that are not actually pit bulls. In one case on my local news, the dog looked more like a German Shepherd.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:53 (twenty years ago) link

People adopt them because they are familiar with the breed.

People adopt them because they're supposed to be badass or something:
http://www.pitfallkennels.com/images/BIgBoiCover.jpg

I guess when they attack you or puncture your baby's eye, then they prove their worth

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 26 January 2004 18:57 (twenty years ago) link

Searched the web for "rottweiler attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 319

Searched the web for "Doberman attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 492

Searched the web for "german shepherd attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 141

Searched the web for "pitbull attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 478

Searched the web for "poodle attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 31

Your search - "chow-chow attack" - did not match any documents.

okay. there's 3 breeds right there you should require a licence to own then.
(also the media slant agains pitbulls doesn't seem so apparent to me here).

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:00 (twenty years ago) link

oops:

Searched the web for "pit-bull attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,900

damned vicious media¡

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:01 (twenty years ago) link

My last post was a chow-chow attack!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:02 (twenty years ago) link

fwiw, i can think of five or six people i know who have been attacked by chows (not including myself) but no one who has been attacked by a pitbull. "chow-chow attack "doesn't make for sexy copy.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:04 (twenty years ago) link

i've actaully hear chows (of the non-spencer variety) can be nasty.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:06 (twenty years ago) link

What about corgis? This is the most aggressive dog I've ever had! In the Royal Dogfight, I bet it was the corgi that started it.

the river fleet, Monday, 26 January 2004 19:07 (twenty years ago) link

Dude - 'deed, not breed'.

Some pits are ill tempered, some aren't - like a lot of people. You may say that not many people have mauled other people, but well, you'd be wrong there, too. I have a 6 year old son and two pit-mixes - who are the most gentle, goofiest dogs I have ever encountered. (And I've had lots of dogs). Sure pits have a terrible reputation, and I admit that when my ex picked the first one out of the pound, I said no fucking way, but with the right training, guidance and love, they're just amazing dogs.

(The only dog I have ever been bitten by was a chow).

luna (luna.c), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:07 (twenty years ago) link

I think at this point there's some self-fulfilling prophecy going on. People think pits are vicious. Someone who wants an aggressive dog who can scare and intimidate other people chooses a pit and raises them in a way that brings out that viciousness. Of course not all pit owners get their dogs with this mentality, but it doesn't take many to give the breed a bad name
So, if, say, German Shepherds had the same reputation, it'd be the dog-of-choice of anyone who wanted a vicious dog, they'd be raised differently, and you'd be seeing a lot more news about them biting people.

oops (Oops), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:08 (twenty years ago) link

i'm sure there are good ones out there, but in general chows an extremely ill-tempered breed - agressive towards other dogs, bad with kids, not terribly bright. however, they're also not possessed of supercanine strength or championed by celebrities so media attention is comparatively small.

(major xpost)

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:09 (twenty years ago) link

"Chihuahua attack" brought back 147 results. Vicious little fuckers are worse than German sheperds.

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:11 (twenty years ago) link

ugh! my friend's family had one when i was in high school. the unpleasant little shit bit me at least ten times, but everyone always laughed it off - "oh, that feisty chichi!".

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:15 (twenty years ago) link

Liberal media conspiracy!

Listen, I'm sure most Pit-bulls are very sweet. But yeah, jerks who want to be tough/look tough adopt them and have those awful chains on them and then walk them on the street and scare the sh*t out of people. So, I automatically think they're awful. If I were choosing a dog, I'd rule out pit-bulls automatically because I don't want to be associated with that kind of ego/sadism. I'm sure pit-bull owners are aware of the stigma they're attaching to themselves and I guess it's a testament to the animals that they're willing to endure that.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:15 (twenty years ago) link

Corgi Attack on google?

Results 1 - 10 of about 17,000

I rest my case. (OK, a lot of that is actually stuff about the Queen, but still.)

the river fleet, Monday, 26 January 2004 19:17 (twenty years ago) link

I think it's known that full bred pit bulls can be vicious in ways that have nothing to do with their upbringing. It's rare but it happens. My mother lived with a pit bull that belonged to her idiot boyfriend and it was really nice until one day it bit my sister's face when she was petting it. I'm wary of them but people have them for various reasons. Our friends have one that they found as a baby with it's throat slit; they took it to the vet and it's been their dog ever since. She's very sweet. But who knows? That's a gamble they've chosen to take, and I don't think they would have gotten a pit otherwise.

Bull terriers, on the other hand, rock. They're generally very nice and really cool looking. I'm glad that target has brought them back into fashion to obliterate the memory of Spuds.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:18 (twenty years ago) link

The reputation depends on where you live. In Chicago, they're becoming increasingly popular.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:27 (twenty years ago) link

...and of course a Pit Bull attack would make the media - they're big dogs, so when they are vicious, they do more damage. But my understanding is that other breeds bite more.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:29 (twenty years ago) link

Q: I adopted a dog at the shelter and was told that he is a Staffordshire Terrier. Is a Staffordshire Terrier the same as a Pit Bull?

A: First it is important to know that Staffordshire Terrier and Pit Bull are not official breeds. They are common terms used to describe a certain type of dog. There are actually three breeds that can be easily confused. The correct designations are:

The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT) - Recognized by the ADBA and UKC
The American Staffordshire Terrier (AmStaff or AST) - Recognized by the AKC
The Staffordshire Bull Terrier (StaffyBull or SBT) - Recognized by the AKC

They are essentially the same dogs but have been bred for a different purpose and/or size standard since the mid 30's. Some are even duel registered. Pete the Pup from "The little Rascals" was among the first APBTs to be registered with the AKC as an Amstaff.

How can we make the difference? We can't really. We can only try to guess the breed based on some very subtle factors that may differentiate them. Note that even experts can't always tell if a Pit Bull is an APBT, an AST or a SBT

The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT)
The APBT is bred for performance above everything else. The breeders usually focus on the working aspect of the breed, and unfortunately for many breeders that means specifically pit fighting. Therefor, many APBTs are bred primarily for their fighting abilities and for certain physical characteristics that will ensure good performance in the pit (mouth, air, stamina, etc.). Some are also bred for the characteristic called gameness.

Because performance is the most important trait, less consideration is given to conformation (this refers to how closely the dog matches a set physical standard for the breed). You may see APBTs as little as 30 Lbs and as big as 100 Lbs. In general though, the APBTs bred for the pit are usually less than 70 Lbs.

Not all APBT breeders breed for the pit. Some breed for conformation, temperament, weight-pulling, obedience trials, therapy work, etc. The foundation of their bloodlines however, has most likely been tested in the pit and kept the physical and mental characteristics of the pit dogs; Lean and athletic body, agility, intensity, drive, etc.

Cropped ears are not an indicator of the dog's background. Some dogs bred for the pit have cropped ears, some don't. Show dogs often have cropped ears, both with the APBT and the AST, but not always. Some dog fighters prefer cropped ears, some don't.

Today, you will find that a lot of people are breeding Pit Bulls for nothing in particular, or just to be pets, or for protection, or to make a quick buck. In general, these dogs are a little larger than the original APBT. Most of them have stable disposition and make excellent companions. Unfortunately some backyard bred dogs may be born with terrible temperament and human-aggressive tendencies because unknowledgeable individuals who don't make temperament a priority, are allowed to breed dogs. This is true of any breeds by the way, not just the APBT.


The American Staffordshire Terrier (AmStaff)
The AmStaff (or AST) used to be the same dog as the APBT but was taken out of the pit in the mid 30s. AKC opened its stud books to a few APBTs that fit a standard they had chosen, and came up with the name Staffordshire Terrier. In early 1970s the name was changed to American Staffordshire Terrier, to avoid any confusion with a breed called "Staffordshire Bull Terrier" from England that was also recognized by the AKC.

AmStaffs are now primarily bred for conformation and temperament. They have a set height standard and usually weigh between 50-80 Lbs. They may be a little stockier than the APBT, but not always.

Since they share the same ancestors as the APBT (some are even dual registered), AST and APBT not only share the same look, they also have similar personalities. Dog-aggression is a potential trait in both breeds although not as strong and common in the AST than its close cousin the APBT. AmStaffs are very dominant dogs though, and just like the APBT they often have a threatening and intimidating look. That look and dominant attitude could trigger an hostile reaction from other dogs and result in a fight.


Staffordshire Bull Terrier (Stafford, Staffies or SBT)
Staffies are a little less common in the U.S. but remain very popular in England. They also share the same ancestors as the APBT and AST. They are much smaller though, about 15 to 40 Lbs max and their ears are rarely cropped. They are essentially bred for good disposition and conformation. They are often referred to as "nanny dogs" because they are excellent with children. Some people still use them in the pit in certain countries, but rarely in North America since they are so rare to obtain.

Q: I heard that Pit Bulls were not good with children, is it true?

Most Pit Bulls are excellent with children. Since they were bred to perform in the pit, they have a high tolerance for pain, and in general will patiently endure the "abuse" young kids unintentionally dish out. However like any large, powerful dog, they must be supervised with kids at all times.

Pit Bulls are enthusiastic and strong, and can easily knock over an unsteady toddler with their wagging tails. They can be quite rambunctious until they mature, which is around 2-4 years of age. Pit Bulls should be taught to play gently, not jump on people, to sit and wait for a signal before going through doors, etc. Positive training methods work best.

Adding a juvenile Pit Bull to a home with toddlers or very young children may not be ideal since the dogs are very energetic at that age. You may want to consider adopting a mature Pit Bull instead, that has proven himself with children. It is possible to have a young dog with toddlers or infants, but you must be diligent with your supervision. Pit Bulls are great playmates for older, respectful kids.

Q: Our neighbors bought a Pit Bull and now we are scared to let the kids play outside. Are these dogs really mean and vicious like the media portrays them?

A: Most Pit Bulls are NOT human aggressive. In a large number of cases, when a Pit Bull attacks a human, it has been trained to be aggressive towards people, most likely abused, and/or seriously deprived of socialization with humans. Those dogs are usually in the hands of uncaring and irresponsible owners who own them for the wrong reasons.

Any large dog should be supervised around children, and Pit Bull dogs are no exception. They can be rambunctious and play with a lot of intensity. Pit bulls can be animal-aggressive, and should be controlled around other pets, but human-aggression is NOT a normal trait of the breed.

You should evaluate the dog on its own merits, not just that it is a Pit Bull. Most veterinarians will tell you that Pit Bulls are very nice dogs, and not a danger in most cases. Owner responsibility, however, is a must with ANY large and powerful dog and all canines should be well-socialized with adults and kids.

Pit Bulls face prejudice and misunderstanding from many people who do not understand them very well, so ownership requires a willingness to consider your neighbors' fears, and educate them about the dog. The largest issue is to know the owners keep the dog as a pet, give it lots of love, and every opportunities to be around humans. The dog should not be chained outside alone and without the chance to interact with humans.

Etc, et al.

http://www.pbrc.net/info.html

luna (luna.c), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:32 (twenty years ago) link

Chihuahuas are the meanest fuckers on the planet earth and that is a fact. I wish pit bulls would eat all the chihuahuas, quite frankly. I've been bit by many many dogs thanks to my mom owning, approximately, 75 of them (not counting breeded and sold puppies) in my lifetime. The chihuahuas were the meanest and I still have a scar from, I believe, an english bulldog, right under my eye. I've never been bit by a pitbull ever, though we never owned any.

In all honesty, the dogs that NEVER made a move on me at all were the German Shepards and the Rotts. I am pretty sure she's had a doberman too and that never bothered me. The poodle and the chihuahuas are mean motherfuckers!

FWIW the worst animal scar I am still carrying came from a FERRET.

Allyzay, Monday, 26 January 2004 19:32 (twenty years ago) link

But, why would anyone want a dog like that? Even if it had a reasonable disposition, just knowing that it could do so much damage if it so desired. I just don't get it. And unlike German Shepherds, they're not particular attractive animals (my own opinion, of course).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:33 (twenty years ago) link

Any dog could do damage.

luna (luna.c), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:33 (twenty years ago) link

To the same extent as the Pit Bull? I don't think that's accurate.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 19:34 (twenty years ago) link

a neighbor's pit bull named Razor charged at me out of nowhere a few years ago, bit the living fuck out of left calf and knee, and i had to go to the hospital.

despite this, i love pit bulls. they're some of the most loving, sweet dogs. they are serious, SERIOUS cuddlers.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:23 (six years ago) link

an old refrigerator is "more potentially dangerous" to a child than a trained pitbull but y'all are straight up trolling now

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:23 (six years ago) link

imo the names people give to pits should be applied to ridiculous small dogs for fun

mh, Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:25 (six years ago) link

"that's my shih tzu in the picture"
"oh, what's his name?"
"razor"

mh, Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:26 (six years ago) link

Karl OTM about pit bulls and cuddling. My friends pitbull was very affectionate

Unchanging Window (Ross), Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:39 (six years ago) link

looking through the statistics, it seems that pit bulls are, in fact, more likely to attack than other breeds, which makes sense when you consider the fact that many of them were selectively bred to fight.

i also know for a fact that most pit bulls are great dogs with big hearts who are, if anything, more affectionate than average.

Treeship, Thursday, 22 June 2017 19:55 (six years ago) link

I like a lot of the Pitbulls in my neighbourhood, there was one really nasty fucker but it is now gone - with it's shitty owner. It is irresponsible owners with big fucking Akitas that are the current menace around here now. There is a guy who lives around the corner with a sibling duo of Pitbulls named Buddy and Holly, they are so affectionate and cute I even bought christmas presents for them last year. My labrador gets totally jel when I always make a big fuss of them if they are in the garden while we pass. They definitely have not got a bite in them.

calzino, Thursday, 22 June 2017 20:06 (six years ago) link

Oh we're doing this again.

The statistics are that there are a higher number of pitties around than most other dogs, so it's not at all surprising that they'd lead in number of breed-identified attacks.

They are not a more dangerous dog than x or y. They are just mercilessly overbred (visit a shelter sometime).

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 22 June 2017 22:40 (six years ago) link

Why are they breeding so many?

Treeship, Thursday, 22 June 2017 22:46 (six years ago) link

They're concentrated in large part in poorer neighborhoods where people don't have the money to get them fixed and/or don't give a shit. This has been changing over time as the breed (which isn't really a breed, but a loose grouping of genetic characteristics) has found more acceptance in communities outside the hood or biker gangs or whereever else "tough" dogs are prized. But there are still far too many that wind of being destroyed at shelters because they shouldn't have been born in the first place.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 22 June 2017 22:53 (six years ago) link

Breed bans are fucking awful, though, and anybody who supports one is also fucking awful.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 22 June 2017 22:54 (six years ago) link

First they came for the pit bulls . . .

nickn, Friday, 23 June 2017 01:32 (six years ago) link

this thread has been going in pointless circles for 13 years. anti pit bull zealots of ilx: do you really want to fight alex in nyc's war for him in 2017?

adam, Friday, 23 June 2017 01:37 (six years ago) link

great now pitbulls have guns - thanks america

Dean of the University (Latham Green), Friday, 23 June 2017 13:53 (six years ago) link

two weeks pass...

To Adam's point, even I don't give a damn anymore. Enjoy your dogs. Clean up their poop. End of story.

Alex in NYC, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 19:11 (six years ago) link

Hey dude!

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 12 July 2017 01:38 (six years ago) link

Yeah, hey!

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 12 July 2017 03:24 (six years ago) link

six months pass...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.