Jeans with no rear pockets

There is a joke to be made about wormholes here.

I have one pair of jeans with an inside back pocket. I've never worked out why but if you keep your wallet it there it looks like you're intimately scratching your arse when you have to get money out.

Maybe that's what this one guy who's always coming into the library is doing. It always looks like he's grabbing his own ass, but maybe it's one of these mysterious inside back pockets.

God, I LOATHE that hands in each others' back pockets walking stance! I am a bitter fellow.

It's not that I'm against tight pants. I love them! But, girls need to realize that there is such a thing as TOO tight.

Too tight as in white transparent enough to see the coulour of the underwear, now thats too tight.

They look best on skinny Japanese girls, the no pockets streamlines and makes them look even more skinny than they already are...This was an interesting development at first, but now a bit played out I think...bring back the pockets!

Jeans on females need to be tight, but not so tight as to emphasize on the little crevices which need not be seen, just tight enough to get a jist of the basic shape, countour, and roundness of the backside. If you ask me, the pockets on the FRONT side of girls' jeans are the ones that need to be removed. At least you can fit your hands into the back pockets. I don't know why front pockets are even there. It can't be for looks. Who looks at that spot anyway? If you ask me, the entire fashion industry has got the whole pocket-removal thing backwards...

What's going on with false pockets too? I have a pair of trousers with utter useless tiny slits in them where pockets could have been, for no apparent reason other to irritate me.