hahaha. what's the answer? it's right, right?
oops i got the r&j question wrong. damn!
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:13 (twelve years ago) link
mookieproof, re: the catholic thing, it would depend on the intensity of their belief, but having been brought up catholic, i have a lot of personal baggage and animosity toward that religion that might make it hard for catholics to date ME. (again, depending on the intensity of their belief)
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:15 (twelve years ago) link
how many of your questions do you answer secretly? the majority of mine are open, so everyone will know that i know jack shit about romeo and juliet
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:18 (twelve years ago) link
The question is what does "Wherefore" mean in "Wherefore art thou Romeo?"
The answer is 'Why'
― homosexual II, Wednesday, November 9, 2011 7:04 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I thought everyone knew this!
― emil.y, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:31 (twelve years ago) link
That would require me to have taken some kind of English lit class that was worth its weight in paperwork.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:35 (twelve years ago) link
And yes, turning a glove inside-out reverses its handedness!
What if you put the glove on upside down? These questions are too simplistic. Anyway I am going to go back and change the r&j one now that this new info has come to light.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:42 (twelve years ago) link
Also hilair that among hundredz of explicit sex questions there are a few of these semi-SAT questions. I like the number/pattern ones.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:44 (twelve years ago) link
i changed my answer too, rrrobyn. hehe.
so the sentence means "why are you Romeo?"
sadly I was an English major in undergrad.
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:48 (twelve years ago) link
Could this be a way to weed out spammers, maybe?
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:00 (twelve years ago) link
i think i have one or two questions hidden, but i don't remember what they are.
one of my high % matches appears to have not just answered but commented on each of hundreds of questions. many of her comments are witty, but the overall effect is a little alarming in its relentlessness tbh
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:01 (twelve years ago) link
It means Why you gotta be a montague?xp
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:02 (twelve years ago) link
says the internetOhwell!
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:05 (twelve years ago) link
I'm frustrated by a lot of the match questions because theyre not an either/or proposition, but if you pick all the answers it deems it "irrelevant"! For eg:If you could have brilliant skill at something, would you prefer:
* 1 Q something practical? * 2 W something fun?
Depends what the damn skill is! And why you think it would be fun or practical! Another one asked which kind of intelligence you prefer (logical, creative, intrapersonal, something like that). I'm like... all are good, it really depends on the person. Gah.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:08 (twelve years ago) link
I also skip all questions about drugs and most about sex. I dont need a database knowing my answers to such things, thanks.
Lol I like answering the drugs questions but some of them and the sex ones are just juvenile - and then I realize there are a lot of juvenile people on this site... Which reminds me that I am totally procrastinating on completing my eharmony profile, yknow, where the mature people are. lol. I will tho, just to see what's what.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:15 (twelve years ago) link
i like to answer both of them because i want to be able to restrict others based on their own answers, but i keep it private. but yeah, regardless, it's in a database. :-/
i guess all of that is past tense since i disabled.
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:21 (twelve years ago) link
braggin
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link
sorry:-/
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:28 (twelve years ago) link
i think i'm trying to justify my (probably creepy) presence on this thread, just because i found the whole experience so interesting, having never done the whole online dating thing before.
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:29 (twelve years ago) link
― Trayce, Wednesday, November 9, 2011 9:08 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
pvmic <3
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:37 (twelve years ago) link
really frustrating doing the questions. i'd accept any answer for most of them, despite having an answer of my own. it's so dense, why would you want someone to be the exact same as you, except on matters of whether they're a psychotic racist or whatever...just because i answer i might make a joke that could offend someone who was uptight doesn't mean i care if my SO would or want them to be either/or.
― When a German communicates, you listen (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:48 (twelve years ago) link
Hahah Hoos! Waht! Im not that tinfoil hat am I :/ lol
― Trayce, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 22:15 (twelve years ago) link
must say you get WAY, WAY more views when you answer questions. tho i've been adding in a lot of answer explanations too...
― When a German communicates, you listen (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 22:47 (twelve years ago) link
wish there was a way to filter to just see questions that have explanations, those are like tiny profile extensions that tell me way more than the answers themselves
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 22:48 (twelve years ago) link
I publically answer so few questions, heh. :/
― Trayce, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 22:56 (twelve years ago) link
I got a five star rating from a cuet philadelphian guy... who lives in China, booh. So I messaged him "thanks, youre cute!" which I'd never do to a local person because I am a MASSIVE COWARD haha anyway he replied and said I am "totally cute" so hey, I feel better now :)
― Trayce, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:07 (twelve years ago) link
had a nice evening
― conrad, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:34 (twelve years ago) link
oooh tell us more conrad
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:46 (twelve years ago) link
also a pale british dad wrote me
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:47 (twelve years ago) link
i have noticed that a lot of guys around age 42-45 seem to think I am about the right age for them
(PS I am 31)
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:48 (twelve years ago) link
long good conversation beer brief snog in underground tunnel probably see her again
― conrad, Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:14 (twelve years ago) link
awwwwwwwesome
― homosexual II, Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:14 (twelve years ago) link
Good to see people getting some great results out of this at least :)
I just found a really cool sounding video gamer nerd dude who I have messaged.
― Trayce, Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:24 (twelve years ago) link
for as much as it's worth in the fickle world of okc i spent the last hour or so messaging back and forth with a really funny and pretty person and seems like we may go for a drink...
― When a German communicates, you listen (LocalGarda), Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:29 (twelve years ago) link
awesome
― mookieproof, Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:31 (twelve years ago) link
btw "wherefore" is an actual word, not just in Romeo & Juliet
― ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ (sic), Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link
thx
― mookieproof, Thursday, 10 November 2011 00:50 (twelve years ago) link
wait Z S already disabled? that was quick!
i just impulse bought an iphone and i'm downloading the locals app as we speak. hopefully hilarious consequences to follow!
― bene_gesserit, Thursday, 10 November 2011 01:30 (twelve years ago) link
well this is stupid, none of these people are even close to me! and i thought i would be able to see them on a map.
― bene_gesserit, Thursday, 10 November 2011 01:50 (twelve years ago) link
an actual word in england maybexps
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:11 (twelve years ago) link
whoa i just got an incredibly charming msg from someone!so i guess i'm actually going to go on dates at some point eh. weirdly amazed.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:19 (twelve years ago) link
p.s. ZS i don't think anyone thinks yr being creepy hanging out on this thread or need to be on okcupid to be anyway
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:27 (twelve years ago) link
Verona is in Belgium iirc
― ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ (sic), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:31 (twelve years ago) link
sure
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:33 (twelve years ago) link
wherefore art we waiting
― Trayce, Thursday, 10 November 2011 03:16 (twelve years ago) link
All of my questions are answered privately. I think there is such a thing as having too much information about a person.
B_g, I stopped looking at my locals because it was always the same people there. Maybe I'll check in again.
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 10 November 2011 03:49 (twelve years ago) link
2 people said they would like to meet me on locals but i haven't even looked at their profiles. i got distracted by dropbox and the fact that i can now read graphic novels on my phone!
maybe i will put a broadcast out tomorrow asking for an iphone tutorial.
― bene_gesserit, Thursday, 10 November 2011 05:08 (twelve years ago) link
Ha, a broadcast. No one has ever contacted me on locals :(
I developed a new rating system, as of this evening. If someone seems cute and cool, but there's nothing in their profile for me to latch onto and write them about...5 stars!
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 10 November 2011 05:31 (twelve years ago) link
Rejecting people on answers to single non-sequitur questions still seems weird to me. A pattern, maybe, but wtf?
― mh, Thursday, 10 November 2011 15:25 (twelve years ago) link