Steve Jobs RIP 1955-2011

IT IS ACCOMPLISHED

http://www.stevejobsthelostinterview.com/

jesus just put it on youtube dog

"Robert X. Cringely" (not his real name) is way too big a fan of himself for that

or release it on imax

it's a VHS transfer; it'd look pretty silly on imax

fuck you

D:

The book is ace. I was expecting gushy worship of the bloke but it's not that at all. Very much a profile of a businessman. Huge (I'm only halfway through it) but also very entertaining.

wait is he still dead?????

I think he dies at the end

I bet the Woz did it

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/11/14/111114fa_fact_gladwell

real genius: the steve jobs story

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/25/Real_genius.jpg/220px-Real_genius.jpg

I had no idea Steve Jobs and Mona Simpson were siblings! Weird.

But I thought you knew everything [/alfred]

sorry

I had no idea Steve Jobs and Mona Simpson were siblings! Weird.

― Bon Ivoj (jaymc), Monday, November 14, 2011 10:47 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark

in all fairness, neither did they

MONASIMSON_REAL

lol

Think Jobs was listening in on my Sunday School when I was six:

But what I've always felt that a team of people doing something they really believe in is like is like when I was a young kid there was a widowed man that lived up the street. He was in his eighties. He was a little scary looking. And I got to know him a little bit. I think he may have paid me to mow his lawn or something.

And one day he said to me, "come on into my garage I want to show you something." And he pulled out this dusty old rock tumbler. It was a motor and a coffee can and a little band between them. And he said, "come on with me." We went out into the back and we got just some rocks. Some regular old ugly rocks. And we put them in the can with a little bit of liquid and little bit of grit powder, and we closed the can up and he turned this motor on and he said, "come back tomorrow."

And this can was making a racket as the stones went around.

And I came back the next day, and we opened the can. And we took out these amazingly beautiful polished rocks. The same common stones that had gone in, through rubbing against each other like this (clapping his hands), creating a little bit of friction, creating a little bit of noise, had come out these beautiful polished rocks.

That's always been in my mind my metaphor for a team working really hard on something they're passionate about.

yo thanks for the link

I work at a software company, Apple products are great, but I don't want to be one of those rocks!

Moral: when a scary-looking guy says "come on into my garage I want to show you something," follow him

lol AA

http://i.imgur.com/DyuvZ.png

ILU, Jedward. Never change.

And people think I'm irreverent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2C2oCsrqcM

yo mh this looks good

this is the event that that clip of gassee i linked to a couple of days ago is from -- just found it

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379824_10150352571516721_362474601720_8394224_2131142578_n.jpg

did i just blow your minds or

http://fun.resplace.net/Emoticons/Uncategorized/Amazed.gif

that malcolm gladwell piece was 100% horrible

^^ it was like a book report

like, he was working off the same facts from the biography that were AVAILABLE TO EVERY OTHER SINGLE PERSON WHO HAD READ THE BIOGRAPHY. + some bullshit half-baked tweaked shit about tweakers.

did you read the biography

+ some bullshit half-baked tweaked shit about tweakers.

the other stuff where jobs yelled at everyone around him and stole ideas i knew about. . . the tweaker stuff was half baked, even for gladwell

if you read the biography and want to hear someone smart talk about it, this is good: http://5by5.tv/hypercritical/42

part two drops later today

i listened to that and it was not very good. computer people don't know how to talk on air. so many awkward gaps. and the interviewer kept asking stupid questions.

and the guy's main points were completely unsupported, and then he went on to do some really trivial nitpicking.

dogg, dayo... thats what book reviews in the nyer basically are

the tweaker stuff is basically right but havent people been saying that about jobs for like... decades now?

it wasn't a book review tho, it was "annals of technology"

i havent read this article but im assuming "tweaker" isnt referring to meth?

I read the nyer for the articles, man

oh i thought it was in the critics section

heres the article slock

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/11/14/111114fa_fact_gladwell

I meant 'book report' in the sense that it was just a summarization of facts - what irked me was that gladwell was trying to push his specific interpretation of those facts as if they were something revelatory and not at all self-evident from the biography when it was basically just what every single other review of the book out there was saying

like he was trying to pass it off as some brilliant insight that he garnered from his own investigative sleuthing and in depth research when really he got the book on release date same as everybody else and was busting ass to get this article out so he could collect $50k from the nyer, because he's maclolm gladwell

at least he may have stopped pretending to be a scientist

xp he didn't even tell us which washing machine steve ended up getting.