Superhero Filmmakers: Where's Our Watchmen?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2161 of them)

Yeah nice comic book stylings. No need for Billy "laughing boy" Corgan, though.

Neil S, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:29 (fifteen years ago) link

visually at least, it looks great.

Pretty much my thought. I'm honestly amazed. Of course, the very 21st century effects/editing touches are jarring, but to be expected.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm still convinced this film is an impossible sell to people who haven't read the book (and some who have.)

Simon H., Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm ultimately skeptical -- still, though. (Sharp move not showing Veidt's Antarctic base, actually.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link

The question is whether the director can coherently transplant the plot and its ramifications, though. Given the level of subtlety of 300 I have my doubts, but here's hoping.

Neil S, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Dr Manhattan lookin' pretty good. Awful use of Corgan tho. the whole approach of the trailer is pretty terrible and formulaic - should'be tried to stand out more here. Cool to see the Mars glass house tho.

blueski, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

the whole approach of the trailer is pretty terrible and formulaic

A good number of the shots are pretty much from the book -- and I'm amused at how they're all "Look, Night Owl's Batman, WE KNOW"

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Great looking trailer even with Corrigan's nasal mewling.

Capitaine Jay Vee, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I better read the comic! I have had the TPB for a while now, but there's always some fan-boy crossover that takes priority. I think there should be a She-Hulk movie, that would be awesome.

jel --, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

A good number of the shots are pretty much from the book

i know, it's just the whole style of the trailer itself but i was hoping for no music, no slow mo etc., maybe use actual Nixon speeches cut up and whatnot

also really sick and tired of 'human being destroyed/blown apart/smashed into bits but the last remaining recognisable part of them is their screaming mouth' sequences

blueski, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

link doesn't work for me :(

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Awful soundtrack to that preview.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:51 (fifteen years ago) link

don't like the obviously-all-shot-in-front-of-a-green-screen-ness of it all :(

DG, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it looks terrible. color scheme is all wrong.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:55 (fifteen years ago) link

would love to hear deeznuts explain how this movie is inherently superior to the comics by virtue of its being a movie

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link

OK, it's also at (shudder) Harry Knowles's.

DG, it wasn't all shot in front of a green screen! It was shot mostly on practical sets!

Love the shot of Veidt nailing the assassin guy. And the Dr. Manhattan effects look great.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link

they did actually film on Mars i believe

blueski, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:01 (fifteen years ago) link

No, they filmed on Venus doubling for Mars. It's cheaper to travel towards the sun for a movie crew.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:02 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, i'm done

is that aged Nixon on the TVs behind Veidt then?

blueski, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Looks interesting to me! Virtual sets/actors is the only way this thing COULD work, short of being an animation (which I can't believe no one had a serious go at).

forksclovetofu, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

DG, it wasn't all shot in front of a green screen! It was shot mostly on practical sets!

i know, i read the production blog from time to time. still looks weird tho. that shot of dr manhattan blowing up a viet cong looks like some 1996 command and conquer cutscene

DG, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

> would love to hear deeznuts explain how this movie is inherently superior to the comics by virtue of its being a movie

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:59 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Music is also inherently superior to sculpture.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

ok haven't seen trailer but stills look fucking awesome

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:30 (fifteen years ago) link

the only good I can see coming of this is that maybe Dave Gibbons got a lot of money

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:34 (fifteen years ago) link

My status is still intrigued but skeptical. Only universally stinking reviews will stop me checking it out out of curiosity, though.

chap, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

we get it dude. you dont like it. xp

s1ocki, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Another link for the trailer:
http://io9.com/5026402/watch-how-faithful-watchmen-will-be

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I, like Shakey Mo, love this trailer and I will be first in line.

jeff, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:22 (fifteen years ago) link

i always imagined theire outfits to look way rattier/homemade/not like batman begins

Will M., Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:25 (fifteen years ago) link

"I guess I look pretty Devo, huh?"

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:26 (fifteen years ago) link

yep

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:28 (fifteen years ago) link

top marks for manhattanpants

DG, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:05 (fifteen years ago) link

omgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomg

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:15 (fifteen years ago) link

As my wife likes to remind me, I am quite often way too cynical for my own good. So as far as this movie goes, I've decided to just geek the fuck out and enjoy it.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:16 (fifteen years ago) link

love the nipples on the Ozymandias suit

latebloomer, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I loved that B&W still that was released a few months back but I absolutely hate the trailer. Eh, I'll still see it.

Allen, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:30 (fifteen years ago) link

why is Ozymandias wearing nipple-plated leatherwear rather than the greco-egyptian shit his entire persona is centered on

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link

seriously so much wrong, you guys are on crack

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link

"You can't even turn the pages on this movie!"

forksclovetofu, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link

It's, like, metatextual, Shakey. Like how the comic was a comic about comics, the movie is a movie about movies. Therefore the "modern" (i.e., 1985) heroes in the movie have costumes more like current movie heroes, just like how 1990s Batman costume was so much different from Adam West costume.

Yes, it's anachronistic. So is Richard Nixon in the White House in 1985. Deal.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link

this can't be bad! rorschach's mask moves! oooooooooh

DG, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Like how the comic was a comic about comics, the movie is a movie about movies.

does not compute

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Uh, ok. I guess not, if you're determined to be dumb/stubborn/whatever.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link

you might note that I'm not complaining about anachronisms - which are crucial to the "alternate reality" theme of the story - I'm complaining abotu STUPID SHIT that is in there for no reason and has nothing to do with the character other than "oooh we need to have the bad guy in black. leather. with nipples. wouldn't that be cool."

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link

saying its a movie about movies is a gross misrepresentation - its a movie about a comic book about comic books. unless they've completely re-written the plot.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:15 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.