Let's talk about Vice Magazine

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1177 of them)
(Actually, I have very little against Vice and a gigantic issue with Momus.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

Guys, there's a fantastic lightning storm here in Tokyo! You should see it! The fork lightning was flickering in straggly horizontal lines across the horizon, so the whole city felt like a floodlit football arena with very unreliable lights!

I've totally gone off the idea of the song about retards. Now I think I want to write one called 'The Biographies of Famous Mathematicians', because mathematicians are under-represented in song, and the math of curves is beautiful. Or something about lapdogs...

BTW Dan, I just recorded my Schubert song in German (it didn't sound right in English) and was thinking about you -- affectionately -- when I sang it, because I remembered you'd offered to sing it. I guess that isn't going to happen now...

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

Flattery will... well fuck, it will get you pretty damn far.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Sob!)

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

If all this naturalisation is so successful, why does "gay" seem to be used as a negative and offensive term about a zillion times more now than five years ago? Where is Momus when I need him to recontextualise the way my little sister and her friends talk and make it tolerable?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

it's because we haven't taken it far enough yet, tim.

we won't reap the rewards until oprah derides the latest martha stewart clothing line as being hella gay.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 13:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

jesus christ, go to bed for eight hours...

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

...and you still won't want to get up. At least that's my approach to life.

(Vaguely serious post on this thread by me to occur sometime tonight, perhaps.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 14:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

I love everything about Vice. It's odd that almost this entire thread is about the language they use and not about the actual articles, reviews, etc that make up the magazine.

sundar subramanian, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

who wants to point out the hi-larious logical inconsistency in sundar's post there?!

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

i agree with sundar

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

sigh.

in what possible universe is "language" distinct and seperable from "writing"?

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

this thread is almost as bad as the abortion one. well done everybody...

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

Me: Momus, can you explain why exactly you see inherent value in people's doing things society disapproves of?

Momus: Because I don't believe in the status quo.

This is my problem, Momus: you never seem to bother to isolate the valuable parts of the status quo from the ones you disagree with. The western "status quo," insofar as it exists, frowns on things like racism, child pornography, spousal abuse, and incitements to violence -- and I don't imagine you'd see inherent transgressive value in taking any of those actions. It's for that reason that you can't simply fall back on the syllogism that any transgression against the status quo is an inherently good thing: at some point you're going to have to start looking at the individual transgressions and working out whether you think they're productive ones or not. What I'm seeing in a lot of this thread is you saying "it's a transgression, therefore it's good" and a lot of other people saying "it's a particular transgression that doesn't help anything and quite possibly makes things worse."

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

or: "stop acting like a 16 year old goth girl."

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

what's wrong with acting like a 16-yr old goth girl?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

have you ever tried debating one?

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

"16 year old goth girl" = "white boy" = "nigga", jess

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

by which i mean stereotypes are stereotypes are stereotypes, not any kind of relativity of historical meaning

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

Racism isn't primarily bad because it stereotypes.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

long and arduous is the oppression the middle-class subcultural teenager has suffered at the hands of those who have since outgrown it. swing low, sweet chariot!

"nigga" isn't a stereotype, fritz. it's a collection of stereotypes as well as being a word, unlike "16 year old goth girl" which is just a collection of stereotypes (and isn't a racial or sexual slur no matter how it can be twisted.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually maybe it is. Bit I still think there's a useful real-life distinction between "nigga" and "16 year-old goth girl" as epithets.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

OF COURSE there's a HUGE diff btwn those terms as epithets, what i was trying to say is that jess is using "16-year old goth girl" as Vice uses "nigga" purely in terms of using a word as a literary device. He's just doing it with a safe term instead of a dangerous term. you're saying, 'I know this is a stereotype but hey, you know me so you know so you know that I know that I don't mean it as saying "16-yr old girls are dumb, goths are dumb, girls are dumb" even though it implies all those things.' and I know what jess meant and wasn't offended by it. and I know what vice means by "nigga" and I'm not offended by it. it doesn't make me think of either as a particularly reliable narrator, but I understand what they're trying to do.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

nb: you might have to take out some of those 'i know so you knows' to make sense of that last post

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Addendum: Equating a magazine with a private conversation is Bill O'Reilly-level idiocy. Did someone redefine "clever" when I wasn't looking?)

(nb: i don't think fritz is an idiot, and basically agree with what he sez.)

(also equating a public message board with a magazine is a bit more problematic.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

i don't think jess is an idiot either, for whatever that's worth.

I had a huge argument with a Vce editor about this issue one night, and his basic argument was that there should be no difference between the way people talked to their closest friends and the way they wrote. they were arguing that it was just honest.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

In that case, everytime I talk to one of my friends in public, I'm going to charge everyone around us $3.50. (Yes, I recognize that the fact that Vice is free undermines my point; I just want the money.)

Julio: Glad to oblige.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

"n-" is an act which invokes a set of social relations and understandings.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Does anyone remember the interview with Weights & Measures? That must be one of the funniest things I've ever read.

I don't know if I should even get involved but Jess, I guess my point was more something like "Well, do you like the magazine otherwise?" Because there are other things going on in the magazine, with or without the smartass diction they use, which never struck me as the main point of the magazine. Some of the reviews and interviews are brilliant. The Andrew WK review was one of the main things that got me interested in him. The debate about using these slurs is relatively uninteresting to me - sometimes I talk like that with people who know me and think it's funny, mostly with my sister. If it offended you a great deal I probably wouldn't around you. I don't think it's that much worse than making jokes about dead babies or something - I don't take the latter as condoning child murder. It's not a big deal to me either way but I can understand why it could offend someone. If it offends you, fine, understandable, that's a general point about using these slurs that applies everywhere, not just Vice. But if we're going to talk about Vice, I think there's a lot more to talk about even if the vocabulary does offend you. I'd be more interested in talking about the reviews, interviews, articles, and columns. Unless you're so turned off by the use of words like "homo" that you never read further, in which case HOW DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN SIT THROUGH YOUR EMINEM AND G'N'R ALBUMS? It reminds me of the time I lent my sister a Public Enemy CD. She gave it back after only reading the lyric sheet and complaining about some of the attitudes towards women. All this said to me was that she had no interest in listening to the music itself.

sundar subramanian, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

but practically every word used to describe people does that on some level, Sterling.

stockbroker. beautiful. divorced. fat. busboy. German. singer-songwriter. rockist.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

sundar, enjoyment of eminem or p.e. or gnr or juvenile or WHOEVER does not immediately equate with agreeing with their attitudes. i find vice pitiable not JUST because of the language used, but because the schtick is so fucking old. it's a snooze.

as i said before, i am friends (or at least "friendly") with almost everyone who has expressed a "dissenting" opinion from my own on this thread. including geeta, who tried to paint me into the reductionist "you disagree with jess" = "you are wrong" corner. if i had to stop liking them because i disagree i think i'd surely be limiting the enrichment of my life. but if my friends were as juvenile and purile as vice with little redeeming value, i'd feel no shame.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Know that I'm just asking Sterling to be more specific because his ppoint is too vague for me, not equating these terms with Nigga

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

and please please PLEASE dont anyone try to paint me into some liberal guilt corner that i "forgive" eminem or juvenile because they're noble savages.

i like big black too, that doesn't mean i don't think steve albini is an idiot.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

but jess you don't have to agree with a magazine to like it either.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's sort of what I was saying in less words.

sundar subramanian, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

i know, that was kind of my point. i don't like vice because i think it sucks. above and beyond the racial stuff.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

oh, ok. i thought you were arguing that music could be appreciated despite its flaws in a way that the written word could not

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd argue that A) "n-" is more so and B) "n-" is unique in that it changes the character of a conversation and invokes all these things whether or not is applied to you in particular, or just used at all.

The problem is that the word has historically meant not just "you are a person of these particular inferior characteristics tied to your race" but also "you deserve according treatment, as do all such people" which is a great deal to go into a word, and that doesn't even begin to address the "-a" issue.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah, and that's why I'm NOT gonna say it. But anyone who cares to say it should go right ahead so I know where they stand. or where they think they stand anyway.

know what I'm saying? the use of the n-word in huck finn tells me more about the characters of tom and huck than it does about jim, right?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Momus - even if we do reclaim the streets, they'll only just make new words up. The pressure differences will always be. We could equalise left and right (fag is right, fag is wrong) and have ourselves a word. But there'll open up new gaps: new words. I liked Tom's post re: knowing our boundaries.

david h (david h), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fritz: yeah. a book is a book. but it also says something when you allow yourself to be called that. and once again -- situation.

imagine that same book which is great and anti-racist and powerful and all thrown into a crowded integrated inner-city classroom already rife with racial tension -- some gang related, much not -- and kids being asked to read out loud passages including that word. it's like throwing a bomb into the room.

context is everything.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wish the world was binary.

Home Truths thread to thread! Or just d00mie.

david h (david h), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

I love everything about Vice. It's odd that almost this entire thread is about the language they use and not about the actual articles, reviews, etc that make up the magazine.

You want examples of why I hate Vice? This article got mentioned on some blogs a few months ago. I'm sure this magazine is very proud of its CANON SMASHING SHOCKAH, and I'm not like offended that they're dissing bands I like, I just think the writing here is really puerile and annoying. (And ooooooh, "venereal warts" -- these guys are PUSHING BOUNDARIES. WHOA.)
And I quote:

3 The Fall
Great band, right? “Mr. Pharmacist” is the jam, right? What about the other 99.9% of their songs? Have you ever heard that album they made up on the spot? The one where he goes, “I am curious orange, curious oh-rawnge”? What the fuck is that? Those guys suck. They’re one of those bands your big brother totes because nobody’s ever heard them before and they seem like some heavy shit. Like Brian Eno. Or Roxy Music. How gay are they? All these groundbreaking bands like The Residents or Throbbing Gristle or Captain Beefheart or Pere Ubu or Cabaret Voltaire are essentially nonexistent. Music critics always cite them as a huge influence but nobody’s ever heard them play a note. I wouldn’t be surprised if none of them even have any albums. I’m not going to look into it, though. I checked out Gang of Four, Love, and Frank Zappa after hearing how influential they were and all I heard was a bunch of gay weirdos going “pajama people, pajama people.” Fuck that.

Jody Beth Rosen, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

jeez louise, there's an I Hate Everything board where that vile New York Press article you linked to also belongs. perpetutating that stuff makes you complicit.

felicity (felicity), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

that's right, jbr. it's all smiles and roses here on i love everything.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 17:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

that paragraph jbr cited is hilarious. does anyone find it ironic that some of jess' own posts on ilx are very similar to vice's style of writing?!

chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 18:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

You're missing my point, Mark P. I THINK THE WRITING SUCKS AND THERE'S AN ANNOYING OVERRELIANCE ON SHOCK VALUE.

Jody Beth Rosen, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 18:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

jbr, I think mark p. was actually on your side there.

felicity (felicity), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 18:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

jbr, i think the writing was trying to be 'childlike' on purpose to get a reaction from 'proper' writers like yourself. and you fell for it!

chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 18:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

chaki, if you can find me a post where i call someone a "nigger" or a "fag" ironically or not (and NOT in this thread), without using it to point out someone elses stupidity, then you get a cookie.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 18:11 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.