"My Chemical Romance is this generation's Nirvana"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (735 of them)
I don't think I've ever consciously listened to anything by My Chemical Romance.

From a British perspective, Nirvana were only seen as important (onj a wider scale as opposed to a 10-out-of-10 from ET in Melody Maker scale) after they'd been on The Word.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:05 (eighteen years ago) link

I've only seen the "Helena" video out of the corner of my eye - was it some sort've FatBob does Busby Berkeley affair?

. . . maybe I shld go & have a listen before saying anything else.

etc, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:09 (eighteen years ago) link

dom when will you learn that bruza's fans are realer than mcr's: that counts for more than numbers.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:09 (eighteen years ago) link

You spelt "Man like Dom" wrong.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:10 (eighteen years ago) link

Nirvana were seen as important when they played Reading in 1991 and everyone went 'what the fuck was that?'. The mass media never did catch up, except for Francis Wheen.

MCR are huge, just like many of their fans. Who doesn't know this?

snotty moore, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think there's any one big band (or set of) who occupy the lanscape quite like Nirvana and the acts broken in their wake did with Grunge.

The whole emo thing seems like millions of micro acts, and a few commercial pastiches picking up the signifiers on top (MCR).

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:13 (eighteen years ago) link

I was at Reading '91 and can testify that the act considered far and away the most "important" there by the audience was Carter USM, who were second top of the bill on the Saturday and James might as well not have bothered turning up.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:14 (eighteen years ago) link

(x-post)

But that's the thing. Were Tad really any more dominating to the landscape than Something Corporate are now?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:16 (eighteen years ago) link

The mass media jumped onto Nirvana a lot quicker, and with more complicit approval than they did with (for example) Rave & House exploding. Where they covered it hugely, but as a *scandalous* thing.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:16 (eighteen years ago) link

The landscape re: the media and on the ground (what actually happened) really shouldn't be thought of as representative of each other (Dom and Marcello's point I think).

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Also, at the time Tad were the media tip for the big act to come out of Sub Pop.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:28 (eighteen years ago) link

I sense a double meaning there.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:28 (eighteen years ago) link

I was at Reading '91 and can testify that the act considered far and away the most "important" there by the audience was Carter USM, who were second top of the bill on the Saturday and James might as well not have bothered turning up.

OTM, but that was pre-Nevermind. Compare: Reading '92.

s1.c@rter, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Most importantly, why should music journos necessarily care what 16-year-olds think? And do they really think they're writing for them? My guess is that most are just writing about music that they like and see value in.

Another question is what does "this generation's Nirvana" mean? As someone who felt pretty in touch with the zeitgeist in 1991, left the US a few months before Nirvana broke, and returned a couple of years later and felt completely lost, I find the claim pretty hard to swallow. Beyond whatever quality judgment you may make about Nirvana, they were the poster boys for a huge change in radio and popular tastes.

Following that (Sean is actually younger than ultragrrl, if I read everything correctly) the fact that he (and I for that matter) has never heard a note of MCR suggests that their "historical" role isn't really comparable to Nirvana.

I think it's just using the sacred Nirvana cow -- I guess she doesn't like them -- that makes this controversial. If we picked a slightly different generation for comparison I think we "MCR is this generation's Bon Jovi" and it would be equally true and feel a lot less argumentative.

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Most importantly, why should music journos necessarily care what 16-year-olds think? And do they really think they're writing for them? My guess is that most are just writing about music that they like and see value in.

well, they're paid by either money earned from advertisers who want 16-year-old kids to buy their warez OR by 16-year-old kids buying their magazines. they probably have some commercial considerations in mind beyond "about music that they like and see value in".

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually the funniest part is the 'MySpace searches sez they're popular' claim. That thing she refers to had (or maybe had) been unchanged for months in *all* categories, which likely bears as much comparison to reality as our own statscock. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:21 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, MCR rank only 74th at last.fm

xpost
Well, yes, obviously, but the market is larger than just 16-year-olds. Also, presumably, those commercial considerations would actually drive more media coverage (which is not necessarly the same thing as music journalism) of MCR if they were really as popular as Britney et al.

(And maybe I'm just proving that I'm 35 here, but the "commercial considerations" that drive Pitchfork and Stylus, Sean Gramophone and Matthew Fluxblog, Chuck and Xgau, Robert Hilburn and Ann Powers, etc. are very different.)

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:24 (eighteen years ago) link

i suppose the more subjective answer is that many music hacks still see pop and rock music as essentially 'youth' forms, not without reason, really, and that youth phenomena are important, a sign of the times. probably this is because more music obsessives are teenagers than 35-year-olds.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:27 (eighteen years ago) link

"MCR is this generation's Bon Jovi"

Bon Jovi were the Nirvana of hair metal.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:31 (eighteen years ago) link

I read the linked article, I didn't like it much b/c I don't like the "voice" she writes in, but as far as it went, I didn't think she was totally wrong.

What did occur to me was that, uh, there is this assumption that MCR "mean" s.th. to "this" generation, but when Nirvana were active & Cobain alive, I don't recall them "meaning" anything like that to the equivalent generation back then, though obviously layers of "meaning" have been applied to Nirvana & Cobain in the intervening years. Perhaps.

I've heard MCR on the radio a bit, but I didn't think they were particularly, well, particularly anything, really. Then again, I'm 40 and I like Hawkwind.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:32 (eighteen years ago) link

nirvana meant a lot to the sensitive people with curtains in the years above me.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm all for their dress sense (well, the lead dude's dress sense, and make-up for that matter) and implied ruined romanticism. Their music, not so much.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago) link

I would argue that those "hacks" who think youth phenomena are important and to be written about, write about youth music and therefore MCR in proportion to their popularity. Those who are still writing about Neil Young and Springstreen or whoever are writing about the music they like and feel has "artistic" merit, or they cover the Red Hot Chili Peppers or Madonna or whoever, following those commercial urges you spoke about.

As always, it would be interesting to see some numbers comparing column inches, record sales, and airplay for MCR, Kanye, etc.

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:36 (eighteen years ago) link

oh MCR are totally this generation's Nirvana: they're both a) angsty, b) have terrible noisy guitars, c) crap singers and d) are complete crap.


The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:39 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost

Bon Jovi were the Nirvana of hair metal.

Exactly my point, except that the rockists among us won't take umbrage at comparing Bon Jovi and MCR the way they do Nirvana.

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Some of the comments to the original post were quite interesting as well. It wasn't so long ago that someone would ahve been substituting Korn or Limp Bizkit for MCR in that post. And now look...

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:40 (eighteen years ago) link

"Bands in becoming less popular over period of time" shock!

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Various things...

Another question is what does "this generation's Nirvana" mean?

I have no idea what this means either! Does she mean they're a band that are changing the greater musical landscape or does she simply mean that they're important to angsty kids? Or both? I don't geddit.

i suppose the more subjective answer is that many music hacks still see pop and rock music as essentially 'youth' forms, not without reason, really, and that youth phenomena are important, a sign of the times. probably this is because more music obsessives are teenagers than 35-year-olds.

One thing about Nirvana I suppose is that yer old buggers were into them way before yer 16-year olds knew who they were. Is this her point? I don't know!

Also, at the time Tad were the media tip for the big act to come out of Sub Pop.

I don't really recall this, but I wasn't really paying that much attention. Was this on the evidence of God's Balls vs. Bleach? 'Behemoth' was good, but not that good, IIRC. Anyhow Mudhoney would've been the obvious choice to me, but it's nice thinking about a planet where Tad released Nevermind. If only Dave Geffen had listened to that demo of 'Smells Like Beef Dripping'...

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I kind of assume that she means "important to angsty kids". I don't recall nirvana's usp being "important to angsty kids" while they were active, though obviously they became so later. Actually, I don't know if it is "obviously" - I'm just assuming so b/c I remember seeing a lot of teenagers w/nirvana tees, satchel patches etc over the years. I saw Nirvana twice - once with Tad as a double headliner, where the audience could perhaps be characterised as early-mid twenties people, the kind of folks who had been into eg swans, pixies, snc youth, big black. When I saw Killdozer playing the tour for "uncompromising war on art..." it was a slightly smaller audience, but nearly all the same people. Mudhoney headlining w/Telescopes support drew a much bigger crowd. The second time it was w/eugenius & shonen knife at a bigger venue, and it was a more metalised audience. It reminded me strongly of when Hanoi Rocks crossed over from a small proto-goth audience to a much larger kerrang readers audience.

If u/grl'z "it's yoof, you oldies don't understand" blather is true w/r/2 MCR's audience, then I don't see the comparison, & I bet she's just tossing it out b/c she knows it'll annoy some Cobain=godhead type ppl.

(blethering about the innate musical & rocking superiority of Mudhoney to any of this shit ruthlessly excised)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:54 (eighteen years ago) link

I saw Nirvana twice - once with Tad as a double headliner, where the audience could perhaps be characterised as early-mid twenties people, the kind of folks who had been into eg swans, pixies, snc youth, big black.

I saw them on the same tour, and yeah, that was what the crowd were like. Later on, it was more of your grebo-lite Neds types. But certainly not kids.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Later on, it was more of your grebo-lite Neds types

Yay! Oh wait...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually *High School Musical* is this generation's Bon Jovi. (My Chemical Romance is for OLD people. Ultragrrrl is clearly not in touch with the kids.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:09 (eighteen years ago) link

Ned, are you grebo-lite?

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:11 (eighteen years ago) link

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00004VVNB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:31 (eighteen years ago) link

She's what, 26 now? Most of my friends fall in the mid 20s and I can see where she's coming from. If you were just beginning your teens when Nirvana started getting huge then their canonization seems a little odd. Most of the bands that are popular at any one time with kids of that age are forgotten a decade later. The narrative that the music press puts together in retrospect is great, but I think at that age you're likely to feel fairly passionately about whatever bands you like.

MCR might not fare as well in the retrospective critical opinion, but does that matter to their core fanbase? I mean, look at the NME readers in the UK -- they think that there's some canon with Arctic Monkeys and this Pete Doherty stuff near the top! That sounds like kids thinking they're living in some crucial moment to me.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:37 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't recall nirvana's usp being "important to angsty kids" while they were active, though obviously they became so later.

Pash, OTM It wasn't until the deification of Cobains death in the late 90's that the angsty kid's became their core audience.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:50 (eighteen years ago) link

My Chemical Romance is fucking terrible.

Dan (Blech) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:59 (eighteen years ago) link

being a kid in the mythical time of nirvana, i can unequivocally state that they were huge with the kids, angsty or not (at least in the us). they were also popular with adults. the critics liked them too. then the guy killed himself.

these seem to be the four things that made nirvana the nirvana of their generation: loved by the kids, loved by the non-kids, enjoyed by the critics, suicide.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:05 (eighteen years ago) link

I was 12-15 during the Nirvana time and peers of that time definitely had a huge awareness of the band, even if not everybody liked them. But the I think its a bad analogy because MCR isn't nearly as accepted by the rockcrit world as Nirvana was.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Also Nevermind didn't gradually hit 2 million over a year and a half.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

It's not about whether MCR is good or bad. It's about accepting them or risking irrelevance to anyone that matters.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

sorry for all the typos, just got up.

x-post the children of rich white people?

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Dakota Fanning matters?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Eminem is this generation's Nirvana, duh.

I accept My Chemical Romance. I think they are totally relevant for 2006, but certainly won't be remembered that way in, say, 2010. They write OK rock songs that are pretty fun now, but won't be much more than nostalgia in the longrun. MCR is this generation's Bush.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

To paraphrase Clooney at the Oscars the other night: in that case I'm proud to be "irrelevant."

(xpost x 3)

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Jane's Addiction might be a better analogy. Nasal vocals, represents subculture on the cusp of cultural saturation. Fun videos. Singer who likes to paint and says hippie-ish stuff on stage. Derivative fashion sense that's considered vaguely refreshing in cultural context. Somewhat more tolerable than their peers (emo being funk-metal).

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:20 (eighteen years ago) link

"Helena" = "Jane Says"

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:22 (eighteen years ago) link

This is what I don't get--back when Nirvana "broke," it's not like the journalists were that much younger. I mean, by the time you "make" it in the paper rags, aren't you already a bit older? So wouldn't the ppl writing about Nirvana have been the same distance from Nirvana as journalists are today with MCR?

Or maybe not.

Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link

If only Perry had thought to film a video at a funeral.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Eminem is this generation's Nirvana, duh.

ok grandad.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link

“Ambulance” is soo good, it’s their Jimmy Eat World moment.

have you heard the earlier version of “the world is ugly” Brad? there are one or two performances on YouTube from 2008 or so. it doesn’t have the verses from CW, basically launches straight into the chorus and a different bridge and is all the better for it.

anyway it seems like they’re switching up the setlists on this tour and playing a ton of CW and other deep cuts - “Surrender the Night”, “Make Room!!!” and “Boy Division” on day 1, “Mastas of Ravenkroft” on day 2

Roz, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:20 (one year ago) link

i have mixed feelings about the tour version of "the world is ugly" as it is clearly an unfinished song but is also gorgeous and feels like it points toward a post-rockier path the band ultimately didn't take

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:23 (one year ago) link

'cause you only live forever in the lights you make
when we were young we used to say
that you only hear the music when your heart begins to break
now we are the kids from yesterday

;_;

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:31 (one year ago) link

<3

Roz, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:39 (one year ago) link

i've never listened to the danger days b-sides before!!! uhhhh these songs are all great!!!!!

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:44 (one year ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zU_QjjjyCs

yo!!!! i love it when this band pretends to be the pixies

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 17:47 (one year ago) link

I haven’t heard the DD b-sides or other rarities either, will get there at some point.

Mostly just still in awe at how good “The Foundations of Decay” is esp as (as noted upthread) aside from Hesitant Alien, their respective solo output hasn’t been impressive. some kind of magical band chemistry.

Roz, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:03 (one year ago) link

oh roz you gotta hear "kill all your friends" if you haven't

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:06 (one year ago) link

oh that one I have!!

It's amusing how blatant they were with their hero worship too - Gerard's vocal runs at the end of "The Sharpest Lives" are a pitch perfect impression of Matt Bellamy/Muse, who I suspect he was listening to a lot while they were recording this. But not terrible! One of their best choruses. And then there's like "Kill All Your Friends" which is so clearly "Where is My Mind?" run through a Britpop filter lol.

― Roz, Tuesday, 16 June 2020 22:05 (one year ago) bookmarkflaglink

Roz, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:10 (one year ago) link

yo!!!! i love it when this band pretends to be the pixies

― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, May 18, 2022 10:47 AM (twenty-two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:10 (one year ago) link

I will listen to that tmr! am actually about to go bed - it’s late here in Asia

for an NJ band, they do have a lot of songs about California though lol

Roz, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:18 (one year ago) link

I always appreciated how in the Quietus interview for Danger Days they mentioned being huge Suede nerds, which I approve of greatly.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:34 (one year ago) link

it just makes sense

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 May 2022 18:40 (one year ago) link

Lol did not realize they are an East coast band. I also assumed they were from California, since like RHCP, they sing about it so much

imo the bare bones garage rock approach gets ropier the further they get into ballad territory

I'm not sure if you were also referring to "The Light Behind Your Eyes", but it's probably my favorite track from Conventional Weapons, even if it's a bit of a misfit with the other material. I also like "The World is Ugly" but they've done some better songs in that style on other albums

Vinnie, Thursday, 19 May 2022 01:39 (one year ago) link

yo!!!! i love it when this band pretends to be the pixies

― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Wednesday, May 18, 2022 10:47 AM (twenty-two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

ok i have heard this now - omg even gerard's singing style on this lmao! it IS great though

Ned, MCR are massive Anglophiles - they've covered Blur and Pulp in the past, some of their songs reference Smiths lyrics, so being into Suede is completely unsurprising

Roz, Thursday, 19 May 2022 02:31 (one year ago) link

I mean Gerard's early hair was "I think I'm Robert Smith" so I should damn well hope they're Anglophiles!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 19 May 2022 03:14 (one year ago) link

one nice thing about getting into this band so late is discovering how quietly revolutionary they've always been

so easy for ppl to dismiss them as a band for preteen girls back in the day, but i can't imagine how incredible it must have been for a preteen girl who was into pop-punk/emo to have seen gerard way say this in 2005:

"If you ever see shitty ass rock dudes in shitty ass rock bands asking you to show them your tits for backstage passes, I want you to spit right in their fucking faces and yell FUCK YOU!"pic.twitter.com/wV1ddK2XGX

— grace (@vintageemisery) January 7, 2020

lots more examples like that in the twitter thread

Roz, Thursday, 19 May 2022 11:37 (one year ago) link

three months pass...

gerard looking absolutely adorable performing “Mama” in a cheerleader’s outfit <3

THIS IS THE BEST MOMENT OF MY LIFE pic.twitter.com/0ulEMYGEMR

— nati | mcr in 3 days (@nataliawraggm) August 24, 2022

Roz, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:22 (one year ago) link

lol. God bless him. Wish I had tickets.

peace, man, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:26 (one year ago) link

My daughter was at the show last night in Nashville. She's never been much of a concertgoer but would have run through a brick wall to get to this one, and I gather it totally delivered.

WmC, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:42 (one year ago) link

Lucky her! Definitely looked like it was a total blast

Roz, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:49 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.