The strangely seductive banality of "Interview" magazine.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (20 of them)
Was orginally "Andy Warhol's Interview", and thus visually fabulous and oddly full of emptiness.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 19 December 2003 10:41 (twenty years ago) link

i guess i'm most interested in the "seductive" part...

as you say, colin, "interview" is basically empty, but somehow it sustains the illusion of being not-empty, or rather it succesfully projects a sense of independence and intelligence, if only for a short while. what does it do right--as far as it goes--that other similar magazines do not, and why does it still come up so short? what version of celebrity are they selling and is it a different thing from the other ones? did it represent a new version of celebrity when it first came out?

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 19 December 2003 10:49 (twenty years ago) link

To the extent that "Hi, Mick and Bianca." "Hi, Andy. Can you pass the cocaine?" was new, yes.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 19 December 2003 10:52 (twenty years ago) link

eight months pass...
if every starlet featured in a hollywood magazine is "not your average starlet" (complete with unconvincing quotes meant to display intelligence/"refreshing cynicism"/"refreshing non-cynicism"/sophistication), then who is your average starlet?

amateur!!st, Friday, 27 August 2004 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

The Naomi Watts photo-spread was disturbing

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link

i kind of have a thing for all these "fashion" magazines now that i can read them for free...it's like watching the clouds go by.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link

that's the best description yet

amateur!!st, Friday, 27 August 2004 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link

it's just a world i have absolutely no connection with. i can't process it. it's like looking into a bird's eye.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:28 (nineteen years ago) link

it's pretty lightweight now. i remember reading a robert downey jr. interview in the late 80s that seemed pretty meaty but maybe it's cos i was 13.

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

an old girlfriend of mine was a subscriber! that and that only...

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

i read "fader" today, yeah, yeah, it's a "music" magazine sure right. the m.i.a. and killa cam interviewe were dumb but pretty pictures.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link

i'd actually read it, tho. the one-sleb-interviews-another is an ok idea i guess, pharell interviewing michael jackson (or vice versa?) was hilarious, creepy, suck-uppy etc

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:33 (nineteen years ago) link

btw amst, yr average startlet is jennifer aniston (or her new improved equiv)

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 August 2004 20:33 (nineteen years ago) link

thirteen years pass...

I have no idea what magazines are still in print besides, like, Time, National Geographic and The Economist, and Vogue and Cosmo.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 22 May 2018 01:43 (five years ago) link

Lotta people I know got their first jobs shooting for interview

Never bought or read an issue, makes me a little sad anyway.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 May 2018 01:54 (five years ago) link

Greil Marcus used to have a music column with 'em.

This one was probably the first time he wrote about Corin Tucker, before Heavens To Betsey even had an album out.

Making Plans For Sturgill (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 22 May 2018 02:26 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.