Prince Albert Pujols, he reigneth

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (886 of them)

ha ha

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:23 (twelve years ago) link

Anyway, he's up to .304--likely won't even be an issue.

clemenza, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:26 (twelve years ago) link

For my eyes only! 1-2, 1 RBI--he needs one more hit and one more RBI...and he should try to win the game, too.

clemenza, Thursday, 29 September 2011 00:43 (twelve years ago) link

.299/99...noooooo!

clemenza, Thursday, 29 September 2011 02:31 (twelve years ago) link

^numerologist

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 29 September 2011 02:35 (twelve years ago) link

could still get game 163

very public (bnw), Thursday, 29 September 2011 03:35 (twelve years ago) link

eh, not looking likely...

was this his "worst" season to date?

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 29 September 2011 03:37 (twelve years ago) link

by far

k3vin k., Thursday, 29 September 2011 03:44 (twelve years ago) link

embarrassing disaster imo

very public (bnw), Thursday, 29 September 2011 03:49 (twelve years ago) link

It's all downhill from here now that he is finally in his late 20s.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 29 September 2011 04:13 (twelve years ago) link

two years pass...

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfFGBb7CMAAF3HL.jpg

mookieproof, Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:22 (ten years ago) link

I'll put this here...Didn't know you could make up and download your own WAR graphs on Fangraphs. Here's one for cumulative WAR showing Pujols' downturn the last two seasons:

http://i1059.photobucket.com/albums/t427/sayhey1/cumulativewar_zps562c47b6.png

clemenza, Sunday, 9 February 2014 17:19 (ten years ago) link

i didn't know that either. good thing i got no plans this afternoon!

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 9 February 2014 18:20 (ten years ago) link

I'm kind of curious to see what Pujols and Hamilton do this year and see if they have some bounce back in them.

I still think both the Angels and Rangers look kind of thin in starting pitching. Joe Blanton is like LA's #4 and he was pretty bad last year. Both clubs got a couple of guys counted on that haven't really had a season putting up some innings.

earlnash, Sunday, 9 February 2014 19:23 (ten years ago) link

Angels rotation last year was a dumpster fire. I blame arte for the fixation on declining sluggers..

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 10 February 2014 15:07 (ten years ago) link

pujols will presumably be at least a bit healthier this year. he was such a mess last season. i bet he'll be better but still off his second half pace from 2012

le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 10 February 2014 15:41 (ten years ago) link

yeah, if he's truly 100% from his injuries, or even close, i think he's a great bounce-back candidate. after watching him play a ton of games in STL, he was really showing some wear and tear even in 2010 and 2011. noticeably limping, all the time. and he was still playing pretty well in those years! given that he's turning 39 this year, i think that his upside is a repeat of 2011 (4.4 fWAR, .299/.384/.541)

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 11 February 2014 17:12 (ten years ago) link

also he dropped his lawsuit against asshole jack clark, because clark issued an apology. the most sincere apologies are issued months after the fact, with a pending lawsuit

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 11 February 2014 17:13 (ten years ago) link

"given that he's turning 39 this year"

heh

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 11 February 2014 17:30 (ten years ago) link

The ghost of Steve Shasta lives!

eeeLastica (Leee), Tuesday, 11 February 2014 17:34 (ten years ago) link

one month passes...

494, getting close. (If it still means anything--it should.)

clemenza, Thursday, 10 April 2014 15:28 (ten years ago) link

Obviously too early to tell, but I get the feeling he's going to settle into a Frank Thomas-like second half of his career: the power will come and go, and he'll still have some big home-run years, but BA and OBP markedly down from his prime.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 April 2014 14:25 (ten years ago) link

Will be even worse because most of Pujols OBP was driven by IBB. Without those and with the average plummeting he might never get an OPS higher than 900 again.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Saturday, 19 April 2014 15:14 (ten years ago) link

If he spends a few years hitting behind a decent leadoff hitter and Mike Trout then he'll see loads of pitches with men on base, which will boost his BA and a bunch of other counting stats.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 19 April 2014 19:49 (ten years ago) link

Hasn't he spent the last two years hitting behind Trout though to little effect?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 20 April 2014 01:39 (nine years ago) link

He has been playing through an injury for the last 3 years. I'm expecting a very good year from in 2014, actually.

Karl Malone, Sunday, 20 April 2014 03:04 (nine years ago) link

lol WARP3

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Sunday, 20 April 2014 04:32 (nine years ago) link

not sure how accurate it is to say his OBP has been "driven" by IBBs when the guy averaged 130 walks a season

k3vin k., Monday, 21 April 2014 16:22 (nine years ago) link

Alex's statement sounded odd to me too, but I checked, and he's right--a high percentage of Pujols' walks have been intentional over his career. Here are the top 26 HR guys (everyone with 500+, plus Pujols) reordered according to their IBB/BB percentages:

Banks -- 0.275 (missing first two seasons)
Bonds -- 0.269
Pujols -- 0.258
Aaron -- 0.213 (missing first season)
McCovey -- 0.193
Griffey -- 0.188
Murray -- 0.167
Sosa -- 0.166
Manny -- 0.163
Ted Williams -- 0.160 (last six seasons only)
Frank Robinson -- 0.154
Mays -- 0.145 (missing first three seasons)
Schmidt -- 0.133
Palmeiro -- 0.127
Reggie Jackson -- 0.119
McGwire -- 0.114
Killebrew -- 0.103 (missing first season)
Frank Thomas -- 0.101
Thome -- 0.099
Mathews -- 0.091
Sheffield -- 0.088
Mantle -- 0.087 (missing first four seasons)
A-Rod -- 0.074
Ruth -- n/a
Foxx -- n/a
Ott -- n/a

(My way of avoiding the drudgery of marking book reports.)

Obviously overall lineup strength plays a part in this (significant, I would guess), and also prevailing managerial strategies through the years, but holy cow, Banks--I would have bet my house on Bonds having the highest percentage. And lineup aside, Mantle's figure is weirdly low. Williams' figure is only for his age 36-41 seasons; bet he was up around 20% in his prime.

Pujols has only drawn 100 walks three times in his career, and never more than 115 in a season. Over a quarter of them have been intentional.

Trivia question I tripped over in a article about his impending 500th: who was slated to play left field for the Cardinals the year he broke in?

clemenza, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:33 (nine years ago) link

Cabrera's 0.225 would place him fourth on that list.

clemenza, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:36 (nine years ago) link

Trivia question I tripped over in a article about his impending 500th: who was slated to play left field for the Cardinals the year he broke in?

Lou Brock

Andy K, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:37 (nine years ago) link

Oh, wait -- you said "broke in," not "born."

Andy K, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:37 (nine years ago) link

Brock was slated to play left field for the Jays this year, but no.

clemenza, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:38 (nine years ago) link

oh i feel like we've had this conversation before -- on bbref, the BB columnn includes IBBs, right? that's confusing

k3vin k., Monday, 21 April 2014 17:39 (nine years ago) link

Yes.

Mario Mendoza -- 0.077 (Mantle/A-Rod territory)...which may or may not say something about how meaningful a stat this is.

clemenza, Monday, 21 April 2014 17:48 (nine years ago) link

xposts bobby bonilla, right?

Karl Malone, Monday, 21 April 2014 18:12 (nine years ago) link

Well done. Found that a little disorienting.

clemenza, Monday, 21 April 2014 18:24 (nine years ago) link

I was going to guess Andy Van Slyke.

Call the Doctorb, the B is for Brownstein (Leee), Monday, 21 April 2014 18:29 (nine years ago) link

Banks IBB #s hugely inflated cuz Cubs both stunk and he didn't walk a huge amount otherwise. Unlike Bonds who did.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 00:57 (nine years ago) link

hit 499th in 1st in DC

images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 23:27 (nine years ago) link

His 500th in the 5th. Congrats!

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 00:44 (nine years ago) link

PUJOLS BACK

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 April 2014 00:51 (nine years ago) link

weird: looking at pujols' career defensive numbers, bbref has him as a huge plus (not including the positional adjustment), which is how i've always thought of him, while fangraphs has him as a huge minus

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 April 2014 00:53 (nine years ago) link

are you looking at the "DEF" line on fg? that includes position

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:06 (nine years ago) link

right, but on bbref he's +25 runs above average in the field (including position) where on FG he's -70

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:09 (nine years ago) link

i mean i get that they use different methods but that's a huge difference

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:09 (nine years ago) link

yeah BBRef uses DRS and FG uses UZR, i guess they have some different ideas

fwiw pujols has the highest UZR on record for a 1b. i think it only goes back to 2002 but still.

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:19 (nine years ago) link

just read about this, congrats.

"Only 26 of the thousands of men who have played in the major leagues have ever reached that milestone. At 34, he is the third-youngest to do so."

Bee OK, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:33 (nine years ago) link

not sure about that last part however. :-)

Bee OK, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 01:34 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.