I agree (although I don't know what "anaphoric/cataphoric referencing" means). When I wrote "my pet drafting hate: 'this' without a noun", I meant "people who use..." Looks like my own drafting could be tightened up.
― ban this sick stunt (anagram), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:14 (twelve years ago) link
Nah, I think we still disagree, actually. My point is that 'this without a noun' is fine if used clearly. Anaphoric/cataphoric referencing is, without going into endophora and deixis in general, stuff that requires contect - anaphora points backwards (so 'blah blah blah <-- THIS'), cataphora points forwards (as in 'THIS will be pointing forwards: the cataphoric reference').
― emil.y, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:22 (twelve years ago) link
Stuff that requires CONTEXT. My typing is bad today.
― emil.y, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:23 (twelve years ago) link
Rule of thumb is that "this" most likely refers backwards to the last noun used OR (by usage) the dominant noun in the last clause containing nouns. The (poor) writer may know what this dominant noun is, but doesn't spot that an unhipped reader won't.
I think it's got way worse -- as have related probs like dangling modifiers -- since word processing enabled instant redrafting and word-order shift on an industrial scale.
― mark s, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:48 (twelve years ago) link
it's = the general situation in this regard, dear unhipped reader
― mark s, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:50 (twelve years ago) link
why does "It held little interest to me" sound so wrong when "It was of little interest to me" is fine? just the Preposition Factor? I should change it to "for me," right?
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 September 2011 16:55 (twelve years ago) link
for me, i think?
― talking heads, quiet smith (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 September 2011 17:01 (twelve years ago) link
R.E.M. Breaks Up: Michael Stipe, Bandmates Release Ends Run
Can someone diagram this bullshit for me? Is "release" a noun or a verb in this headline?
― Antonio Carlos Broheem (WmC), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 18:54 (twelve years ago) link
it's a noun, there should be an apostrophe after "bandmates"?
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:09 (twelve years ago) link
yep
― talking heads, quiet smith (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:16 (twelve years ago) link
One last little dig at Mike Mills before they went.
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:20 (twelve years ago) link
At first I thought it meant they were releasing one final album called "Ends Run".
― Antonio Carlos Broheem (WmC), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:23 (twelve years ago) link
Ends Run In My Family
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:31 (twelve years ago) link
seems needless to enforce correct apostrophe laws when you're playing word-jenga for max compression: "this michael stipe and bandmates release ends the run"
― mark s, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:46 (twelve years ago) link
ie "michael stipe and bandmates" is being deployed as an adjective there
― mark s, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:47 (twelve years ago) link
without the apostrophe its too easy to read "release" as a verb, though, especially since its used so frequently in a musical context
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:53 (twelve years ago) link
Some bands I'd like to namecheck/and one of them is Michael Stipe, Bandmates
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:54 (twelve years ago) link
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:31 PM (41 minutes ago)
I lol'd btw
― Antonio Carlos Broheem (WmC), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:14 (twelve years ago) link
it's not jenga if the structure isn't dicey
― mark s, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 21:05 (twelve years ago) link
http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/293991_781121081135_120400092_39501134_353160453_n.jpg
― Disraeli Geirs (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 02:41 (twelve years ago) link
sticklers for the oxford comma but not for capitalization huh
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 02:45 (twelve years ago) link
^^one to talk
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 September 2011 11:17 (twelve years ago) link
sarcastrophe
this exists. it's currently our IT department's thing
― Crackle Box, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 12:19 (twelve years ago) link
that oxford comma cartoon is shite
― conrad, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 12:46 (twelve years ago) link
besides which, caption for the second picture s/b: "we invited the strippers jfk and stalin" viz no comma at all
(unless it's also attempting to claim that jfk and stalin are the only two strippers in all history, and here are their names) (which is silly, because there have in fact been other strippers)
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 12:53 (twelve years ago) link
There was Theodore Roosevelt that time at Spearmint Rhino, for example.
― Viva Brother Beyond (ithappens), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 12:57 (twelve years ago) link
caption for the second picture s/b: "we invited the strippers jfk and stalin" viz no comma at all
not in my view, the sentence contains a natural pause there which should be marked by a comma
― ban this sick stunt (anagram), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:01 (twelve years ago) link
its a restrictive apposition and it needs a comma
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:04 (twelve years ago) link
or restrictive appositive i guess
oh sorry--i guess its the non-restrictives appositives that require the commas. this one could go either way
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:06 (twelve years ago) link
unless it's also attempting to claim that jfk and stalin are the only two strippers in all history, and here are their names
the gag does seem to work better where the examples exhaust the set, e.g. "i'd like to thank my parents, god and ayn rand", or merle haggard's ex wives:
http://problogservice.com/images/Merle-Haggard-ex-wives-kris-kristofferson-robert-duval.jpg
― ledge, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:06 (twelve years ago) link
it's only a restrictive appositive if jfk and stalin are the only two strippers ever
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:06 (twelve years ago) link
in which case it doesnt require a comma
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:08 (twelve years ago) link
but the comma is what makes it sound like a restrictive apposition, instead of a list?
― ledge, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:09 (twelve years ago) link
appositive w/evah
― ledge, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:10 (twelve years ago) link
the natural pause argument is the "rossian comma", i guess, after the new yorker's harold ross, who was mad for the little monsters -- in this kind of instance it falls, because it's "misleading" in the restrictive/non-restrictive dimension (further problematised by having to choose with of two deliberately silly counterfactual situations the cartoonists are intending to conjure with)
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:11 (twelve years ago) link
"we invited the strippers jfk and stalin" <-- there are other strippers but we didn't invite em"we invited the strippers, jfk and stalin" <-- there are no other strippers
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:12 (twelve years ago) link
as always clarity can be achieved otherwise we invited jfk, stalin and the strippers unless that confuses things by suggesting jfk is a collective comprising stalin and the strippers imagine if that were the case we could do a cartoon of it
― conrad, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:16 (twelve years ago) link
(ps i am v.crap and muddly at proper actual technical grammatical parsing when it comes to naming the names of parts of speech what they're doing, so just blerg through any clause where i deploy these)
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:16 (twelve years ago) link
i think youve got it backwards mark--a restrictive appositive, which would limit the prior noun, has no comma, while a nonrestrictive appositive, which just modifies the noun parenthetically, does have a comma
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:16 (twelve years ago) link
or wait
― max, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:17 (twelve years ago) link
never mind
i give up
intricate subtlety can always be achieved in english: unambiguous clarity much more rarely
max, i think the definitive rules are more complex than that: i'm going to check fowler when i get home (as i say, i'm hopeless with the technical terms)
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:21 (twelve years ago) link
I don't think the commas imply that JFK and Stalin are the only two strippers in human history, just that they are the strippers being discussed. (I inferred a context in which "the strippers" were already part of the story.)
(Where were you guys when I posted this cartoon on the "comma roundtable" thread last week?)
― jaymc, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:28 (twelve years ago) link
"the only two strippers in human history" <-- this is funnier tho, hence by implication must be what a cartoon is striving for
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:32 (twelve years ago) link
mark's first post was right
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 September 2011 16:02 (twelve years ago) link
I agree with mark s the editor
― Alba, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 23:24 (twelve years ago) link
The editor mark s, rather.
― Alba, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 23:27 (twelve years ago) link
(but if were talking about a publication where mark s was the editor, I'd say "the editor, mark s")
― Alba, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 23:31 (twelve years ago) link