one of somebody, anyway
― nabisco, Monday, 4 August 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link
how about tucking in polo shirts?
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 07:56 (fifteen years ago) link
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j251/mzing12/tuck.jpg
There's the end result. The jeans are tapered, so I'm going for that 1991 Slacker look.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link
if you have a spare tire this is usually a bad idea, unless you want to wear your pants around your belly button, which sometimes doesnt look that bad
― max, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link
Nah, I have a skinny, compact frame but I guess it looks like I'm fat thanks to the lighting there.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link
i meant me
― max, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link
ohhhhhrrrrrrrrrhhhgggggggggggfffffghfgjjfghnkfjnbkhghraoghorgflgoghdfgdhggghgbhbshgjsafhurhgrauhg;ghruharueauhra;rueh;rughergbhgubhr;aurehg;aurhga;dhfhuhrgggrhurrgrrrrhghghhga;ggha;urhgglaehghg;ahgurhghghhhrghrhhhhhuhhhhrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 17:28 (fifteen years ago) link
it's pretty challenging to successfully tuck your shirt into pants that have a low rise -- long shirts bunch uncomfortably and short shirts come untucked as soon as you move. pretty sure you should be wearing your pants high up on your hips or at your natural waist for a secure tuck
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link
That's kinda why I said it works better with casual shirts -- low rises tend to mean either a halfway "Alabama tuck" or a kind of rodeo-dude / Matt McConnaughey type of thing (note: I know actual rodeo guys tuck in medium-high and all but you probably know what I mean here)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 20:21 (fifteen years ago) link