Sitcom Hell

"Ever Decreasing Circles".

Mind you, there's not such a paradox here, perhaps: since I feel much the same way about Whitehouse. Like: make it go away.

EDC fits Tom's theory, except – once again — it isn't funny.

Actually the mention of EDC in the copy of Papercuts which is current toilet reading at Casa Ewing is what prompted this thread, so everything comes full circle, sort of.

EDC is, I think, meant to be more neurotic than laugh-out-loud funny. I still love it, though. Any chance of going into more detail, Mike?

Tom's vision of hell theory rings true for EDC. In fact, it is a particularly complex example of this. The situation is hellish for Martin because of his perfect neighbour Paul (Peter Egan). Martin takes it to extremes ("Why do the moles make molehills my lawn and not Paul's?" he asks in frustration at the beginning of one episode). But also, it is hellish for both Paul and Martin's wife (Helen I think, played by Penelope Wilton) *because* of Martin's obsessive behaviour and tedious conversation. Martin gets on very well with the dull, far-too-couply Howard and Hilda, to Paul and Helen's chagrin.

Was EDC funny? Yes, but in a subtle way. It could almost be the origin of the term "gentle comedy", which would bring comments of "so gentle it's not funny" from lovers of more brash, in yer face material. My parents *loved* this show and I'm sure it is because they knew ppl who were just like the characters.

Good example: Father Ted obv., Only Fools & Horses obvx2, Steptoe & Hancock (which may in fairness have provided the kernel of the idea, now that I reread the thread above). US sitcoms are again a bad match.

Mind you, you can understand Paul's bemusement. How does someone as intelligent, witty and all round great as Penelope Wilton's character end up married to someone like this?

Roseanne v The Good Life v My Name is Earl v Coupling.

The OC and Desperate Housewives wouldn't work here because British culture doesn't work like that. Also, as you pointed out, they aren't comedies. Though Hollyoaks comes close to the OC, I guess (xpost)

My Family is pretty much the archetypal British sitcom, isn't it?

Er...I'm sure we could find as many (or more) examples that aren't. Aside from the two Ailsa mentioned, Everybody Loves Raymond (they're not poor but...), Rhoda, Archie Bunker's Place/All In The Family, Sanford and Son (OK, last two = US equivalents of UK sitcoms), Chico and the Man, Cheers, Taxi, King of the Hill...

There's also a few amount of mileage to be had in US sitcoms of class-straddling culture-clash (Fresh Prince of Bel Air, er...Diff'rent Strokes at a push...)

It's not all Niles and Frasier sipping lattes (though that has its own class tension in Crane senior).

Cheers had a pretty broad social spectrum; laffs were both at the expense, and benefit, of the toffs (frasier, dianne) and the proles (the rest of them), at different times. episodes like the 'snark hunt', or when woody got involved in politics, or where frasier wanted to read them dickens but ended up twisting it into a tale of serial killers and mutant ninja turtles to keep the bar interested, were excellent at this.

Yeah, I think the only way "Seinfeld" fits here is through the George character. Which means that "Curb Your Enthusiasm" fits better, as larry=george.

Yeah, I think the only way "Seinfeld" fits here is through the George character. "Curb Your Enthusiasm" fits almost perfectly here though.

I have missed the boat as regards beating up the "upper-middle-class" line, but any generalisation about American Comedy that misses the Simpsons needs rewriting.

- peep show
- the office
- black books
- spaced
- fucking my family

do not conform to this.

Counter examples can be found just as easily as your examples. David Brent, Alan Patridge, as I see it, are classic examples of people making a pigs ear of a good situation - they are in good honest middle management/public eye positions are and shite at it, which is not in the same mould as a Steptoe/Norman Stanley Fletcher at all.

Similarly, Earl Hickey, Roseanne & Dan Conner (pre lottery-winning shark jump), are good honest decent hard-working folks who are making the best of a bad situation.

(xpost)

do not conform to this.

actually i think Black Books and Spaced kind of do.

*I quite like it, but then I don't "get" comedy.

xxxpost
didn't mean to diss cloth-capped Yorkshire coalminers, just trying to down-play the "class" card since characters in Men Behaving Badly aren't exactly lower-class, but they still represent a kind of grottiness which you just don't get on US TV. Similarly, shite like Hollyoaks just goes to show what happens if you try and sheen-up British TV in the same way American TV does - we just can't do it.

and loads of brit ones about the upper middle class (Good life, EDC, Butteflies) and the wealthy (Yes Minister, To the manor born). this thread is ridiculous.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cb/Gimmeabreak.jpg

Answer, btw, to "where does...fit into this?" is "it doesn't". Doglatin is pretty much talking pish from a fairly uninformed standpoint.

No, he does have the money. What happened was, he got the winning ticket, then he got hit by the car and lost the ticket. Then, while he was in hospital, he saw Carson Daly on the telly talking about karma, so he made his list, and when he fixed the very first thing on his list (I forget what it was), he found the ticket and collected the money. And now he's using the money to fix all the bad things he did because if he doesn't, karma will take the money away from him again.

also Cheers.