Is there a thread for the rapid death of the newspaper industry?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (801 of them)

Nickel Ads, the Newspaper of The Future!!

Aimless, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link

two months pass...

RIP rocky mountain news

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I am considering whether 'twould be nobler in the mind to subscribe to the NYT and read a newspaper whose reason for existance does not revolve around the comics page. But it seems disloyal somehow.

Aimless, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago) link

http://realproofonline.com/lj/finalrocky.jpg

StanM, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link

:'-(

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link

adapt or die, eh?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link

no wonder they folded, all the news on the sidebar is 150 years late

bobby dijindal (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Seattle Post-Intelligencer and/or SF Chronicle are probably the next two to drop unless they figure something out

dmr, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:25 (fifteen years ago) link

P-I is screwed, might go web-only but who cares if that's the case

linh (jergins), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost -- I like how that URL is completely opposite from the headline.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 3 March 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago) link

How does delivering the paper equate to reading it?

Jarlrmai, Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:13 (fifteen years ago) link

"Rap Band"

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:17 (fifteen years ago) link

(it's asking if newspapers have dumbed down in the last 30 years)

there will probably be a story about bears shitting in the woods accompanying it.

1989

The paper wears its Thatcherite heart on its sleeve with page leads on plans being considered by the Tory government for identity cards and the possibility of all immigrants being DNA tested.

and

George Walden pens a column about the dangers of the end of the Cold War, including the rise of Islam.

(it's asking if newspapers have dumbed down in the last 30 years)

Er. Is it? It just seems to be going "MY GOD, LOOK, WE'VE GOT AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF WEBSPACE TO FILL SO WE'RE GOING TO PUT THIS DRIVEL UP HERE." Really, the impression I get is that the only newspapers with which the author is properly familiar are the ones used to line the bottom of his cage.

Still. Yes, newspapers as we know them absolutely and totally fucked, large swathes of the broadcast media hot on their heels ... in what possible way is this news? :)

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Also: if you ever wanted evidence of why newspapers as we know them should cease to exist, that "Teens: Yesterday and Today" thing might be pretty much perfect. Other than "I am a suppurating fucking bell-end", I fail to see what point the cartoonist is trying to make.

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that is the point actually.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Ha. Fair enough.

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:54 (fifteen years ago) link

There is nothing like reading a newspaper in its hard copy form. However, I have found from sniffing around that if your online paper looks like a newspaper, people might find your news more substantial. I have been reading the Pantagraph lately because it looks great. By the way, this paper is 172 years old!

u s steel, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link

the cartoon is an onion parody btw, just in case it's not clear who is being a suppurating fucking bell-end here.

joe, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh! I'd consider blushing, but ... er, actually, I'm not sure it works as a parody either.

<Looks again>

OK. Might not be as offensively shit, but it's still shit. Unless there's some fabulous piece of context in which it should be viewed?

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Fabulous piece of context = most US political cartoonists.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Christ, really? *Boggles*. OK, in that case I'm going to step back ... there are some holes in my knowledge I'm happy to keep. Apologies to the Onion cartoonist, but to be honest: you might actually be better simply using your pen to go around stabbing some of your contemporaries in the neck.

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Chuck Asay died for your sins: batshit rightwing cartoonists 2009

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link

^ Threads I have never opened and never intend to, #26. And I think this little exchange has really, really impressed upon me how many tears of blood I would weep if I did.

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:28 (fifteen years ago) link

never read it either

Pfunkboy in blood drenched rabbit suit jamming in the woods (Herman G. Neuname), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 13:11 (fifteen years ago) link

You're missing out

I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 13:19 (fifteen years ago) link

There is nothing like reading a newspaper in its hard copy form. However, I have found from sniffing around that if your online paper looks like a newspaper, people might find your news more substantial. I have been reading the Pantagraph lately because it looks great. By the way, this paper is 172 years old!

#462 in the series of things I never thought I would see referenced on ILX. I grew up in a tiny shit town in McLean County, so that was pretty much the only paper I even saw for a good chunk of my youth. I always thought the mustachioed Bill Flick was hilarious when I was 12.

legendary North American forest ape (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 13:22 (fifteen years ago) link

i still don't understand that onion cartoon

\∫Öζ/.... argh oh noes! (ken c), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link

tomorrow is the final print edition of the seattle post-intelligencer. 146 years...

cathlamet wa (jergins), Monday, 16 March 2009 19:26 (fifteen years ago) link

the final print edition

(sings)

I gave my love a newspaper, with no paaaay-per.

Aimless, Monday, 16 March 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link

seattle post-intelligencer

<Doffs cap, sadly>

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Monday, 16 March 2009 19:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Seattle P-I Editor and Publisher Roger Oglesby addressed staff in the newsroom Monday morning. Here are his remarks:

Tonight we'll be putting the paper to bed for the last time. But the bloodline will live on.

Hearst is announcing today that the P-I will become an online-only news operation. The last print edition will appear tomorrow.

We have copies of the press release for you, as well as a letter from (The Hearst Corp. CEO) Frank Bennack and (Hearst Newspapers President) Steve Swartz. But first I have just a couple of things to say.

This is a hard day for all of us. We were fortunate to be part of a great newspaper with a great tradition, and we've been blessed to be part of a wonderful group of talented people. We all hate to see that end.

But we knew it was coming. Hearst fought for years to keep this place going, but time and these rotten economic conditions finally caught up with us.

But there's another part to the story, and I'm not going to let you forget it. It's the part that has to do with what will live on and who's responsible for it. Tomorrow, SeattlePI.com will be reborn, outside the JOA. It will continue, and it will thrive, and it will be a strong and vital voice of this city for years to come.

Some of you will part of that ongoing effort, and you have an exciting road ahead of you. But we should all remember that everybody at this paper helped to build SeattlePI.com and the foundation on which its future will rest. Every one of you, everyone at this paper, should take pride in that. I will, and you should, too.

As for the paper, tonight will be the final run. So let's do it right. This is a great newspaper and has been for a long time. Let's show the world it still is. Let's show them what we can do, one more time.

http://www.seattlepi.com/business/403793_piclosure17.html

James Mitchell, Monday, 16 March 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

145 editorial jobs going, only 20 to remain. rip.

joe, Monday, 16 March 2009 20:26 (fifteen years ago) link

estimated 2010 numbers

iatee, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 05:11 (fifteen years ago) link

From the Stranger piece linked above:

In one of the areas that remained populated, page designers ("Of which none will be kept," a guide said)

WELL, NO SHIT. If there aren't any pages to design ...

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Mind you, perhaps they could hire one to design a new banner for future save-newspapers rallies. This one's the worst I've ever seen:

http://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2009/03/16/1237256847-rally5.jpg

Atoms are "balls" (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Still. Got a new display name out of it.

a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 20:23 (fifteen years ago) link

the number of former and/or aspiring newspaper/alt-weekly people i know who can't find jobs or have been forced out of their old ones is reaching really pretty alarming levels. and people i know who are still employed are dealing with unpaid furloughs and all that shit.

paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

and people i know who are still employed are dealing with unpaid furloughs and all that shit

*Waves, cheerlessly*

True, in our (ultimately Gannett-owned) place these are voluntary. And it suits me: going part-time halved my salary, so I'm not going to notice the cost of a few extra days' holiday. But still. The whole game is F U C K E D and I'm under no illusions about that.

a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago) link

from today's P-I
http://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2009/03/17/1237329845-piobit.jpg

cathlamet wa (jergins), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean Jesus Christ lads pic.twitter.com/oDOW6EBh3W

— The Author, Séamas O'Reilly (@shockproofbeats) April 8, 2021

nashwan, Friday, 9 April 2021 09:06 (three years ago) link

LOL Englishes

Duncan Disorderly (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2021 09:13 (three years ago) link

Mind you, maybe the editor of the Metro is an Orangeman.

Duncan Disorderly (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2021 09:14 (three years ago) link

well they did previously get a load of DUP cash for a Brexit ad.

calzino, Friday, 9 April 2021 09:22 (three years ago) link

Some questioned if it was a deliberate attempt at humour, or if the positioning of the stories was an unfortunate oversight.

lol yeah sure

calzino, Friday, 9 April 2021 09:35 (three years ago) link

Orangeman bad

six months pass...

A whole lot of responses to the question: why did you cancel your NYT/Guardian/Idaho Mountain Express subscription

https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/10/expensive-boring-and-wrong-here-are-all-the-news-publications-people-canceled-and-why/

Alba, Saturday, 30 October 2021 12:03 (two years ago) link

one month passes...
one month passes...

Superfluous announcement gets canned

📢 '...put unwanted newspapers in the bin...'

This is one example of the announcements that we're getting rid of, making the passenger experience better and delivering on the Williams-Shapps #PlanForRail

Read more on announcements we’re removing: https://t.co/ZZQGqW58Jn pic.twitter.com/l2ITutFsci

— Department for Transport (@transportgovuk) January 21, 2022

Alba, Friday, 21 January 2022 14:50 (two years ago) link

Captured on video: the last willing reader of the Telegraph

There's A Goots In My House (stevie), Saturday, 22 January 2022 10:55 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.