is the associates : 'sulk' all it's cracked up to be ?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (32 of them)

as soon as i opened this thread itunes shuffle selected the associates! not something from sulk but still ...

yes it is. such an amazing mix of accessibility and experimentation. some of the deep cuts are so fucking weird

teflon dawn (uptown churl), Friday, 17 June 2011 19:45 (twelve years ago) link

two years pass...

Can I just mention how much I love the drums on this record? Everything about the record is incredibly slick and overloaded (which I love), but then the drums underneath seem like they could fall apart at any time... it's great!

zip-a-dee-doo-dah, motherfucker! (Turrican), Monday, 23 December 2013 19:54 (ten years ago) link

Didn't they fill up the drums with water or something? The whole album sounds warped, in a great way.

brimstead, Monday, 23 December 2013 20:08 (ten years ago) link

In their endless search for found sounds, industrial drums and canisters were rolled down reverberating corridors, sheets of metal were vigorously shaken to create the effect of rolling thunder (witness the introduction to No), hired drums were filled with water (they turned to mush), hired guitars were pissed in (Billy's idea)

From Tom Doyle's sleeve notes for the sulk reissue

brimstead, Monday, 23 December 2013 20:10 (ten years ago) link

five years pass...

Saw a clip of Associates in the Big Gold Dream documentary a couple of years ago and they were the only thing that wowed me. I knew the name of the band and nothing more before then.

Got this album recently and it is great, the demo of "Party Fears Two", called "I never Will" has an amazing vocal that is distinct enough to be a very worthwhile alternate version.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 9 August 2019 19:23 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.