"Aliens" : Some nice effects, but actually kind've a crap film.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (795 of them)
or a goddamn tagline from one of the posters for The Village

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:12 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just disapointed with it. I remember digging the hell out of it at the time, but it just seems dumb now.

Alex, you're making totally irrelevant points

I'm just making observations, Harold, don't get your pants wet.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (nineteen years ago) link

i think harold has a point though alex, see it widescreen w/o commercials and you may change your mind

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (nineteen years ago) link

seeing movies on tv has a way of making them seem much worse.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

or a goddamn tagline from one of the posters for The Village

totally irrelevant, but m night shamalyan (or whatever the fuck his name is) is such a putz.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

especially action movies, where the frame is cropped and the sound (all-important in these movies in particular) is compressed all to hell (xp)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just making observations, Harold, don't get your pants wet.

Ok. But I still think your arguments are silly given the topic at hand. An action movie is this: establishment of premise. Build. Payoff. That's it, man. "Writing"? Pfft. I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

i actually think aliens is pretty well-scripted! i mean the dialogue is a bit corny but that's ok with me. it's a very well-structured movie.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Newt couldn't possibly be more annoying ("they mostleeee come at night. mostleeeee)

yeah but she allows sigourney to express her maternal ass-kicking instincts when she fights the ALIEN MOTHER.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (nineteen years ago) link

xp

Well-executed formula -- I agree. I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (nineteen years ago) link

and there are a lot of very imaginative scenes, stuff that had never been done before and that's been copied badly so many times

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean name me another action movie that has that weird maternal subtext!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (nineteen years ago) link

This thread got lots of posts fast.

Alex OTM. I love Alien but the rest are rubbish. Whenever I say I don't like Aliens people always go "But it's got cool guns". Yeah, well.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (nineteen years ago) link

yes that's exactly what we've been saying on this thread! it's got cool guns and that's the only reason i like it

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Let's not forget that the first Alien was nothing more than a well-executed horror movie.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (nineteen years ago) link

i think harold has a point though alex, see it widescreen w/o commercials and you may change your mind

Oh, I've seen it properly before (in a theatre, actually). And yes, TV doesn't do justice to many films. I just don't think it's that well written. It's predecessor, meanwhile, was.


I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.

Well, I just don't think, in retrospect, it lives up to the promise of the first one.

I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.

....or lack of it.


By the way, there are certainly worse films out there, for what it's worth.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (nineteen years ago) link

that maternal subtext is HUGE and significantly complicates the subtext of the first (ripley defending her womanhood against the asexual rapaciousness of the alien and the asexual murderous logic of the android)

the sexual subtexts are easily the best thing about the alien movies - why else have giger design the shit? - hell, and scifi and horror movies in general, too, as opposed to scifi and horror novels - and the 2nd movie expands on those subtexts in a way that "alien: resurrection" just don't (now there's a shit movie).

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:19 (nineteen years ago) link

i see nobody cares for this highfalutin lit crit shit

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Let's not forget that the first Alien was nothing more than a well-executed horror movie.

I would argue that it's a great deal more difficult to make an effectively scary, suspenseful horror film than an action movie (wherein all you really need to please certain folks, as noted, are "cool guns").

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (nineteen years ago) link

why else have giger design the shit?

Was HR Giger involved with the films that followed the second one?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:21 (nineteen years ago) link

he was only involved with the first

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:27 (nineteen years ago) link

and vahid i'm with you totally!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:27 (nineteen years ago) link

But surely the studio had the rights to his designs. So, kind-of.

Also, vahid OTM.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Although to be fair, the highfalutin lit crit shit happens after the fact, and neither adds nor detracts from the shit-yr-pants suspense.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Vahid's made some nice points re: Ripley's maternal role in the second one (the sexual elements in the first one, I believe, have more to do with Giger's actual design...could the monster look any more priapic?) But paired with the popcorn dialogue ("game over, man, game over!" "get your hands off her, you bitch!"), the subtext vahid alludes to seems muted.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (nineteen years ago) link

come on, the subtext there is totally obvious, you can't say that it's just some lit-critters reading in the maternal aspect

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (nineteen years ago) link

and alex that is why they call it SUBtext

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Seems to me, at least, the first one was genuinely suspenseful and NOT FOR EVERYONE , whereas this one went for the wider audience buck. That seems kinda crass to me.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Cripes, I look away and a thread breaks out on one of my fave films of all time (sorry Alex).

S: the theatrical cut
D: *only* being able to have the extended cut on DVD for a long time, but that's thankfully now corrected

Alien and Aliens are different takes on standard tropes that were successful precisely Scott and crew on the one hand and Cameron and crew on the other were able to hotwire them into something which was so ridiculously successful -- commercially and in terms of effective filmmaking -- that each in their own single-handedly established a slew of new cliches. Which may seem a strange thing to credit them for, but *how* many films since then have essentially tried to be one or the other, borrowing set pieces, concepts, dialogue practically and more? And none are nearly as good as these two.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (nineteen years ago) link

...but damnit, Cameron's at the top of his game here. He defines his job -- "This movie will be about a bunch of lovable Army meatheads that will be put into terrible danger" -- and then he does it better, arguably, than he has ever done any other job.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (nineteen years ago) link

xp

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:34 (nineteen years ago) link

The mother confrontation is on right now. Whatever problems I have with the film -- this is very stylishly done, I must say.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (nineteen years ago) link

ahhhh!!! you love it

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (nineteen years ago) link

alex loves aliens!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (nineteen years ago) link

how about the music at the end there? (bum-ba-dum-ba-dum, bum-ba-dum-ba-dum etc) that must've been used in almost every post-aliens action trailer ever

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm rooting for the aliens, if that's what you mean.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (nineteen years ago) link

and what an ending! the surprise alien mother attack at the end (when ripley gets into the exoskeleton), i mean come on man. come. on.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, the whole "running through the ship before it goes kablooey" ship....didn't we cover that in the last film?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:38 (nineteen years ago) link

You're back to arguing against the obviously formulaic, which will ruin your appreciation of the movie every time.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm rooting for the aliens, if that's what you mean.

that's pretty much the subtext of EVERY ilxor post you've ever written, alex!

:-)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, when the Queen Beastie gets sucked out into deep space, but only manages to slip away with Ripley's fetching Reebok pump (or whatever she was wearing). Weak.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

come on, you can't go wrong with a self-destruct climax

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, when the Queen Beastie gets sucked out into deep space, but only manages to slip away with Ripley's fetching Reebok pump (or whatever she was wearing).

Brilliantly parodied in the MST3K movie. So I will have nothing said against the original.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (nineteen years ago) link

If only Newt had been flayed alive and chopped into mcnuggets, this film would be way better.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I really need to get this DVD

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (nineteen years ago) link

What was the name of the cat in the first one?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (nineteen years ago) link

The only "marines battling aliens" film I like more is Starship Troopers, which has another kind of subtext entirely.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (nineteen years ago) link

The third and fourth installments really did suck a big space bone, though, can we all agree on that?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Jonesy the cat.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (nineteen years ago) link

definitely, but go into any movie chatroom worldwide and Fincher bonesmokers will tell you it's the best in the series.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I get the criticism about the story beats not being innovative - the bones of it are an off-the-rack 'go on a mission, find the key to your character at the end of it'. All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."

One Eye Open, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:09 (five years ago) link

cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:46 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah what a boring scene

― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:48 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalink

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:17 (five years ago) link

All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."

haha this isn't even missing

(prob the joke)

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:45 (five years ago) link

Another thing I thought of upon re-viewing, is this movie really set the template for a lot of first person shooters, right? With the helmet cams and vitals and whatnot. I'm not much of a gamer, but that really reminds me of how a lot of games are set up. At the least it set the template for "Contra," or so I assume. "Contra" was 1987.

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:01 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah contra is heavily ripped from this, including a lot of the boss visuals and stuff. and it reaches FPSes almost immediately if without such 1:1 connections in DOOM, whose creators had obviously seen this about ten times each.

― Doctor Casino, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:05 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

(OK, xpost, but I guess Biehn and his wife Jennifer Blanc were producing a line of grind house films? Maybe I saw a press release for one of the more salacious titles and got the wrong idea?)

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:08 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A lot of the movies lines were nicked and appeared in various FPS games.

― Ste, Monday, November 6, 2017 2:45 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not to mention starcraft

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:48 (five years ago) link

The way Weaver looks at the Queen without saying a word before threatening to incinerate the eggs and the Queen's momentary ceding ground = classic.

I'm amazed that in 1986 the Academy saw through its blinders during the staidest decade of its existence to date and gave a Best Actress nomination to a genre piece.

Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:49 (five years ago) link

Anyone who doesn't like this film needs a good thrashing.

Having said that, probably these will all turn out to be balls: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alien-celebrating-40th-anniversary-6-short-films-1193923

Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Thursday, 14 March 2019 23:44 (five years ago) link

James otm on both counts

Besmirch this movie at your peril

https://68.media.tumblr.com/1b4731564aee8ba541588f50604f9cbe/tumblr_nrnh0x9xR81u2ragso2_500.gif

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 05:13 (five years ago) link

the effects/sets in this movie look better than any cgi movie

na (NA), Friday, 15 March 2019 14:14 (five years ago) link

1982 - 1986 was the apogee of film special effects

Number None, Friday, 15 March 2019 14:27 (five years ago) link

I think this film has a bit of the Jaws effect. The creature effects are totally superb but it seems likely that in order to hide a bit of the awkwardness of the aliens’ movements Cameron had to keep them in shadow and keep glimpses of them to a minimum, up until we see the queen at the end. It creates this real sense of terror and a scene like Hicks popping up into the ceiling to have a look and his flashlight panning across dozens of these things crawling at him is one of the more nightmarish visuals i recall from my childhood. that and Vasquez/Gorman being cornered in the ventilation shaft gave me some bad dreams as a teen.

omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 15:30 (five years ago) link

Yeah, possibly the only flawed shot in the movie is when the queen's two goons sort of awkwardly shuffle in and out of the scene. For the most part though he just shows you a second or two of various slithering and awful motions, and your brain fills in how the aliens probably walk and attack - - - much scarier and more fluid than anything they could create by having someone in a rubber suit walk across the set. It's amazing how many of the bargain-basement direct-to-video knock-offs (which of course also have even cheaper rubber suits, etc.) manage to screw this up.

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:11 (five years ago) link

same type of quick show/cut used to the same horrifying effect in matrix rave scene

~mine own~ bitcoin (darraghmac), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:27 (five years ago) link

Omar otm

I think because Cameron leans so hard into the meathead action-horror genre it feels like it’s just a dumb alien movie. And in a way it kind of is. But as Omar notes, Cameron makes really good choices in terms of dialing up tension, finessing the action, or playing up the horror moments - the kind of attention to detail that makes it really enjoyable to watch. Mainly because that kind of care & finesse stands out when you’re in a B-movie kinda world.

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:37 (five years ago) link

i think the very unusual Ebert review of this is pretty spot-on, even if in some sense i disagree with it. He admits it's amazing but also admits he didn't enjoy it because of its intensity and constant dread, whereas i totally enjoy it every time. but i understand what he means. i think as far as a film depicting people finding themselves trapped in a desperate situation with no easy way out, it's almost unparalleled. the best thing about it is while there are characters who are not especially bright, none of them do anything especially stupid. they're flawed in recognizable ways. Hudson is an idiot but he doesn't make any dumb tactical errors, he freaks out but never in moments of action, just in moments of downtime. Gorman is in over his head but he's not a craven coward, he just freezes up. Burke flees into a bad spot towards the end, but i mean who the hell wouldn't make a run for it? etc etc...lots of the character types are cliches but their behavior and decision-making makes perfect sense for each one and unlike lesser films they don't behave in ways to artificially change the narrative and story, they're always reacting to what's happening at the moment.

the only thing i question is Burke still thinking about the Company and getting the samples back through quarantine at a time when the survival of the entire team seems pretty unlikely. But Reiser's extremely '80s nervous nice dude comedy style works surprisingly well for the character of an ambitious, sociopathic creep, so it mostly works for me despite that, and i suppose he also figured his survival was a mutually exclusive issue alongside the issue of the alien samples.

omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 16:53 (five years ago) link

agreed

omar otm again, as always

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:23 (five years ago) link

co-sign

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:43 (five years ago) link

'kind've'

mookieproof, Friday, 15 March 2019 17:48 (five years ago) link

two months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmq2gDwXpo

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (four years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmq2gDwXpo

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (four years ago) link

hmmm

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (four years ago) link

three years pass...

lol beautiful

Ste, Saturday, 29 April 2023 19:49 (eleven months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.