Norm Macdonald Returns to Television!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (479 of them)
she has glow sticks hanging from her ears. or a few pocket vibes.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

I think all of those women are men.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

the guy posing on the left says it all.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:24 (twenty years ago) link

your left or my left?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:25 (twenty years ago) link

Does it matter?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:25 (twenty years ago) link

not really. Alfonso Ribiero looks like he's ready.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:27 (twenty years ago) link

How sharp are the cheekbones of the Black dancer (bottom, left)? I could model, if I had those.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:28 (twenty years ago) link

has anyone seen this show yet? like an advance copy or anything? i wonder if samson from river's edge is funny. he looks like a laughriot.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:28 (twenty years ago) link

it's on tonight. after that 70s show, whose season premiere is getting a million times more push than stan hooper
I just hope they use the eminem song for the them

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:29 (twenty years ago) link

http://i.imdb.com/Photos/HH/0736263/dr3.jpg

apparently he was jay leno in the late shift. wow. he must be funny if he can play jay leno.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

Fred Willard looks entertaining. Per usual.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 18:31 (twenty years ago) link


Nothing like Fred Willard to kill a thread.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:55 (twenty years ago) link

WHA' HAPPEN????

Fred Willard (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:56 (twenty years ago) link

Ever since I saw the promos for this, early summer, I've been like "Norm McDonald and Fred Willard in a sitcom? TOGETHER? GENIUS!!!"

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:14 (twenty years ago) link


unfortunately you are not 10,000,000 18-34 year old males.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:16 (twenty years ago) link

(checks)Thank god for that.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:17 (twenty years ago) link

Dean, your anecdote about Norm at your table raises an interesting question about the degree to which we willingly suspend our disbelief about stand-up being an "act," in light of its direct and frequently personal nature.

I think we want to feel like there's something unique and spontaneous about a stand-up performance, and the comics comply. Bits beginning with "On the way over here..." probably did not take place recently, if they actually happened to the comic at all -- but we think to ourselves, "He just came up with that!" I'm sure stand-ups also have standard comments about audiences they make with EVERY crowd but are delivered in such a way as to seem spontaneous and specific.

I've been hosting this variety show for the last couple of months, and invited back a stand-up comic to test out some new material; in his second appearance, he slipped in some old material that, the second time around, didn't work at all. For instance, his reaction of mock-outrage at one point seemed affected -- and it's because I was aware of it now as an "act."

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:33 (twenty years ago) link


yeah, i was actually going to ask at one point if anyone here knows any comedians, without being a comedian themself. it seems to me that the comedic style of many comes out of this distanced defensive approach of relating to people ... but that it only comes across as charming when on a stage. also, i have no problem with comics making their act seem fresh and topical, but it is rather disconcerting at times to meet a comic and hear them doing bits instead of just conversing like most people do. can you really hold back putting on an act when you get paid to do it? it strikes me most when i see comedians on a talk show because they always try to trot out their new material and force it into coversation and it always appears (to me) so stilted and awkward.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:46 (twenty years ago) link

well, walking around and greeting people in the VIP section can probably be pretty lame most of time, present company excepted.

as for the talk shows, those are SOOOO not-spontaneous. the host is usually just feeding lines to their guests. it's entertainment. the real chitchat happens during the commercials.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:58 (twenty years ago) link

i agree on both, but still ... it's not like it isn't an option to be genuine.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:00 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, what kills me about comedians on talk shows is the phony set-ups that the hosts give them: like, "Do you, I don't know, have an opinion on the reality TV craze?" "Why, funny you should ask: [launches into bit]..."

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

or, "so I understand you have a new baby and it likes to make poo-poo"

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:02 (twenty years ago) link

it's not like it isn't an option to be genuine.

But in what context? I think what threw you is that you thought that Norm had cast aside his "stage persona" when talking to you off-stage. But suppose he wants to keep it on the entire time he's in the club; no matter where he goes in the club, his role is the performer. Same with on TV talk shows. In other words, it may not be a matter of genuine vs. non-genuine as much as whether you're Norm McDonald or "Norm McDonald."

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

Or maybe what I mean is: it's a conscious decision to stay "in character" rather than an inability to be genuine.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:12 (twenty years ago) link

my main complaint in that situation is that you are given the appearance of genuine interaction and it is not, so, correct. i really don't care though. i don't fancy watching talk shows or talking to "celebs." i just found it amusing.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:14 (twenty years ago) link

Not speaking from experience here (just wanting to make sure nobody thinks that I think I am a "real" comedian or anything), jaymc probably has a very good point.
I would think it could be quite taxing on your psychic energy or emotional health or whatever to allow that PROVERBIAL fourth wall to come down.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:14 (twenty years ago) link

re: your last comment. it could be either. that goes back to my question about whether anyone knows comedians personally and can verify this distinction. for example, i know many people who are funny all the time and never let a serious word or emotion slip out. i am wondering if what separates these people from comedians is merely a job title.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

just to use myself as an example again, I'm not a laugh riot to be around. outside of ILX of course.
I can get into a groove or something, where I'm performing (even in a social situation) but most of the time, I wouldn't say I'm stoic, but I'm not "ON" all the time.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

and your profession is comedian? (i'm not familiar with you)

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:21 (twenty years ago) link

I do know what you mean, though, Dean. I mean, I was on an improv team all through college, and I'd go to parties with some of my fellow performers and I'd be like, "Dude, we're not on stage anymore."

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:28 (twenty years ago) link

... as they tried to engage me in some forced witty repartee, I mean.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:30 (twenty years ago) link

That's too bad; I was hoping you'd just walk into whatever room they were in and start screaming "DUDE WHAT THE FUCK?????? WE AREN'T ON STAGE; GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME!!!!!!!!!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:32 (twenty years ago) link

This show sucks.

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:47 (twenty years ago) link

It was a sad, sad Newhart wannabe. Makes me wonder how this even got on the air. Hasn't this guy used up all his second chances yet?

Kim (Kim), Thursday, 30 October 2003 03:40 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, I turned it off halfway through. It's just shitty enough in that According to Jim sort of way that it could be on FOREVER.
I kept hoping that the curtain would be pulled back and Stan Hooper would be revealed to be Norm Henderson from the ABC sitcom NORM (which was hilarious), having a bad dream. Then he would go back to his court-appointed job as a social worker surrounded by a talented cast of character actors.

I hate this show. I will not watch it next week. I feel betrayed. Especially since the last show he had in development (for CBS), which DIDN'T EVEN GET TO PILOT stage was an Odd Couple ripoff where he would have been paired with JON LOVITZ. NOW that would have been impossible to fuck up.
I even like Norm Macdonald's movies, which are very shitty. But I hate A MINUTE WITH STAN HOOPER.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:13 (twenty years ago) link

I watched the Conan interview and it was pretty entertaining. I was afraid I'd be dissapointed by the sitcom. Glad I didn't check it out.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:15 (twenty years ago) link

but I did finally see Chappelle's Show and while it's not quite excellent or anything, it was pretty damn good. Except for the part where he was driving in a car, or possible an SUV and Mos Def was rapping along to the AM radio or something. I like Mos Def and all, but that was sorta lame.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

Yep, piece of shit. Fred Willard was not funny. And I wanted to punch the shit out of that kid and his retard girlfriend. I mean can they really have a show that has 1500 cheese and butler jokes every week.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

I kept thinking to myself: "So?"
the only remotely funny parts where when Norm would break character, and since he's a pretty terrible actor, that could happen frequently, but it's not enough to save this shitty shit shitterly show.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:27 (twenty years ago) link

god, that was terrible. i can understand how critics may like it because norm has no jokes. willard gets jokes. norm's wife gets jokes. the f'n butler gets jokes. but not norm. THAT IS WHY IT IS NOT FUNNY. the only thing that made the norm show funny was that he had most of the jokes.

but in defense of hooper, i was flipping back and forth between that and tv carnage volume two and nothing beats that Three's Company / scat montage. nothing.

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Thursday, 30 October 2003 17:43 (twenty years ago) link

also, A Minute With Stan Hooper is not funny

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 17:49 (twenty years ago) link

I turned it off as soon as they introduced the butler. I can handle an obvious plot device as long as it's funny. I mean, why not force the Hoopers to spend the night in a HAUNTED HOUSE before they can even be considered for the lease?

Fuckin' Norm. I think he's the funniest guy, but sheesh, his "legit" stuff sucks.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 30 October 2003 18:10 (twenty years ago) link

It would have been awesome if the butler had been played by a former Seinfeld cast member.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 18:19 (twenty years ago) link

So, over all, would you say his new show is pretty good then? Huh. Maybe I should check it out after all...

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 30 October 2003 19:46 (twenty years ago) link

the thing is, this show would be cancel-proof if it was on ABC, it achieves that uniform crappiness that all their other shows have (the real reason they turfed the original FUNNY Norm Show).

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 30 October 2003 19:49 (twenty years ago) link

four years pass...

dude needs more work. also, can't say this is surprising -
"However, on the January 2, 2008 episode of The O'Reilly Factor, Macdonald stated that he is "very pro-life, but against the death penalty". He also revealed that he supports John McCain for president in the 2008 US Presidential Election"

gershy, Saturday, 2 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i was just thinking of him today cuz one of the episodes of fairly odd parents where he plays a genie was on . he should do more cartoon work. he plays norm the genie, of course.

scott seward, Saturday, 2 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

three years pass...

Norm Macdonald returns to returning to television!!

Watched his new "Sports Show" last night. A little bit hit and miss, but 100% Norm. I think it'll warm up, he seems to enjoy himself.

This sketch he did with Blake Griffin was probably the highlight of the show and it's fucking hysterical imo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIyybvoyY1U

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 15 April 2011 04:25 (thirteen years ago) link

woot! Let's hope this show lasts longer than that Murray brothers golf show from a few years back (which was also awesome!)

I <3 Norm, he's like Mike Nelson, in that he keeps his politics out of his humour (although I don't think he's as conservative as ol' MJN).

No pop, no style -- all simply (Viceroy), Friday, 15 April 2011 04:40 (thirteen years ago) link

I don't give a shit about sports at all but I laughed! Love Norm.

GLOWER METAL (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 15 April 2011 05:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Norm himself has drawn parallels between his compulsions as a gambling addict who doubles-down when possibly losing their bankroll, and his compulsions to double-down on a bad/awkward bit if he's losing the audience.

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 20 August 2023 04:23 (seven months ago) link

Norm is nothing like Hicks, idk if he's ever said anything about him directly but I know he really hated that particular style of comedy. the big difference between him and other lionized comedians is that instead of wanting to be the smartest guy in the room Norm wanted to come off as the dumbest, which is why he can land jokes like "You know who Germany wanted to go to war with?? The WORLD"

frogbs, Monday, 21 August 2023 15:20 (seven months ago) link

but yeah I think Neil Hamburger is a much better analogue to what the thread bump is about; when Norm "bombs" you can still see and hear parts of the audience laughing, when Neil does it the audience is actively hostile, and he antagonizes them right back, which makes the whole experience really funny if you're in the know

frogbs, Monday, 21 August 2023 15:25 (seven months ago) link

Norm is exactly like Hicks in that that a certain subset of the internet sees him as a libertarian/right wing free-speech hero and gravitate towards his edgiest material

sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 21 August 2023 15:33 (seven months ago) link

well by that measure the next Bill Hicks is clearly Dave Chappelle, a dude whose entire act now is just "let me tell it like it is" and then complaining that people get upset by his comedy

whenever Norm gets asked a question about politics he generally responsed with amusment that anyone would care what he thinks, because he openly admitted he doesn't really follow it. he probably has said some things about free speech and I know he defended Shane Gillis when he got fired from SNL but if you watch his stuff it's seriously like 0% of his act

frogbs, Monday, 21 August 2023 15:46 (seven months ago) link

I'm not saying anything about his comedy, I'm just saying what his legacy is becoming among reddit people

sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 21 August 2023 15:52 (seven months ago) link

Norm is exactly like Hicks in that that a certain subset of the internet sees him as a libertarian/right wing free-speech hero and gravitate towards his edgiest material

― sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 21 August 2023 15:33 (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink

this isn't really what being like someone is

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Monday, 21 August 2023 16:45 (seven months ago) link

what is that even a response to?

― budo jeru, Saturday, August 19, 2023 9:21 AM (two days ago) bookmarkflaglink

budo jeru, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 00:53 (seven months ago) link

what his legacy is becoming among reddit people

you can just not care

budo jeru, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 00:53 (seven months ago) link

It was a response to a comment on that DJ Crazy Times video

oh

budo jeru, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 01:39 (seven months ago) link

way off the mark imo.

budo jeru, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 01:41 (seven months ago) link

Norms “comedians are not philosophers” take needs more airtime. Big fan of his controversial opinion that comedians should tell jokes

hrep (H.P), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 02:15 (seven months ago) link

Although I think norm did break his own rules in his post-humous Netflix special. That one did not rub me the right way.

Norm seems less alt-right-free-speech adjacent in his comedy, and more dirtbag-left-let’s-make-fun-of-the-ludicrousness-blinders-the-liberal-media-have-on-without-being-a-redneck-per-se. That, mixed with enjoying shocking people is the totality of his edge (which yeah, I guess “shocking people” is a bit of an alt-right signifier these days).

His appearance on “the view” sums this all up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3PP_SWHUQQ

hrep (H.P), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 02:20 (seven months ago) link



Norm seems less alt-right-free-speech adjacent in his comedy, and more dirtbag-left-let’s-make-fun-of-the-ludicrousness-blinders-the-liberal-media-have-on-without-being-a-redneck-per-se.


Now this might strike some viewers as harsh, but I believe everyone involved in this story should die

sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 02:41 (seven months ago) link

I love Norm and I know that "dirtbag left" is probably shorthand here, but it's worth saying that Norm MacDonald was not in any way shape or form of "the left"

intheblanks, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 03:14 (seven months ago) link

hes not much of a political thinker at all so I kinda wonder if he became that way because of the particular era of SNL he was on

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 03:19 (seven months ago) link

I guess it feels like everyone is misunderstanding Whiney here, he's talking about how the work of a comedian is interpreted and how/where it "lives on." Sure, one could just ignore it, that's totally a valid choice.

But I'd guess most people would agree that, on some level, it can be interesting to talk about how someone's body of work is received.

intheblanks, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 03:21 (seven months ago) link

well not amongst the biggest dipshits in the YouTube comment section

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 03:22 (seven months ago) link

I guess it feels like everyone is misunderstanding Whiney here

read that again and possibly consider whether "everyone" misunderstanding something is not actually a signifier of whether the point is well made or possibly just wrong altogether

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 06:04 (seven months ago) link

My point is pretty unassailable if you’ve spent five minutes on the aforementioned subreddits and YouTube comment sections

sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 06:35 (seven months ago) link

So that’s why it didn’t make sense

H.P, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 06:52 (seven months ago) link

Anyway, thank you intheblanks

sean paul akerman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 07:03 (seven months ago) link

not saying you're wrong whiney im saying its a weird angle to insist on, its a small angle but insofar as it goes sure revisionism from youtube comments is a wild beast and whence it takes us none living can say

im not sure anybody misunderstood the point but it isnt afaict the discussion ppl were having?

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 August 2023 07:27 (seven months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.