Max B The Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (530 of them)

the point was that YOUR only touchpoint for 'real heads' is ethan

― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, May 2, 2011 5:16 PM (26 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and apparently yours is people whose knowledge begins & ends with adult swim rap

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:17 (thirteen years ago) link

what, you?

bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:18 (thirteen years ago) link

read aero's post again dude -- Elvis Costello and Springsteen are artists Hilburn's readers were familiar with too

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:18 (thirteen years ago) link

Adult Swim rap and THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA TUNNEL TUNNEL JACKA GUCCI BRRR

bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:19 (thirteen years ago) link

do i compare stuff to bone thugs in every review i write?

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:19 (thirteen years ago) link

whiney is pulling a burt_stanton

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:19 (thirteen years ago) link

read aero's post again dude -- Elvis Costello and Springsteen are artists Hilburn's readers were familiar with too

― some dude, Monday, May 2, 2011 5:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i mean you're basically arguing that i cant ever refer to musicians i happen to like in reviews any more?

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:21 (thirteen years ago) link

ive never made a reference to an artist in my writing where it was relevant to do so. point blank period. im sorry if you think im overloading people with artists i happen to like but i think thats bullshit.

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:22 (thirteen years ago) link

ha, typo. where it wasnt relevant to do so

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link

that's a good question, but oh hey look at the beautiful weather outside, i'm gonna take my son to the park instead of spending another second talking about this right now, hope that's cool w/ you.

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:25 (thirteen years ago) link

do i compare stuff to bone thugs in every review i write?

no but if I sweeten the deal with a quarter for every bone thugs reference could we make this a reality?

xp fuckin lol @ relevancy typo.

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:33 (thirteen years ago) link

but tbrr you compared synths on a j stalin record to wendy carlos where goblin or john carpenter soundtracks would have been way more apt so relevant yes but I'm ringin u up with a great big comparison-aptness check so like deal w/that

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:37 (thirteen years ago) link

i dunno man that shit sounds like some clockwork orange outtakes to me

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:42 (thirteen years ago) link

fwiw because im tired of this 'deej is obsessed w/ [x]' coming up everytime we talk about any of an entire series of artists ive talked a lot about on ilx, im going to set this out there:

1) some artists are talked about a lot by critics / on ilx, some are not

2) if an artist i like is not talked about a lot by critics, i will spend more time here talking about it

3) if an artist - say dj quik or e-40 or gucci, for examples of artists i used to talk about a lot MORE on ilx - gets picked up by wider discussions here, i tend to talk about them less, because theres no need to get a ball rolling

4) if an artist is not, i tend to spend more time talking about that artist, because what he's accomplishing artistically feels undervalued to me, so i try to convince others of his/her value

5) none of these things are particularly related to my reference to the jacka in a max b review, which was more about identifying different approaches to the art of rapping between two similarly-minded artists.

can we be done now?

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:46 (thirteen years ago) link

lol 2 & 4 are basically the same thing but im typing this on my clocked-out half-hour lunch break so i did it kind of hurridly

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:47 (thirteen years ago) link

mainly I just like to bitch about the j stalin review because I copped that record on the strength of the review and I thought the record sucked balls so I will be angry abt it until I die

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:47 (thirteen years ago) link

sad u felt that way boo. i def dont think it sucks balls tho i did feel i overrated it slightly after the fact, if only bcuz in retrospect i realized 'gas nation' is a more fully-realized project

did you like 'red & blue lights' at least?

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:48 (thirteen years ago) link

man, max b is in the slammer and this is his ilx thread, what a raw deal

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah it was a decent track!

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago) link

man, max b is in the slammer and this is his ilx thread, what a raw deal

lol

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago) link

rip max b thread virginity

deej bringing up jacka & gucci is funny like "that's our deej" as j0rdan said, not clowning him for being nearsighted or a problem w/ his criticism, or at least thats totally different from the og lol intent

flopson, Monday, 2 May 2011 18:01 (thirteen years ago) link

i would like to say "flopson otm" again but apparently that's not allowed, just know that i am with you in spirit

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 18:48 (thirteen years ago) link

its 'not allowed' only in that it contradicts what u wrote previously, but whatev

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:02 (thirteen years ago) link

no, no it doesn't, not at all, especially since he's talking about "the og lol intent" i.e. MY first post which obviously i kind of have some idea of the meaning of

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:05 (thirteen years ago) link

i mean the whole time i've been saying "i am having a laugh for reasons that are obvious and have been discussed here before" and you're the one going "no this has very grim and portentous subtext about how you feel about me as a person as a critic" and then my eyes roll into the back of my head and i leave the thread

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:07 (thirteen years ago) link

aerosmith - have you seen that old tom snyder show clip with paul weller, joan jett, kim fowley, and hilburn talking about "punk"...it's pretty priceless television

coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:09 (thirteen years ago) link

xp what an odd caricature of what happened here

no, you said something that i disagreed about that wasnt 'just a laugh' & you retreated backwards to 'oh but its just joeks' when i disagreed with it

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:10 (thirteen years ago) link

some dude maybe u dont realize this but when you post these things you tend to load them as, 'you are wrong to have said this' rather than, 'lol thats our deej' -- something to think about maybe

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:11 (thirteen years ago) link

no it doesn't, pretty much the only connection between those 3 artists is "these are people that the author of this review loves and has to bring up at every opportunity"

― hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Sunday, May 1, 2011 6:57 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark

is this the supposed post in which i am lowering the veil of serious attacks on your critical style and not just explaining the lol

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:18 (thirteen years ago) link

it was the point of disagreement for me that this entire stupid argument has been about -- you can dramatize it all you want but that specific sentence is what i disagree w/, it says something more than 'ha deej referencing his fav artists'. you also talked about me realizing i had 'made an error' like whiney supposedly did. you clearly disagree w my use of that artist here and argued w me about it.

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:22 (thirteen years ago) link

aerosmith - have you seen that old tom snyder show clip with paul weller, joan jett, kim fowley, and hilburn talking about "punk"...it's pretty priceless television

lol yes...if you think I'm high-strung now you should have seen young aero screaming at the screen whenever hilburn got tv time

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:23 (thirteen years ago) link

"SHUT THE FUCK UP! YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT MUSIC! IF YOU SAY 'SPRINGSTEEN' ONE MORE TIME I'M GOING TO THROW A BRICK THROUGH THIS TV!"

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:24 (thirteen years ago) link

if it was just lol to see me bring up jacka, like, "ha how deej," then never mind. if you think i was doing it for no reason other than to try to insert my fav artists into discourse whenever possible -- which is what aerosmith said, and you cosigned -- then i disagree. you should prob make up your mind which one you are arguing

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:24 (thirteen years ago) link

can we all agree that the loser in all this is max b, especially when deej's review makes it sound like he's dead

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:25 (thirteen years ago) link

i get the feeling from somedude -- but not j0rdan or flopson -- that you are questioning my motives. if this is just a misunderstanding, then i apologize for making a big deal abt it

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:25 (thirteen years ago) link

can we all agree that the loser in all this is max b, especially when deej's review makes it sound like he's dead

― don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Monday, May 2, 2011 7:25 PM (50 seconds ago) Bookmark

haha. this ill take the blame for u_u

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link

aerosmith - have you seen that old tom snyder show clip with paul weller, joan jett, kim fowley, and hilburn talking about "punk"...it's pretty priceless television

lol yes...if you think I'm high-strung now you should have seen young aero screaming at the screen whenever hilburn got tv time

― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, May 2, 2011 2:23 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

haha yeah but i could hardly notice him w all the murderous barely contained hatred going on between snyder and fowley...also snyder was probably the most "punk" dude in the room IMO

coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:27 (thirteen years ago) link

if it was just lol to see me bring up jacka, like, "ha how deej," then never mind. if you think i was doing it for no reason other than to try to insert my fav artists into discourse whenever possible -- which is what aerosmith said, and you cosigned -- then i disagree. you should prob make up your mind which one you are arguing

― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, May 2, 2011 3:24 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

aero was describing how that kind of thing can LOOK to readers regardless of intent and was recommending you consider that when you write, which i agreed with. but if you want to be an either/or absolutist about it, that's cool, i personally think those 2 perspectives are not mutually exclusive.

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:29 (thirteen years ago) link

ok well thats not really an issue since this is afai can recall the only time ive done that, so i guess we all agree, flopson otm

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:30 (thirteen years ago) link

only time ive referred to him w/ a seemingly unrelated artist i mean

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:31 (thirteen years ago) link

cool. see you later.

some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:31 (thirteen years ago) link

*exhales*

flopson, Monday, 2 May 2011 19:32 (thirteen years ago) link

didn't know max b was dead, rip

five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:35 (thirteen years ago) link

RIP max

That Dunkster! (absolutely clean glasses), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:36 (thirteen years ago) link

*pours some out*

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Monday, 2 May 2011 19:39 (thirteen years ago) link

my main problem with the gucci/jacka stuff is that deej failed to mention 50, who obv plays a huge part in max's lineage

J0rdan S., Monday, 2 May 2011 20:00 (thirteen years ago) link

yah i mean im not sure it relates to what i was saying about him in relation to rappers who were his contemporaries, but 50 cent is obv a touchpoint i could have included. i mean what i was trying to say was that like 50 hes a songwriter, but he seperates out the song from the rapper in a way 50 didnt -- 50 did hooks as himself, you know?

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 20:15 (thirteen years ago) link

eh thats poorly worded / confusin. ill rewrite when i get off work

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 20:16 (thirteen years ago) link

I feel like I say this every time and deej I don't mean to blindside you but you have this bizarrely intense need imo to be vindicated by everyone. Like, you can't just drop it that Ship doesn't see eye to eye with you in terms of the jacka and gucci mane, you just have to keep going. And I don't think it's a horrible characteristic on its face -- it works for you when you're constantly evangelizing about music, but when it's about your own points it gets tedious and borders on maniacal imo

J0rdan S., Monday, 2 May 2011 20:24 (thirteen years ago) link

im not asking him to agree at all though

geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 20:33 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.