Dilbert - C or D?

Obviously an alias can be used for evil just as easily as it can be used to clear up simple factual matters. A hammer can be used to build a porch or it can be used to crush your neighbor's skull. Don't hate the tool.

lol

hoo boy

Dear Scott Adams,

You are on your own now, you big stupid nerd.

Middle-fingerfully,

DJP

I typed a vague rant of betrayal on behalf of teenage me, who mistook Adams' cynicism regarding clueless un-technical managers for some kind of anti-capitalist pro-science sentiment when apparently he was only ever yet another oblivious self-aggrandising jerk with an MBA, but then I remembered that it's already at least 12 years too late to give a shit. So.

(Admittedly I already sort of knew part of this from the final chapter of whichever 90s book where he tells readers to visualise good futures for themselves and write them out 100x daily to make them come true, but I guess a little part of me still wanted that to be some really weird trolling.)

oh hahaha I remember that; I thought it was the funniest fucking thing

doesn't surprise me to find the whole "men's rights" thing was done tongue-in-cheek, I used to read the Dilbert blog from time to time and I know most of what he says on there is not meant to be taken straight. this whole weird thing about him defending himself is bizarre, but he kind of admits on his blog that he doesn't really have much integrity when it comes to public forums. In a way I kind of understand why he did it, his blog is EXACTLY the sort of thing that people can take out of context and use to slam the guy, but explanation or not this whole thing is kind of disturbing

Was I the only person who was put off by Dilbert from the beginning? The "capitalist servitude is the lolz" attitude just seemed like smokescreen for maintaining the status quo. Pointy-headed bosses will always rule, so put up with it.

Always felt that Dogbert was Adams' way of inserting himself into the strip a la Dave Sim and Viktor Davis.

Adams was equal parts Dogbert/Catbert/Alice/Wally IMO

it is definitely not questioning the status quo. and that's ok because it still has decent jokes.

ha that's actually a good point, I don't see how a strip that is basically "my job is soul-crushingly stupid and nothing I do seems to change anything" even comes under consideration as something that could be challenging the status quo

Guess I have a thin-skin when it comes to this, but I also work as a programmer. Too close to home?

well, I'm also a programmer; I always viewed the strip like the coworker who's always bitching

Was I the only person who was put off by Dilbert from the beginning? The "capitalist servitude is the lolz" attitude just seemed like smokescreen for maintaining the status quo. Pointy-headed bosses will always rule, so put up with it.

There was a whole book written about this 14-years ago.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61ZD9A4VJXL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Its complaints are a little repetitive but on the whole it is a good read.

Admittedly I already sort of knew part of this from the final chapter of whichever 90s book where he tells readers to visualise good futures for themselves and write them out 100x daily to make them come true, but I guess a little part of me still wanted that to be some really weird trolling.

That was the Dilbert Future...I always wondered the same thing. He always is going on and on about pranking people at the office so the whole way I kinda thought he was pulling one over on us, but if you go back and re-read it, everything seems to sincere that it's a little hard to tell. The implications there were just a little too weird to comprehend. But he did manage to "re-wire" his brain and cure his "incurable" spasmodic dysphonia or something, so at least that's pretty impressive.

He always is going on and on about pranking people at the office so the whole way I kinda thought he was pulling one over on us, but if you go back and re-read it, everything seems to sincere that it's a little hard to tell. The implications there were just a little too weird to comprehend. But he did manage to "re-wire" his brain and cure his "incurable" spasmodic dysphonia or something, so at least that's pretty impressive.

― frogbs, Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:54 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is a good observation. he anticipated internet trolls.

this is a good one:

http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-06-07

Is there a way to make a comic strip an ILX board description?

Technically yeah, but it breaks mobile ILXing so it's verboten.

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/145456082991/my-endorsement-for-president-of-the-united-states

The only downside I can see to the new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States. And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (I’m called an “apologist” on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels).

0_0

I mean obvs he is batshit but sometimes it is still a shock to smell the shit of the bat

top-ten assassination target

I guess he read my diary.

hmmmm - was not aware of his batshit-ness until now :(

Yet another casualty of bouncing his increasingly-bizarre political ideas off the echo chamber of a drafting table for decades on end.

It must have the same effect as solitary confinement for some.

eagerly anticipating his "guys, I was just joking and y'all were too stupid to realize it" post when Trump does not win via landslide

Nah, dude has been tweaked for years. Rapidly tumbling into Sim territory.

Yeah, he's been spouting misogynist MRA and evolutionary biology bullshit for a long time now.

hmm, skimming through his blog it does sound awfully like the ramblings of a somewhat smart high schooler spending too much time on his own

https://twitter.com/Lubchansky/status/714872078713896961

hey dilbert guy, are you cool

http://dilbert.com/strip/2016-06-16

i mean
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/146361457021/the-humiliation-of-the-american-male-in-2016

How many of the married men reading this blog have received those same sweaters as “gifts” from women? Personally, I’ve received about 25 over the years. None from men. I received three of those sweaters so far this year. I throw them away. Nice try.

Many of you can’t talk about this topic without being accused of sexism, losing your jobs, and being cast out of your social groups. But I can talk about it because I endorse Hillary Clinton for president.

rooneyish

this guy is a psycho

as in, andy?

xp yup

funny how the guy who did a comic about how schlubby engineers are really smart and everyone else is really stupid turned out to be a self-satisfied womanhater dickhead

I think question #1 here is "why are you reading Scott Adams' blog?"

he's turned himself into some kind of sage for trump fans this election, it's the weirdest thing

classic material

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/139295746646/marriage-civilizations-biggest-mistake

yeah, andy -- in form, at least.

my submission is this graf from a recent piece about trump's mastery of persuasion:

For example, I have already used several persuasion techniques in the paragraphs above. If I were to see another writer use these same persuasion methods on me, I would recognize them. But most of you did not recognize the methods – at least not all of them – when I used them right in front of you.

Persuasion hides in plain sight.

genuine lol at "check out this commercial for dishwasher detergent."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kydKTVLmP58

TRUMP'S "LINGUISTIC KILL SHOTS" EXPLAINED

"Linguistic Kill Shots" sounds like some PUA bullshit.

trump makes fun of people's looks. what a hypnotist.

How are we going to feel when Randall Munroe goes full douchebag? I feel it's inevitable

I mean it probably happened already, I just don't care enough to notice since (like Scott Adams) the majority of his output and fan base are just annoying

I think question #1 here is "why are you reading Scott Adams' blog?"
― volumetric god rays (DJP), Friday, June 24, 2016

Rapidly tumbling into Sim territory.

That v-neck sweater one totally reads like a Sim who was never smart.

classic material

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/139295746646/marriage-civilizations-biggest-mistake

this guy tries so hard to straddle the line between "see!! I was right about everything! you're just not open minded enough!" and "guys I was just trolling, get a sense of humor!", also lol @ him preemptively defending himself against people tweeting at him

like this

I can talk about it because I endorse Hillary Clinton for president. I did that for my personal safety,

is just the most disingenuous shit, you got such a Trumpboner just own it like a fucking man

also lol at the idea that Trump is some kind of master hypnotist deploying surgical linguistic kill shots to get the nomination, he got the nomination by being a radical candidate in a historically stuffed field, full of candidates who for whatever reason thought the way to beat Trump was to go to his level. He did it by stoking the same base you've been mocking for the last 30 years of your life. If he WAS actually savvy - if say, he had an actual campaign, any remotely consistent positions, or knew when and where was the time for his vile racism, maybe he would have some kind of shot, which is terrifying. As it is he's making unforced errors every week and most likely is going to get blown out, so who knows how Adams is gonna walk back that "Trump wins in history's biggest landslide" prediction

now taking credit for Brexit:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/146709758156/the-time-i-accidentally-plunged-europe-into