RAdiohead

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (789 of them)
I agree that "The Bends" is their best LP from start to finish, but still, "Idioteque" and "Knives Out" rate amongst my top 5 'head songs.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 22 August 2002 03:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

There There: I don't know how to avoid superlatives on this one. A subtle, snakecharming groove hidden in torrents of percussion. There's a mythical quality to the whole song.
Scatterbrain: Sounds like the physical act of crying. A dischordant ballad with no way out. The aftermath of a storm.
Up On The Ladder: Starts poorly, Radiohead try the whole "rocking out" thing again. Fail. But the ending is beautiful, desperate, his voice over mournful synth chords. A song about immense disappointment.
We Suck Young Blood: Sangria-drenched piano chords start the song. It's a "horror song" as they say. But the song is more bitingly sarcastic than anything else. They also finally make use of those Mingus handclaps that they so love.
I Will: A too brief lullaby. All three-part harmonies and poignant melody.
Sail to The Moon: Sounds like the title. Floating, wistful... Gentle piano spirals into the stars.
Myxomatosis: A villainous song. An evil only a lurid detective novel from the 40s could imagine. All propulsive fuzz-bass and sneering diatribe. There is, as is common with Radiohead songs, a lurking sadness, though.
A Punch Up At A Wedding: The most seethingly angry song I've ever heard. On the surface, it's all insistent beat, slightly rollicking piano, and bass. But it's coming apart at the seams. It's ready to rip your throat out.
Lift: This song was boring in 1996, and is still boring now. Coldplay have based their entire career on this song.
Wolf at the Door: Each word is a knife. An impossibly hurt, fearful song. Stream-of-consciousness ranting over dark arpeggios. Building a blockade of words for protection.
Sit Down. Stand Up.: Layers of sequenced piano build until the tension is unbearable. The song is about to burst. And it does. It begins as a hymn and ends as an exorcism.
Go to Sleep: Eastern-inflected roots rock song. Dull, really. But not without a few surprises.
Where I End and You Begin: The day the earth stood still. The Ondes-Martenot keens its unearthly cry. The song is a sentinel, a prison.
2+2=5: A melody menacing from the beginning. Ghostly harmonizing erupts into unexpected danger halfway through. A protest song... Someone being broken.
Wicked Child: Bluesy. Not much there. Repetitive. Boring. Does involve hot harmonica action from J. Greenwood though.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 04:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

First person to say "Wizard's cap" will get smacked.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 04:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

erm... why is that?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 22 August 2002 05:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not sure how I feel about dissecting songs that are works in progress as if they are patients, spread out, anaethetised upon the table.

To listen to a new song live, to experience it, to watch it unfold, to hear it change as it is reworked is a magical, wonderful thing. It's one of the joys of following unsigned bands is that they lack the fear and/or resources so they are more likely to do it in public.

But to record a live song, distribute it and critique it before the artist has had the chance to stand back from the painting and go "There, OK, that's done" seems kind of unfair. Both to the artist, who is being interrupted, and to the song, which may or may not take a completely different shape eventually.

Listening to works in progress is wonderful, but trying to pin them down and dissect them seems, well ... I'm not going to say disrespectful, but it does seem kind of ... pointless? Self defeating? What's the word I'm looking for?

That said, no I've not seen Radiohead on this tour, nor heard any of the tunes.

kate, Thursday, 22 August 2002 07:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

''Is there really that much radiohead hate here outside Julio?''

I would hope so I really do.

you couldn't resist it could you melissa.

''Scatterbrain: Sounds like the physical act of crying. A dischordant ballad with no way out. The aftermath of a storm.''

this is such a cliched description I don't even know where to begin. Get your head checked melissa.

''Up On The Ladder: Starts poorly, Radiohead try the whole "rocking out" thing again. Fail. But the ending is beautiful, desperate, his voice over mournful synth chords. A song about immense disappointment.''

Pushing the 'sad chords' triggers again. Mournful, desperation, dissapointment. sob, sob, sob...all the way to the bank we go.

''Where I End and You Begin: The day the earth stood still. The Ondes-Martenot keens its unearthly cry. The song is a sentinel, a prison.''

''Wolf at the Door: Each word is a knife. An impossibly hurt, fearful song.''

er...more crying then. I'm beginning to think Thom Yorke wasn't breast fed when he was a baby.

''A Punch Up At A Wedding: The most seethingly angry song I've ever heard. On the surface, it's all insistent beat, slightly rollicking piano, and bass. But it's coming apart at the seams. It's ready to rip your throat out.''

yes but angry at what. Is it like an adolescent who is just angry for no reason or is it actually anger at something specific. This is all bullshit.

''Go to Sleep: Eastern-inflected roots rock song. Dull, really.''

b-but why is it dull? don't just leave it at that.

and on it fucking goes...I avoided the golden jubilee but there's too many institutions and you can't avoid it all.


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 09:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

does anyone have a link for these songs? my web searching skills are badly letting me down.

angela, Thursday, 22 August 2002 09:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Just fuck off, Julio. You have no fun unless you're pissing on someone's parade. (Oh my god, she used another cliché. Who will save you from such horrors?)

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 09:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

(This is why I don't post on ILM.)

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 09:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

I saw the first shows in Lisbon and was very pleased with the new songs.

There, There - bit of a homage to Adam and the Ants circa Kings of the Wild Frontier featuring Ed and Jonny on JAMC Bobby Gillespie style stand up drums with a top acending climax - a fitting opener

Scatterbrain - needs a lot of work and doesn't really go anywhere.

Up on the ladder - pretty rocky with thom doing his 'you and whose army' unfocused anti blair schtick

We suck young blood - slow and swinging with harmonies from phil and ed (phil was wearing an amusing madonna style headset during his backing vox)

I will - an old song, briefly featured in the 'Meeting people is easy' doc with lovely harmonies from Thom and Ed

Myxamotosis - fairly fast rocky number with Ed playing a les paul (surely a first).

going for some lunch now, will post my thoughts on the rest later

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

You couldn't resist it, could you, Julio? And on it fucking goes...

Damian (Damian), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

i have found the answer to my own question. the songs are here.

melissa, thank you putting up your descriptions.

angela, Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

thank you _for_ putting up your descriptions.

angela, Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

''You couldn't resist it, could you, Julio?''

Melissa couldn't resisit it and nor could I.

''(This is why I don't post on ILM.)''

ILM isn't a radiohead list. Or a keiji haino list. Or improv or free jazz, etc. fans and non-fans of everything to do with [x] are here and when a thread is opened by soemone and I feel the need to comment I will do so.

I'm not 'pissing', I'm just adding my thoughts on your descriptions. Sorry about the 'checking your head' line though.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

What you did went far beyond fair play. That was a slimy personal attack. I don't care what you think about Radiohead, but please, keep your comments to them exclusively.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

oh no it wasn't personal and I'm sorry you think that.

when you describe a song as ''The most seethingly angry song I've ever heard'' then I want to know at what as well.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Julio, we have the power to bar people on nuILX. Play nice.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

graham: did you think that was a personal attack or a comment on her descriptions?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was trying to keep it succinct. No one here has any desire to read an essay on new Radiohead songs. And of course it was personal. You weren't harping on the new Radiohead songs (that you obviously have not heard and most probably have no desire to), but were harping on my descriptions of them. What purpose does that serve except to humiliate me?

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

sorry if you felt that. just thought some of the descriptions were sort of things i heard before that's all. I never intend to humiliate.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

melissa -> FUCK being scared - especially about something as precious as music. self-censorship isn't worth the time or the worry.

irony = julio's stance as radiohead hata being JUST as cliched and as ho hum as he wants (hopes?) the new songs to be. he HASN'T EVEN HEARD THEM and yet he took time out to bash the fecking DESCRIPTIONS. and why?

its one thing to be convinced that radiohead are inauthentic or overrated; its another entirely to pounce like a wolf on anybody else who sees something in them, especially when the crux of that fan-music connection is one borne out of vulnerability.

he (or anyone else) can take the sadness, confusion, anger, fear and deride it, mock it, HATE it all he wants. me, i'll take it (as well as the songs) and celebrate it all. not because i'm a sad moany bastard (really, i'm not) but because the alternative, to deny all of that, is too ugly and dark and boring to bear.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

fwiw julio, that was fucking harsh. melissa was giving a quick rundown of what each song was, i'm not sure what the purpose of systematically laying into her like that was. its not a points scoring board you know

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

Melissa felt it was, and that's more important than whether you or I did. If you're going to behave in a way that discourages other people form posting about *MUSIC*, then why do we want you here? And it's not like you responded to anyone else's descriptions.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think it was a bit harsh but I think threatening to bar people is the road to disaster.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Personal attacks are usually the last resort of a flailing intellect or mark an attempt to press someone's buttons - since Jules was both attempting to rip Melissa up AND had no idea what he was talking about, I guess he qualifies in both depts. But you know, the problem here is that with someting as personal as music it is very hard on both sides to separate criticism of the material from criticism of the consumer. It's a hard trap to avoid falling into I reckon... But it can be fun too, to jump in there I suppose.

Jules: "Get your head checked melissa" constitutes personal attack with intent. But what's this claptrap about banning the guy??? Tell me that's a fucking joke. I thought what he said was valid ranting.

And right-on Mark P - you are on the money.

Roger Fascist, Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

''irony = julio's stance as radiohead hata being JUST as cliched and as ho hum as he wants (hopes?) the new songs to be.''

yeah. I've heard everything they've done up to this and when I saw the descriptions it just reminded of the past. Irony indeed.

''its one thing to be convinced that radiohead are inauthentic or overrated; its another entirely to pounce like a wolf on anybody else who sees something in them, especially when the crux of that fan-music connection is one borne out of vulnerability.''

i did not intend to 'pounce'. I didn't know it was borne out of some 'vulnerability'.

''he (or anyone else) can take the sadness, confusion, anger, fear and deride it, mock it, HATE it all he wants.''

I love or hate a lot of music with nothing in between, which is unfortunate sometimes.

melissa- hope you accept my apologies.

''"Get your head checked melissa" constitutes personal attack with intent.''

yeah, and I apologised for that.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

People should be able to discuss whoever they like without twats like him with no interest in what they're talking about pouncing on them, and there's little point in a board where people can't.

So yeah, deleting ILM would probably be a much more satisfactory solution than baring people. Don't tempt me.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

So........does anyone want to hear my thoughts on the rest of the new songs i heard in Lisbon?

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jesus nu-ilm is Logans Run....

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

You mean we have to be nice on new-ILM? I want out!

Genuinely, though, he's apologised, and I don't think his attack was that vicious in the first place (although I understand Melissa's upset at being told to "get her head checked"). Kiss and make up, folks.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

great...nu-ILM is the nu-nanny state.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

What's so difficult about being civil to each other?

DELETE FROM boards WHERE boardid='2';

Finger on the fucking enter key.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

Some of the songs are surprisingly dissapointing -- Up On The Ladder, Go To Sleep, Wicked Child... 2+2=5 is alright but sounds like a 1995 b-side.

Punch Up At A Wedding is wonderful, however. Yorke seems to have perfected his knack for singing nasty, horrible lyrics while sounding all sweetness and light. "I don't know why you bother / nothing's ever good enough for you / ... / you've come here just to start a fight."

I don't think anyone's going to be surprised about the lyrical content of the songs -- it's still confusion, loss, despair, anger and so on. Scatterbrain and Sail To The Moon do show an unexpected tender side, almost. Wolf From The Door features a stream of consciousness rant full of non sequiturs which is geniunely unsettling.

I imagine the studio versions will be significantly different, though.

Clive, Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Punch up at a wedding - one of the shagging songs, a slow burner with some funky piano and bass action from thom and colin.

Lift - a very old song, was supposed to be on Ok Computer, Ed's soaring backing vox on the chorus have been chopped and it's been slowed down quite a bit, not as good as the old version, although you may hear my high pitched squeaking on the bootlegs from the 1st night in Lisbon.

Wolf from the door - thom could be heard mumbling 'ooh baby, baby, baby...' over the middle eight, i guess he hadn't bothered to write lyrics before they played it, there was reference to Stepford Wives though.

Stand up, Sit Down - most like the Kid A/Amnesiac stuff, lots of analogue synth action from Jonny and vocal harmonies from Ed - speeds up towards the end with 'little raindrops' repeated over and over again.

I didn't get to hear the other new stuff cos i had to come home.

Didn't realise how crap i was at describing the new stuff until i posted this, you live and learn i suppose.


The band seemed the most happy and relaxed i'd ever seen them, a friend who has seen them more than 50 times seemed to concur.

It'll remain to be seen whether they'll manage to lay them down in 2 weeks as planned, something tells me the March 2003 release date may be pushed back.

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is silly, I think there's good reason why I've never seen anyone threaten to delete ILM in the year or so since I found it despite WAY WORSE threads than this and far more contenious arguments. Aside from whatever you think about me personally Graham don't escalate the situation, if you're going to moderate at least follow the example that was set by people who actually use ILM....

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

And I can be the most sanctimonious of them all...

DG (D_To_The_G), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

The only reason I don't use it is because it's so fucking rub, and the only reason I haven't done anything about it is because I think it's beyond redemption. There are loads of people whose contributions I would like to read, but most of them have been pushed out by how annoying this place has become.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

''What's so difficult about being civil to each other?''

I didn't think I was being vicious. I was actually trying to discuss some of the things around the music that was being described. why was [x] song the 'angriest' what made it angry in the first place. Sure, I didn't hear the music but there is the music and then there is the 'matter' that surrounds it. and i have heard radiohead...

also, are there a set of chords which make music mournful and why do they keep doing it over and over...

I was honestly curious about some of these descriptions and just trying to get some discussion but I think the way i put things in a bad way and i accept that.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Melissa..thanks for the descriptions.. I appreciate them..and thought them insightful....

Julio- I wish the fleas of a 1000 reindeer nestle in your genitals

that is all.

insectifly, Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

A comment on Kate's comment -- if they're playing the songs live to a paying audience, then I would no longer call the songs "works in progress." If people are paying money to hear them they better be done, I say.

I appreciated your descriptions, Mel. It's helpful because I know a little about your taste & have seen some of your writing so I have an idea where you're coming from. Where would you place these new songs in the context of the last three albums? Is there a place where they "fit," in terms of production, mood, etc?

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

what's so difficult about being civil to each other


Yeah I wonder!!!!

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Most fit rather well with the jazzier excursions on Amnesiac. They're a bit more full-blooded, though. The songs I don't really like harken back to The Bends a bit more. Some of the songs do seem the slightest bit too straightforward. And they are definitely works in progress. Some literally changed from night to night. I hope they spice up some of the songs with unusual production/arrangements.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

At any rate, it was really nice to hear your descriptions Melissa.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

the new stuff seems to be a consolidation of all the post pablo honey stuff, although i can't really make firm comparisons between it and any of the old stuff. There's a warmth in the new material that's been lacking from their previous work. They seem to be in a much happier place just now. It's if they've been afraid of relaxing before in fear of it all collapsing, now they've to and it shows positively in the music.

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Julio's not the only Radiohead hater here. But otherwise I'll keep my mouth shut.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

oops, looks like i haven't been paying enough attention to what i'm posting, my last sentence should have read 'now they've learned how to' - doh!

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thanks, Nicole. :)

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Apart from the few songs which verge on Pablo Honey-esque rockers, they feel like a straightforward progression (or refinement or something) from Kid A/Amnesiac. The band's claim of less computers/less studio trickery will be impossible to verify until the album is out -- the Kid A songs live featured reasonably standard arrangements.

Lyrically it's the same ground as the previous two; oblique, cryptic phrases, dealing with some vague non-specific dread. You know.

Clive, Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

They're recording it in L.A...who knows, it could come out sounding like the Eagles or CSNY.

Leigh, Thursday, 22 August 2002 12:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah agree about the panic, the anxiety. That’s what made Ok Computer stand out so much at the time to me.

brimstead, Friday, 26 January 2024 16:45 (two months ago) link

26 years of panic and vomit

maf you one two (maffew12), Friday, 26 January 2024 16:53 (two months ago) link

Panic & Vomit: The Curse of the Where's Chorus?

guanacoyaki (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 26 January 2024 18:21 (two months ago) link

You don't remember

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:08 (two months ago) link

There’s still some of the OKC and Kid A/Amnesiac anxiety and panic though?

Like per example “Burn the Witch” (which I think was sketched back on the Kid A sessions) could comfortably be added to Amnesiac and wouldn’t sound out of place and it would actually be one of the highlights.

Weird Fishes/Arpeggi wouldn’t also feel out of place on Kid A… feels similar to “In Limbo” to me.

“Morning mr magpie” is also from those sessions and “little by little” sounds very paranoid.. those two wouldn’t sound out of place on something like HTTT.

I mean the bite is still definitely there for my ears, but yeah it’s valid criticism since they seem to prefer to do mellow, textural things or stick to a groove and vibe with it.

✖✖✖ (Moka), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:09 (two months ago) link

This new one is much better than I expected

Jordan s/t (Jordan), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:58 (two months ago) link

Yeah, I was a little worried after reading people online who listened to the leak describing the album as boring but I kind of love it. Sure, more vibe-y than structured but the vibe is exactly what I want from Radiohead in 2024

ˈʌglɪɪst preɪ, Friday, 26 January 2024 21:19 (two months ago) link

does this mean Radiohead is basically kaputt? would imagine so

frogbs, Friday, 26 January 2024 21:24 (two months ago) link

it means Phil was sacked iirc

guanacoyaki (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 26 January 2024 21:52 (two months ago) link

After seeing the couple "boring" posts on here I went in with tempered expectations and I really enjoyed it on first listen! Almost more immediate for me than the first.

DT, Saturday, 27 January 2024 04:18 (two months ago) link

whenever any of them are asked about radiohead's future in interviews they say they haven't broken up and intend to do something eventually but there aren't any plans yet. i figure it'll happen once thom & jonny run out of momentum with the smile, but that might take a little while, it wouldn't really surprise me if they just jump back in and make the smile lp3 once they're done touring wall of eyes.

ufo, Saturday, 27 January 2024 05:21 (two months ago) link

Other than Bending Hectic, wasn’t really feeling the prerelease tracks. And yet…LOVING the album.

Davey D, Sunday, 28 January 2024 02:13 (two months ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhivN4GJQCQ

^ this is very pretty! there's some British prog thing going on the bass that I can't seem to nail...

fpsa, Sunday, 28 January 2024 06:51 (two months ago) link

Top youtube comment;

“Kids in the crowd “PLAY CREEP!””

✖✖✖ (Moka), Sunday, 28 January 2024 15:29 (two months ago) link

there's some British prog thing going on the bass that I can't seem to nail...

The sound is very Van der Graaf Generator/Atomic Rooster.

Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Sunday, 28 January 2024 17:34 (two months ago) link

This might be my favourite Radiohead-related album since King of Limbs.

Frederik B, Sunday, 28 January 2024 19:14 (two months ago) link

I guess I quite enjoyed what I've heard of this. Yes it is "boring", or at least lacking in high energy flash-bangs, but not unpleasantly so. I can imagine myself putting this on quite a bit when I just need music to listen to and can't decide what.

Still can't quite work out what projects like this are about, as in, where the two most prominent members of a band decide to do a side project that doesn't sound especially different in style and scope to the main project.

I mean, I'd understand if Thom and Jonny had this real urge to explore a specific sound away from Radiohead - post-punk or hip hop or something. But A lot of this really does sound like A Moon Shaped Pool to me.

I understand if this were released as the next Radiohead album there'd probably be a backlash, but what then is The Smile other than a platform for Radiohead "B-songs" done in a slightly more stripped back style?

...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Sunday, 28 January 2024 20:43 (two months ago) link

It sounds less fussed-over, more "first thought, best thought" to my ears, liberated from the expectations surrounding "the next entry in the Radiohead canon", just musicians doing what comes most-naturally to them, and I like that. The same way I don't think I'd claim that any Beak> album is superior to any Portishead album, and yet I listen to more Beak> than Portishead because it feels like less investment, less emotional weight, but a similar set of sonic rewards

in an aeroplane under the sea (flamboyant goon tie included), Sunday, 28 January 2024 22:23 (two months ago) link

Wasn't The Smile *supposed* to be more of a post-punk thing? I recall reading that somewhere before hearing any music...in any case I never got that vibe from the finished product.

DT, Monday, 29 January 2024 09:41 (two months ago) link

i don't think they were supposed to be more of a post-punk thing explicitly or anything, maybe people just said that's what they sounded like after the first few songs they premiered or something

the reason the smile exists is just that thom & jonny wanted to make music during the pandemic but the others were unavailable. that seems to have been a very creatively productive time for them - they said they still have more smile material they're working on, mostly dating back to back to that big creative burst during the pandemic, but they've been writing more on tour too. they're just feeling creatively energised at the moment

ufo, Monday, 29 January 2024 12:07 (two months ago) link

there are a number of reasons i do not really want to listen to radiohead or associated projects anymore, but i really like this new record. i mean, i knew i would from the moment everyone decided it was boring and lacked compelling songs. the mistier and harder-to-pin-down the compositions are in the better imo, the main reason moon shaped pool and king of limbs are my fave radiohead releases these days

ivy., Tuesday, 30 January 2024 15:30 (two months ago) link

Lol yeah I actually liked this more than I thought I would. I really like the production too… I feel like Godrich is good but sometimes a slight change is good.

TKOL is easily a top 3 RH album for me - probably top 2 if Staircase and Supercollider were part of it - idk why so many Radiohead fans seem to rank it next to Pablo Honey.

✖✖✖ (Moka), Wednesday, 31 January 2024 22:05 (two months ago) link

The new issue of The Wire is out, so here's my full review of the Smile album:

The Smile
Wall Of Eyes
XL CD/DL/LP
Why do The Smile exist? Jonny Greenwood has done brilliant work as a composer for films. Thom Yorke has his solo work and Atoms For Peace. Is it just a way to play concerts without being asked to sing “Karma Police”?

The group’s previous studio album and its accompanying live document offer songs that feel as half-sketched as those on the last two (or three, or four) Radiohead albums. Occasional post-punk outbursts tease the prospect of excitement, but middle aged ennui always wins out, and Tom Skinner, one of the most exciting drummers on the London jazz scene, is reduced to delivering somnambulistic half-remembered Ethio-jazz, like a library music version of Sault.

The title track lays a gentle Brazilian guitar strum over booming tympani. In the back, electronics crackle like distant firecrackers, and eventually strings come in. The music is gentle but ominous, and it’s hard to be sure which impression they want to linger. “Read The Room” and “Teleharmonic” are more conventional rock songs; the former in particular could have come off any 21st century Radiohead album. “Under Our Pillows” has a math rock feel to start, guitars sliding into place like the gears of a watch; in the song’s second half, a motorik bassline materialises, pumping the energy level up somewhat. “Friend Of A Friend” pulls from multiple early 1970s sources. Yorke’s near falsetto vocals bring to mind Elton John at his most mawkish and the orchestral arrangements amplify that tendency, but there’s some Bowie-ish theatricality and King Crimson-esque buzz around the edges.

In the final moments of the inexplicably eight minute “Bending Hectic” someone plugs in an electric guitar, an almost bafflingly aggressive gesture compared with everything before. And/but the minute all these songs end, they vanish from your mind’s ear as if they’d never existed. Again, why?

Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 15:23 (two months ago) link

Home visiting my folks and going through boxes of stuff from youth, found my copies of the 'Drill' EP 12", the 'Pop Is Dead' 12", original UK 2LP of 'OK Computer' and 2x10" of 'Amnesiac' all in a closet unplayed (and upright) the last 23 years...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGIJLFIWQAA8EOP?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGIJT-wXMAAW9Uq?format=jpg&name=large

Should probably sell them, right?

Soundslike, Monday, 12 February 2024 15:57 (two months ago) link

always valuable to learn who an obscure young vocalist like this Yorke fellow "brings to mind"

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Monday, 12 February 2024 19:20 (two months ago) link

Again, why?

Davey D, Monday, 12 February 2024 19:24 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.